Variation in the use of laparoscopy with inguinal hernia repairs in a sample of pediatric patients at children's hospitals.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernias (MCH) occur in approximately 10% of pediatric patients following unilateral inguinal hernia repairs (UIHR). Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral internal ring is a method of identifying high-risk individuals for prophylactic contralateral exploration and repair. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess variation in utilization of diagnostic laparoscopy, and report costs associated with the evaluation of a contralateral patent processus vaginalis during hernia repair in pediatric hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: The Pediatric Health Information System database was searched to identify outpatient surgical encounters for pediatric patients with a diagnosis of inguinal hernia during a 1-year period (2014). Records were identified that contained diagnostic codes for unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia in combination with a procedure code for open hernia repair with or without diagnostic laparoscopy. RESULTS: After exclusions there were 3952 hernia repairs performed at 30 hospitals; median age was 4 years (IQR 1-7), 78.8% were male, and 64.9% Caucasian. Three-quarters (76.7%) had UIHR, 8.6% had unilateral repairs with laparoscopy (UIHRL), 12.2% had bilateral inguinal hernia repairs (BIHR), and 2.4% had bilateral repairs with laparoscopy (BIHRL). Where laparoscopy was used, 78% resulted in a unilateral repair and 22% in a bilateral procedure. The percent of patients undergoing laparoscopy varied from 0 to 57% among hospitals, and 0-100% among surgeons. Pediatric surgeons were more than three times more likely to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy compared with pediatric urologists. Median adjusted costs were $2298 (IQR 1659-2955) for UIHR, $2713 (IQR 1873-3409) for UIHRL, $2752 (IQR 2230-3411) for BIHR, and $2783 (IQR 2233-3453) for BIHRL. Median costs varied over two-fold among hospitals ($1310-4434), and over four-fold among surgeons ($948-5040). DISCUSSION: Data suggested that <10% of patients with clinically unilateral inguinal hernias developed MCH. A negative diagnostic laparoscopy ensured that 0.9-1.31% developed MCH. However, up to 30% of patients underwent contralateral exploration/repair when diagnostic laparoscopy was used. The current study found increased costs associated with the use of laparoscopy, with considerable variation in costs among surgeons and hospitals. These data elucidate competing financial and clinical consequences associated with the use of diagnostic laparoscopy with clinically unilateral hernias. CONCLUSIONS: Variation existed in the use of laparoscopy during inguinal hernia repairs and associated costs within the current sample from children's hospitals in the United States. The additional costs of laparoscopic evaluation must be considered against the clinical utility and therapeutic consequences of identifying individuals with a higher risk of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia.

Evaluation of the contralateral inguinal ring in clinically unilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The management of the contralateral inguinal canal in children with clinical unilateral inguinal hernia is controversial. Our objective was to systematically review the literature regarding management of the contralateral inguinal canal. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (1940-2011) using 'hernia' and 'inguinal' and either 'pediatric,' 'infant,' or 'child,' to identify studies of pediatric (age ≤21 years) patients with inguinal hernia. Among clinical unilateral hernia patients, we assessed the number of cases with contralateral patent processus (CPP) and incidence of subsequent clinical metachronous contralateral hernia (MCH). We evaluated three strategies for contralateral management: expectant management, laparoscopic evaluation or pre-operative ultrasound. Pooled estimates of MCH or CPP were generated with random effects by study when heterogeneity was found (I(2) > 50 %, or Cochrane's Q p ≥ 0.10). RESULTS: We identified 2,477 non-duplicated studies, 129 of which met our inclusion criteria and had sufficient information for quantitative analysis. The pooled incidence of MCH after open unilateral repair was 7.3 % (95 % CI 6.5-8.1 %). Laparoscopic examination identified CPP in 30 % (95 % CI 26-34 %). Lower age was associated with higher incidence of CPP (p < 0.01). The incidence of MCH after a negative laparoscopic evaluation was 0.9 % (95 % CI 0.5-1.3 %). Significant heterogeneity was found in studies and pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: The literature suggests that laparoscopically identified CPP is a poor indicator of future contralateral hernia. Almost a third of patients will have a CPP, while less than one in 10 will develop MCH when managed expectantly. Performing contralateral hernia repair in patients with CPP results in overtreatment in roughly 2 out of 3 patients.