Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intensive Care Med ; 33(10): 1840-7, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17673974

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of direct examination and quantitative cultures of BAL to diagnose pneumonia with or without antibiotic treatment. DESIGN: Experimental rat models. INTERVENTIONS: Pneumonia was induced by intratracheal inoculation of S. pneumoniae (10(9) cfu/ml) or P. aeruginosa (10(8)cfu/ml). Controls (n = 10) received sterile inoculum. Study animals received penicillin (n = 19) or saline (n = 18) (pneumococcal model); amikacin (n = 13), ceftazidime (n = 11), or saline (n = 13) (Pseudomonas model). BAL was assessed 48 h after infection. The animals were killed for histopathological analysis. RESULTS: All study animals developed pneumonia, which was more extensive in the pneumococcal than in the Pseudomonas model. In pneumococcal pneumonia the sensitivity of BAL cultures (10(3) cfu/ml or higher) was 77.8% with saline and 21.0% with penicillin. In the Pseudomonas ceftazidime group all specimens were negative, precluding diagnosis. The sensitivity of cultures with amikacin was 23.1% vs. 30.8% with saline. In the pneumococcal model intracellular organism (ICO) count of 2% or higher had a sensitivity of 100% for detecting pneumonia with saline and 57.9% with penicillin. In the Pseudomonas model the sensitivity of ICO was 69.2% with both amikacin and saline and 36.3% with ceftazidime. The sensitivity of neutrophil count above 50% in pneumococcal pneumonia was 77.8% and 64.7% with saline and penicillin, respectively, and 69.2%, 61.5%, and 81.8% with saline, amikacin, and ceftazidime, respectively, in Pseudomonas pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: BAL-positive intracellular organisms were more accurate than cultures for the diagnosis of recent pneumonia, and were less affected by antibiotic treatment.


Assuntos
Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/microbiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Pulmão/microbiologia , Pulmão/patologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/patologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação
2.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 23(2): 242-51, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14761773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate canine lungs obtained from non-heart-beating donors after unilateral lung transplantation subjected to partial liquid ventilation with perfluorodecalin. METHODS: Twelve donor dogs were killed and kept under mechanical ventilation for 3 hours. Heart-lung blocks were harvested after retrograde pulmonary hypothermic flush with Perfadex. Left lung grafts were randomly transplanted into 12 weight-matched recipient animals. Animals were divided into 2 groups: control (standard mechanical ventilation, n = 6) and PLV (partial liquid ventilation, n = 6). Forty-five minutes after transplantation, the animals in the PLV group received perfluorodecalin (15 ml/kg) via orotracheal tube. All animals received volume-controlled ventilation (FIO2) 1.0, PEEP 5 cm H(2)O) over 6 consecutive hours. Thereafter, blood-gas analysis, ventilatory mechanics and hemodynamics were registered at 30-minute intervals. After 6 hours of reperfusion the animals were killed and the transplanted lungs were extracted to obtain the wet/dry weight ratio. RESULTS: There were significant differences in pulmonary arterial pressure, which were higher in control group animals (p < 0.009). The control animals also showed higher arterial PaO(2) than those in the PLV group (p < 0.00001), but lower PaCO(2) (p < 0.008). The peak and plateau pressures were higher in the PLV group (p < 0.00001). Neither static compliance nor wet/dry weight ratios were different in between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PLV with perfluorodecalin yields functional results compatible with life in this model. Nonetheless, pulmonary gas exchange and mechanics were superior after reperfusion in animals given conventional mechanical ventilation up to 6 hours after left lung allotransplantation.


Assuntos
Substitutos Sanguíneos , Fluorocarbonos , Ventilação Líquida , Transplante de Pulmão , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cães , Ventilação Líquida/métodos , Transplante de Pulmão/fisiologia , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar , Respiração Artificial , Mecânica Respiratória , Doadores de Tecidos , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...