RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic therapy with self-expanding metallic endoprostheses in the management of inoperable primary malignant esophageal obstruction or stenosis and the cost-effectiveness of the method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 5/1997-12/2002, obstruction of the esophagus was diagnosed in 78 patients (52 males, 26 females, age range 53-102, mean 72.3 years). The etiology was squamous cell carcinoma (n=42) and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (n=36). In total, 89 ultraflex metal stents were introduced endoscopically. In 46 patients dilation with Savary dilators prior to stent placement was required. A cost-effective analysis was performed, comparing oesophageal stenting with laser therapy. RESULTS: Stents were placed successfully in all patients. After 48 h, all patients were able to tolerate solid or semi-solid food. During the follow-up period 8 patients developed dysphagia due to food impaction (treated successfully endoscopically). Eleven patients developed recurrent dysphagia 4-16 weeks after stenting due to tumor overgrowth and were treated with placement of a second stent. The median survival time was 18 weeks. There was no survival difference between squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. A similar cost was calculated for both procedures. A significant improvement in quality of life was noted in patients undergoing stenting (96% and 75% vs. 71% and 57% for the first two months). CONCLUSION: Placement of self-expanding metal stents is a safe and cost-effective treatment modality that improves the quality of life, compared with laser therapy, for patients with inoperable malignant esophageal obstruction.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of endoscopic palliative treatment with selfexpanding metallic stents with that of stoma creation in the management of inoperable malignant colonic obstructions. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with inoperable malignant partial obstruction (due to metastases, hemodynamic instability, or pulmonary instability) in the left colon arising from colorectal or ovarian cancer were included in the study. Fifteen were randomized to undergo palliative metallic colonic stent placement and 15 to undergo stoma creation. The efficacy and safety of the two methods was compared. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed, including the cost of postinterventional care. RESULTS: Stents were placed successfully in 14 of 15 patients. In one patient with obstruction of a tortuous rectosigmoid flexure colon, stenting was not possible; this patient was excluded from the study. During the follow-up period, a moderate, nonocclusive ingrowth of tumor into the stent lumen was observed in six patients; they were all treated with internal laser ablation. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that although the stoma creation procedure was less expensive, the total difference in average costs for the two methods was 6.9% (132 Euros). CONCLUSIONS: Self-expanding metallic stent placement is a palliative alternative to colostomy for patients with inoperable malignant colonic strictures. This treatment option provides a better quality of life for the patient, without the psychological repercussions of a colostomy, and it appears to be cost-effective.
