Triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infections: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The scope of this article is to perform a meta-analysis of the studies that compare the use of triclosan-coated sutures (TCS) to uncoated sutures in prevention of surgical-site infections (SSIs). METHODS: A systematic search of randomized and non-randomized studies was carried out on Pubmed and Scopus databases until July 2016. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 30 studies (19 randomized, 11 non-randomized; 15,385 procedures) gave evidence that TCS were associated with a lower risk of SSIs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81). Triclosan-coated sutures were associated with lower risk for SSIs in high-quality randomized studies (Jadad score 4 or 5). A lower risk for the development of SSIs based on wound classification was observed in clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated but not for dirty procedures. No benefit was observed in specific types of surgery: colorectal, cardiac, lower limb vascular or breast surgery. Only a trend was found for lower risk for wound dehiscence, whereas no difference was observed for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Further randomized studies are needed to confirm the role of TCS in specific surgical procedures and whether or not they are related with lower risk for mortality.

Gentamicin-Collagen Sponges for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: To study the effectiveness of gentamicin-collagen sponges (GCS) for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed (up to April 2015) to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of GCS for the prevention of SSIs. A random effects model was applied. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs (8,472 patients) were included. Gentamicin-collagen sponges were associated with a lower risk of SSIs (risk ratio [RR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.84). Based on Jadad scores, a lower risk for the development of SSI was presented in lower-quality studies (Jadad <3; RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.71), but no difference was observed in high-quality studies (Jadad ≥3; RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.02). No difference was observed in all-cause deaths in the GCS group compared with the control group (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.56-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: When analyzing lower-quality studies or only clean procedures, GCS significantly reduced the risk of SSI. Further high-quality randomized studies are needed to confirm the benefit of GCS for lowering mortality rates.

Maternal Influenza Vaccination and Risk for Congenital Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically summarize the literature on maternal influenza vaccination and the risk for congenital malformations using the methodology of meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases (up to December 2014) as well as ClinicalTrials.gov (May 2015) and references of relevant articles were searched. The search strategy included combinations of the terms "influenza," "vaccin*," "pregnan*," "safe*," "adverse," "congenital," "malformation," "defect," and "anomal*." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies examined the association between antepartum or preconceptional maternal immunization with inactivated influenza vaccines (seasonal trivalent or monovalent H1N1) and the risk for congenital malformations. Studies with no or inappropriate control group (comparison with population background rates or other vaccine types) were excluded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The risk for congenital anomalies after influenza vaccination was examined in 15 studies: 14 cohorts (events per vaccinated compared with unvaccinated: 859/32,774 [2.6%] compared with 7,644/245,314 [3.1%]) and one case-control study (vaccinated per cases compared with controls: 1,351/3,618 [37.3%] compared with 511/1,225 [41.7%]). Eight studies reported on first-trimester immunization (events per vaccinated compared with unvaccinated: 258/4,733 [5.4%] compared with 6,470/196,054 [3.3%]). No association was found between congenital defects and influenza vaccination at any trimester of pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.07; 15 studies; I2=36) or at the first trimester (OR 1.03, 0.91-1.18; eight studies; I2=0). When assessing only major malformations, no increased risk was detected after immunization at any trimester (OR 0.99, 0.88-1.11; 12 studies; I2=31.5) or at the first trimester (OR 0.98, 0.83-1.16; seven studies; I2=0). Neither adjuvanted (OR 1.06, 0.95-1.20; five studies; I2=18.8) nor unadjuvanted vaccines (OR 0.89, 0.75-1.04; seven studies; I2=22.6) were associated with an increased risk for congenital defects. CONCLUSION: This systematic review did not indicate an increased risk for congenital anomalies after maternal influenza immunization adding to the evidence base on the safety of influenza vaccination in pregnancy.

Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infectious complications after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation are increasing over time and are associated with substantial mortality and healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to systematically summarize the literature on risk factors for infection after pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation. Electronic searches (up to January 2014) were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Sixty studies (21 prospective, 9 case-control, and 30 retrospective cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria. The average device infection rate was 1-1.3%. In the meta-analysis, significant host-related risk factors for infection included diabetes mellitus (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] = 2.08 [1.62-2.67]), end-stage renal disease (OR = 8.73 [3.42-22.31]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 2.95 [1.78-4.90]), corticosteroid use (OR = 3.44 [1.62-7.32]), history of the previous device infection (OR = 7.84 [1.94-31.60]), renal insufficiency (OR = 3.02 [1.38-6.64]), malignancy (OR = 2.23 [1.26-3.95]), heart failure (OR = 1.65 [1.14-2.39]), pre-procedural fever (OR = 4.27 [1.13-16.12]), anticoagulant drug use (OR = 1.59 [1.01-2.48]), and skin disorders (OR = 2.46 [1.04-5.80]). Regarding procedure-related factors, post-operative haematoma (OR = 8.46 [4.01-17.86]), reintervention for lead dislodgement (OR = 6.37 [2.93-13.82]), device replacement/revision (OR = 1.98 [1.46-2.70]), lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (OR = 0.32 [0.18-0.55]), temporary pacing (OR = 2.31 [1.36-3.92]), inexperienced operator (OR = 2.85 [1.23-6.58]), and procedure duration (weighted mean difference = 9.89 [0.52-19.25]) were all predictors of CIED infection. Among device-related characteristics, abdominal pocket (OR = 4.01 [2.48-6.49]), epicardial leads (OR = 8.09 [3.46-18.92]), positioning of two or more leads (OR = 2.02 [1.11-3.69]), and dual-chamber systems (OR = 1.45 [1.02-2.05]) predisposed to device infection. This systematic review on risk factors for CIED infection may contribute to developing better infection control strategies for high-risk patients and can also help risk assessment in the management of device revisions.

Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.

Predictors of mortality in patients with infections due to multi-drug resistant Gram negative bacteria: the study, the patient, the bug or the drug?

OBJECTIVE: To study the predictors of mortality among patients with multi-drug resistant Gram negative (MDRGN) infections and the role of MDRGN bacteria in the outcome of such patients. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched (until June 30, 2012). Data were extracted and analyzed using the technique of meta-analysis. RESULTS: 30 studies (25 retrospective) were included in the analysis; 9 provided data on predictors of mortality for MDRGN infections only, while 21 provided data for MDRGN vs non-MDRGN infections. Acinetobacter spp were the most commonly studied bacteria followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae. Significant diversity was observed among studies regarding the evaluated predictors of mortality. Infection severity and underlying diseases were the most commonly reported independent predictors of mortality followed by multidrug resistance, inappropriate treatment and increasing age. In studies that included only patients with MDRGN infections, cancer (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.39) and prior or current ICU stay (1.27, 1.02-1.56) were associated with mortality. In studies that included patients with MDRGN and non-MDRGN infections, septic shock (3.36, 2.47-4.57), ICU stay (2.15, 1.45-3.20), pneumonia (1.65, 1.09-2.52), isolation of MDRGN bacteria (1.49, 1.21-1.83), inappropriate definitive (2.05, 1.12-3.76) and empirical treatment (1.37, 1.25-1.51), and male gender (1.13, 1.05-1.21) were most commonly observed in patients who died than patients who survived. CONCLUSION: Significant diversity and statistical heterogeneity was observed. Beyond comorbidity and severity scores, MDR and inappropriate treatment were also identified as predictors of mortality.

Risk factors for development of Clostridium difficile infection due to BI/NAP1/027 strain: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for the development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) due to C. difficile BI/NAP1/027 strain. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies that sought to identify risk factors for CDI due to the BI/NAP1/027 strain. The technique of meta-analysis was applied. RESULTS: Five studies compared CDI BI/NAP1/027 patients to CDI patients infected with non-BI/NAP1/027 strains, one compared CDI BI/NAP1/027 patients to non-CDI patients, and one provided data for both comparisons. The meta-analysis showed that fluoroquinolones were associated with a higher risk of CDI due to BI/NAP1/027 when compared to non-BI/NAP1/027 CDI (odds ratio (OR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.37-2.80). A trend towards a lower risk for CDI due to BI/NAP1/027 was observed with cephalosporins when compared to non-BI/NAP1/027 CDI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.07). Prior macrolides were not associated with a higher risk for CDI BI/NAP1/027 when compared with non-BI/NAP1/027 CDI controls (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.78). Clindamycin administration was associated with a lower risk for CDI due to BI/NAP1/027 when compared to non-BI/NAP1/027 CDI (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.48). Age over 65 years was associated with an increased risk of CDI BI/NAP1/027 compared to non-BI/NAP1/027 CDI (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.31-2.38). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones and age over 65 years were associated with a higher risk of CDI due to the BI/NAP1/027 strain. Clindamycin was associated with a lower risk of CDI due to BI/NAP1/027.