Imaging of Patients Suspected of SLAP Tear: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND. Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears are a common shoulder pathology. Although MRI is the imaging reference standard for diagnosis of this pathology, the cost-effectiveness of common MRI strategies is unclear. OBJECTIVE. The primary objective of our study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the common MRI-based strategies used for the diagnosis of SLAP tears. METHODS. We created decision analytic models from the perspective of the U.S. health care system over a 2-year time horizon for a hypothetical population of 25-year-old patients with a previous diagnosis of SLAP tear. We used the decision models to compare the differences in incremental cost-effectiveness of the common MRI strategies, which included combinations of 1.5-T and 3-T MR arthrography (MRA) and unenhanced MRI protocols, and the resulting treatment applied for these patients. Input data on cost, probability, and utility estimates were obtained through a comprehensive literature search. The primary effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life years. Costs were estimated in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS. When all imaging strategies were considered, the unenhanced 3-T MRI-based imaging strategy was the preferred and dominant option over 3-T MRA and 1.5-T imaging (MRI and MRA). When the model was run without 3-T imaging as an option, 1.5-T MRA was the favored option. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the same preferred imaging strategy results. CONCLUSION. An unenhanced 3-T MRI-based strategy is the most cost-effective imaging option for patients with suspected SLAP tear. When 3-T imaging is not available, 1.5-T MRA is more cost-effective than 1.5-T MRI. The main driver of these results is the fact that 3-T MRI and 1.5-T MRA are the most specific tests in these respective scenarios, which results in fewer false-positives, prevents unnecessary surgeries, and leads to decreased costs. CLINICAL IMPACT. Our cost-effectiveness model findings complement prior diagnostic accuracy work, helping produce a more comprehensive approach to define imaging utility for radiologists, clinicians, and patients with SLAP tears who have access to various types of MRI options.

Comparison between radiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of sacroiliitis in the initial diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: a cost-effectiveness study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of radiography and MRI-based imaging strategies for the initial diagnosis of sacroiliitis in a hypothetical population with suspected axial spondyloarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analytic model from the health care system perspective for patients with inflammatory back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis was used to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of 3 imaging strategies for the sacroiliac joints over a 3-year horizon: radiography, MRI, and radiography followed by MRI. Comprehensive literature search and expert opinion provided input data on cost, probability, and utility estimates. The primary effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with a willingness-to-pay threshold set to $100,000/QALY gained (2018 American dollars). RESULTS: Radiography was the least costly strategy ($46,220). Radiography followed by MRI was the most effective strategy over a 3-year course (2.64 QALYs). Radiography was the most cost-effective strategy. MRI-based and radiography followed by MRI-based strategies were not found to be cost-effective imaging options for this patient population. Radiography remained the most cost-effective strategy over all willingness-to-pay thresholds up to $100,000. CONCLUSION: Radiography is the most cost-effective imaging strategy for the initial diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with inflammatory back pain suspicious for axial spondyloarthritis.

Interrater Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale with Standardized Movement Speeds: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the interrater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) using consistent movement speeds guided by a metronome when measuring wrist flexor and ankle plantar flexor spasticity in patients with an upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion. The MAS has been found to have inconsistent interrater reliability for scoring the degree of spasticity. Method: This quantitative cross-sectional pilot study occurred in the outpatient spasticity clinic of a community rehabilitation hospital. Participants were a convenience sample of 20 patients with UMN lesions receiving botulinum toxin type A injections for focal spasticity. For each of the muscle groups tested, different pairs of evaluators scored spasticity on the MAS at a velocity of 130° per second. Evaluators were physical therapy students trained by an experienced physical therapist in MAS assessment. Weighted κ values were calculated to measure interrater reliability for each muscle group. Results: The weighted κ values for the wrist flexors and ankle plantar flexors were, respectively, moderate (κw = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.87) and slight (κw = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.34, 0.50). Conclusion: Using consistent movement velocity, novice evaluators were able to score spasticity with reasonable interrater reliability when assessing the wrist flexors but not the ankle plantar flexors.

Objectif : évaluer la fiabilité interévaluateur de l'échelle modifiée d'Ashworth (ÉMA) à l'aide de vitesses de mouvement uniformes orientées par un métronome pour mesurer la spasticité des fléchisseurs du poignet et des fléchisseurs plantaires de la cheville chez les patients victimes d'une lésion des motoneurones supérieurs (MNS). Il a été établi que la fiabilité interévaluateur des MNS était inégale lors du classement du degré de spasticité. Méthodologie : la présente étude pilote transversale quantitative a eu lieu à la clinique de spasticité ambulatoire d'un hôpital de réadaptation communautaire. Les participants potentiels provenaient d'un échantillon de commodité formé de 20 patients victimes de lésions des MNS qui se faisaient injecter de la toxine botulique de type A pour soulager leur spasticité focale. Des dyades d'évaluateurs différentes ont classé la spasticité sur l'ÉMA pour chacun des groupes musculaires évalués, à une vélocité de 130 degrés à la seconde. Les évaluateurs étaient des étudiants en physiothérapie formés par un physiothérapeute chevronné dans l'évaluation de l'ÉMA. Ils ont calculé les valeurs kappa pondérées pour mesurer la fiabilité interévaluateur de chaque groupe musculaire. Résultats : les valeurs kappa pondérées des fléchisseurs du poignet et des fléchisseurs plantaires de la cheville étaient modérées (κp = 0,54; IC à 95 % : 0,21; 0,87) et modestes (κp = 0,08; IC à 95 % : −0,34; 0,50), respectivement. Conclusion : au moyen d'une vélocité de mouvement uniforme, les évaluateurs novices ont pu respecter une fiabilité interévaluateur raisonnable pour classer la spasticité des fléchisseurs du poignet, mais pas des fléchisseurs plantaires de la cheville.

Comparison Between Image-Guided and Landmark-Based Glenohumeral Joint Injections for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of landmark-based and image-guided intraarticular steroid injections for the initial treatment of a population with adhesive capsulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analytic model from the health care system perspective over a 6-month time frame for 50-year-old patients with clinical findings consistent with adhesive capsulitis was used to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of three techniques for administering intraarticular steroid to the glenohumeral joint: landmark based (also called blind), ultrasound guided, and fluoroscopy guided. Input data on cost, probability, and utility estimates were obtained through a comprehensive literature search and from expert opinion. The primary effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Costs were estimated in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided injections were the dominant strategy for the base case, because it was the least expensive ($1280) and most effective (0.4096 QALY) strategy of the three options overall. The model was sensitive to the probabilities of getting the steroid into the joint by means of blind, ultrasound-guided, and fluoroscopy-guided techniques and to the costs of the ultrasound-guided and blind techniques. Two-way sensitivity analyses showed that ultrasound-guided injections were favored over blind and fluoroscopy-guided injections over a range of reasonable probabilities and costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ultrasound-guided injections were cost-effective in 44% of simulations, compared with 34% for blind injections and 22% for fluoroscopy-guided injections and over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided injections are the most cost-effective option for the initial steroid-based treatment of patients with adhesive capsulitis. Blind and fluoroscopy-guided injections can also be cost-effective when performed by a clinician likely to accurately administer the medication into the correct location.