The ability of fluconazole to penetrate into ventilated, healthy and inflamed lung tissue in a model of severe sepsis in rats.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We measured the extracellular concentrations of fluconazole in lung tissue of septic and healthy rats. METHODS: A single intravenous dose of 6 mg/kg total body weight of fluconazole was administered intravenously to rats following insertion of microdialysis probes into lung tissue. Another probe was inserted into skeletal muscle and served as control. RESULTS: The mean peak concentration (C(max)), time to C(max), area under the concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 6 h (fAUC(0-6)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to ∞ of unbound fluconazole for healthy lung were 11.0 ± 2.3 mg/l, 1.9 ± 1.5 h, 47.4 ± 8.6 mg·h/l and 233.7 ± 121.1 mg·h/l, respectively. The corresponding values for inflamed lung were 11.8 ± 1.7 mg/l, 1.5 ± 0.0 h, 52.9 ± 6.2 mg·h/l and 212.6 ± 79.7 mg·h/l, respectively. The mean apparent terminal elimination half-lives of fluconazole ranged from 12.3 to 22.4 h between compartments. The ratios of the fAUC(0-6) for lung to the fAUC(0-6) for plasma were 1.38 ± 0.39 and 1.32 ± 0.04 for healthy and inflamed lung, respectively. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that free fluconazole levels in plasma, the extracellular space fluid of lung tissue and skeletal muscle are almost superimposable during inflammatory and normal conditions.

Concentrations of voriconazole in healthy and inflamed lung in rats.

By utilizing the microdialysis technique, we investigated the pharmacokinetic profile of voriconazole in the interstitium of the lungs and skeletal muscle tissue of rats after a single intravenous dose under healthy and inflammatory conditions. As expected, voriconazole penetrated excellently into the interstitium of tissues, and its levels were descriptively almost identical to free concentration-versus-time profiles in plasma.

Randomized comparison of mounted versus unmounted stents: the multicenter COMUS trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of premounted stents on a delivery balloon has almost completely eliminated the initially used hand-crimping procedure, no data are available that prove the superiority of one or the other approach on a randomized basis. Therefore, this study was designed to examine whether the use of premounted stents is comparable with the hand-crimping procedure. METHODS: A total of 123 patients (64 treated with unmounted stents, 59 treated with premounted stents) were examined in a multicenter, randomized, prospective study. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. RESULTS: Primary end points (acute, postinterventional [within 72 hours], and late complications related to the stenting procedure) were reached in 1 patient treated with an unmounted stent versus 2 patients with mounted stents (P = not significant). In patients with angiographic follow up (n = 84, mean follow-up period 6 +/- 1 months), the total rate of restenosis was 27% (unmounted 12, mounted 11, P = not significant). Secondary end points were procedural success of stenting and maximal balloon inflation pressure needed for optimal stenting results by use of angiography. There were no differences in secondary end points for both techniques. The mean balloon pressure was 12.56 +/- 2.1 atmospheres (unmounted) and 12.12 +/- 1.92 atmospheres (mounted, P = not significant). CONCLUSION: Stenting with premounted devices was demonstrated to have a similar clinical and angiographic outcome as the hand-crimping approach for maximal inflation pressure, procedural success, major cardiac events, and rate of restenosis after 6 months of follow up. Thus, the more convenient use of a premounted stent provides procedural safety and efficacy comparable with a hand-crimped system.