Efficacity and Safety of the Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Uveitic Macular Edema: A Real-Life Study from the French Uveitis Network.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi, Iluvien® Horus pharma, Nice, France) in non-infectious uveitic macular edema (UME) and to approach the predictive factors of treatment response. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter real-life study included patients with chronic non-infectious UME who received intravitreal FAi after at least two dexamethasone implants (DEXi). RESULTS: Twenty-six eyes from 22 patients (73.1% of females) were included. The mean age was 60.4 ± 16 years. The mean follow-up was 11.4 ± 2 months. The mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.43 ± 0.36 LogMAR, improving significantly after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.05 vs. baseline). The mean baseline central macular thickness (CMT) was 429 ± 110 µm, improving significantly after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.05 vs. baseline). Five eyes (19.2%) developed ocular hypertension during the follow-up, requiring initiation or strengthening of intraocular pressure lowering medication. The majority of eyes (77%) did not require any rescue DEXi during the available 12-month follow-up. The resolution of UME after DEXi seemed to predict the anatomical response after FAi. The baseline presence of a disorganization of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) and hyperreflective foci (HRF) were both associated with a higher likelihood of requiring rescue DEXi injections. CONCLUSION: FAi implantation led to a significant BCVA and CMT improvement with a good safety profile over the 12-month follow-up. Predictive factors of treatment outcomes seem to include the anatomical response to DEXi and the presence of DRIL and HRF at baseline.

Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in Clinical Setting: The ProDEX Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies. DESIGN: An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included. METHODS: This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious uveitis macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation maculopathy (RM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit. RESULTS: According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (P = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) µm (P < 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (> 50 µm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (P < 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (P < 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (P = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Targeted therapies for uveitis in spondyloarthritis: A narrative review.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a group of chronic inflammatory disorders of the joints frequently associated with uveitis in almost a quarter of cases. SpA-related uveitis typically affects the eye anterior chamber with sudden onset, causing pain, redness, photophobia, and blurred vision. Ophthalmologists will describe an acute anterior unilateral uveitis. Most patients present with episodic acute anterior non-granulomatous uveitis and retain excellent visual acuity. However, systemic treatments are recommended in the event of frequent relapses (2-3/year) or in rare cases of sight-threatening with ocular complications. The improved understanding of the pathogenesis of SpA has led to the management of this disease by biologics. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target specific components in inflammatory pathways for the treatment of SpA-related uveitis. These therapies are recommended for long-term control when uveitis relapses occur too frequently despite conventional systemic treatments. Significant benefits have been obtained with the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis), particularly infliximab and adalimumab. Paradoxically, a high number of uveitis occurrences have been shown on etanercept. Mixed results have been demonstrated with interleukin-17 antagonists (secukinumab) and interleukin-12/interleukin-23 antagonists (ustekinumab) in cases of failure of TNFis. JAK inhibitors seem to be a valuable class of medications for these patients in the future. Although SpA-related uveitis is typically managed with conventional local and/or systemic treatments, these biological/targeted therapies may provide avenues to control both the underlying SpA and uveitis manifestations. Thus, a close collaboration between patients, rheumatologists, internists, and ophthalmologists is needed to optimally manage ocular inflammation in SpA.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Beyond One Year of Treatment: AZURE, a Randomized Trial of Treat-and-Extend vs. Fixed Dosing.

INTRODUCTION: AZURE was a 76-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IIIb noninferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen with fixed dosing in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously receiving IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year. METHODS: Patients were aged ≥ 51 years and had completed ≥ 1 year of IVT-AFL treatment prior to enrollment (IVT-AFL once per month [- 1 or + 2 weeks] for 3 months followed by IVT-AFL every 2 months [6-12 weeks]). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive IVT-AFL 2 mg in either a T&E (minimum treatment interval of 8 weeks with no upper limit, adjusted according to functional and anatomic outcomes, as assessed by the investigator; n = 168), or a fixed dosing regimen (treatment every 8 weeks [± 3 days]; n = 168). The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week (W) 52. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining vision (< 15-letter loss) at W52. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 332 patients (T&E: n = 165; fixed dosing: n = 167). Mean BCVA change (baseline to W52) was - 0.3 ± 7.5 vs. - 0.5 ± 8.4 letters (T&E vs. fixed dosing; least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: 0.22 [- 1.51 to 1.96] letters; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority test [5-letter margin]). From baseline to W52, 95.2% (T&E) and 94.0% (fixed dosing) of patients maintained vision. Mean central subfield thickness change from baseline to W52 was - 24 ± 55 (T&E) and - 33 ± 47 (fixed dosing) µm. Last treatment interval to W76 was ≥ 12 weeks for 37.0% of T&E patients. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: IVT-AFL T&E can achieve similar functional and anatomic outcomes to fixed dosing every 8 weeks over 52 weeks in patients with nAMD who have completed ≥ 1 year of treatment, while reducing treatment burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540954.

Hydroxychloroquine Therapy in Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of hydroxychloroquine in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective study on all patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis who were treated with hydroxychloroquine between 2003 and 2019 in a French university hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis received hydroxychloroquine. The mean duration of treatment was 20.0 ± 10.9 months. At the end of the follow-up, hydroxychloroquine success was achieved in 15 (55.6%) patients. Four of them were also on oral corticosteroids, with a prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day. Under treatment, the median prednisone dose decreased from 20.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 7-25) to 5.0 (IQR, 3-6.5) mg/day (p = .02). The incidence rate of flare decreased from 204.6 to 63.8 per 100 person-years (p = .02). Hydroxychloroquine was discontinued in 12 (44.4%) patients during follow-up, including 8 (29.6%) for ineffectiveness, and three who experienced side effects. CONCLUSION: Hydroxychloroquine appears as an interesting option in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.Abbreviations: AZA: Azathioprine; BAL: Bronchoalveolar Lavage; BCVA: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity; ENT: Ears, Nose and Throat; HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine; IOP: Intra-Ocular Pressure; IQR: interquartile range; MHC: Major Histocompatibility Complex; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; MTX: Methotrexate; PMSI: Programme de Médicalisation du Système d'Information; SAU: Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis; SD: Standard Deviation; SUN: Standard Uveitis Nomenclature.

Real-world experience with brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration over 2 years: the REBA extension study.

BACKGROUND: To determine long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the real-world setting. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, multicentric study and an extension of the REBA study (Real-world Experience with Brolucizumab in nAMD) to 24 months. The study entailed follow-up of 91 consecutive eyes (67 patients) with nAMD who received brolucizumab therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Both treatment-naïve and switch therapy patients were included. All relevant data were collected. The primary outcome measure was changed in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time. Secondary outcome measures included change in central subfield thickness (CST) and complications. RESULTS: The mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 48.4 (3.5) letters and 36.2 (7.1) letters in treatment-naïve group and switch therapy group, respectively. BCVA gain was + 9.2 (3.7) letters (p = 0.01) and + 7.7 (3.4) letters (p = 0.011), respectively. The change in mean (SD) CST has shown a significant decrease in retinal thickness in treatment-naïve group (from 432.5 (68.4) to 283.0 (51.3) µm; p = 0.018) and in switch therapy group (from 452.5 (40.5) to 271.0 (43.4) µm; p = 0.011) group. One switch patient developed vascular occlusion and another a macular hole after the fifth brolucizumab injection as reported in the primary study. Both patients recovered uneventfully. Three patients demonstrated reversible intraocular inflammation between months 10 and 24. CONCLUSION: Patients showed a significant anatomical and functional response to brolucizumab therapy in the real world, regardless of prior treatment status, until the end of the follow-up period. Overall, 5 significant untoward events were noted.

Value of Chest X-Ray and Chest Computed Tomography for Systemic Sarcoidosis Diagnosis in Undifferentiated Uveitis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the contribution of chest X-ray and chest CT for the diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective study on consecutive patients with uveitis of unknown etiology, who underwent both chest X-ray and CT during uveitis diagnosis workup in a tertiary French university hospital. RESULTS: A total of 914 patients were included. Systemic sarcoidosis was identified in 23.1%. The probability of discordance between chest X-ray and CT increased with age at diagnosis (p < 0.001). In patients 30 years of age and younger, the probability of discordance was 5% or less, and 0.8% if the ACE level was normal. After 78.3 years of age, the probability of discordance was 20% or more. CONCLUSION: We recommend not to perform CT in patients under 30 years of age with a normal chest X ray and ACE level, and suggest performing chest CT first in the elderly.

Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis: Contribution of the of the Extra-Ophthalmological Clinical Examination.

PURPOSE: Determining uveitis etiology is a challenge. It is based primarily on demographic data and the characteristics of eye examination. It is not clear to what extent extraocular physical signs contribute to elucidating the etiology. This study aimed to establish the contribution of the clinical extra-ophthalmological features for the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2003 and 2021. Uveitis was classified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. Clinical features were collected at diagnosis by internists before the etiological diagnosis was made. The main outcome description was the contribution of clinical features. RESULTS: Clinical extra-ophthalmological features contributed to the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis in 363 (27.8%) patients. The joint and the skin examinations were the most useful for etiological investigations, respectively in 12.3% and 11.8% of patients. Five etiologies of uveitis accounted for 80% of the cases: sarcoidosis, HLA-B27-related uveitis, Behçet's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Clinical extra-ophthalmological features were particularly important in the etiological diagnosis of acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clinical extra-ophthalmological features are essential for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis in more than a quarter of patients. It demonstrates once again the value of collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists experienced in performing extra-ophthalmological clinical examinations, particularly in patients with acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

Uveitis in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Retrospective Study of Seven Observational Cases and Literature Review.

PURPOSE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of uveitis in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), their treatments, and evolution. METHODS: A national retrospective cohort study was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with GCA fulfilling the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria and a diagnostic of uveitis attested by an ophthalmologist. RESULTS: Seven women were included. The median age at diagnosis of uveitis was 71 years (64-84). All uveitis were diagnosed during active GCA (five at initial diagnosis, two at relapse). All uveitis were acute (100%), mostly anterior (86%) and bilateral (71%). Granulomatous features were less common (29%). All uveitis were treated with local and systemic corticosteroids. After a median follow-up of 30 (21-55) months, all patients achieved complete ophthalmic remission, with only one relapse at 2 years. GCA was also in complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: Uveitis could reveal GCA, and its presence correlated with disease activity of GCA. The most frequent clinical presentation of uveitis was acute and anterior; using local and systemic corticosteroids, the prognosis was favorable.

Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Delphi Consensus Exercise.

Geographic atrophy (GA) is a progressive and irreversible retinal disease with no comprehensive recommendations for diagnosis or monitoring. We used a Delphi approach to determine consensus in key areas around diagnosis and management of GA. A steering committee of eight retina specialists developed two sequential online surveys administered to eye care professionals (ECPs). Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of respondents. Up to 177 ECPs from eight countries completed one or both surveys. Consensus was achieved in several topics related to diagnostic imaging, including the use of optical coherence tomography, and the urgent need for treatments and beneficial interventions to reduce the associated burden. Currently, low-vision aids and smoking cessation are considered the most beneficial interventions. We demonstrate consensus for diagnosis and management of patients with GA including best practices in patient identification and monitoring, and unmet needs. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:589-598.].

Long-Term Outcomes of Birdshot Chorioretinopathy Treated with Corticosteroids: A Case Reports.

PURPOSE: To report the progression of patients diagnosed with birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) initially treated with corticosteroids. METHODS: We included 39 BSCR patients that were followed for ≥1 year. We analyzed their progression under treatment after 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year, and at the end of follow-up. In order to determine the efficiency of initial loading doses, patients were classified into two groups according to their initial treatment: methylprednisolone followed by prednisone (n = 28) and prednisone alone (n = 11). RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, 31/39 (79.5%) patients had reached inflammation control. Thirteen out of 28 (46.4%) and 6/11 (54.5%) patients were treated exclusively with corticosteroids, and 18/19 (94.7%) of them had reached inflammation control at the end of follow-up; their mean (range) corticosteroid dose was 3.5 (0-10) mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the prolonged corticosteroid therapy treatment strategy resulted in inflammation control in half of BSCR patients. This control was maintained with low doses of cortisone, usually <5 mg/day.

Relevance of Visual Acuity Measurement for Therapeutic Decisions in Diabetic Macular Edema.

This study aimed to determine the validity of basing retreatment decisions on anatomical criteria alone (captured using optical coherence tomography (OCT)-OCT-guided strategy) rather than the gold standard (combined visual acuity (VA) and OCT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). This cross-sectional study included 81 eyes undergoing treatment for DME from September 2021 to December 2021. An initial therapeutic treatment decision based on OCT results was made on inclusion. Subsequently, in light of the patient's VA score, this initial decision was upheld or adjusted, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. In 67 out of the 81 eyes included in the study (82.7%), the OCT-guided strategy produced equivalent results to the gold standard. In this study, the OCT-guided retreatment decision strategy yielded sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 73.8%, respectively, and PPV and NPV of 76.6% and 91.2%, respectively. These findings differed according to the patient's treatment regimen: the sensitivity and specificity for eyes under a treat and extend regimen was higher, 100% and 88.9%, respectively, than eyes under a Pro Re Nata regimen, 90% and 69.7%, respectively. These findings show that VA testing could be omitted from the follow-up of certain patients with DME treated with intravitreal injections without impacting the quality of care.

Detection and Management of Intraocular Inflammation after Brolucizumab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To present interim descriptive insights from the OCTOPUS and SWIFT studies on incidence, clinical features, management, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI), vasculitis, and occlusive vasculitis with brolucizumab treatment (Beovu, Novartis) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who were anti-VEGF naive or pretreated with anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab or aflibercept). DESIGN: OCTOPUS (NCT04239027) and SWIFT (NCT04264819) studies are prospective phase IIIb single-arm, open-label, multicenter studies assessing brolucizumab. SUBJECTS: Anti-VEGF naive (OCTOPUS) and pretreated (SWIFT) patients with nAMD. METHODS: Interim prespecified analysis on the efficacy end point provided an opportunity to analyze IOI-related safety. Reports of IOI-related adverse events (AEs) were reviewed, and AE images and clinical features and outcomes of each case were analyzed by a review committee. RESULTS: Of 505 brolucizumab-treated eyes/patients with median brolucizumab treatment of 8.8 months, 53 eyes demonstrated at least 1 IOI-related AE. The incidence of overall IOI-related AEs was 10.5%; among these events, the incidence was 7.1% for IOI only without retinal involvement and 3.4% for IOI with retinal involvement (2.0% with vasculitis, 1.4% with vascular occlusion with or without vasculitis). Incidence was similar in naive and pretreated patients. Before the onset of the first IOI-related AE, eyes received a median of 2 brolucizumab injections; 81.1% of IOI-related AEs occurred during the loading phase (median, 25.0 days from the last brolucizumab injection). At AE onset, most frequently reported symptoms were floaters (52.8%) and blurred or decreased vision (37.8%). Of the 86.8% of AEs that were treated, most were treated with topical corticosteroids (75.5%), 28.3% by systemic corticosteroids, and 26.8% by intraocular corticosteroids. No severe vision loss was reported for the 7 nontreated AEs. Overall, the median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at IOI-related AEs resolution from baseline was 1 letter (range, -74 to +32 letters), and 2 patients with occlusive vasculitis had BCVA loss ≥ 15 letters due to IOI-related AEs. All eyes permanently discontinued brolucizumab after the first IOI-related AE. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis highlights the need for monitoring and education of patients to report any signs of IOI-related events immediately when being treated with brolucizumab. IOI should be treated promptly and intensely with corticosteroids. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Sarcoidosis-Related Uveitis: A Review.

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease that involves the eyes in 10-55% of cases, sometimes without systemic involvement. All eye structures can be affected, but uveitis is the most common ocular manifestation and causes vision loss. The typical ophthalmological appearance of these uveitis is granulomatous (in cases with anterior involvement), which are usually bilateral and with synechiae. Posterior involvement includes vitritis, vasculitis and choroidal lesions. Tuberculosis is a classic differential diagnosis to be wary of, especially in people who have spent time in endemic areas. The diagnosis is based on histology with the presence of non-caseating epithelioid granulomas. However, due to the technical difficulty and yield of biopsies, the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis is often based on clinico-radiological features. The international criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis have recently been revised. Corticosteroids remain the first-line treatment for sarcoidosis, but up to 30% of patients require high doses, justifying the use of corticosteroid-sparing treatments. In these cases, immunosuppressive treatments such as methotrexate may be introduced. More recent biotherapies such as anti-TNF are also very effective (as they are in other non-infectious uveitis etiologies).