Postoperative Airway Management after Submandibular Duct Relocation in 96 Drooling Children and Adolescents.

The aim of this study was to evaluate our institutions airway management and complications after submandibular duct relocation (SMDR). We analysed a historic cohort of children and adolescents who were examined at the Multidisciplinary Saliva Control Centre between March 2005 and April 2016. Ninety-six patients underwent SMDR for excessive drooling. We studied details of the surgical procedure, postoperative swelling and other complications. Ninety-six patients, 62 males and 34 females, were treated consecutively by SMDR. Mean age at time of surgery was 14 years and 11 months. The ASA physical status was 2 in most patients. The majority of children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy (67.7%). Postoperative swelling of the floor of the mouth or tongue was reported in 31 patients (32.3%). The swelling was mild and transient in 22 patients (22.9%) but profound swelling was seen in nine patients (9.4%). In 4.2% of the patients the airway was compromised. In general, SMDR is a well-tolerated procedure, but we should be aware of swelling of the tongue and floor of the mouth. This may lead to a prolonged period of endotracheal intubation or a need for reintubation which can be challenging. After extensive intra-oral surgery such as SMDR we strongly recommend a extended perioperative intubation and extubation after the airway is checked and secure.

The medium to long-term effects of two-duct ligation for excessive drooling in neurodisabilities, a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the medium to long-term (1-12 years) effectiveness of two-duct ligation (2-DL) in patients with nonprogressive neurodisabilities. METHODS: Main outcomes included a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Drooling Severity (DS) and Drooling Frequency (DF), collected at baseline, 32 weeks postintervention and 1-12 years postintervention. Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), and satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analyzed (mean age 17 years, mean baseline VAS 82). VAS decreased significantly from baseline to long-term (n = 30. Mean difference -36.5, CI -47.0 to -26.0, p ≤ 0.001; -26.1, CI -36.2 to -15.9, p ≤ 0.001). However, long-term VAS significantly increased compared to VAS at 32 weeks (+10.4, CI 1.0-19.8, p = 0.031). Out of 42 patients, 64% would recommend 2-DL to peers. CONCLUSION: There is a significant subjective 2-DL effect on drooling severity in the medium to long-term as reported by patients and caregivers, but there is also a certain degree of recurrence in this time span, and 33% of the patients required subsequent treatment. However, the majority of patients and/or caregivers would recommend 2-DL to peers.

Surgery versus botulinum neurotoxin A to reduce drooling and improve daily life for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To compare the effect of bilateral submandibular duct ligation and botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) on drooling severity and its impact on daily life and care in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe drooling. METHOD: This was a randomized, interventional, controlled trial in which 53 children and adolescents (31 males, 22 females, mean age 11y, range 8-22y, SD 2y 10mo) with cerebral palsy (58.5%) or other non-progressive developmental disorders (41.5%) were randomized to BoNT-A (n=26) or bilateral submandibular duct ligation (n=27). A parent questionnaire on the severity of drooling in specific positions and daily activities and the impact of drooling on daily life and care was filled out at baseline and 8 and 32 weeks posttreatment. RESULTS: Both BoNT-A and bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a positive effect on daily care, damage to electronic equipment and/or furniture, social interactions, and self-esteem. However, bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a significant greater and longer-lasting short- (8wks) and medium-term (32wks) effect on daily care, reducing damage to electronic devices, and improving social interactions and satisfaction with life in general. INTERPRETATION: This randomized controlled trial confirms reduced drooling by both BoNT-A and bilateral submandibular duct ligation, but provides new evidence on improved well-being through a reduction in drooling. Even though there is a greater risk of complications and morbidity after bilateral submandibular duct ligation, compared to BoNT-A there was a significantly greater and longer-lasting positive effect on most outcomes. What this paper adds Bilateral botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) and submandibular duct ligation had a positive effect on the well-being of individuals with moderate-to-severe drooling. Bilateral submandibular duct ligation had a greater effect on the impact of drooling during daily care than BoNT-A. Bilateral submandibular duct ligation reduced damage to electronic devices and improved social interactions and satisfaction with life.

Submandibular gland botulinum neurotoxin A injection for predicting the outcome of submandibular duct relocation in drooling: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: This study evaluated whether the effect of submandibular gland botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection can predict the outcome of submandibular duct relocation with sublingual gland excision (SMDR) in children with drooling. Furthermore, we compared the effectiveness of both procedures. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 42 children and adolescents (25 males, 17 females; mean [SD] age at BoNT-A injection 11y [4], range 4-20y; mean [SD] age at SMDR 15y [4], range 7-23y) with cerebral palsy or another non-progressive developmental disability who had undergone both BoNT-A injection and SMDR for drooling. Main outcomes were the drooling quotient and the visual analogue scale (VAS) on drooling severity at 8 weeks and 32 weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Failure or success of previous BoNT-A injections had no influence on success of consecutive SMDR. Relative change in main outcomes showed no significant relation between BoNT-A injection and SMDR for any follow-up measurement. After 8 weeks, SMDR was more successful than BoNT-A injection in diminishing VAS (VAS 80.0% vs 54.3%; drooling quotient 56.2% vs 51.0%). After 32 weeks, both drooling quotient (64.3% vs 29.5%) and VAS (75.7% vs 37.1%) showed significantly higher proportions of success for SMDR. INTERPRETATION: The effect of submandibular BoNT-A injection does not predict subsequent SMDR success in drooling. Furthermore, SMDR has a larger and longer-lasting positive effect on drooling than BoNT-A injections. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection effect does not predict submandibular duct relocation with sublingual gland excision outcome. Submandibular duct relocation is more effective and more permanent than BoNT-A injection.

INYECCIÓN DE NEUROTOXINA BOTULÍNICA A EN LA GLÁNDULA SUBMANDIBULAR PARA PREDECIR EL RESULTADO DE LA REUBICACIÓN DEL CONDUCTO SUBMANDIBULAR EN BABEO: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO: OBJETIVO: Este estudio evaluó si el efecto de la inyección de neurotoxina A botulínica submandibular (BoNT-A) puede predecir el resultado de la reubicación del conducto submandibular con escisión de la glándula sublingual (SMDR) en niños con babeo. Además, comparamos la efectividad de ambos procedimientos. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en 42 niños y adolescentes (25 varones, 17 mujeres; edad media [DE] en la inyección de BoNT-A 11 años [4], rango 4-20 años; edad media [SD] a SMDR 15 años [4] rango 7-23 años) con parálisis cerebral u otra discapacidad del desarrollo no progresiva que se haya sometido a una inyección de BoNT-A y SMDR para babear. Los resultados principales fueron el cociente de babeo y la escala analógica visual (VAS) en la severidad del babeo a las 8 semanas y 32 semanas de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: El fracaso o el éxito de las inyecciones anteriores de BoNT-A no tuvo influencia en el éxito de la SMDR consecutiva. El cambio relativo en los resultados principales no mostró una relación significativa entre la inyección de BoNT-A y SMDR para cualquier medición de seguimiento. Después de 8 semanas, SMDR fue más exitoso que la inyección de BoNT-A en la VAS disminuida (VAS 80,0% vs 54,3%; cociente de babeo 56,2% vs 51,0%). Después de 32 semanas, tanto el cociente de babeo (64,3% vs 29,5%) como el VAS (75,7% vs 37,1%) mostraron proporciones significativamente más altas de éxito para SMDR. INTERPRETACIÓN: El efecto de la inyección submandibular de BoNT-A no predice el éxito posterior de SMDR en el babeo. Además, el SMDR tiene un efecto positivo mayor y más duradero en el babeo que las inyecciones de BoNT-A.

INJEÇÃO DE NEUROTOXINA BOTULÍNICA NA GLÂNDULA SUBMANDIBULAR PARA PREDIÇÃO DO RESULTADO DA RELOCACÃO DO DUCTO SUBMANDIBULAR NA SIALORRÉIA: UM ESTUDO DE COORTE RETROSPECTIVO: OBJETIVO: Este estudo avaliou se o efeito da neurotoxina botulínica A (NTBo-A) na glândula submandibular pode predizer o resultado da relocação do ducto submandibular com excisão sublingual da glândula (RDSM) em crianças com sialorréia. Ainda, comparamos a efetividade de ambos os procedimentos. MÉTODO: Um estudo de coorte retrospectivo foi realizado em 42 crianças e adolescentes (25 do sexo masculino, 17 do sexo feminino; idade média [DP] no momento da injeção de NTBo-A 11a[4], variação de 4-20a; idade média [DP] no momento da RDSM 15a [4], variação de 7-23a) com paralisia cerebral ou outra desordem não-progressiva do desenvolvimento que passaram por injeção de NTBo-A e RDSM para sialorréia. Os principais desfechos foram o quociente de sialorréia e a escala visual análoga (EVA) sobre a severidade da sialorréia no acompanhamento de 8 e 32 semanas. RESULTADOS: A falha ou sucesso da NTBo-A prévia não teve influência no sucesso da RDSM consecutiva. A mudança relativa nos principais desfechos não mostrou nenhuma relação significativa entre a injeção de NTBo-A e a RDSM para nenhuma das medidas no acompanhamento. Após 8 semanas, a RDSM foi mais bem sucedida do que a NTBo-A na redução da EVA (EVA 80,0% vs 54,3%; quociente de sialorréia 56,2% vs 51,0%). Após 32 semanas, tanto o quociente de sialorréia (64,3% vs 29,5%) quanto a EVA (75,7% vs 37,1%) mostram proporções significativamente mais altas de sucesso para a RDSM. INTERPRETAÇÃO: O efeito da injeção submandibular de NTBo-A não prediz o sucesso da RDSM subsequente na sialorréia. Ainda, a RDSM tem efeito maior e mais duradouro na sialorréia do que injeções de NTBo-A.

Randomized controlled trial comparing botulinum vs surgery for drooling in neurodisabilities.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of submandibular duct ligation (2-DL) and submandibular botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) for drooling in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities. METHODS: A randomized, interventional, controlled, and partly single-blinded study was performed in which submandibular BoNT-A was compared with 2-DL to treat excessive drooling. Main outcomes included a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), drooling quotient (DQ), drooling severity (DS) scale and drooling frequency (DF) scale. Each was obtained at baseline, and 8 and 32 weeks post treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (mean age: 11 years, mean baseline VAS score 7.9, mean baseline DQ 27.3%) were randomized to the 2-DL or BoNT-A group. Four patients were excluded from analyses, leaving 53 patients for intention-to-treat analyses. Response to treatment, defined as a ≥50% reduction in DQ or VAS score, was higher for 2-DL after 32 weeks (63.0% vs 26.9%, p = 0.008). Both VAS score (24.5, p < 0.001) and DQ (-9.3%, p = 0.022) were significantly lower at follow-up after 2-DL vs BoNT-A. The total number of adverse events (p = 0.088, 40.7% vs 19.2%) and postoperative complaints was higher (p < 0.001, mean 9.6 vs 3.6 days) for 2-DL than for BoNT-A. CONCLUSION: The 2-DL procedure is a more effective treatment for drooling than botulinum toxin, but carries a slightly greater risk of complications and morbidity. TRIALREGISTERNL IDENTIFIER: NTR3537. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities and severe drooling, 2-DL compared to a one-time intraglandular BoNT-A injection is more effective at reducing drooling at 32 weeks.

Effectiveness of submandibular duct relocation in 91 children with excessive drooling: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of submandibular duct relocation (SMDR) in drooling children with neurological disorders. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Outpatient Saliva Control Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one children suffering from moderate to severe drooling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct observational drooling quotient (DQ; 0-100) and caretaker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0-100). Secondary outcome measures were drooling severity (DS) and frequency rating scales. RESULTS: The DQ at baseline, 8 and 32 weeks postoperatively was 26.4, 12.3 and 10.8, respectively. VAS score decreased from 80.1 at baseline to 28.3 and 37.0 at 8 and 32 weeks after surgery. Median DS at baseline, 8 and 32 weeks was 5, 3 and 4, whereas the drooling frequency median scores were 4, 2 and 2, respectively. Five children required prolonged intubation due to transient floor of the mouth swelling, two of whom developed a ventilator-associated pneumonia. Another child developed atelectasis with postoperative pneumonia. Two more children needed tube feeding because of postoperative eating difficulties for 3 days or suprapubic catheterisation for urinary retention. Children aged 12 years or older (OR = 3.41; P = 0.03) and those with adequate stability and position of the head (OR = 2.84; P = 0.09) appeared to benefit most from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Submandibular duct relocation combined with excision of the sublingual glands appears to be relatively safe and effective in diminishing visible drooling in children with neurological disorders, particularly in children aged 12 years and older and those without a forward head posture.

The impact of submandibular duct relocation on drooling and the well-being of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a reduction in drooling after bilateral submandibular duct relocation (SMDR) with sublingual gland excision on daily life and care, as well as social and emotional consequences in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 72 children and adolescents (46 males, 26 females) with moderate to severe drooling, and their caregivers. Mean age at the time of surgery was 15 years 2 months (SD 4y 3mo). Fifty-two children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy and 20 had other non-progressive developmental disabilities. A caregiver questionnaire to document the impact of drooling on daily care and economic consequences, social interaction and emotional development and self-esteem was administered before, and 8 and 32 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Following bilateral SMDR the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100) scores demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in the severity of drooling from 81 at baseline to 28 and 36 after 8 and 32 weeks, respectively. This was accompanied by a decrease in the amount of daily care required and reduced economic consequences. In addition, an increase in social contact with other children and adults was reported by caregivers after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bilateral SMDR with sublingual gland excision provides a significant positive reduction in daily care of children suffering from drooling. Caregivers also report positive changes in their child's social interaction and sense of self-esteem.