Evaluation of deep-learning TSE images in clinical musculoskeletal imaging.

In this study, we compared the fat-saturated (FS) and non-FS turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging knee sequences reconstructed conventionally (conventional-TSE) against a deep learning-based reconstruction of accelerated TSE (DL-TSE) scans. A total of 232 conventional-TSE and DL-TSE image pairs were acquired for comparison. For each consenting patient, one of the clinically acquired conventional-TSE proton density-weighted sequences in the sagittal or coronal planes (FS and non-FS), or in the axial plane (non-FS), was repeated using a research DL-TSE sequence. The DL-TSE reconstruction resulted in an image resolution that increased by at least 45% and scan times that were up to 52% faster compared to the conventional TSE. All images were acquired on a MAGNETOM Vida 3T scanner (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany). The reporting radiologists, blinded to the acquisition time, were requested to qualitatively compare the DL-TSE against the conventional-TSE reconstructions. Despite having a faster acquisition time, the DL-TSE was rated to depict smaller structures better for 139/232 (60%) cases, equivalent for 72/232 (31%) cases and worse for 21/232 (9%) cases compared to the conventional-TSE. Overall, the radiologists preferred the DL-TSE reconstruction in 124/232 (53%) cases and stated no preference, implying equivalence, for 65/232 (28%) cases. DL-TSE reconstructions enabled faster acquisition times while enhancing spatial resolution and preserving the image contrast. From these results, the DL-TSE provided added or comparable clinical value and utility in less time. DL-TSE offers the opportunity to further reduce the overall examination time and improve patient comfort with no loss in diagnostic accuracy.

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Fast 5-minute shoulder MRI protocol with accelerated TSE-sequences and deep learning image reconstruction for the assessment of shoulder pain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol. Methods: Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSES) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols. Results: A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSEDL versus TSES (p<0.001). Noise and edge sharpness were evaluated to be significantly superior in TSEDL versus TSES (noise: p<0.001, edge sharpness: p<0.05). No difference was found concerning qualitative diagnostic confidence, assessability of anatomical structures (p>0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences. Conclusions: A fast 5-minute TSEDL MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSES protocol.

Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Accelerated 2D Hip MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction Based on a Deep Iterative Hierarchical Network.

OBJECTIVES: Hip MRI using standard multiplanar sequences requires long scan times. Accelerating MRI is accompanied by reduced image quality. This study aimed to compare standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with accelerated 2D TSE sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (TSEDL) for routine clinical hip MRI at 1.5 and 3 T in terms of feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective, monocentric study, TSEDL was implemented clinically and evaluated in 14 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing a clinically indicated hip MRI at 1.5 and 3T between October 2020 and May 2021. Each patient underwent two examinations: For the first exam, we used standard sequences with generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSES). For the second exam, we implemented prospectively undersampled TSE sequences with DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists assessed the TSEDL and TSES regarding image quality, artifacts, noise, edge sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using an ordinal five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = moderate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). Both sequences were compared regarding the detection of common pathologies of the hip. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between TSEDL and TSES. RESULTS: Compared with TSES, TSEDL was rated to be significantly superior in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.020) with significantly reduced noise (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly improved edge sharpness (p = 0.003). No difference was found between TSES and TSEDL concerning the extent of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, or the delineation of anatomical structures (p > 0.05). Example acquisition time reductions for the TSE sequences of 52% at 3 Tesla and 70% at 1.5 Tesla were achieved. CONCLUSION: TSEDL of the hip is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared with TSES, reducing the acquisition time significantly.

Faster Elbow MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality, Diagnostic Confidence, and Anatomy Visualization Compared to Standard Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the elbow regarding image quality and visualization of anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2020 and June 2021, seventeen participants (eight patients, nine healthy subjects; mean age: 43 ± 16 (20-70) years, eight men) were prospectively included in this study. Each patient underwent two examinations: standard MRI, including TSE sequences reconstructed with a generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSESTD), and prospectively undersampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using a 5-point Likert scale, and rated the images concerning the detection of common pathologies. RESULTS: Image quality was significantly improved in TSEDL (mean 4.35, IQR 4-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.76, IQR 3-4, p = 0.008). Moreover, TSEDL showed decreased noise (mean 4.29, IQR 3.5-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.35, IQR 3-4, p = 0.004). Ratings for delineation of anatomical structures, artifacts, edge sharpness, and diagnostic confidence did not differ significantly between TSEDL and TSESTD (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.628-0.904). No difference was found concerning the detection of pathologies between the readers and between TSEDL and TSESTD. Using DL, the acquisition time could be reduced by more than 35% compared to TSESTD. CONCLUSION: TSEDL provided improved image quality and decreased noise while receiving equal ratings for edge sharpness, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, diagnostic confidence, and detection of pathologies compared to TSESTD. Providing more than a 35% reduction of acquisition time, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for elbow imaging due to increased patient comfort and higher patient throughput.

Feasibility and clinical usefulness of deep learning-accelerated MRI for acute painful fracture patients wearing a splint: A prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of deep learning (DL)-accelerated turbo spin echo (TSEDL) sequences relative to standard TSE sequences (TSES) for acute radius fracture patients wearing a splint. METHODS: This prospective consecutive study investigated 50 patients' preoperative wrist MRI scans acquired between July 2021 and January 2022. Examinations were performed at 3 Tesla MRI with body array coils due to the wrist splint. Besides TSES obtained according to the routine protocol, TSEDL sequences for axial T2-, coronal T1-, and coronal PD-weighted TSE sequences were scanned for comparison. For quantitative assessment, the relative signal-to-noise ratio (rSNR), the relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR), and the relative contrast ratio (rCR) were measured. For qualitative assessment, all images were assessed by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists in terms of perceived SNR, image contrast, image sharpness, artifacts disturbing evaluation, overall image quality and diagnostic confidence for injuries using a four- or five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The scan time was shortened approximately by a factor of two for TSEDL compared to TSES. TSEDL images showed significantly better rSNR, rCNR, and rCR values for all sequences, and scored significantly better in terms of both image quality and diagnostic confidence for both readers than TSES images (all p < .05). Interrater reliabilities were in almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: The DL-accelerated technique proved to be very helpful not only to reduce scan time but also to improve image quality for acute painful fracture patients wearing a splint despite using body array coils instead of a wrist-specific coil. Based on our study, the DL-accelerated technique can be very useful for MRI of any part of the extremities in trauma settings just with body array coils.

Image quality and lesion detectability of deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted Dixon imaging of the cervical spine.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the subjective image quality and lesion detectability of deep learning-accelerated Dixon (DL-Dixon) imaging of the cervical spine compared with routine Dixon imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients underwent sagittal routine Dixon and DL-Dixon imaging of the cervical spine. Acquisition parameters were compared and non-uniformity (NU) values were calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed the two imaging methods for subjective image quality and lesion detectability. Interreader and intermethod agreements were estimated with weighted kappa values. RESULTS: Compared with the routine Dixon imaging, the DL-Dixon imaging reduced the acquisition time by 23.76%. The NU value is slightly higher in DL-Dixon imaging (p value: 0.015). DL-Dixon imaging showed superior visibility of all four anatomical structures (spinal cord, disc margin, dorsal root ganglion, and facet joint) for both readers (p value: < 0.001 ~ 0.002). The motion artifact scores were slightly higher in the DL-Dixon images than in routine Dixon images (p value = 0.785). Intermethod agreements were almost perfect for disc herniation, facet osteoarthritis, uncovertebral arthritis, central canal stenosis (κ range: 0.830 ~ 0.980, all p values < 0.001) and substantial to almost perfect for foraminal stenosis (κ = 0.955, 0.705 for each reader). There was an improvement in the interreader agreement of foraminal stenosis by DL-Dixon images, from moderate to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The DLR sequence can substantially decrease the acquisition time of the Dixon sequence with subjective image quality at least as good as the conventional sequence. And no significant differences in lesion detectability were observed between the two sequence types.

Prospective intraindividual comparison of a standard 2D TSE MRI protocol for ankle imaging and a deep learning-based 2D TSE MRI protocol with a scan time reduction of 48.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan time remains a limited and valuable resource. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep learning (DL)-based accelerated TSE study protocol compared to a standard TSE study protocol in ankle MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2020 and July 2021 forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study for an intraindividual comparison of a standard TSE study protocol and a DL TSE study protocol either on a 1.5 T or a 3 T scanner. Two radiologists evaluated the examinations regarding structural pathologies and image quality categories (5-point-Likert-scale; 1 = "non diagnostic", 5 = "excellent"). RESULTS: Both readers showed almost perfect/perfect agreement of DL TSE with standard TSE in all analyzed structural pathologies (0.81-1.00) with a median "good" or "excellent" rating (4-5/5) in all image quality categories in both 1.5 T and 3 T MRI. The reduction of total acquisition time of DL TSE compared to standard TSE was 49% in 1.5 T and 48% in 3 T MRI to a total acquisition time of 5 min 41 s and 5 min 46 s. CONCLUSION: In ankle MRI the new DL-based accelerated TSE study protocol delivers high agreement with standard TSE and high image quality, while reducing the acquisition time by 48%.

Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction for Accelerating Turbo Spin Echo Hand and Wrist Imaging: A Comparison of Image Quality, Visualization of Anatomy, and Detection of Common Pathologies with Standard Imaging.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hand and wrist is a routine MRI examination and takes about 15-20 minutes, which can lead to problems resulting from the relatively long scan time, such as decreased image quality due to motion artifacts and lower patient throughput. The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the hand and wrist regarding image quality, visualization of anatomy, and diagnostic performance concerning common pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (mean age: 43 ± 19 [19-85] years, 10 men, 11 female) were prospectively enrolled in this study between October 2020 and June 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI protocols: first, standard fully sampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a standard GRAPPA reconstruction (TSES) and second, prospectively undersampled TSE sequences using a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Both protocols were acquired consecutively in one examination. Two experienced MSK-imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence, as well as the delineation of anatomical structures (triangular fibrocartilage complex, tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle, extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, median nerve, cartilage) using a five-point Likert scale and assessed common pathologies. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the sequences. RESULTS: Overall image quality, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, and diagnostic confidence of TSEDL were rated to be comparable to TSES (p > 0.05). Additionally, TSEDL showed decreased image noise (4.90, median 5, IQR 5-5) compared to TSES (4.52, median 5, IQR 4-5, p < 0.05) and improved edge sharpness (TSEDL: 4.10, median 4, IQR 3.5-5; TSES: 3.57, median 4, IQR 3-4; p < 0.05). Inter- and intrareader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.632-1.000) for the detection of common pathologies. Time of acquisition could be reduced by more than 60% with the protocol using TSEDL. CONCLUSION: Compared to TSES, TSEDL provided decreased noise and increased edge sharpness, equal image quality, delineation of anatomical structures, detection of pathologies, and diagnostic confidence. Therefore, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for hand and wrist imaging, as it reduces examination time by more than 60%, thus increasing patient comfort and patient throughput.

Deep Learning Reconstruction for Accelerated Spine MRI: Prospective Analysis of Interchangeability.

Background Deep learning (DL)-based MRI reconstructions can reduce examination times for turbo spin-echo (TSE) acquisitions. Studies that prospectively employ DL-based reconstructions of rapidly acquired, undersampled spine MRI are needed. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic interchangeability of an unrolled DL-reconstructed TSE (hereafter, TSEDL) T1- and T2-weighted acquisition method with standard TSE and to test their impact on acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic confidence. Materials and Methods This prospective single-center study included participants with various spinal abnormalities who gave written consent from November 2020 to July 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI examinations: standard fully sampled T1- and T2-weighted TSE acquisitions (reference standard) and prospectively undersampled TSEDL acquisitions with threefold and fourfold acceleration. Image evaluation was performed by five readers. Interchangeability analysis and an image quality-based analysis were used to compare the TSE and TSEDL images. Acquisition time and diagnostic confidence were also compared. Interchangeability was tested using the individual equivalence index regarding various degenerative and nondegenerative entities, which were analyzed on each vertebra and defined as discordant clinical judgments of less than 5%. Interreader and intrareader agreement and concordance (κ and Kendall τ and W statistics) were computed and Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used. Results Overall, 50 participants were evaluated (mean age, 46 years ± 18 [SD]; 26 men). The TSEDL method enabled up to a 70% reduction in total acquisition time (100 seconds for TSEDL vs 328 seconds for TSE, P < .001). All individual equivalence indexes were less than 4%. TSEDL acquisition was rated as having superior image noise by all readers (P < .001). No evidence of a difference was found between standard TSE and TSEDL regarding frequency of major findings, overall image quality, or diagnostic confidence. Conclusion The deep learning (DL)-reconstructed turbo spin-echo (TSE) method was found to be interchangeable with standard TSE for detecting various abnormalities of the spine at MRI. DL-reconstructed TSE acquisition provided excellent image quality, with a 70% reduction in examination time. German Clinical Trials Register no. DRKS00023278 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hallinan in this issue.

Feasibility of an accelerated 2D-multi-contrast knee MRI protocol using deep-learning image reconstruction: a prospective intraindividual comparison with a standard MRI protocol.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of a deep-learning (DL)-accelerated two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) MRI of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T in clinical routine in comparison to standard MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty participants, who underwent knee MRI at 1.5 and 3 T between October/2020 and March/2021 with a protocol using standard 2D-TSE (TSES) and DL-accelerated 2D-TSE sequences (TSEDL), were enrolled in this prospective institutional review board-approved study. Three radiologists assessed the sequences regarding structural abnormalities and evaluated the images concerning overall image quality, artifacts, noise, sharpness, subjective signal-to-noise ratio, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale (1-5, 5 = best). RESULTS: Overall image quality for TSEDL was rated to be excellent (median 5, IQR 4-5), significantly higher compared to TSES (median 5, IQR 4 - 5, p < 0.05), showing significantly lower extents of noise and improved sharpness (p < 0.001). Inter- and intra-reader agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.92-1.00) for the detection of internal derangement and substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.58-0.98) for the assessment of cartilage defects. No difference was found concerning the detection of bone marrow edema and fractures. The diagnostic confidence of TSEDL was rated to be comparable to that of TSES (median 5, IQR 5-5, p > 0.05). Time of acquisition could be reduced to 6:11 min using TSEDL compared to 11:56 min for a protocol using TSES. CONCLUSION: TSEDL of the knee is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared to TSES, reducing the acquisition time about 50%. KEY POINTS: • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging is able to almost halve the acquisition time of a three-plane knee MRI with proton density and T1-weighted images, from 11:56 min to 6:11 min at 3 T. • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging of the knee provided significant improvement of noise levels (p < 0.001), providing higher image quality (p < 0.05) compared to conventional TSE imaging. • Deep-learning reconstructed TSE imaging of the knee had similar diagnostic performance for internal derangement of the knee compared to standard TSE.

MR Fingerprinting-A Radiogenomic Marker for Diffuse Gliomas.

(1) Background: Advanced MR imaging (MRI) of brain tumors is mainly based on qualitative contrast images. MR Fingerprinting (MRF) offers a novel approach. The purpose of this study was to use MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation maps to differentiate diffuse gliomas according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation. (2) Methods: Twenty-four patients with histologically verified diffuse gliomas (14 IDH-mutant, four 1p/19q-codeleted, 10 IDH-wildtype) were enrolled. MRF T1 and T2 relaxation times were compared to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) within solid tumor, peritumoral edema, and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), using contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-, perfusion-, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. For perfusion imaging, a T2* weighted perfusion sequence with leakage correction was used. Correlations of MRF T1 and T2 times with two established conventional sequences for T1 and T2 mapping were assessed (a fast double inversion recovery-based MR sequence ('MP2RAGE') for T1 quantification and a multi-contrast spin echo-based sequence for T2 quantification). (3) Results: MRF T1 and T2 relaxation times were significantly higher in the IDH-mutant than in IDH-wildtype gliomas within the solid part of the tumor (p = 0.024 for MRF T1, p = 0.041 for MRF T2). MRF T1 and T2 relaxation times were significantly higher in the IDH-wildtype than in IDH-mutant gliomas within peritumoral edema less than or equal to 1cm adjacent to the tumor (p = 0.038 for MRF T1 mean, p = 0.010 for MRF T2 mean). In the solid part of the tumor, there was a high correlation between MRF and conventionally measured T1 and T2 values (r = 0.913, p < 0.001 for T1, r = 0.775, p < 0.001 for T2), as well as between MRF and ADC values (r = 0.813, p < 0.001 for T2, r = 0.697, p < 0.001 for T1). The correlation was weak between the MRF and rCBV values (r = -0.374, p = 0.005 for T2, r = -0.181, p = 0.181 for T1). (4) Conclusions: MRF enables fast, single-sequence based, multi-parametric, quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse gliomas and may have the potential to differentiate IDH-mutant from IDH-wildtype gliomas.

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Preoperative Meningioma Consistency Prediction.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative meningioma consistency prediction is highly beneficial for surgical planning and prognostication. We aimed to use magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF)-derived T1 and T2 values to preoperatively predict meningioma consistency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients with meningiomas were enrolled in this study. MRF, T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in all patients before surgery using a 3T MRI scanner. MRF-derived T1 and T2 values, T1-weightd and T2-weighted signal intensities, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient value yield from diffusion-weighted imaging were compared between the soft, moderate and hard meningiomas. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine the diagnostic performance of T1, T2 value, and a combination of T1 and T2 values. RESULTS: After Bonferroni corrections, quantitative T1 and T2 values yielded from MRF were significantly different between the soft, moderate and hard meningiomas (all p < 0.05). T2 signal intensity was significantly different between the soft and hard, soft and moderate meningiomas (both p < 0.05), whereas was not significantly different between the moderate and hard meningiomas. However, T1 signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient value had no significant differences between the soft, moderate and hard meningiomas (all p > 0.05). The combination of T1 and T2 values had greater areas under receiver operating characteristic curve curves compared to individual T1 or T2 value. CONCLUSION: MRF may help to preoperatively differentiate between the soft, moderate and hard meningiomas and may be useful in guiding the surgical planning.

Temperature dependence, accuracy, and repeatability of T1 and T2 relaxation times for the ISMRM/NIST system phantom measured using MR fingerprinting.

PURPOSE: Before MR fingerprinting (MRF) can be adopted clinically, the derived quantitative values must be proven accurate and repeatable over a range of T1 and T2 values and temperatures. Correct assessment of accuracy and precision as well as comparison between measurements can only be performed when temperature is either controlled or corrected for. The purpose of this study was to investigate the temperature dependence of T1 and T2 MRF values and evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of temperature-corrected relaxation values derived from a B1 -corrected MRF-fast imaging with steady-state precession implementation using 2 different dictionary sizes. METHODS: The International Society of MR in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology phantom was scanned using an MRF sequence of 2 different lengths, a variable flip angle T1 , and a multi-echo spin echo T2 at 14 temperatures ranging from 15°C to 28°C and investigated with a linear regression model. Temperature-corrected accuracy was evaluated by correlating T1 and T2 times from each MRF dictionary with reference values. Repeatability was assessed using the coefficient of variation, with measurements taken over 30 separate sessions. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant fit of the model for MRF-derived T1 and T2 and temperature (p < 0.05) for all the spheres with a T1 > 500 ms. Both MRF methods showed a strong linear correlation with reference values for T1 (R2 = 0.996) and T2 (R2 = 0.982). MRF repeatability for T1 values was ≤1.4% and for T2 values was ≤3.4%. CONCLUSION: MRF demonstrated relaxation times with a temperature dependence similar to that of conventional mapping methods. Temperature-corrected T1 and T2 values from both dictionaries showed adequate accuracy and excellent repeatability in this phantom study.

Feasibility and Implementation of a Deep Learning MR Reconstruction for TSE Sequences in Musculoskeletal Imaging.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the musculoskeletal system is one of the most common examinations in clinical routine. The application of Deep Learning (DL) reconstruction for MRI is increasingly gaining attention due to its potential to improve the image quality and reduce the acquisition time simultaneously. However, the technology has not yet been implemented in clinical routine for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences in musculoskeletal imaging. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the technical feasibility and evaluate the image quality. Sixty examinations of knee, hip, ankle, shoulder, hand, and lumbar spine in healthy volunteers at 3 T were included in this prospective, internal-review-board-approved study. Conventional (TSES) and DL-based TSE sequences (TSEDL) were compared regarding image quality, anatomical structures, and diagnostic confidence. Overall image quality was rated to be excellent, with a significant improvement in edge sharpness and reduced noise compared to TSES (p < 0.001). No difference was found concerning the extent of artifacts, the delineation of anatomical structures, and the diagnostic confidence comparing TSES and TSEDL (p > 0.05). Therefore, DL image reconstruction for TSE sequences in MSK imaging is feasible, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 75%), whilst maintaining excellent image quality and diagnostic confidence.

Application of magnetic resonance fingerprinting to differentiate grade I transitional and fibrous meningiomas from meningothelial meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical treatment for meningiomas is affected by the subtype and clinical characteristics. Therefore, an accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential. Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology is unable to distinguish between meningioma subtypes. In the present study, we compared and evaluated the utility of conventional MRI, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating World Health Organization grade I transitional and fibrous meningiomas from meningothelial meningiomas. METHODS: Forty-six patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas (15 meningothelial, 18 transitional, and 13 fibrous) were enrolled in the present study. All patients underwent conventional MRI, MRF, and DWI scans before surgery using a 3T scanner. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze differences in the signal and enhancement characteristics of the three groups from T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). To investigate the difference in quantitative T1 and T2 values derived from MRF and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the three groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn on the parenchymal portion of the tumors; P<0.017 was considered statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the different parameters. RESULTS: Meningothelial meningiomas had significantly higher T1 and T2 values than transitional and fibrous meningiomas (all P<0.017). ROC analysis results revealed that the combination of T1 and T2 values had the largest area under the curve (AUC). The AUC for the combination of T1 and T2 values was 0.826 between meningothelial and transitional meningiomas, and the AUC for the combination of T1 and T2 values between meningothelial and fibrous meningiomas was 0.903. No significant differences were found in the T1 and T2 values between transitional and fibrous meningiomas. There were also no statistically significant differences in the conventional MRI (including T1WI, T2WI, and contrast-enhanced T1WI) and ADC values between the three meningioma subtypes (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MRF may provide more quantitative information than either conventional MRI or DWI for differentiating transitional and fibrous meningiomas from meningothelial meningiomas. T1 and T2 values derived from MRF may distinguish transitional and fibrous meningiomas from meningothelial meningiomas, and the combination of T1 and T2 values provides the highest diagnostic efficacy.

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting for preoperative differentiation between gonadotroph and non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas.

OBJECTIVES: To use magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF)-derived T1 and T2 values to differentiate gonadotroph from non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas based on the 2017 World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas. METHODS: A total of 57 patients with suspected pituitary macroadenomas were enrolled for analyses in this study between May 2018 and January 2020. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRF were performed in all patients before surgery using a 3-T MRI scanner. MRF-derived T1 and T2 values were compared between the gonadotroph and non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas using a Mann-Whitney U test. The Knosp classification was used to evaluate cavernous sinus invasion by the adenomas. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine the diagnostic performance of T1 and T2 values. RESULTS: Quantitative T1 and T2 values yielded from MRF of gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas were significantly higher than those of the non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas (p < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively). The AUC for the T2 value (0.888) was significantly greater than that for the T1 value (0.742) (p = 0.034). The AUC for combined T1 and T2 values was 0.885. Non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas were more likely to invade the cavernous sinus than gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas (55% vs 26%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: MRF may help to preoperatively differentiate between gonadotroph and non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas and may be useful in guiding the treatment of these adenomas. KEY POINTS: • Somatostatin receptor type 3 is the most abundant receptor subtype in gonadotroph pituitary adenomas. • Magnetic resonance fingerprinting may help to preoperatively differentiate between gonadotroph and non-gonadotroph pituitary macroadenomas. • Magnetic resonance fingerprinting shows potential for guiding the treatment of pituitary macroadenomas.

Acceleration of 2D-MR fingerprinting by reducing the number of echoes with increased in-plane resolution: a volunteer study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the absolute values and repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) with 3000 and 1500 echoes/slice acquired in 41 s and 20 s (MRF3k and MRF1.5k, respectively). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRF3k and MRF1.5k scans based on fast imaging with steady precession (FISP) were conducted using a 3 T scanner. Inter-scan agreement and intra-scan repeatability were investigated in 41 and 28 subjects, respectively. Region-of-interest (ROI) analysis was conducted on T1 values of MRF3k by two raters, and their agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Between MRF3k and MRF1.5k, differences in T1 and T2 values and inter-measurement correlation coefficients (CCs) were investigated. Intra-measurement repeatability was evaluated using coefficients of variation (CVs). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The ICCs of ROI measurements were 0.77-0.96. Differences were observed between the two MRF scans, but the CCs of the overall ROIs were 0.99 and 0.97 for the T1 and T2 values, respectively. The mean and median CVs of repeatability were equal to or less than 1.58% and 3.13% in each of the ROIs for T1 and T2, respectively; there were some significant differences between MRF3k and MRF1.5k, but they were small, measuring less than 1%. DISCUSSION: Both MRF3k and MRF1.5k had high repeatability, and a strong to very strong correlation was observed, with a trend toward slightly higher values in MRF1.5k.

Comprehensive Evaluation of B1+-corrected FISP-based Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Accuracy, Repeatability and Reproducibility of T1 and T2 Relaxation Times for ISMRM/NIST System Phantom and Volunteers.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate comprehensively; accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times measured by magnetic resonance fingerprinting using B1+-corrected fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP-MRF). METHODS: The International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) phantom was scanned for 100 days, and six healthy volunteers for 5 days using a FISP-MRF prototype sequence. Accuracy was evaluated on the phantom by comparing relaxation times measured by FISP-MRF with the reference values provided by the phantom manufacturer. Daily repeatability was characterized as the coefficient of variation (CV) of the measurements over 100 days for the phantom and over 5 days for volunteers. In addition, the cross-scanner reproducibility was evaluated in volunteers. RESULTS: In the phantom study, T1 and T2 values from FISP-MRF showed a strong linear correlation with the reference values of the phantom (R2 = 0.9963 for T1; R2 = 0.9966 for T2). CVs were <1.0% for T1 values larger than 300 ms, and <3.0% for T2 values across a wide range. In the volunteer study, CVs for both T1 and T2 values were <5.0%, except for one subject. In addition, all T2 values estimated by FISP-MRF in vivo were lower than those measured with conventional mapping sequences reported in previous studies. The cross-scanner variation of T1 and T2 showed good agreement between two different scanners in the volunteers. CONCLUSION: B1+-corrected FISP-MRF showed an acceptable accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility in the phantom and volunteer studies.