Change from semi-rigid to soft collars for prehospital management of trauma patients: An observational study.

Objectives: Protection of the cervical spine is recommended following multisystem injury. In 2021, Ambulance Victoria changed clinical practice guidelines to apply soft collars instead of semi-rigid collars for suspected cervical spine injury. The aim of this study was to describe associated changes in imaging practices and diagnoses of pressure sores, hospital acquired pneumonia, and spinal cord injury. Methods: A retrospective pre- and postintervention study was conducted including all consecutive patients that presented to an adult major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia with a cervical collar placed by emergency medical services over two 3-month periods. Results: There were 1762 patients included. A computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine was performed in 795 (88.4%) patients in the semi-rigid collar period and 810 (93.8%) in the soft collar period (p = 0.001). Soft collars were associated with higher rates of clearance of the cervical spine in the emergency department (ED) (odds ratio [OR] 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.36-5.09). There were no differences in diagnosis of pressure sores (0.11% vs. 0.23%, p = 0.97) or hospital acquired pneumonia (2.0% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.44) or cervical spinal cord injury (0.45% vs. 0.81%; p = 0.50). Conclusions: Following a change from prehospital semi-rigid collars to soft collars, more patients were investigated with a CT scan and more frequent clearance of the cervical spine occurred in the ED. There were no differences in the rates of spinal cord injuries, pressure sores or hospital acquired pneumonia, but the study was underpowered to detect significant differences. The practice of soft collars for prehospital care of patients with suspected neck injury requires ongoing surveillance.

Timing and volume of transfusion for adult major trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: a registry-based cohort study.

Introduction: Transfusion of blood components is vital for the resuscitation of injured patients in hemorrhagic shock. Delays in initiating transfusion have been associated with harm, as has excess transfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate variables associated with hospital mortality, with a focus on the two modifiable risk factors- time to initiate transfusion and volume of blood components-with hospital mortality. Methods: This was a registry-based cohort study, including all consecutive adult patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mm Hg and transfusion of blood components) to a level 1 adult trauma center during a 5-year period (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2021). Associations with hospital mortality were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis, with final models developed using backward elimination. Results: There were 195 patients included and there were 49 (25.1%) in-hospital deaths. The median time to first transfusion was 10 (IQR 6-16) minutes. Age (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.08), initial SBP (aOR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.98), intracranial bleeding or diffuse axonal injury (aOR 2.63; 95% CI: 1.11 to 6.23), and the volume of blood components in the first 4 hours (aOR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.13) were associated with mortality. Time to transfusion was not associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.03). Among the 90 patients who underwent urgent transfer to the operating room or angiography suite, the median time to transfer was 2.38 hours (IQR 1.5-3.7). In this subgroup, age (aOR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.18) and volume of blood components (aOR 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.34) were associated with mortality. Discussion: In this setting where times to transfusion are short, further reductions in the time to transfusion are unlikely to improve outcome. In our population, for every unit of blood component transfused, the adjusted odds of death increased by 8%. These findings suggest investigation into strategies to achieve earlier control of hemorrhage. Level of evidence: III.

Prevalence of alcohol and other drug detections in non-transport injury events.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of alcohol and/or other drug (AOD) detections in suspected major trauma patients with non-transport injuries who presented to an adult major trauma centre. METHODS: This registry-based cohort study examined the prevalence of AOD detections in patients aged ≥18 years who: (i) sustained non-transport injuries; and (ii) met predefined trauma call-out criteria and were therefore managed by an interdisciplinary trauma team between 1 July 2021 and 31 December 2022. Prevalence was measured using routine in-hospital blood alcohol and urine drug screens. RESULTS: A total of 1469 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of cases with a valid blood test (n = 1248, 85.0%), alcohol was detected in 313 (25.1%) patients. Of the 733 (49.9%) cases with urine drug screen results, cannabinoids were most commonly detected (n = 103, 14.1%), followed by benzodiazepines (n = 98, 13.4%), amphetamine-type substances (n = 80, 10.9%), opioids (n = 28, 3.8%) and cocaine (n = 17, 2.3%). Alcohol and/or at least one other drug was detected in 37.4% (n = 472) of cases with either a blood alcohol or urine drug test completed (n = 1263, 86.0%). Multiple substances were detected in 16.6% (n = 119) of cases with both blood alcohol and urine drug screens (n = 718, 48.9%). Detections were prevalent in cases of interpersonal violence (n = 123/179, 68.7%) and intentional self-harm (n = 50/106, 47.2%), and in those occurring on Friday and Saturday nights (n = 118/191, 61.8%). CONCLUSION: AOD detections were common in trauma patients with non-transport injury causes. Population-level surveillance is needed to inform prevention strategies that address AOD use as a significant risk factor for serious injury.