Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(5): 1809-1811, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35502079

RESUMO

Achieving a complete uniform capsulorhexis in an intumescent cataract is perhaps the most crucial and challenging step for surgeons. Star CanVac CCC is a new manual technique for creating a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) in intumescent total cataracts. Small centripetal tears in the shape of a star are created in the center of the anterior lens capsule by using a 26-G cystotome. This allows equal distribution of forces secondary to increased intralenticular pressure, thereby avoiding unidirectional or bidirectional tear extension. Subsequently, a 25-G flat-tipped fine cannula connected to a syringe is used to hold the free capsular flap. The piston of the syringe is withdrawn to create a stable suction pressure, and the rhexis is completed without withdrawing the instrument from the anterior chamber. Our technique is safe, affordable, and an alternative method to routine CCC or expensive techniques such as Femto or Zepto capsulotomy for white intumescent cataracts.


Assuntos
Cápsula Anterior do Cristalino , Catarata , Cápsula do Cristalino , Facoemulsificação , Capsulorrexe/métodos , Catarata/complicações , Humanos , Cápsula do Cristalino/cirurgia , Facoemulsificação/métodos
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(7): 1697-1701, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34146009

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Analysis of complication profile after pterygium excision, in primary and recurrent pterygia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all the patients who had undergone pterygium excision in a tertiary center in South India from 2010 to 2018 was analyzed. A total of 2356 eyes in 2028 patients were included in the study. Patients who had undergone conjunctival autografting for primary pterygium, conjunctival limbal autografting for recurrent pterygium, vertical split conjunctival autografting for double head pterygium were included in the study. In all the surgical procedures fibrin glue was used for fixation of the autograft. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 75 months, with an average of 17 months. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The following postoperative complications were noted, Sub-conjunctival hemorrhage in 912 eyes (38.7%), edema of the graft in 522 cases (22.15%), graft loss in 22 cases (0.93%), graft retraction in 692 cases (29.37%) and sliding of the graft was seen in 9 cases (0.38%). Granuloma was seen in 4 cases (0.16%) at the host site and 5 cases (0.21%) at the donor site. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (1.44%). Other severe complications like corneal melt were seen in only 1 case (0.04%) who was operated on for recurrent pterygium. In comparison between primary and recurrent pterygia; subconjunctival hemorrhage, edema of the graft, graft loss, and recurrence was significantly (P < 0.05%) higher in recurrent pterygia. CONCLUSION: Various complications can occur post pterygium surgery as listed above. Selecting a proper procedure for a particular type of pterygium with a proper graft fixation technique will improve the outcome with minimal complications.


Assuntos
Pterígio , Túnica Conjuntiva , Seguimentos , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pterígio/cirurgia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(3): 559-562, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595472

RESUMO

Purpose: To know the efficacy of the second donor conjunctival graft from the same site as that of the previous donor area in pterygium treatment. Methods: Case record of patients were retrospectively analysed and those patients who had undergone pterygium excision previously, either for nasal or temporal pterygium excision and came with complaints of pterygium growth in opposite side of the bulbar conjunctiva in the same eye were included in the study. The patients with double head pterygium previously treated only over one side were also included. Total of 23 such patients were included in the study. The patients were followed up on post-operative day 1, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. The outcome measures like recurrence, graft edema, graft retraction, graft loss and other complications were noted in each follow up. Results: Among the 23 patients included in the study 9 were male and 14 were female patients with a mean age of 44±7.2 years (range 24-57 years). On an average follow up period of 15±8.5 months, only 1 patient among 23 patients had recurrence (4.43%). Other complications noted were graft retraction in 4 eyes (17.4%), sub conjunctival hemorrhage in 8 eyes (34.8%) and graft edema in 11 eyes (47.8%). Only one patient presented with granuloma (4.34%). Conclusion: The second conjunctival graft from the same site is safe and effective with encouraging results in indicated cases.


Assuntos
Pterígio , Adulto , Túnica Conjuntiva , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pterígio/diagnóstico , Pterígio/cirurgia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 68(12): 3020-3024, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33229690

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcome of participants undergoing toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after cataract extraction using manual marking versus digital marking for intraoperative guidance. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial of participants with cataract and corneal astigmatism of 1.00 D-4.50 D. The eyes were grouped into manual marking (Group 1) and digital marking (Group 2). Preoperative Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and corneal astigmatism were determined. IOL power and axis of alignment were determined using Barrett toric calculator. Eyes were marked by bubble marker and Mendez ring in group 1 and by VERION (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) digital overlay in Group 2. Postoperatively, UDVA, CDVA, residual refractive cylinder and IOL misalignment were determined (iTrace system, Tracey technologies) at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 61 eyes of 50 participants, 31 in Group 1 and 30 in Group 2, were studied. The mean postoperative cylindrical error was 0.50 ± 0.39 D in Group 1 and 0.29 ± 0.34 D in Group 2 (P = 0.03). 67.74% (n = 21) and 93.55% (n = 29) eyes achieved a residual astigmatism of ≤0.50 D and ≤1.00 D, respectively, in Group 1, whereas 83.33% (n = 25) and 100% (n = 30) eyes achieved a residual astigmatism of ≤0.50 D and ≤1.00 D, respectively, in Group 2 at 3 months postoperatively. Toric IOL misalignment was 4.71 ± 3.12° in Group 1 and 4.03 ± 2.99° in Group 2 (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Accurate manual marking and digital marking are equally effective guides for toric IOL alignment, intraoperatively.


Assuntos
Astigmatismo , Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificação , Astigmatismo/cirurgia , Humanos , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Estudos Prospectivos , Refração Ocular , Acuidade Visual
5.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 68(4): 573-576, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32174571

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the outcome and complications in patients who underwent double-head pterygium excision with split conjunctival autograft with and without limbus to limbus orientation. Methods: In this retrospective, comparative study, 99 eyes with double-head pterygium which underwent split conjunctival autograft with limbus to limbus orientation (Group 1) and 93 eyes which underwent without limbus to limbus orientation (Group 2) during the period of 2011-2016 were included in this study. The primary outcome compared was the recurrence rate. Other complications were included as secondary outcomes. Results: Mean age in group 1 and group 2 were 46.84 +/- 10.78 years and 54.38 +/- 11.44 years respectively. M:F was 36:63 in group 1 and 45:48 in group 2 with a mean follow up of 18.30 +/- 7.48 months in group 1 and 17.04 +/- 9.98 months in group 2. Recurrence was seen in 4 cases in each of the 2 groups with the mean time of recurrence being 7 +/- 2.34 months in group 1 and 6 +/- 2.01 months in group 2. Other complications included graft edema, SCH, graft retraction, granuloma, dellen and graft loss with only graft loss being statistically significant between 2 groups. Conclusion: This study provides data that recurrence rates are not different among patients who undergo split conjunctival graft with and without limbal orientation. The strict adherence to maintaining limbus to limbus orientation while managing double-headed pterygia may not be necessary in all cases, especially in those with large defects following excision.


Assuntos
Limbo da Córnea , Pterígio , Adulto , Autoenxertos , Túnica Conjuntiva , Seguimentos , Humanos , Limbo da Córnea/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Pterígio/diagnóstico , Pterígio/cirurgia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...