Surgeon Volume and Laryngectomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between surgeon volume and operative morbidity and mortality for laryngectomy. DATA SOURCES: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 45,156 patients who underwent laryngectomy procedures for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer between 2001 and 2011. Hospital and surgeon laryngectomy volume were modeled as categorical variables. METHODS: Relationships between hospital and surgeon volume and mortality, surgical complications, and acute medical complications were examined using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Higher-volume surgeons were more likely to operate at large, teaching, nonprofit hospitals and were more likely to treat patients who were white, had private insurance, hypopharyngeal cancer, low comorbidity, admitted electively, and to perform partial laryngectomy, concurrent neck dissection, and flap reconstruction. Surgeons treating more than 5 cases per year were associated with lower odds of medical and surgical complications, with a greater reduction in the odds of complications with increasing surgical volume. Surgeons in the top volume quintile (>9 cases/year) were associated with a decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.09 [0.01-0.74]), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 0.58 [0.45-0.74]), and acute medical complications (OR = 0.49 [0.37-0.64]). Surgeon volume accounted for 95% of the effect of hospital volume on mortality and 16%-47% of the effect of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: There is a strong volume-outcome relationship for laryngectomy, with reduced mortality and morbidity associated with higher surgeon and higher hospital volumes. Observed associations between hospital volume and operative morbidity and mortality are mediated by surgeon volume, suggesting that surgeon volume is an important component of the favorable outcomes of high-volume hospital care. Laryngoscope, 133:834-840, 2023.

Peri-Operative Pain and Opioid Use in Opioid-Naïve Patients Following Inpatient Head and Neck Surgery.

Pain management is an important consideration for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients as they are at an increased risk of developing chronic opioid use, which can negatively impact both quality of life and survival outcomes. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate pain, opioid use and opioid prescriptions following HNC surgery. Participants included patients undergoing resection of a head and neck tumor from 2019-2020 at a single academic center with a length of admission (LOA) of at least 24 h. Exclusion criteria were a history of chronic pain, substance-use disorder, inability to tolerate multimodal analgesia or a significant post-operative complication. Subjects were compared by primary surgical site: Neck (neck dissection, thyroidectomy or parotidectomy), Mucosal (resection of tumor of upper aerodigestive tract, excluding oropharynx), Oropharyngeal (OP) and Free flap (FF). Average daily pain and total daily opioid consumption (as morphine milligram equivalents, MME) and quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge were compared. A total of 216 patients met criteria. Pain severity and daily opioid consumption were comparable across groups on post-operative day 1, but both metrics were significantly greater in the OP group on the day prior to discharge (DpDC) (5.6 (1.9-8.6), p < 0.05; 49 ± 44 MME/day, p < 0.01). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge was associated with opioid consumption on the DpDC only in the Mucosal and FF groups, which had longer LOA (6-7 days) than the Neck and OP groups (1 day, p < 0.001). Overall, 65% of patients required at least one dose of an opioid on the DpDC, yet 76% of patients received a prescription for an opioid medication at discharge. A longer LOA (aOR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.48) were negatively associated with receiving an opioid prescription at the time of discharge despite no opioid use on the DpDC, respectively. HNC patients, particularly those with shorter LOA, may be prescribed opioids in excess of their post-operative needs, highlighting the need the for improved pain management algorithms in this patient population. Future work aims to use prospective surveys to better define post-operative and outpatient pain and opioid requirements following HNC surgery.

Association of Tumor Site With the Prognosis and Immunogenomic Landscape of Human Papillomavirus-Related Head and Neck and Cervical Cancers.

Importance: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive status in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with improved survival compared with HPV-negative status. However, it remains controversial whether HPV is associated with improved survival among patients with nonoropharyngeal and cervical squamous cell tumors. Objective: To investigate differences in the immunogenomic landscapes of HPV-associated tumors across anatomical sites (the head and neck and the cervix) and their association with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used genomic and transcriptomic data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 79 patients with OPSCC, 435 with nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (non-OP HNSCC), and 254 with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and/or endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC) along with matched clinical data from TCGA. The data were analyzed from November 2020 to March 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Positivity for HPV was classified by RNA-sequencing reads aligned with the HPV reference genome. Gene expression profiles, immune cell phenotypes, cytolytic activity scores, and overall survival were compared by HPV tumor status across multiple anatomical sites. Results: The study comprised 768 patients, including 514 (66.9%) with HNSCC (380 male [73.9%]; mean [SD] age, 59.5 [10.8] years) and 254 (33.1%) with CESC (mean [SD] age, 48.7 [14.1] years). Human papillomavirus positivity was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall survival for patients with OPSCC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.17; P < .001) but not for those with non-OP HNSCC (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.31-1.27; P = .20) or CESC (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.15-1.67; P = .30). The HPV-positive OPSCCs had increased tumor immune infiltration and immunomodulatory receptor expression compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs. Compared with HPV-positive non-OP HNSCCs, HPV-positive OPSCCs showed greater expression of immune-related metrics including B cells, T cells, CD8+ T cells, T-cell receptor diversity, B-cell receptor diversity, and cytolytic activity scores, independent of tumor variant burden. The immune-related metrics were similar when comparing HPV-positive non-OP HNSCCs and HPV-positive CESCs with their HPV-negative counterparts. The 2-year overall survival rate was significantly higher for patients with HPV-positive OPSCC compared with patients with HPV-negative OPSCC (92.0% [95% CI, 84.8%-99.9%] vs 45.8% [95% CI, 28.3%-74.1%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30]; P = .009). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, tumor site was associated with the immune landscape and survival among patients with HPV-related tumors despite presumed similar biologic characteristics. These tumor site-related findings provide insight on possible outcomes of HPV positivity for tumors in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal sites and a rationale for the stratification of HPV-associated tumors by site and the subsequent development of strategies targeting immune exclusion in HPV-positive nonoropharyngeal cancer.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Transoral Surgery and Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Resectable p16+ Locally Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial (E3311).

PURPOSE: Definitive or postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is curative for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) but induces significant toxicity. As a deintensification strategy, we studied primary transoral surgery (TOS) and reduced postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in intermediate-risk HPV+ OPC. METHODS: E3311 is a phase II randomized trial of reduced- or standard-dose postoperative RT for resected stage III-IVa (American Joint Committee on Cancer-seventh edition) HPV+ OPC, determined by pathologic parameters. Primary goals were feasibility of prospective multi-institutional study of TOS for HPV+ OPC, and oncologic efficacy (2-year progression-free survival) of TOS and adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk patients after resection. TOS plus 50 Gy was considered promising if the lower limit of the exact 90% binomial confidence intervals exceeded 85%. Quality of life and swallowing were measured by functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck and MD Anderson Dysphagia Index. RESULTS: Credentialed surgeons performed TOS for 495 patients. Eligible and treated patients were assigned as follows: arm A (low risk, n = 38) enrolled 11%, intermediate risk arms B (50 Gy, n = 100) or C (60 Gy, n = 108) randomly allocated 58%, and arm D (high risk, n = 113) enrolled 31%. With a median 35.2-month follow-up for 359 evaluable (eligible and treated) patients, 2-year progression-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate is 96.9% (90% CI, 91.9 to 100) for arm A (observation), 94.9% (90% CI, 91.3 to 98.6]) for arm B (50 Gy), 96.0% (90% CI, 92.8 to 99.3) for arm C (60 Gy), and 90.7% (90% CI, 86.2 to 95.4) for arm D (66 Gy plus weekly cisplatin). Treatment arm distribution and oncologic outcome for ineligible or step 2 untreated patients (n = 136) mirrored the 359 evaluable patients. Exploratory comparison of functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck total scores between arms B and C is presented. CONCLUSION: Primary TOS and reduced postoperative RT result in outstanding oncologic outcome and favorable functional outcomes in intermediate-risk HPV+ OPC.

AfHNS fellowship: Model to improve access to head and neck cancer care in Africa and developing countries.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers occur predominantly in developing countries where access to care is poor. Sub-Saharan Africa has <20 head and neck surgeons for >1 billion people and has only two fellowship training programs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AfHNS Head and Neck Fellowship is being introduced to accelerate training of African surgeons to improve access to resource appropriate cancer care. By avoiding fixed time-in-training and single training sites, training can be offered at multiple centers in Africa, even with lower patient volumes. It also creates opportunities for accredited international surgical outreach programs to contribute to training. CONCLUSIONS: Having prescribed reading and appropriate Entrustable Professional Activities that are assessed through Workplace Based Assessment, and having a summative virtual oral examination ensures that fellows are fit-for-purpose to practice in an African resource-constrained setting. Other developing countries are encouraged to adopt a similar approach to expanding head and neck cancer services.

HPV E2, E4, E5 drive alternative carcinogenic pathways in HPV positive cancers.

The dominant paradigm for HPV carcinogenesis includes integration into the host genome followed by expression of E6 and E7 (E6/E7). We explored an alternative carcinogenic pathway characterized by episomal E2, E4, and E5 (E2/E4/E5) expression. Half of HPV positive cervical and pharyngeal cancers comprised a subtype with increase in expression of E2/E4/E5, as well as association with lack of integration into the host genome. Models of the E2/E4/E5 carcinogenesis show p53 dependent enhanced proliferation in vitro, as well as increased susceptibility to induction of cancer in vivo. Whole genomic expression analysis of the E2/E4/E5 pharyngeal cancer subtype is defined by activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway and this subtype is susceptible to combination FGFR and mTOR inhibition, with implications for targeted therapy.

A novel surgeon credentialing and quality assurance process using transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial E3311.

PURPOSE: Understanding the role of transoral surgery in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) requires prospective, randomized multi-institutional data. Meticulous evaluation of surgeon expertise and surgical quality assurance (QA) will be critical to the validity of such trials. We describe a novel surgeon credentialing and QA process developed to support the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E3311 (E3311) and report outcomes related to QA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: E3311 was a phase II randomized clinical trial of transoral surgery followed by low- or standard-dose, risk-adjusted post-operative therapy with stage III-IVa (AJCC 7th edition) HPV-associated OPC. In order to be credentialed to accrue to this trial, surgeons were required to demonstrate active hospital credentials and technique-specific surgical expertise with ≥20 cases of transoral resection for OPC. In addition, 10 paired operative and surgical pathology reports from the preceding 24 months were reviewed by an expert panel. Ongoing QA required <10% rate of positive margins, low oropharyngeal bleeding rates, and accrual of at least one patient per 12 months. Otherwise surgeons were placed on hold and not permitted to accrue until re-credentialed using a new series of transoral resections. RESULTS: 120 surgeons trained in transoral minimally invasive surgery applied for credentialing for E3311 and after peer-review, 87 (73%) were approved from 59 centers. During QA on E3311, positive final pathologic margins were reported in 19 (3.8%) patients. Grade III/IV and grade V oropharyngeal bleeding was reported in 29 (5.9%) and 1 (0.2%) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We provide proof of concept that a comprehensive credentialing process can support multicenter transoral head and neck surgical oncology trials, with low incidence of positive margins and *grade III/V oropharyngeal bleeding.

Correction: Novel Insight into Mutational Landscape of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093102.].

Oral Human Papillomavirus Infection and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Rural Northwest Cameroon.

OBJECTIVE: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the precursor for a growing subset of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) in the developed world. This study was designed to characterize oral HPV infection and OPSCC in a region with high rates of HPV-driven cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study, retrospective case series. SETTING: Northwest Cameroon referral hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus attending an outpatient clinic were evaluated for oral HPV infection with oral swabs or rinses that were tested for 51 HPV types. HNSCCs diagnosed and/or treated at the same hospital from 2011 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to ascertain demographic and tumor characteristics, and available OPSCCs were tested for HPV. RESULTS: The oral HPV infection study population comprised 101 participants. Most (69%) were female and never-smokers (84%). Participants had median 4 lifetime sexual partners (interquartile range, 3-7; range, 1-100). Five participants (5%) had oral HPV infection; one had 2 HPV types. HPV types detected were HPV68 (n = 2), HPV82 (n = 2), HPV32 (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). No significant demographic or behavioral differences were detected among individuals with vs without oral HPV infection. OPSCCs comprised just 8% (n = 11) of 131 HNSCCs in the retrospective study population. Two of 7 OPSCCs were HPV positive. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of OPSCC observed in northwest Cameroon together with the rarity of oral HPV infection suggests low rates of HPV-driven oropharyngeal carcinogenesis in the region. Future research should examine how geographic differences in oral HPV infection are influenced by cultural norms and affect HPV-OPSCC epidemiology.

JAK3 Variant, Immune Signatures, DNA Methylation, and Social Determinants Linked to Survival Racial Disparities in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

To inform novel personalized medicine approaches for race and socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer, we examined germline and somatic mutations, immune signatures, and epigenetic alterations linked to neighborhood determinants of health in Black and non-Latino White (NLW) patients with head and neck cancer. Cox proportional hazards revealed that Black patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) with PAX5 (P = 0.06) and PAX1 (P = 0.017) promoter methylation had worse survival than NLW patients, after controlling for education, zipcode, and tumor-node-metastasis stage (n = 118). We also found that promoter methylation of PAX1 and PAX5 (n = 78), was correlated with neighborhood characteristics at the zip-code level (P < 0.05). Analyses also showed differences in the frequency of TP53 mutations (n = 32) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counts (n = 24), and the presence of a specific C → A germline mutation in JAK3, chr19:17954215 (protein P132T), in Black patients with HNSCC (n = 73; P < 0.05), when compared with NLW (n = 37) patients. TIL counts are associated (P = 0.035) with long-term (>5 years), when compared with short-term survival (<2 years). We show bio-social determinants of health associated with survival in Black patients with HNSCC, which together with racial differences shown in germline mutations, somatic mutations, and TIL counts, suggests that contextual factors may significantly inform precision oncology services for diverse populations.

Priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the era of deintensification, little data are available regarding patients' treatment preferences. The current study evaluated treatment-related priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). METHODS: A total of 150 patients with HNSCC ranked the importance of 10 nononcologic treatment goals relative to the oncologic goals of cure and survival. The level of concern regarding 11 issues and decision regret was recorded. Median rank was reported overall, and factors associated with odds of rank as a top 3 priority were modeled using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the treatment effects analyzed, the odds of being a top 3 priority was especially high for cure (odds, 9.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.05-16.63), followed by survival and swallow (odds, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.88-1.80] and odds, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59-1.21], respectively). Prioritization of cure, survival, and swallow was similar based on human papillomavirus (HPV) tumor status. By increasing decade of age, older participants were found to be significantly less likely than younger individuals to prioritize survival (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00). Concerns regarding mortality (P = .04) and transmission of HPV to the patient's spouse (P = .03) were more frequent among participants with HPV-associated HNSCC. Regret increased with additional treatment modalities (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HNSCC overwhelming prioritize cure, followed by survival and swallow. The decreased prioritization of survival by older age supports further examination of treatment preference by age. The precedence of oncologic over nononcologic priorities among patients regardless of HPV tumor status supports the conservative adoption of deintensification regimens until the interplay between competing oncologic and nononcologic treatment goals is better understood.

African head and neck fellowships: A model for a sustainable impact on head and neck cancer care in developing countries.

BACKGROUND: There is an extreme shortage of head and neck surgeons in Africa. Fourteen head and neck surgeons have completed fellowships in Cape Town and Cameroon. This study determines whether such Africa-based fellowships are a good model for developing countries by making a sustainable impact on head and neck cancer care. METHODS: An observational study was conducted by emailing questionnaires to past fellows. RESULTS: All fellows had returned to teaching hospitals in their counties. Seven established new multidisciplinary cancer teams. Head and neck operations had increased by >335%, as had complexity of the surgery. There was effective transfer of surgical skills to trainees. All considered head and neck fellowships to be the best model to grow head and neck care. CONCLUSION: Head and neck fellowships in developing countries are effective models for establishing training programs and for increasing provision of specialized surgical services in a sustainable fashion.

Functional characterization of alternatively spliced GSN in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

We have recently performed the characterization of alternative splicing events (ASEs) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, which allows dysregulation of protein expression common for cancer cells. Such analysis demonstrated a high ASE prevalence among tumor samples, including tumor-specific alternative splicing in the GSN gene.In vitro studies confirmed that overall expression of either ASE-GSN or wild-type GSN (WT-GSN) isoform inversely correlated with cell proliferation, whereas the high ratio of ASE-GSN to WT-GSN correlated with increased cellular invasion. Additionally, a change in expression of either isoform caused compensatory changes in expression of the other isoform. Our results suggest that the overall expression and the balance between GSN isoforms are mediating factors in proliferation, while increased overall expression of ASE-GSN is specific to cancer tissues. As a result, we propose ASE-GSN can serve not only as a biomarker of disease and disease progression, but also as a neoantigen for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment, for which only a limited number of disease-specific targeted therapies currently exist.

HEY1 is expressed independent of NOTCH1 and is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Notch signaling is frequently altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the nature and clinical implications of this dysregulation are not well understood. We previously described an association of transcriptionally active NOTCH1 Intracellular Domain (NICD1) immunohistochemical (IHC) expression pattern with high-risk pathologic characteristics. Here we further characterize Notch signaling in HNSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IHC expression patterns and clinicopathologic associations of Notch pathway molecules were evaluated among 78 tumors with known NOTCH1 mutation status. IHC was performed for JAG1, a NOTCH1 activating ligand, and HEY1, an NICD1 transcriptional target and Notch pathway activation marker. IHC pattern and H-score (% staining × intensity) were recorded and compared to clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models (HR). RESULTS: JAG1 and NICD1 expression patterns were highly concordant among tumors without truncating NOTCH1 mutations (p < 0.001), but were dissimilar among tumors with truncating NOTCH1 mutations (p = 0.24). There was evidence for JAG1-independent NOTCH1 activation among seven tumors, all with wild-type NOTCH1. HEY1 expression was associated with neither JAG1 nor NICD1 expression, but was associated with NOTCH1 mutation status (p = 0.03). Twelve (16%) tumors expressed HEY1 but not NICD1. Higher HEY1 H-score was significantly associated with worse overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.0, 95% CI = 1.0-4.2) and disease-specific (aHR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.4-7.9) survival, whereas JAG1 and NICD1 expression were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest both NOTCH1-dependent and -independent HEY1 regulation, and imply a previously unrecognized prognostic role for HEY1 in HNSCC.

Pilot randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive smoking cessation intervention for patients with upper aerodigestive cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Smoking among patients with cancer is associated with poor outcomes, however, smoking cessation interventions have had limited success. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial compared a novel smoking cessation intervention ("intervention") with enhanced usual care ("control"). Participants were smokers with head and neck or thoracic malignancies undergoing radiation. Controls received brief counseling. Intervention participants received intensive counseling, pharmacotherapy, text-messaging, and financial incentives. Biochemically confirmed 7-day abstinence at 8 weeks was compared using Fisher's exact t test. Smoking abstinence and intensity were also analyzed using time-series panel regression. RESULTS: The study population comprised 19 intervention and 10 control participants. More intervention (74%) than control (30%) participants abstained from smoking at 8 weeks (P = .05). Intervention participants were significantly more likely to abstain (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 14.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.56-60.76) and smoked fewer cigarettes (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.16; 95% CI 0.06-0.40) during weeks 1 to 8. CONCLUSION: This intervention decreased smoking among patients with upper aerodigestive cancers during radiotherapy.

Short- and long-term outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer care in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between pretreatment variables, short-term and long-term swallowing and airway impairment, and survival in elderly patients (age > 65 years) treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (SCCA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 666 patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal SCCA from 2004 to 2007 were evaluated using cross-tabulations, multivariate logistic regression, and survival analysis. RESULTS: Dysphagia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, 1.0-1.7), esophageal stricture (OR = 5.5, 2.6-11.9), and airway obstruction (OR = 1.6, 1.1-2.2) increased 1 year after treatment. The odds of airway obstruction, esophageal stricture, and pneumonia increased over subsequent years, with significantly increased risk at 5 years for airway obstruction (OR = 3.0, 1.4-6.4), pneumonia (OR = 4.5, 1.8-11.2), and stricture (OR = 5.5, 1.8-17.6). Pretreatment dysphagia was a significant predictor of long-term dysphagia, airway obstruction, and pneumonia. Chemoradiation, advanced stage disease, high-volume hospital care, male sex, and salvage surgery were significant predictors of long-term gastrostomy use. Long-term dysphagia, gastrostomy or tracheostomy dependence, weight loss, airway obstruction, and pneumonia were associated with poorer survival, with tracheostomy dependence (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2, 1.7-2.9) and pneumonia (HR = 2.0, 1.7-2.4) associated with the greatest risk of late mortality. CONCLUSION: Airway and swallowing impairment is common after treatment of oropharyngeal SCCA in elderly patients, increases over time, and is associated with poorer survival. Patients with pretreatment dysphagia, advanced stage disease, initial treatment with chemoradiation, and salvage surgery represent a high-risk group with an increased risk of disability and death. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Laryngoscope, 128:2084-2093, 2018.

Utility of preoperative fine needle aspiration in parotid lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative fine needle aspiration (FNA) of parotid lesions often is used in the initial evaluation of parotid masses, but its role in guiding surgical decision making remains unclear, in part due to varying diagnostic accuracy reported. We sought to evaluate the role of preoperative FNA in detection of malignancy and impact on surgical management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent parotidectomy at a single tertiary medical center were reviewed from 2000 to 2015. Patients who had a preoperative FNA comprised the study cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1,074 consecutive patients underwent parotidectomy during the study period; of those, 477 had a preoperative FNA. FNA was nondiagnostic in 26 cases. There were 29 false positives (6.4%), 26 false negatives (5.8%), 122 true positives (27.1%), and 274 true negatives (60.8%). The sensitivity and specificity of FNA were 82.4% and 90.4%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 80.8% and a negative predictive value of 91.3%. The overall accuracy of preoperative FNA was 87.8%. The preoperative FNA resulted in a change in the surgical plan in 85 (18.9%) cases. In 66 of these cases (78%), surgery was extended to include neck dissection at time of resection. In 10 cases, FNA led to surgical management over surveillance. In 11 cases, FNA downgraded the extent of surgery planned to an excisional biopsy. CONCLUSION: Preoperative FNA is a valuable adjunct in the surgical management of parotid lesions, with high specificity for the detection of malignant disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:398-402, 2018.

Quality indicators of oropharyngeal cancer care in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between quality of care, survival, and costs in elderly patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. METHODS: We evaluated 666 patients diagnosed with OPSCC from 2004 to 2007 using multivariate regression and survival analysis. Using quality indicators derived from guidelines for recommended care, summary measures of quality were calculated for diagnosis, initial treatment, surveillance, treatment for recurrence, end-of-life care, performance, and an overall summary measure of quality. RESULTS: Higher-quality care was associated with significant differences in survival for initial treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55 [0.41 to 0.73]), surveillance (HR = 0.32 [0.22 to 0.48]), treatment of recurrence (HR = 2.37 [1.56 to 3.60]), performance measures (HR = 0.50 [0.36 to 0.69]), and the overall summary measure of quality (HR = 0.53 [0.39 to 0.71]). Higher-quality salvage surgery was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.16 [0.04 to 0.54]), whereas higher-quality chemotherapy given for recurrence was associated with worse survival (HR = 5.70 [1.92 to 16.94]). Overall, higher-quality care was not associated with differences in costs. Higher-quality care was associated with significantly lower mean incremental costs for treatment of recurrence and end-of-life care, and higher costs for diagnosis and surveillance. CONCLUSION: Higher-quality OPSCC care in elderly patients was associated with improved survival; however, higher-quality care was not associated with reduced costs, and higher-quality care for treatment of recurrence was associated with poorer survival, primarily due to poorer survival in patients treated with palliative chemotherapy. These data demonstrate a complex relationship between quality and costs in elderly OPSCC patients, which can be used to frame discussions of value and guide disease-specific quality-measure development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Laryngoscope, 128:2312-2319, 2018.