RESUMO
Certain soil microbes resist and metabolize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The same is true for a subset of skin microbes. In the human mouth, oral microbes have the potential to oxidize tobacco PAHs, thereby increasing these chemicals' ability to cause cancer of adjacent epithelium. We hypothesized that we could identify, in smokers, the oral mucosal microbes that can metabolize PAH. We isolated bacteria and fungi that survived long-term in minimal media with PAHs as the sole carbon source, under aerobic conditions, from the oral mucosa in 17 of 26 smokers and two of 14 nonsmokers. Of bacteria genera that survived harsh PAH exposure in vitro, most were found at trace levels, except for Staphylococcus, Actinomyces, and Kingella, which were more abundant. Two PAH-resistant strains of Candida albicans (C. albicans) were isolated from smokers. C. albicans was a prime candidate to contribute to carcinogenesis in tobacco users as it is found orally at high levels in tobacco users on the mucosa, and some Candida species can metabolize PAHs. However, when C. albicans isolates were tested for metabolism of two model PAH substrates, pyrene and phenanthrene, they were not capable, suggesting they cannot metabolize PAH under the conditions used. In conclusion, evidence for large scale microbial degradation of tobacco PAHs under aerobic conditions on the oral mucosa remains lacking, though nonabundant PAH metabolizers are certainly present.
Assuntos
Mucosa Bucal , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos , Humanos , Boca , Candida , Candida albicans , Produtos do TabacoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Virtual reality (VR) is a promising non-pharmacologic tool for managing health care anxiety. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a pre-operative VR intervention by adult patients and medical staff and measured anxiety in adult patients pre- and post-VR intervention. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 30 patients scheduled to undergo oral surgery and 8 medical staff as participants. The patients completed a verbal demographic survey and rated their anxiety before the VR intervention and at 1 minute and 2 minutes post-intervention. We administered the Acceptability of Intervention Measure to the patients to measure their perceptions of the VR intervention and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure to the medical staff to assess their perception of VR implementation. We performed an analysis of variance to compare pre-operative anxiety over time and assess demographic differences. RESULTS: The patients showed high and consistent acceptability of the pre-operative use of VR among patients, but acceptability varied among medical staff. The patients experienced a statistically significant reduction of pre-operative anxiety (P = .003). CONCLUSION: A brief VR pre-intervention is highly accepted by and very beneficial for patients undergoing oral surgery, positively affecting anxiety reduction. The perception of VR by health care providers needs to be explored to increase acceptability.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Cirurgia Bucal , Terapia de Exposição à Realidade Virtual , Adulto , Humanos , Ansiedade/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ablative mandibular resection with sacrifice of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) results in loss of sensation and decreased quality of life. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional sensory recovery (FSR) of immediate IAN allograft reconstruction performed during ablative mandibular resection at 1 year following surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study that included consecutive subjects who underwent mandibular resection with IAN discontinuity and used a nerve allograft of ≥40 mm. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable is the use of an immediate nerve allograft in mandibular reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The main outcome variable is FSR at 1 year using the Medical Research Council Scale. COVARIATES: Covariates include subject age, sex, specific pathology, nerve gap length, and development of neuropathic pain. ANALYSES: Statistical analysis of comparison of neurosensory outcomes was measured by bivariate statistics, weighted values, repeated measures, analysis of variance, and McNemar test. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 164 subjects, of whom 55 (33.5%) underwent nerve allograft reconstruction and 30 (18.3%) did not have nerve reconstruction. Seventy-nine subjects (48.2%) did not meet the inclusion criteria. In the entire nerve allograft group of 55 subjects, FSR was achieved in 80% at 1 year; however, in benign disease alone, 31 of 33 (94%) achieved FSR at 1 year. In the nonallograft group (all benign disease), only 2 of 30 (7%) achieved FSR at 1 year. The significant covariates were age and pathology. Benign pathologic resections were 5.2 times more likely to achieve FSR than malignancies, and all subjects ≤ 18 years of age achieved FSR. After adjusting for age, sex, pathology, nerve gap length, nerve allograft was significantly associated with achieving FSR at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 5.52, 95% confidence interval = (1.03, 29.51), P value = .045 < .05). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Immediate long-span IAN allograft reconstruction is effective in restoration of sensation with an overall 80% of subjects achieving FSR at 1 year, while benign disease resulted in 94% FSR at 1 year. Immediate IAN reconstruction should be considered with mandibular resection involving the IAN, especially for children and benign disease.
Assuntos
Reconstrução Mandibular , Traumatismos do Nervo Trigêmeo , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Nervo Mandibular/cirurgia , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Traumatismos do Nervo Trigêmeo/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The prevalence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) use is increasing in the general population due to its increased availability, legality, and cultural acceptability. The purpose of the current study was to measure the association of THC use on the vital signs and anesthetic requirements during intravenous (IV) sedation procedures in recreational marijuana users. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. A study sample was chosen from July 2018 to May 2022 based on the following inclusion criteria: patients who underwent toxicology screening due to their history of recent drug use and received IV sedation. The predictor variable of the present study is THC status grouped into THC+ and THC-. THC status was established using urine toxicology. Patients who screened positive for THC were coded THC+. Patients who screened negative for THC were coded THC-. Primary outcome variable was changes in vital signs, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) during IV sedation procedures in THC+ and THC- groups. Secondary outcome variable was difference in medication (midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and ketamine) requirements in THC+ and THC- groups. Covariates included age, gender, race, weight, duration of surgery, smoking history, and alcohol use, data on psychiatric diagnosis and psychiatric medications. Descriptive statistics and 2-sample t test were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study, with 27 patients in the THC+ group and 26 patients in the THC- group. There were no significant statistical differences in the MAP%, HR%, and RR% at T5, T10, T20, and T30 between the THC+ and THC- groups. When comparing THC+ and THC- groups, in bivariate analyses, the THC+ group required, on average, higher doses of fentanyl [83.82 mcg compared to 65 mcg (P = .02)] and propofol [70 mg compared to 45.26 mg (P = .03)] during IV sedation. However, after adjusting the effect of age, gender, and weight, THC had no significant effect on midazolam (P-value = .28), fentanyl (P-value = .12), propofol (P-value = .06) and ketamine (P-value = .86) requirements. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest there are no differences in vital signs or anesthetic requirements between the THC+ and THC- groups.
Assuntos
Ketamina , Uso da Maconha , Propofol , Humanos , Midazolam , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sedação Consciente , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Fentanila , Sinais VitaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Virtual reality (VR) is considered a nonpharmacological intervention to manage pain and anxiety for different procedures. We aimed to review the literature about the role of VR in reducing pain and anxiety in surgical procedures performed in the oral cavity. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using Medline and Embase with no restrictions on language or publication date. Our inclusion criteria were articles related to the use of VR to manage perioperative pain and anxiety on procedures in the oral cavity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The number of publications increased significantly from 2 studies between 2000-2010 to 25 between 2011 and 2021. Of the 27 included studies, 22 (81.4%) studied patients undergoing dental procedures, and 5 (18.5%) in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS). There was heterogeneity in the VR software used in the different studies. Thirteen studies (41.9%) evaluated self or observational assessments of pain and anxiety. Pain alone was evaluated in 9 studies (29%) and anxiety alone in 8 studies (25.8%). Also, 6 studies (19.3%) evaluated physiological parameters such as heart rate and respiratory rate as objective measures of pain and anxiety. In oral surgery studies, VR was effective at reducing acute pain, fear, and anxiety levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research in OMS compared to dentistry. Given that this specialty involves highly stimulating and anxiety-provoking procedures, OMS could benefit from VR intervention for improved patient care.
Assuntos
Manejo da Dor , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , BocaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Telemedicine has been an emerging trend over the past few years and has seen an exponential rise due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracy of planned oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) procedures for patients seen initially by telemedicine in the department of OMS during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Record review of all patients who received telemedicine consultations during the pandemic time frame of March 1, 2020, to March 1, 2021, was performed. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the planned OMS procedure. Accuracy was defined as the ability to conduct the planned surgery with chosen anesthesia (local anesthesia, diazepam + local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, general anesthesia) at the immediate follow-up appointment without the need for further preoperative testing, evaluation, and consultation. The secondary outcomes were to determine the change in surgical plan, anesthesia plan, and medical plan. Predictor variables included age at the time of telemedicine consultation, gender, race, ethnicity, and the type of consult. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were executed. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 286 (64.56%) females and 157 (35.44%) males. The age range of the study population was 9 to 92 years, with a mean age of 33.88 years (standard deviation = 16.29 years). In the cohort of 443 patients who obtained telemedicine consultations, 98.19% were successfully treated at the following appointment. Four hundred thirty-one (97.3%) out of the 443 telemedicine consults pertained to dentoalveolar concerns. Logistic regression analysis showed that neither age nor gender had significant effects on the change of surgical and anesthesia plans. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine can be effectively utilized in performing consultations for routine OMS procedures, especially dentoalveolar surgeries. Telemedicine consultation can also be used to conduct a preoperative assessment to determine anesthesia and setting of care. However, given the lack of control group and the observational nature of this study, the results must be interpreted with caution.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cirurgia Bucal , Telemedicina , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare stock (Biomet-Lorenz Stock, Parsippany, NJ) and custom (TMJ Concepts, Inc., Ventura, CA) total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement prosthetics. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of 17 consecutive patients operated by the same surgeon from 2015 to 2020 comparing stock and custom options for total joint replacement (TJR). The inclusion criteria were patients who documented 1 year of follow-up post-TJR without previous TMJ replacement surgery. The predictor variable was the TMJ prosthetic replacement. The primary clinical outcome variables was pain via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measured at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively and maximum incisal opening measured pre and post-surgery. The other variables were grouped into the following categories: surgery time, length of stay, and unilateral vs bilateral replacements. RESULTS: Our review showed no statistically significant difference in maximum incisal opening, subjective pain score, hospital stay, surgical time, or complication rate between Biomet-Lorenz stock and TMJ Concepts, Inc. custom total joint replacement. Bilateral TJR, irrespective of prosthesis type, did have greater improvement in maximal incisal opening (MIO) compared with unilateral that was statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in the pain VAS or MIO using either stock or custom TJR. Both should be considered good surgical options for improvements in patient function and long-term jaw stability.
Assuntos
Prótese Articular , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Humanos , Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the association between antihypertensive medication use and mandibular cortical thickness. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cross-sectional study was comprised of a study sample of 169 patients aged 40 to 69. Cone beam computed tomography scans were examined. The buccal cortical thickness of the mandibular ramus was measured. Participants were separated into the control or study group based on use of antihypertensive medications. The predictor variable was the use of antihypertensive medications. The primary outcome variable was cortical thickness of the mandible. Age was identified as a covariate affecting the outcome variable. The data was analyzed with a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to remove the effect of age on the outcome variable. The groups were subdivided based on the sex of the patient. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 169 patients with a mean age of 52.1, and 54% were female. There were 67 patients in the antihypertensive group (39.6%). A mean difference of 0.21 mm was found (P = .0010, 95% CI 0.09, 0.34 mm). The difference persisted after adjusting for age with one-way ANCOVA testing (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there may be an association between antihypertensive use and mandibular cortical thickness. Age may be an effect modifier with the effect increasing in older patients.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Osso Cortical , Mandíbula , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osso Cortical/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the success rate of osseointegrated dental implants placed secondarily in fibula free flaps using the Albrektsson and colleagues criteria. Material and Methods: A computerized database search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL. Specific ascertainment criteria were applied for the inclusion of the eligible studies. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis PRISMA checklist. Risk of bias was assessed for all the included studies. Results: The meta-analysis was carried using ten studies that met the inclusion criteria. The present review pooled data obtained from 242 patients (167 males and 75 females), with the age range of 13 to 79 years. A total of 848 dental implants were placed in the free fibula flaps. All dental implants were placed in a delayed fashion, ranging from 14 to 192 months. The estimated proportion of successful implants placed in fibula flaps used to reconstruct the maxillomandibular complex was 0.94 or 94% (95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.91 to 0.96]) with an insignificant heterogeneity of 37%, P = 0.12. Using a random effect model the annual implant failure rate was 0.02 with a 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.03. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis strongly indicate that using objective criteria, delayed implant placement in free fibula flaps is highly successful.