Cardiologist-Directed Sedation Management in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has increased. In line with this, the safety of such procedures has also increased. Traditionally, TLE is performed under resource-intensive general anaesthesia. This study aims to evaluate the safety and outcomes of Cardiologist-lead deep sedation for TLE. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 328 TLE procedures performed under deep sedation from 2016 to 2019. TLE procedures were performed by experienced electrophysiologists. Sedation was administered by a specifically trained cardiologist (bolus midazolam/fentanyl and propofol infusion). Procedural sedation data including blood pressure, medication administration and sedation time were collected. Complications related to sedation and the operative component of the procedure were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The sedation-associated complication rate during TLE was 22.0%. The most common complication (75% of complications) was hypotension requiring noradrenaline, followed by bradycardia requiring atropine (13% of complications). Additionally, the unplanned presence of an anaesthesiologist was needed in one case (0.3%). Deep sedation was achieved with midazolam (mean dose 42.9 ± 26.5 µg/kg), fentanyl (mean dose 0.4 ± 0.6 µg/kg) and propofol (mean dose 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg/h). There was no difference in medication dosage between those with a sedation-associated complication and those without. Sedation-associated complications appeared significantly more in patients with reduced LVEF (p = 0.01), renal impairment (p = 0.01) and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Deep sedation for TLE can be safely performed by a specifically trained cardiologist, with a transition to general anaesthesia required in only 0.3% of cases. We continue to recommend the on-call availability of an anaesthesiologist and cardiac surgeon in case of major complications.

Incidence and Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (wtATTR-CM) is characterized by heart failure, conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias. The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly ventricular tachycardias (VTs), in wtATTR-CM is unclear. With the development of targeted therapies and improved overall prognosis, there is an unmet need to identify patients at high risk for VTs who might benefit from ICD therapy. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2022, 72 patients diagnosed with wtATTR-CM were prospectively evaluated for the presence of ventricular arrhythmias using a Holter ECG. VTs were defined as >3 consecutive beats with a heart rate > 100 beats per minute originating from a ventricle. RESULTS: The incidence of VTs was 44% (n = 32/72) in unselected wtATTR-CM patients. Patients with VT showed significantly more severe left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (septum diameter 21 ± 2.6 vs. 19 ± 3.0 mm, p = 0.006), reduced LV ejection fraction (47 ± 8 vs. 52 ± 8%, p = 0.014) and larger left atria (32 ± 7 vs. 28 ± 6 mm2, p = 0.020), but no differences in cardiac markers such as NTproBNP and troponin. In a multivariable model, LV hypertrophy (LV mass indexed, OR = 1.02 [1.00-1.03], p = 0.031), LV end-diastolic diameter (OR = 0.85 [0.74-0.98], p = 0.021) and LV end-systolic diameter (OR = 1.19 [1.03-1.349], p = 0.092) were predictive for VT occurrence with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.76 [0.65-0.87]. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ventricular arrhythmia in wtATTR-CM is high and is associated with an advanced stage of left ventricular disease. Further studies are needed evaluating the role of VTs in predicting sudden cardiac death and the benefit of ICD therapy in wtATTR-CM.

High-power chargers for electric vehicles: are they safe for patients with pacemakers and defibrillators?

AIMS: Battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales and use are rapidly expanding. Battery electric vehicles, along with their charging stations, are a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The new 'high-power' charging stations have the potential to create strong electromagnetic fields and induce EMI in CIEDs, and their safety has not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 130 CIED patients performed 561 charges of four BEVs and a test vehicle (350 kW charge capacity) using high-power charging stations under continuous 6-lead electrocardiogram monitoring. The charging cable was placed directly over the CIED, and devices were programmed to maximize the chance of EMI detection. Cardiac implantable electronic devices were re-interrogated after patients charged all BEVs and the test vehicle for evidence of EMI. There were no incidences of EMI, specifically no over-sensing, pacing inhibition, inappropriate tachycardia detection, mode switching, or spontaneous reprogramming. The risk of EMI on a patient-based analysis is 0/130 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0%-2%], and the risk of EMI on a charge-based analysis is 0/561 (95% CI 0%-0.6%). The effective magnetic field along the charging cable was 38.65 µT and at the charging station was 77.9 µT. CONCLUSIONS: The use of electric cars with high-power chargers by patients with cardiac devices appears to be safe with no evidence of clinically relevant EMI. Reasonable caution, by minimizing the time spent in close proximity with the charging cables, is still advised as the occurrence of very rare events cannot be excluded from our results.

REACT DX registry: Real world REACTion to atrial high rate episodes detected in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients with a DX lead.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and is predicted by atrial high rate events. The early detection of AF is paramount to timely interventions to reduce the morbidity of AF. The DX ICD system combined with Home Monitoring® allows for continuous atrial rhythm monitoring without the need for a dedicated atrial lead. OBJECTIVE: To establish the reaction to and timing of reactions to the detection of atrial high rate episodes (AHRE). METHODS: A prospective cohort of DX ICD systems was followed up and the response to AHREs was collected and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were enrolled; an AHRE ⩾ 6 min was detected in 13.7% of patients (n= 32) within a mean follow-up duration of 16 months. A high rate of oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription was seen with the detection of AHREs in patients with a not-low risk CHA2DS2-VASc score. There was a delay in this prescription highlighting the potential to improve the timeliness of patient care in this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The DX ICD system provides rapid and ongoing atrial rhythm monitoring such that physicians are rapidly aware of AHRE without the need for a dedicated atrial lead, but local protocols are needed to improve the response time of anti-coagulation prescription.

Ultrasound-Guided Access Reduces Vascular Complications in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Background: Femoral vascular access using the standard anatomic landmark-guided method is often limited by peripheral artery disease and obesity. We investigated the effect of ultrasound-guided vascular puncture (UGVP) on the rate of vascular complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The data of 479 patients (59% male, mean age 68 years ± 11 years) undergoing catheter ablation for left atrial (n = 426; 89%), right atrial (n = 28; 6%) or ventricular arrhythmias (n = 28; 6%) were analyzed. All patients were on uninterrupted oral anticoagulants and heparin was administered intravenously during the procedure. Femoral access complications were compared between patients undergoing UGVP (n = 320; 67%) and patients undergoing a conventional approach (n = 159; 33%). Complication rates were also compared between patients with a BMI of >30 kg/m2 (n = 136) and patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 343). Results: Total vascular access complications including mild hematomas were n = 37 (7.7%). In the conventional group n = 17 (10.7%) and in the ultrasound (US) group n = 20 (6.3%) total vascular access complications occurred (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.283−1.096). UGVP significantly reduced the risk of hematoma > 5 cm (OR 0.382, 95% CI 0.148, 0.988) or pseudoaneurysm (OR 0.160, 95% CI 0.032, 0.804). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding retroperitoneal hematomas or AV fistulas (p > 0.05). In patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2, UGVP led to a highly relevant reduction in the risk of total vascular access complications (OR 0.138, 95% CI 0.027, 0.659), hematomas > 5 cm (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466) and pseudoaneurysms (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466). Conclusion: UGVP significantly reduces vascular access complications. Patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 seem to particularly profit from a UGVP approach.

Deep sedation with propofol in patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures-Is it safe?

Background: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial tachycardia is well established. To avoid body movement and pain, sedative and analgesic agents are used. Objective: The aim was to investigate safety of sedation/anti-pain protocol administered by electrophysiology (EP) staff. Methods: A total of 3211 consecutive patients (61% male) undergoing left atrial ablation for paroxysmal AF (37.1%), persistent AF (35.3%) or left atrial tachycardia (27.6%) were included. Midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol were administered by EP staff. In case of respiratory depression, endotracheal intubation (eIT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was implemented. Risk factors for eIT or NIV were analyzed. Results: Mean doses of propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl were 33.7 ± 16.7 mg, 3 ± 11.1 mg, and 0.16 ± 2.2 mg, respectively. Norepinephrine was administered in 396 of 3211 patients (12.3%) because of blood pressure drop (mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg). NIV was necessary in 47 patients (1.5%) and eIT in 1 patient (0.03%). Procedure duration, high body mass index (BMI), high CHADS2-VASC2 score, high age, low glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, and low baseline oxygen saturation were associated with NIV or eIT. The only independent predictor for NIV/eIT was high BMI (>30.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2). Therefore, patients with a BMI of ≥30 had a 40% higher risk for the need of NIV/eIT during the procedure in our study. Conclusion: Sedation/anti-pain control including midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl administered by EP staff is safe, with only 1.53% requirement of NIV/eIT. High BMI (>30 kg/m2) emerged as an independent predictor for eIT/NIV.

Patient Characteristics, Procedural Characteristics, and Outcomes in Patients Having Lead Extraction in a High-Volume Center.

The rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasing, with an increasing rate of complex devices being implanted. TLE is now a routine part of cardiac device management and up-to-date data on the safety and efficacy of TLE with modern tools and techniques is essential to management decisions regarding noninfectious indications for lead extraction. We present a contemporary, prospective review of TLE at our high-volume cardiac center. All patients who underwent TLE from June 2016 to June 2019 were enrolled in our local database, and baseline clinical data, procedural information, and outcome data were collected. In total, 561 leads were explanted (n = 153) or extracted (n = 408) from 341 patients over the study period. Patients were predominantly male (71%), with a mean age of 65 ± 17 years. The most common indication for lead removal was lead failure (45.2%, n = 154), followed by infection of the pocket or device (29.3%, n = 100). In total, complete success was achieved in 96.4% (n = 541) leads, clinical success in a further 2.1% (n = 12), and failure only in 1.4% (n = 8). There was an overall complication rate of 0.9% (3/341) for major complications and 1.5% (5/341) for minor complications. There were no deaths. In conclusion, our data suggest that there are ongoing improvements in the safety profile and success rates of lead extraction undertaken by experienced operators. The major complication rate now is <1%.

A prospective case-control validation of procalcitonin as a biomarker diagnosing pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator pocket infection.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of device infections, especially pocket infections, is challenging and relies primarily on clinical presentation. The prospective DIRT (Device associated Infections Role of new diagnostic Tools) study identified procalcitonin (PCT) as the most promising biomarker among other 14 biomarkers to aid the diagnosis of pocket infection. It also identified an optimized cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for a localized generator pocket infection. AIMS: The present study aims to validate the proposed PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for the diagnosis of pocket infection in an independent cohort. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 81 patients with pocket infections and 81 controls matched for age and renal function presenting for elective device exchange or lead revision. Patients with concomitant infectious or inflammatory diseases, end-stage renal failure, current active malignancy, or receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. RESULTS: An elevated PCT over 0.05 ng/ml was found in 68% (n = 55) of pocket infections and 24% (n = 19) of controls, corresponding to a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 77% for diagnosing a pocket infection. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, PCT showed an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.83; P < 0.001). Sensitivity remained high with antibiotic pretreatment (65% compared to 69% without pretreatment) and in cases with minimal inflammatory signs (67% compared to 70% with extensive inflammation). CONCLUSION: Our study validates the cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml PCT for diagnosis of a pocket infection, even in patients pre-treated with antibiotics or with minimal clinical signs of inflammation.

Clinical valuation of ST changes in a group of patients with ventricular arrhythmias: The inSighT Study.

BACKGROUND: The inSighT study was designed to determine the prevalence of ischemic changes as recorded by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) ST deviations in intracardiac electrocardiograms (EGM) over the 24 h preceding malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) or high risk of future development of CAD implanted with an ICD equipped with an ST monitoring feature (Ellipse™/Fortify Assura™, St. Jude Medical). Device session records were collected at each in-clinic follow-up. EGM ST levels of the beats over the 15 minutes prior to VT/VF events were compared using a t test with those from a baseline period of 23-24 h prior to the VT/VF event. All events with p < .05 were visually inspected to confirm they were evaluable; additional criteria for exclusion from further analysis included inappropriate therapy, aberrant conduction, and occurrence of VT/VF within 24h prior to the current event. RESULTS: The study enrolled 481 ICD patients (64 ± 11 years, 83% male) in 14 countries and followed them for 15±5 months. A total of 165 confirmed VT/VF episodes were observed, of which 71 events (in 56 patients, 34% of all patients with VT/VF) were preceded by significant (p < .05) ST-segment changes unrelated to known non-ischemic causes. None of the analyzed demographic and clinical factors proved to be associated with greater odds of presenting with ST-segment changes prior to VT/VF episode. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, characteristic ST-segment changes, likely representative of ischemic events, were observed in 34% of all patients with VT/VF episodes.

Feasibility and safety of left atrial access for ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: In patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) ablation procedures can be challenging. We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of left atrial ablations in patients with PLSVC, especially when PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis 15 adult patients (mean age 64.6 ± 14.5 years, 53.3% male) with PLSVC undergoing 27 ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter were included. In 5 (33.3%) patients PLSVC was only discovered during the procedure. Transseptal puncture (TSP) was declared "difficult" by the ablating physician in 13 of 27 (48.2%) procedures and was not successfully completed in the first attempt in two patients with known PLSVC. Once TSP was successfully completed, all relevant structures were reached both during mapping and ablation in all procedures independent of whether PLSVC was known prior to the procedure. One major complication (3.7%) occurred in 27 procedures in a patient with known PLSVC. In the patients with unknown PLSVC no complication occurred. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, left atrial access and ablation in patients with PLSVC is feasible and safe, particularly with regard to patients in whom the PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure.

Catheter ablation in adult congenital heart disease on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation: Is it safe? Data from a large single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is a critical treatment strategy for complex arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). In addition to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC, examining thromboembolic, bleeding, and vascular access complications. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 234 ACHD patients with simple (n = 83), moderate (n = 66), or complex (n = 85) CHD (mean age 46 years) undergoing 368 ablation procedures on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA (45.4%) or DOAC (54.6%) was undertaken. Arrhythmias were AF in 97, right AT in 181, left AT in 65, or a combination of AF and AT in 25. RESULTS: No thromboembolic complications occurred. Major complications occurred in 4 patients (1.1%; 1 VKA, 3 DOAC), including retroperitoneal hematoma in 2 and arteriovenous (AV) fistula requiring surgical treatment in 2. Minor bleeding or vascular access complications occurred in 46 cases (12.5%), including hematomas >5 cm in 26, AV fistulas (not requiring surgical intervention) in 13, and pseudoaneurysms in 7 (thrombin injection in 3/7). Overall, no significant difference was found between DOAC (14.9%) and VKA groups (12.0%; P = .411). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC is feasible and safe. No thromboembolic events occurred, and major bleeding or vascular access complications were rare. No significant differences regarding minor bleeding or vascular access complications between patients on DOAC or VKA were found.

Role of the Ambulatory Assessed Apnea-Hypopnea Index for Predicting Recurring Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation Therapy.

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for recurrent AF. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) is a measurement tool to screen patients for OSA. We sought to evaluate if the ambulatory assessed AHI is associated with AF recurrence following AF catheter ablation. 187 patients with paroxysmal (n = 155) or early persistent (n = 32) AF presenting for catheter ablation were included in the study. AHI was determined prior to ablation using an ambulatory screening device. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In patients with early persistent AF (17%) additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) was performed. Clinical follow-up was available after 3 and 12 months including 7-day Holter-ECG. All 187 patients (60.3 ± 11.4 years, 64.2% male) completed the 3 months follow-up and 170 patients the 12 months follow-up. A pathological AHI ≥15 was found in 45/187 (24.1%) patients. Additional CFAE did not differ between patients with an AHI ≥15 and AHI <15 (p = 0.663). After 3 months, 12/41 (29.3%) patients with AHI ≥15 showed recurrent AF compared to 24/146 (16.4%) patients with AHI <15 (p = 0.066). After 12 months, AHI ≥15 was associated with a significant higher rate of AF recurrence of 47.4% (18/38) versus 26.5% (35/132) in patients with AHI <15 (p = 0.014). In the logistic regression analysis AHI ≥15 was an independent predictor of recurrent AF at 12 months (p = 0.011). In conclusion, ambulatory assessed AHI ≥15 is associated with increased risk for AF recurrence following catheter ablation. OSA screening should be performed in AF patients as it might influence catheter ablation success.

Implantable loop recorder for monitoring patients with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) are prone to residua, sequels and complications from the underlying anomaly, where cardiac arrhythmias are one of the major causes for hospitalization, morbidity and mortality. The importance of the subcutaneous implantable loop recorder (ILR) for the detection and documentation of significant arrhythmias has increased over the last years. To date, however, there is little data on ILR use in the CHD population. METHODS: In this single center, retrospective observational study, all CHD-patients with an ILR were identified who were under care of the German Heart Center Munich between February 2015 and January 2019. The primary endpoint of the study was the detection or exclusion of significant arrhythmias during follow-up in CHD-patients who had received an ILR. The secondary endpoint was to determine whether ILR findings influenced patient management, defined as initiation or adjustment of medication, cardioversion, electrophysiologic study, catheter ablation, or implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. RESULTS: An ILR was implanted in 33 CHD-patients (mean age, 43±20 years; 42.4% female) with CHD. During a mean observation period of 697±433 days, clinically relevant arrhythmias, correlating with the patients' complaints and symptoms, were detected in 19 patients (59.4%), encompassing supraventricular tachycardia (n=10), supraventricular or ventricular ectopic beats (n=10), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=2), ventricular tachycardia (n=2), and bradycardia (n=2). In 9 patients (28.1%) the detected arrhythmia was considered an event requiring treatment. Treatment modalities included catheter ablation (n=5), modification of antiarrhythmic drug regime (n=2), adaptation of anticoagulation therapy (n=2), or implantation of a subcutaneous ICD (n=1). Regarding the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias or a related need for therapeutic intervention, no significant differences were identified with respect to WHO functional class, the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension or reduced resting peripheral oxygen saturation. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic CHD-patients at risk for life-threatening cardiac events, ILR has a considerable complementary diagnostic value for the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant arrhythmias. Considering the overall low risk of complications, ILR implantation should be considered in patients with CHD of any complexity who need medium or long-term arrhythmia monitoring, especially if short-term Holter monitoring cannot provide sufficient diagnostic certainty.

Release of high-sensitive TROPonin T by implantation of an entirely subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator compared to a conventional transvenous approach: the TROPIC registry.

PURPOSE: Implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has become an alternative option when a conventional transvenous approach is not suitable. The myocardial damage caused by S-ICD implantation appears to be minimal despite mandatory defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing. However, there has not been a direct comparison with the traditional transvenous placement of a single-chamber ICD (VVI-ICD). The aim of this study was to determine the extent of myocardial damage by analysing the changes in serum levels of cardiac enzymes after S-ICD implantation in comparison with VVI-ICD. METHODS: In 43 patients who received an S-ICD system, differences in serum levels of high-sensitive troponin T (ΔhsTnT) and creatine kinase total (ΔCK) and muscle brain fraction (ΔCK-MB) were acquired by blood sampling before and the day after implantation. The control group consisted of 43 patients from the TropShock study who had received a transvenous VVI-ICD without DFT. RESULTS: After S-ICD implantation and testing procedure, ΔhsTnT (0.000 ng/ml, IQR - 0.003-0.002 ng/ml) was significantly lower than after conventional VVI-ICD implantation (0.018 ng/ml, IQR 0.004-0.032 ng/ml; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in CK (ΔCKS-ICD 85.0 U/I, IQR 30.5-225.8 U/I vs ΔCKVVI-ICD 69.5 U/I, IQR 22.9-172.3 U/I; p = 0.357), but there was a significant difference in CK-MB (ΔCK-MBS-ICD of - 0.60, IQR - 2.60-1.0 vs ΔCK-MBVVI-ICD 1.0, IQR - 1.08-3.18; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: S-ICD implantation causes less myocardial damage than VVI-ICD implantation evidenced by ΔhsTnT and ΔCK-MB.

Security millimetre wave body scanner safe for patients with leadless pacemakers or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the electromagnetic interference (EMI) effects and safety of the new security screening millimetre wave body scanners (MWBSs) for patients with rare cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: We identified 73 patients with either entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) or leadless pacemakers (LPM) attending routine device follow-up. CIED programming was optimised for the detection of EMI occurrence, and high-voltage therapy was disabled. Patients then underwent millimetre wave body scans under continuous ECG monitoring. Scanning was performed at the recommended distance as well as in close proximity to the scanner emulating accidental exposure. CIED function was observed for EMI effects. RESULTS: There were no episodes of inhibition of pacing in the leadless pacemaker subgroup, no oversensing in the S-ICD subgroup and no spontaneous device reprogramming in any group. There was no change in pacing or sensing thresholds, and S-ICD vector eligibility remained unchanged after scanning with the MWBS. No CIEDs were identified by the MWBS during the study. CONCLUSION: No EMI events were detected during the use of MWBSs by patients with either S-ICDs or LPMs. This data should be reassuring for patients suggesting that they can undergo security body scans without worries or disclosure of their CIED status.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with left bundle branch block with residual conduction.

AIM: To evaluate whether left bundle branch block with residual conduction (rLBBB) is associated with worse outcomes after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). METHODS: All consecutive CRT implants at our institution between 2006 and 2013 were identified from our local device registry. Pre- and post-implant patient specific data were extracted from clinical records. RESULTS: A total of 690 CRT implants were identified during the study period. Prior to CRT, 52.2% of patients had true left bundle branch block (LBBB), 19.1% a pacing-induced LBBB (pLBBB), 11.2% a rLBBB, 0.8% a right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 16.5% had a nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) electrocardiogram pattern. Mean age at implant was 67.5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.6), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) was 25.7% (SD = 7.9%), and mean QRS duration was 158.4 ms (SD = 32 ms). After CRT, QRS duration was significantly reduced in the LBBB (p < 0.001), pLBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p < 0.001), RBBB (p = 0.04), and IVCD groups (p = 0.03). LV EF significantly improved in the LBBB (p < 0.001), rLBBB (p = 0.002), and pLBBB (p < 0.001) groups, but the RBBB and IVCD groups showed no improvement. There was no significant difference in mortality between the LBBB and rLBBB groups. LV EF post-CRT, chronic kidney disease, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and age at implant were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: CRT in patients with rLBBB results in improved LV EF and similar mortality rates to CRT patients with complete LBBB. Predictors of mortality post-CRT include post-CRT LV EF, presence of CKD, hyperkalaemia, hypernatremia, and older age at implant.