Upregulation of CCR4 in activated CD8+ T cells indicates enhanced lung homing in patients with severe acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease leading to bilateral pneumonia and respiratory failure. The underlying reasons why a smaller percentage of patients present with severe pulmonary symptoms whereas the majority is only mildly affected are to date not well understood. Comparing the immunological phenotype in healthy donors and patients with mild versus severe COVID-19 shows that in COVID-19 patients, NK-/B-cell activation and proliferation are enhanced independent of severity. As an important precondition for effective antibody responses, T-follicular helper cells and antibody secreting cells are increased both in patients with mild and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Beyond this, T cells in COVID-19 patients exhibit a stronger activation profile with differentiation toward effector cell phenotypes. Importantly, when looking at the rates of pulmonary complications in COVID-19 patients, the chemokine receptor CCR4 is higher expressed by both CD4 and CD8 T cells of patients with severe COVID-19. This raises the hypothesis that CCR4 upregulation on T cells in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 promotes stronger T-cell attraction to the lungs leading to increased immune activation with presumably higher pulmonary toxicity. Our study contributes significantly to the understanding of the immunological changes during COVID-19, as new therapeutic agents, preferentially targeting the immune system, are highly warranted.

First Human Study of the Investigational Sedative and Anesthetic Drug AZD3043: A Dose-Escalation Trial to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of a 30-Minute Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: AZD3043 is a positive allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor that is rapidly metabolized to an inactive metabolite by esterases present in blood and liver. Preclinical results suggest that AZD3043 has the potential as a short-acting IV sedative/anesthetic drug with rapid and predictable recovery characteristics and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. METHODS: Our primary objective in this phase 1, single-center, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AZD3043 after IV infusion and to estimate the maximal tolerated dose. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of AZD3043 pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. Sequential ascending-dose cohorts of 5 or 6 healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 45 years received a single 30-minute IV infusion of AZD3043. Assessments included adverse events, vital signs, blood gases, laboratory values, clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia, and bispectral index. RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects received AZD3043 in infusion rate cohorts of 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 54, and 81 mg/kg/h. There were no discontinuations, and dose escalation was stopped on reaching the predefined exposure limit. Adverse events occurring in >1 subject were headache (n = 4), erythema (n = 3), chest discomfort (n = 2), nausea (n = 2), and dyspnea (n = 2). The frequency and character of adverse events appeared unrelated to dose. There were no spontaneous reports of pain on injection and no clinically relevant changes in respiratory rate or arterial blood pressure. However, heart rate increased dose-dependently at infusion rates >18 mg/kg/h. Occurrence of sedation/anesthesia corresponded with dose; the lowest applied infusion rate to induce anesthesia according to clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia at predefined time points was 12 mg/kg/h (1 of 6 subjects anesthetized), and all subjects in the 3 highest dose groups were anesthetized. The onset of anesthesia ranged from 4 minutes in the highest infusion rate group to 29 minutes in the 12-mg/kg/h infusion rate group. Return of response to oral command occurred at 3 minutes after the end of infusion in the single subject who was anesthetized in the 12-mg/kg/h group and median 25 minutes in the 81-mg/kg/h group. Involuntary movements ranging from minor twitches to extensive movements were accompanied by increased muscle tone. CONCLUSIONS: AZD3043 was well tolerated in this first human study and seems to exhibit rapid onset and recovery, indicating potential use as a short-acting drug for anesthesia and sedation.

A Bolus and Bolus Followed by Infusion Study of AZD3043, an Investigational Intravenous Drug for Sedation and Anesthesia: Safety and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: AZD3043 (THRX-918661) is an investigational phenylpropanoid sedative/anesthetic that is rapidly metabolized by esterases in blood and liver. In the first-in-man study, a 30-minute constant IV infusion of AZD3043 induced anesthesia without major safety or tolerability concerns and with rapid recovery characteristics. METHODS: The primary objective of this phase 1, single-center, open-label study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00984880) was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AZD3043 administered as a single IV bolus and as a bolus followed by infusion. Secondary objectives included evaluation of AZD3043 pharmacodynamics and efficacy. Sequential ascending dose cohorts of 8 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 65 years received either a single 1-minute bolus IV infusion (part A) or a 1-minute bolus followed by a 30-minute infusion (part B). Assessments included adverse events, vital signs, blood gases, laboratory values, clinical signs of sedation/anesthesia, and bispectral index score. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects (8 females, 64 males) received AZD3043 doses of 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute (part A) or 0.8 + 10, 1 + 15, 3 + 30, and 4 + 40 mg/kg bolus + mg/kg/h infusion for 30 minutes (part B). There were no discontinuations. Adverse events occurring in >1 subject were headache (n = 15; 21%), nausea (n = 7; 10%), vomiting (n = 3; 4%), and fatigue (n = 2; 3%). Twenty-one subjects experienced at least 1 adverse event. There seemed to be no dose relationship associated with any adverse event. Ventilation was maintained, but there was a dose-dependent increase in heart rate. There were no spontaneous reports of pain on injection. Thirty-two subjects were anesthetized, including all subjects in the highest dose group in part A and all subjects in the 2 highest dose groups in part B. Recovery from anesthesia was rapid, with swift return of orientation and proprioception. All subjects were able to walk 10 m without support at their first assessment, 30 minutes after end of dosing, except for 1 subject in each of the 2 mg/kg bolus (part A) and 4 mg/kg bolus + 40 mg/kg/h 30-minute infusion (part B) dose groups, who passed this test at the subsequent assessment, 45 minutes after the end of dosing. Involuntary movements were observed at higher doses, accompanied by increased muscle tone. CONCLUSIONS: AZD3043 provided rapid recovery from anesthesia with maintained ventilation. Further studies are warranted in a clinical setting.