Out-of-office hours' elective surgical intensive care admissions and their associated complications.

BACKGROUND: The 'weekend' effect is a controversial theory that links reduced staffing levels, staffing seniority and supportive services at hospitals during 'out-of-office hours' time periods with worsening patient outcomes. It is uncertain whether admitting elective surgery patients to intensive care units (ICU) during 'out-of-office hours' time periods mitigates this affect through higher staffing ratios and seniority. METHODS: Over a 3-year period in Western Australia's largest private hospital, this retrospective nested-cohort study compared all elective surgical patients admitted to the ICU based on whether their admission occurred 'in-office hours' (Monday-Friday 08.00-18.00 hours) or 'out-of-office hours' (all other times). The main outcomes were surgical complications using the Dindo-Clavien classification and length-of-stay data. RESULTS: Of the total 4363 ICU admissions, 3584 ICU admissions were planned following elective surgery resulting in 2515 (70.2%) in-office hours and 1069 (29.8%) out-of-office hours elective ICU surgical admissions. Out-of-office hours ICU admissions following elective surgery were associated with an increased risk of infection (P = 0.029), blood transfusion (P = 0.020), total parental nutrition (P < 0.001) and unplanned re-operations (P = 0.027). Out-of-office hours ICU admissions were also associated with an increased hospital length-of-stay, with (1.74 days longer, P < 0.0001) and without (2.8 days longer, P < 0.001) adjusting for severity of acute and chronic illnesses and inter-hospital transfers (12.3 versus 9.8%, P = 0.024). Hospital mortality (1.2 versus 0.7%, P = 0.111) was low and similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: Out-of-office hours ICU admissions following elective surgery is common and associated with serious post-operative complications culminating in significantly longer hospital length-of-stays and greater transfers with important patient and health economic implications.

Five year clinical follow up of patients who have had off pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has become a common technique for conducting coronary artery surgery. There has been some concern that the anastomoses might not be conducted as effectively on the beating heart, which could lead to poor long-term results. The aim of the present study was to follow up all patients who had undergone OPCAB at our institution to determine clinical outcomes up to 5 years postoperatively. METHODS: All living patients who had undergone OPCAB up until December 2000 were telephoned. For those who could be contacted, a detailed questionnaire was completed and the data were analysed. RESULTS: The technique of OPCAB was carried out on 312 patients. Thirteen of these patients died, five perioperatively. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 94.6% and freedom from cardiac related events was 92.1%. There were only two patients with angina worse than class I. Patients showed a high rate of compliance with risk factor management. Forty per cent of patients claimed to have had psychological problems related to the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-term results of OPCAB are very satisfactory, but randomised trials are needed to see whether they are different from the results of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.