Functional outcomes, union rate, and complications of the Anser Clavicle Pin at 1 year: a novel intramedullary device in managing midshaft clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults leads to better union rates, improved early functional outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction compared with nonoperative treatment. However, both intramedullary fixation and plate osteosynthesis are subject to a specific array of disadvantages and complications. The Anser Clavicle Pin is a novel intramedullary device designed to address these disadvantages and complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the union rate, functional outcomes, and complications of the Anser Clavicle Pin at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A prospective explorative case series including 20 patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures was performed in 2 hospitals. The primary outcomes were union rate, functional outcomes (Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score), and complications. The secondary outcomes were closed reduction rate, operative time, image-intensifier time, hospital stay, incision length, time to radiologic union, postoperative pain reduction, reoperation rate, health-related quality-of-life score, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There was a 100% union rate. The Constant-Murley score at 1 year was 96.7 (standard deviation [SD], 5). The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 5.1 (SD, 10). There were no infections, neuropathy of the supraclavicular nerve, or hardware irritation requiring removal of hardware. Three device-related complications (15%) occurred, including plastic deformation, protrusion, and hardware failure. The satisfaction score was 8.9 (SD, 1) on the visual analog scale at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Managing displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with the Anser Clavicle Pin results in a 100% union rate and excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. It has a low non-device-related complication rate, and the device-related complications that occurred in this series may be prevented in the future.

A feedback protocol improves the diagnostic performance of MR arthrography by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic-resonance-arthrography (MRA) by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists in patients with traumatic-anterior-shoulder-instability (TASI), after feedback protocol execution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five surgically confirmed MRA's were used to enhance personal feedback, to discuss differences in outcome between MRA assessment and surgical findings and to fine-tune definition interpretation agreement of 7 different TASI-related lesions, between experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and experienced orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. After execution of the feedback protocol 20 new, surgically confirmed, MRA's were assessed by 2 experienced musculoskeletal radiologists using a seven-lesion standardized scoring form. Kappa coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and differences in percentage agreement or correct diagnosis (p-value, McNemar's test) were calculated per lesion and overall per 7 lesion types to assess whether diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy was improved. RESULTS: Per 7 lesion types, the overall kappa and percentage of agreement, between the 2 radiologists, were dramatically increased in comparison with our former study (k=0.81 versus k=0.48 and 90.7% versus 78.2%, respectively). The overall sensitivity of radiologist 1 increased from 45.9% to 87.8%, the overall sensitivity of radiologist 2 increased from 63.5% to 79.6% and the overall specificity of radiologist 2 increased from 80.1% to 85.7%. Furthermore, the overall percentage of correct diagnosis of both radiologist was also exceedingly higher (85.7% and 83.6%) compared to our former study (74.4% and 74.8%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of our feedback protocol dramatically improved the reproducibility and accuracy of high field MRA by experienced musculoskeletal radiologist in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

Are radiologists superior to orthopaedic surgeons in diagnosing instability-related shoulder lesions on magnetic resonance arthrography? A multicenter reproducibility and accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy of musculoskeletal radiologists with orthopaedic shoulder surgeons in 2 large medical centers in assessing magnetic resonance arthrograms (MRAs) of patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: Forty-five surgically confirmed MRAs were assessed by 4 radiologists, 4 orthopaedic surgeons, 2 radiologic teams, and 2 orthopaedic teams. During MRA assessment and surgery, the same 7-lesion scoring form was used. κ Coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and differences in percentage of agreement or correct diagnosis (P < .05, McNemar test) were calculated per lesion and overall per the 7 lesion types. RESULTS: The overall κ between the individual radiologists (κ = 0.51, κ = 0.46) and orthopaedic surgeons (κ = 0.46, κ = 0.41) was moderate. Although the overall percentage of agreement between the radiologists was slightly higher than that between the orthopaedic surgeons in both centers (80.0% vs 77.5% and 75.2% vs 73.7%), there was no significant difference. In each medical center, however, the most experienced orthopaedic surgeon was exceedingly more accurate than both radiologists per the 7 lesion types (81.9% vs 72.4%/74.6% and 76.5% vs 67.3%/73.7%). In 3 of 4 cases, this difference was significant. Overall accuracy improvement through consensus assessment was merely established for the weakest member of each team. CONCLUSION: Experienced orthopaedic surgeons are more accurate than radiologists in assessing traumatic anterior shoulder instability-related lesions on MRA. In case of diagnosis disagreement, these orthopaedic surgeons should base their treatment decision on their own MRA interpretation.

Sural artery injury with arteriovenous fistula: case report about a rare complication following arthroscopic medial meniscectomy.

This case report presents a patient with hematoma and pain after a knee arthroscopy with partial medial meniscectomy. A lesion of the sural artery was treated by endovascular coiling. The level of evidence is IV.