Safety attitudes, burnout and well-being among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Indo-Pacific regional cross-sectional study.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact in Asia and has placed significant burden on already stretched healthcare systems. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on the safety attitudes among healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as their associated demographic and occupational factors, and measures of burnout, depression and anxiety. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study utilising snowball sampling was performed involving doctors, nurses and allied health professions from 23 hospitals in Singapore, Malaysia, India and Indonesia between 29 May 2020 and 13 July 2020. This survey collated demographic data and workplace conditions and included three validated questionnaires: the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. We performed multivariate mixed-model regression to assess independent associations with the SAQ total percentage agree rate (PAR). Results: We obtained 3,163 responses. The SAQ total PARs were found to be 35.7%, 15.0%, 51.0% and 3.3% among the respondents from Singapore, Malaysia, India and Indonesia, respectively. Burnout scores were highest among respondents from Indonesia and lowest among respondents from India (70.9%-85.4% vs. 56.3%-63.6%, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that meeting burnout and depression thresholds and shifts lasting ≥12 h were significantly associated with lower SAQ total PAR. Conclusion: Addressing the factors contributing to high burnout and depression and placing strict limits on work hours per shift may contribute significantly towards improving safety culture among HCWs and should remain priorities during the pandemic.

Effect of erroneous body-weight estimation on outcome of thrombolyzed stroke patients.

Intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), dose determined by patients' body-weight, remains the only approved drug treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since a shorter onset-to-treatment time results in better functional outcome, treatment is often initiated according to the estimated or last-known body-weight of the patient. This approach may result in underdosing or overdosing of tPA. In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the extent of error in tPA dosing in our AIS cohort and its impact on functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Consecutive AIS patients, receiving IV-tPA, dose determined by the estimated body-weight, at three tertiary centers between January and December 2017 were included. Collected data included information about demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke subtype and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Estimated and measured body-weights were recorded. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 2 or more defined unfavorable outcome. The study included 150 patients. Median age was 64 -years (IQR 55-75) with male preponderance (67%) and median NIHSS score of 9 points (IQR 6-17). Mean measured weight of our study population was 58 (SD 13) kg. Median difference between actual and estimated body-weight was 3 kg (IQR 1.5-6). Difference was more than 10% in 35 (23.3%) patients. Good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was achieved by 74 (49.3%) patients and 10 (6.8%) developed SICH. NIHSS (OR 1.288; 95% CI 1.157-1.435, p < 0.001) and large artery atherosclerosis (OR 5.878; 95% CI 1.929-17.910, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of unfavorable functional outcome. Our finding of the statistically insignificant 2.5-fold increase in poor outcomes among patients where the estimated and actual weight differed by more than 10% should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Significant difference occurs between estimated and actual body-weight in a considerable proportion of thrombolysed AIS patients. However, this discrepancy does not affect functional outcome or the risk of SICH.

Quality of life in Wilson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of Quality of life (QoL) is fast assuming significance as the measure of health in many disorders. AIM: To correlate clinical severity and QoL in patients with Wilson's disease (WD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated patients of WD on regular follow up for at least two years and aged over 18 years using Neurological Symptom Score (NSS) for clinical severity and WHO-BREF for QoL at a university teaching hospital. Patients with inability to respond to the questionnaire due to behavioral problems, low IQ or other disease related factors were excluded. These 30 patients (M:F:: 23:7) had a mean age of 27.97 +/- 11.16 years at evaluation and the mean duration of treatment of 9.2 +/- 6.4 years. RESULTS: All four domains of WHO-QoL-BREF viz., Physical, Psychological, Social and Environmental correlated well with each other (p < 0.01). The NSS correlated inversely with the physical domain (p < 0.02), while the duration of treatment had a positive correlation with the physical domain (p < 0.01). None of the other features of QoL showed any significant correlation with age, NSS or duration of treatment. CONCLUSION: QoL is complementary to formal neurological assessment and should be routinely incorporated in the evaluation of outcome of patients with WD and other chronic neurological disorders.