Biologics combined with conventional systemic agents or phototherapy for the treatment of psoriasis: real-life data from PSONET registries.

BACKGROUND: Biologics have greatly improved psoriasis management. However, primary and secondary non-response to treatment requires innovative strategies to optimize outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of combined treatment of biologics with conventional systemic agents or phototherapy in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We collected data on frequency of use, demographics, treatment characteristics and drug survival of biologics combined with conventional systemic agents or phototherapy in five PSONET registries. RESULTS: Of 9922 biologic treatment cycles, 982 (9.9%) were identified as combination treatment. 72.9% of treatment cycles concerned concomitant use of methotrexate, 25.3% concerned concomitant UVB therapy, acitretin or cyclosporin and 1.8% concerned combined treatment with PUVA, fumaric acids or a second biologic. Substantial variation was detected in type and frequency of combination treatments prescribed across registries. Patients initiated on combined treatment had generally severe disease and were affected with psoriasis for many years. The extent to which patients had been priory treated with biologic monotherapy and the proportion of patients affected with psoriatic arthritis differed between registries. Survival rates for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab and ustekinumab with methotrexate ranged between 43 and 92%, 28 and 83%, 65 and 87% and 53 and 77%, respectively, across registries after one year with no consistent superior survival for a particular biologic. Longest survival on a biologic combined with methotrexate, acitretin or cyclosporin was 103, 78 and 34 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate was the most commonly used concomitant treatment for patients on a biologic. Wide geographical variations in treatment selection and persistence of combination treatment exist. Data derived from ongoing studies may help to determine whether combined treatment is superior to biologic monotherapy.

Sentinel lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used in locally advanced cervical cancers with the aim to decrease the size of the tumor and to allow for less radical surgery. Despite of the fact that the high response rate of the tumor has been well established, the impact of NAC on sentinel lymph node (SN) detection and status has not been explored to date. METHODS: Our study included 82 patients with locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB1 >3 cm, IB2, IIA2 and selected IIB) out of which 51 patients were referred to SN biopsy prior to NAC and 31 patients to radical surgical procedure including SN biopsy after three courses of "dose density" NAC. In both groups, the prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITC) in SN was compared. RESULTS: The total of 179 SNs was evaluated. SN detection rate in the whole cohort reached 87.8% per patient and 60.9% bilaterally, without significant difference between both groups. In the group with upfront SN biopsy prior to NAC the prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC amounted to 43.1% (22/51), 7.8% (4/51) and 7.8% (4/51) respectively. In the group with SN biopsy after previous NAC, macrometastases were detected in 22.6 (7/31) of patients in SN, whereas there was only one micrometastasis and no ITC detected in that group. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the detection rate of SNs, yet it was associated with significantly reduced prevalence of metastatic involvement of SNs, especially almost completely eliminating low volume disease.