Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases: High rates of local control with favorable toxicity.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Oligometastatic sarcoma pulmonary metastases (PM's) are traditionally treated with resection and/or chemotherapy. We hypothesize that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective, safe alternative to surgery that can achieve excellent local control (LC) with a favorable toxicity profile. METHODS: Patients treated with SBRT for sarcoma PM's from 2011 to 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania were included. Median dose was 50 Gy. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography/CT Q3 months post-SBRT. RESULTS: 44 patients with 56 separate PM's were treated with SBRT. Median age was 59 (range 19-82). 82% received prior chemotherapy, 66% had prior pulmonary resections (range, 1-5 resections), and 32% received prior thoracic radiotherapy. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.5-8.1 cm). Median follow-up was 16 months and 25 months for patients alive at last follow-up. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) and 46% (95% CI, 38%-55%). LC at 12 and 24 months was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%) and 90% (95% CI, 84%-96%). LC and overall survival did not differ based on age, gender, histology, fractionation, lesion location, or size (P > .05). Three developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 grade-2 chest-wall toxicities; one had grade-2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the first multi-institutional series on SBRT for sarcoma PM's, SBRT has excellent LC and is well-tolerated. SBRT should be considered as an alternative/complement to resection.

Toxicity of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery May Be Greater in Patients with Lower Cranial Nerve Schwannomas.

Objective Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK-SRS) is a preferred treatment option for tumors of the jugular foramen. We hypothesized that GK-SRS toxicity is higher for lower cranial nerve schwannomas than for glomus jugulare tumors despite anatomically similar locations. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients who received GK-SRS for glomus jugulare tumors and lower cranial nerve schwannomas at our institution between 2006 and 2014. Because of small sample sizes, Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression techniques were employed using SPSS. Result We identified 20 glomus jugulare tumors and 6 lower cranial nerve schwannoma patients with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median marginal dose was 16 Gy (range 13-18 Gy) and 12.5 Gy (range 12-14 Gy), respectively. All except one patient had tumor control at last follow-up visit. No worsening of pre-existing neurological deficits was observed. There were seven patients who developed any new neurological deficit after GK-SRS, four from the glomus group, and three from the schwannoma group (20 and 50% of each group, respectively). Only two of seven patients had permanent new neurological deficits. Both of them were in the schwannoma group. Univariate analysis showed that only a diagnosis of schwannoma had a greater risk of permanent new cranial nerve complication after GK-SRS compared with diagnosis of glomus jugulare ( p = 0.046). Conclusion Although the marginal dose for glomus jugulare is greater, our study suggests that the risk of a new permanent neurological deficit after GK-SRS was higher in the schwannoma group compared with the glomus group.

Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of pulmonary metastases from sarcoma: A potential alternative to resection.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Oligometastatic sarcoma pulmonary metastases (PM) are typically treated with resection and/or chemotherapy. We hypothesize that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can be an alternative to surgery that can achieve high rates of local control (LC) with limited toxicity. METHODS: Thirty consecutive sarcoma patients received SBRT to 39 PM's from 2011 to 2015 at two university hospitals to a median dose of 50 Gy in 4-5 fractions with CyberKnife or linear accelerator. Patients underwent CT or PET/CT scans q3 months after SBRT. RESULTS: 77% received prior chemotherapy, 70% had 1-3 prior pulmonary resections, and 26% received prior thoracic radiotherapy. Median lesion size was 2.4 cm (range 0.5-8.1 cm). Median follow-up was 16 and 23 months for patients alive at last follow-up. At 12 and 24 months, LC was 94% and 86%, and OS was 76% and 43%. LC and OS did not differ by SBRT technique, fractionation regimen, lesion location, histology, or size (all P > 0.05). Three developed grade 2 chest-wall toxicity with no other grade ≥2 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series on SBRT for sarcoma PM's and demonstrates that SBRT is well-tolerated with excellent LC across tumor locations and sizes. SBRT should be considered in these patients, and prospective studies are warranted. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:65-69. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone is an increasingly common treatment strategy for brain metastases. However, existing prognostic tools for overall survival (OS) were developed using cohorts of patients treated predominantly with approaches other than SRS alone. Therefore, we devised novel risk scores for OS and distant brain failure (DF) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with SRS alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients treated with SRS alone for MBM from 2009-2014. OS and DF were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified clinical risk factors. Risk scores were created based on weighted regression coefficients. OS scores range from 0-10 (0 representing best OS), and DF risk scores range from 0-5 (0 representing lowest risk of DF). Predictive power was evaluated using c-index statistics. Bootstrapping with 200 resamples tested model stability. RESULTS: The median OS was 8.1 months from SRS, and 54 (70.1 %) patients had DF at a median of 3.3 months. Risk scores for OS were predicated on performance status, extracranial disease (ED) status, number of lesions, and gender. Median OS for the low-risk group (0-3 points) was not reached. For the moderate-risk (4-6 points) and high-risk (6.5-10) groups, median OS was 7.6 months and 2.4 months, respectively (p < .0001). Scores for DF were predicated on performance status, ED status, and number of lesions. Median time to DF for the low-risk group (0 points) was not reached. For the moderate-risk (1-2 points) and high-risk (3-5 points) groups, time to DF was 4.8 and 2.0 months, respectively (p < .0001). The novel scores were more predictive (c-index = 0.72) than melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment or RTOG recursive partitioning analysis tools (c-index = 0.66 and 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We devised novel risk scores for MBM treated with SRS alone. These scores have implications for prognosis and treatment strategy selection (SRS versus whole-brain radiotherapy).

Stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection bed for intracranial metastases and risk of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

OBJECT: Following resection of a brain metastasis, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the cavity is an emerging alternative to postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). This approach attempts to achieve local control without the neurocognitive risks associated with WBRT. The authors aimed to report the outcomes of a large patient cohort treated with this strategy. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 91 patients without a history of WBRT who received Gamma Knife (GK) SRS to 96 metastasis resection cavities between 2007 and 2013. Patterns of intracranial control were examined in the 86 cases with post-GK imaging. Survival, local failure, and distant failure were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were tested by univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards model) analyses. RESULTS: Common primary tumors were non-small cell lung (43%), melanoma (14%), and breast (13%). The cases were predominantly recursive partitioning analysis Class I (25%) or II (70%). Median preoperative metastasis diameter was 2.8 cm, and 82% of patients underwent gross-total resection. A median dose of 16 Gy was delivered to the 50% isodose line, encompassing a median treatment volume of 9.2 cm(3). Synchronous intact metastases were treated in addition to the resection bed in 43% of cases. Patients survived a median of 22.3 months from the time of GK. Local failure developed in 16 cavities, for a crude rate of 18% and 1-year actuarial local control of 81%. Preoperative metastasis diameter ≥ 3 cm and residual or recurrent tumor at the time of GK were associated with local failure (p = 0.04 and 0.008, respectively). Distant intracranial failure occurred in 55 cases (64%) at a median of 7.3 months from GK. Salvage therapies included WBRT and additional SRS in 33% and 31% of patients, respectively. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis developed in 12 cases (14%) and was associated with breast histology and infratentorial cavities (p = 0.024 and 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study bolsters the existing evidence for SRS to the resection bed. Local control rates are high, but patients with larger preoperative metastases or residual/recurrent tumor at the time of SRS are more likely to fail at the cavity. While most patients develop distant intracranial failure, an SRS approach spared or delayed WBRT in the majority of cases. The risk of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis does not appear to be elevated with this strategy.

Age-related reference ranges for complexed prostate-specific antigen and complexed/total prostate-specific antigen ratio: results from East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute screening campaign.

The East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute conducted a regional prostate cancer screening campaign over a 3-year period from 1998 through 2000. Total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), and cPSA/tPSA ratio (c/tPSA) values were determined. To better define prostate cancer in the population, we chose to determine age-based reference ranges for these PSA isoforms in apparently healthy men. Participants (N = 12,902) between the ages of 20 and 94 were screened and demographic information and serum tPSA and cPSA values were collected across 41 centers throughout East Texas. Men with an abnormal digital rectal examination, a follow-up biopsy indicating prostatic disease, or any clinical signs and symptoms of prostatic disease were excluded. Sera from 7541 evaluable men were tested with the Bayer Immuno 1 PSA and cPSA methods at East Texas Medical Center. The resulting PSA data were then stratified by decade of age to determine age-related reference ranges for each PSA species. The cPSA values increased across all age decades: 40 to 49 years, 1.45 ng/mL; 50 to 59, 1.92 ng/mL; 60 to 69, 2.49 ng/mL; and 70 to 79, 2.77 ng/mL (95th percentile). tPSA levels also increased with age: 1.81 ng/mL, 2.45 ng/mL, 3.17 ng/mL, and 3.57, respectively. Comparatively, the c/tPSA levels remained constant (0.87), regardless of age. The upper limits of tPSA and cPSA values reported here suggest that men should be screened using lower cutoff values than are currently in use. These limits may more accurately identify prostate cancer among otherwise healthy men.