Acute hepatitis C in the Netherlands: characteristics of the epidemic in 2014.

Within the Dutch Acute HCV in HIV Study, a surveillance system was initiated to estimate the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in 2014. Following the Dutch HIV treatment guidelines, HIV-positive men having sex with men (MSM) in 19 participating centers were screened. Ninety-nine acute HCV infections were reported, which resulted in a mean incidence of 11 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up. Unfortunately, the HCV epidemic among Dutch HIV-positive MSM is not coming to a halt.

Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the HIV Dementia Scale in the assessment of cognitive impairment in HIV-1 infected patients.

The gold standard for evaluating cognitive impairments in HIV-infected patients is to administer an extensive neuropsychological assessment. This may, however, be time-consuming and hence not always feasible in the clinic. Therefore, several brief screening tools have been developed. This study determined the validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) in detecting cognitive impairment using both the Frascati and cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) criteria to classify cognitive impairment in HIV-1 infected patients. The MoCA, HDS, and an extensive neuropsychological assessment, covering nine cognitive domains, were administered in a group of 102 HIV-infected patients who were all on cART and virologically suppressed for at least 1 year. Results show that the areas under the curve (AUCs) for both the MoCA and the HDS were statistically significant, using both the Frascati and the CIND criteria as gold standard. However, the AUCs for the MoCA and HDS did not differ significantly, regardless of the used classification criteria (Frascati: z = 0.37, p = 0.35; CIND: z = -0.62, p = 0.27). Sensitivity of both the MoCA and HDS were low for the recommended cutoff scores (Frascati: MoCA (<26) = 0.56, HDS (<11) = 0.26; CIND: MoCA (<26) = 0.55, HDS (<11) = 0.36). Cutoff scores with good sensitivity and adequate specificity could not be determined for both screening instruments. Therefore, the HDS and MoCA are not recommended as sole instruments to diagnose HIV-associated cognitive impairment.

A randomized controlled trial of single-class maintenance therapy with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine after standard triple antiretroviral induction therapy: final 96-week results from the FREE study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to test the antiviral efficacy of a triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen, with potential beneficial metabolic effects, as maintenance therapy after induction with dual NRTIs and a boosted protease inhibitor (PI). METHODS: An open-label, noninferiority study was carried out. Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve patients with CD4 count ≤ 350 cells/µL and HIV-1 RNA >30000 copies/mL (n=207) were treated with zidovudine/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir. After achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL on two consecutive occasions between weeks 12 and 24 after baseline, 120 patients (baseline: median HIV-1 RNA 5.19 log10 copies/mL; median CD4 count 180 cells/µL) were randomized to receive abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine (ABC/3TC/ZDV) (n=61) or to continue the PI-based ART (n=59). RESULTS: For the proportions of patients (intention-to-treat; missing=failure) with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL (PI group, 66%; ABC/3TC/ZDV group, 71%) and <50 copies/mL (PI group, 63%; ABC/3TC/ZDV group, 62%) at 96 weeks, switching to ABC/3TC/ZDV was noninferior compared with continuing the PI regimen; the difference in failure rate (ABC/3TC/ZDV minus PI) was -4.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI) -21.0 to +12.3 percentage points] and +0.4 percentage points (95% CI -16.9 to +17.7 percentage points), respectively. In the per protocol analysis, the difference in virological failure for HIV-1 RNA >400 copies/mL (0 of 39 patients in the PI group and two of 45 patients in the NRTI group) and for HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL (two of 39 and three of 45 patients, respectively) was +4.4 percentage points (95% CI -2.1 to +11.0 percentage points) and +1.5 percentage points (95% CI -8.6 to +11.7 percentage points), respectively, also showing noninferiority. Serum lipids significantly improved in the NRTI group, but not in the PI arm. CONCLUSIONS: A single-class NRTI regimen after successful induction with standard ART had similar antiviral efficacy compared to continuation of a PI-based regimen at 96 weeks after baseline, with improved serum lipids.

A case-control pilot study on cognitive functioning, symptom validity and psychological wellbeing in HIV-1-infected patients in the Netherlands.

The objective of this study was to examine and relate both cognitive functioning and psychological wellbeing in Dutch HIV-1-infected patients (n = 30) in comparison with a matched healthy control group (n = 30), taking symptom validity into account. Significant differences in performance between patients and controls were found in the domain Working memory (P = 0.036), but not in the other cognitive domains. There was a significant difference in all dimensions of the psychological wellbeing scale, measured with the SCL-90-R (P values between 0.002 and 0.023), except for agoraphobia, cognitive performance difficulty and sleep disturbances. No correlations were found between the performance on the Working memory domain and wellbeing. Future research should focus on unravelling the underlying mechanisms of neurocognitive dysfunction further using neuropsychological tests, including a symptom validity test in combination with neuroimaging techniques in larger samples.

Could differential virological characteristics account for ongoing viral replication and insidious damage of the brain during HIV 1 infection of the central nervous system?

Neurocognitive disorders due to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have been reported in 25-60% of cases,(1-3) despite a sustained viral response in peripheral blood while on highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). A possible reason may be that the central nervous system (CNS) is less accessible for anti-retroviral agents, therefore this sanctuary site can provide a reservoir for ongoing HIV-1 replication. Mutations conferring resistance to anti-retroviral drugs may predominate in compartments where drug levels are suboptimal. This review provides an overview on the literature regarding the development of resistance mutations and the sensitivity for co-receptors in CNS. Mutations caused by the anti-retroviral drugs with the lowest intracerebral penetration would be expected to be found in higher percentages in the CNS than in the periphery of the human body. However, few studies have been performed that can confirm or reject this claim. Zidovudine, the anti-retroviral drug with the best intracerebral penetration, has been studied to some extent. This drug indeed induces resistance mutations in blood as well as the CNS. HAART induces a switch from HIV that uses co-receptor CRR5 to HIV that uses co-receptor CXCR4. This switch may appear later in the CNS compartment compared to the periphery. However, current literature shows conflicting evidence. In conclusion, the current understanding of HIV-strain evolution under drug pressure in sanctuary sites like CNS is incomplete. Therefore, more research is needed in order to establish the role of these sites in the development of drug resistant mutants under adequate HAART.

Should antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection be tailored for intracerebral penetration?

The continuous replication of HIV-1 in the central nervous system, in particular the brain, and its potential long-term deleterious effect is the focus of this review. Cognitive deficits are observed in a significant percentage of HIV-1-infected patients. That may occur despite successful peripheral suppression of the HIV-1 replication. Compartmentalisation of HIV-1 in the brain, genetic mutation of HIV-1, age, HCV coinfection and poor intracerebral penetration, as well as possibly a direct toxic effect of antiretroviral drugs, are factors that may account for potential creeping damage of the brain after many years of treatment. Patients with neurological symptoms or cognitive deficits may require another approach to the treatment of their HIV infection.

The effect of cholecalciferol supplementation on vitamin D levels and insulin sensitivity is dose related in vitamin D-deficient HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of cholecalciferol supplementation on vitamin D levels, bone mineral density (BMD), body fat distribution and insulin sensitivity in vitamin D-deficient HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: Twenty vitamin D-deficient HIV-1-infected patients were prospectively treated with 2000 IU cholecalciferol/day for 14 weeks, whereafter treatment was continued with half this dosage until 48 weeks. BMD, body fat distribution, 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)2D3), fasting glucose, insulin, adiponectin, leptin, interleukin (IL)-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha were measured at baseline, and at 24 and 48 weeks. Parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxy vitamin D(3) [25(OH)D(3)], cholesterol and triglycerides were measured at baseline, and at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, cholecalciferol supplementation significantly increased 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 levels and decreased PTH and insulin sensitivity. After 48 weeks, however, only 25(OH)D3 levels remained significantly different from baseline, while the other parameter levels returned to baseline, suggesting a dose-response effect. Cholecalciferol had no effect on BMD, adipokines and triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of cholecalciferol treatment in this cohort appears to be dose dependent. Cholecalciferol dosages of > or =2000 IU are necessary to achieve 1,25(OH)2D3 levels that significantly decrease PTH, but also negatively affect insulin sensitivity. The results of this hypothesis-driven explorative study need to be confirmed in larger clinical trials.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the HIV protease inhibitor atazanavir in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is being applied for a number of antiretroviral agents. Little is known about the use of TDM for atazanavir. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis on the use of TDM of atazanavir at three clinical sites in The Netherlands. Patients were divided into three groups: (i) all patients with evaluable data of plasma atazanavir concentrations and its relationship with hyperbilirubinaemia; (ii) patients who started atazanavir without documented evidence of protease inhibitor (PI) mutations; (iii) patients who started atazanavir with documented evidence of PI mutations. The genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) was calculated by dividing the mean atazanavir plasma trough concentration by the number of PI mutations. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included; 70 (65.8%) were using atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg once daily). No significant relationship was observed between atazanavir plasma trough concentration and antiviral response in patients starting atazanavir without PI mutations (group 2; n = 82). In contrast, a significant relationship was observed between atazanavir GIQ and treatment response in patients starting atazanavir while having PI mutations (group 3; n = 26). The cut-off value for GIQ most predictive of virological failure was 0.23 mg/L/mutation: patients (n = 8) with a GIQ equal to or below this value had 50% virological failure whereas patients (n = 18) with a GIQ above 0.23 mg/L/mutation had only 11% virological failure (chi(2): P = 0.030). Atazanavir plasma trough concentrations were significantly related with the occurrence of increased total bilirubin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: TDM of atazanavir might be beneficial for patients with documented PI resistance or patients with hyperbilirubinaemia.

Comparison of two once-daily regimens with a regimen consisting of nelfinavir, didanosine, and stavudine in antiretroviral therapy-naïve adults: 48-week results from the Antiretroviral Regimen Evaluation Study (ARES).

BACKGROUND: To improve the dosing frequency and pill burden of antiretroviral therapy, we compared two once-daily dosed regimens to a twice-daily dosed regimen. METHOD: HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral drug-naïve adults were randomized to either twice-daily nelfinavir and stavudine and once-daily didanosine (regimen A) or simplified once-daily dosed antiretroviral regimens consisting of nevirapine, didanosine, and lamivudine (regimen B) or saquinavir, ritonavir, didanosine, and lamivudine (regimen C). RESULTS: At 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of patients with a blood plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration (pVL) <50 copies/mL by intention-to treat analysis was 42.3%, 50.0%, and 56.5% for regimens A (n = 26), B (n = 22), and C (n = 23), respectively. The time to a pVL <50 copies/mL for the first time was significantly shorter in regimen C, and there was significantly more progression to CDC events in regimen B. These differences are possibly due to differences in baseline characteristics. Adverse events were lowest for regimen C; more signs associated with mitochondrial toxicity occurred in regimen A. Increase in CD4 count was comparable between arms. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in efficacy was found between the two investigated once-daily dosed treatment regimens (B and C) and the reference (A). Regimen C possibly had a better virological response and less toxicity than regimens A and B.

Effect of efavirenz treatment on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir boosted by ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: A once-daily (q.d.) nucleoside-sparing regimen can prevent mitochondrial toxicity, overcome viral resistance and improve compliance. In the present study the effect of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir was evaluated in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study in 24 healthy subjects. Each received from days 1-10 (period 1): 1875 mg nelfinavir plus 200 mg ritonavir q.d. with a 300-kcal snack. During days 11-20 (period 2) efavirenz 600 mg q.d. was added to the regimen. Blood samples were collected up to 24 h after dosing on days 10 (period 1) and 20 (period 2). High-performance liquid chromatography methods were used for the determination of the concentrations of all compounds. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. After the first period mean nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) were 49.6 mg h(-1) l(-1), 5.0 mg l(-1) and 0.37 mg l(-1), and the sum of nelfinavir plus its active metabolite M8 C(24) was 0.83 mg l(-1). The relative bioavailability, expressed as a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for nelfinavir AUC(0-24 h), C(max) and C(24) of period 2 compared with period 1 was: 1.30 (1.21, 1.40), 1.29 (1.19, 1.40) and 1.48 (1.32, 1.66). The sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) in period 2 was 0.99 mg l(-1), an increase of 19%. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The studied regimens were well tolerated. Nelfinavir/ritonavir given together with efavirenz resulted in a 48% higher mean C(24) concentration for nelfinavir, and the sum of nelfinavir and M8 C(24) concentrations was 0.99 mg l(-1). Efavirenz exposure in this study was similar to that reported previously, and therefore can be used effectively in combination with ritonavir and nelfinavir.

Ocular syphilis acquired through oral sex in two HIV-infected patients.

Two cases of ocular syphilis are described in HIV-infected individuals after unprotected oral sex. The primary syphilitic lesion remained unnoticed and lues was therefore only diagnosed after visual symptoms developed.

Pharmacokinetics of adjusted-dose lopinavir-ritonavir combined with rifampin in healthy volunteers.

Coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir, an antiretroviral protease inhibitor, at the standard dose (400/100 mg twice a day [BID]) with the antituberculous agent rifampin is contraindicated because of a significant pharmacokinetic interaction due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A by rifampin. In the present study, two adjusted-dose regimens of lopinavir-ritonavir were tested in combination with rifampin. Thirty-two healthy subjects participated in a randomized, two-arm, open-label, multiple-dose, within-subject controlled study. All subjects were treated with lopinavir-ritonavir at 400/100 mg BID from days 1 to 15. From days 16 to 24, the subjects in arm 1 received lopinavir-ritonavir at 800/200 mg BID in a dose titration, and the subjects in arm 2 received lopinavir-ritonavir at 400/400 mg BID in a dose titration. Rifampin was given at 600 mg once daily to all subjects from days 11 to 24. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of lopinavir, ritonavir, and rifampin were assessed. Twelve of 32 subjects withdrew from the study. For nine subjects lopinavir-ritonavir combined with rifampin resulted in liver enzyme level elevations. Pharmacokinetic data for 19 subjects were evaluable. Geometric mean ratios for the lopinavir minimum concentration in serum and the maximum concentration in serum (C(max)) on day 24 versus that on day 10 were 0.43 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.96) and 1.02 (90% CI, 0.85 to 1.23), respectively, for arm 1 (n = 10) and 1.03 (90% CI, 0.68 to 1.56) and 0.93 (90% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), respectively, for arm 2 (n = 9). Ritonavir exposure increased from days 10 to 24 in both arms. The geometric mean C(max) of rifampin was 13.5 mg/liter (day 24) and was similar between the two arms. Adjusted-dose regimens of lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with therapeutic drug monitoring and monitoring of liver function may allow concomitant use of rifampin.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: lessons for the future.

HIV-related morbidity and mortality has been greatly reduced since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Issues regarding the patient, the virus, the drugs and the treatment team are discussed. HIV treatment remains complex with a rapidly changing field of possibilities and views, and should therefore be limited to specialised centres.

[Enfuvirtide, the first representative of a new class of drugs for the treatment of HIV infection : HIV fusion inhibitors]. / Enfuvirtide, de eerste vertegenwoordiger van een nieuwe klasse van geneesmiddelen voor de behandeling van HIV-infectie: HIV-fusieremmers.

In March 2003, enfuvirtide was approved in the USA and the European Union for the treatment of patients with HIV infection who have experienced failure or intolerable side effects of treatment with at least one representative of each antiretroviral drug class. Enfuvirtide has a new mode of action: it binds to the viral envelope glycoprotein 41 that is involved in the fusion of the virus to the membrane of the CD4 T cell. In two large phase III studies, 90 mg of enfuvirtide administered twice daily subcutaneously in addition to a background treatment of other antiretroviral drugs, had a significant favourable effect on both the plasma viral load (decrease) and the CD4 counts (increase) compared to the background treatment alone. Disadvantages of treatment with enfuvirtide are its subcutaneous administration (98% of the patients had local adverse reactions) and the high costs involved (1500 euro per patient per month).

[Tuberculosis and HIV coinfection in three patients: the possibilities for simultaneous treatment]. / Tuberculose- en HIV-co-infectie bij 3 patiënten: mogelijkheden voor gelijktijdige behandeling.

Three patients received simultaneous treatment for tuberculosis and HIV: a 23-year-old woman and a 33-year-old man who were asylum seekers from Africa and a 45-year-old woman who was an intravenous drug addict. During the treatment with antiretroviral and anti-tuberculous drugs, several problems arose: drug interactions (between rifampicine and protease inhibitors/non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), side effects, non-compliance and immune reconstitution reactions. These problems were solved either by temporary withdrawal of the medication or by substituting other drugs. There are a number of possible treatment strategies that minimise the risks. Despite the potential problems, in patients with advanced HIV infection, antiretroviral treatment should not be delayed until after the end of the tuberculosis treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: This study was performed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and short-term tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir. METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were randomized over three groups to receive a once-daily regimen of nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg (group 1), 2,000/400 mg (group 2) or 2,500/200 mg (group 3) with food for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters for nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were assessed on study days 15 and 16, after administration of the regimens with a full (610 kcal) or light (271 kcal) breakfast, respectively. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for eight volunteers in group 1, eight in group 2 and four in group 3. Administration of nelfinavir/ritonavir with a full breakfast resulted in geometric mean (GM) nelfinavir AUC(24h) values of 76.8, 51.3, and 61.9 h*mg/l in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GM 24-h Cmin concentrations of nelfinavir were 0.76 mg l(-1), 0.43 mg l(-1) and 0.47 mg l(-1), respectively. Co-administration of ritonavir increased M8 concentrations more than nelfinavir concentrations, resulting in GM AUC(24h) and Cmin values for nelfinavir plus M8 that were higher than or comparable to reference values for the approved regimen of nelfinavir (1,250 mg BID without ritonavir). In the 2,000/200 mg group, seven out of eight subjects had a Cmin value of nelfinavir plus M8 above a threshold of 1.0 mg l-1. Administration of the combinations with a light breakfast resulted in significant decreases in the AUC(24h) and Cmin of nelfinavir and nelfinavir plus M8, compared with intake with a full breakfast. For the Cmin of nelfinavir plus M8, the GM ratio (light/full breakfast) was 0.76 (90% confidence interval 0.67-0.86, participants from all groups combined). Short-term tolerability was satisfactory, apart from a higher than expected incidence of mild rash (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of nelfinavir in a once-daily regimen appears feasible. A nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg combination appears appropriate for further evaluation. Once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir should be taken with a meal containing at least 600 kcal.

Saquinavir soft-gel capsules (Fortovase) give lower exposure than expected, even after a high-fat breakfast.

BACKGROUND: The soft-gel capsule (sgc) of saquinavir has been developed in order to improve the poor oral bioavailability of the original hard-gel capsules. However, in a Dutch study population using saquinavir-sgc plasma levels were lower than expected. We hypothesised that this was caused by differences in the amount of fat in the meals of the study populations. METHODS: 8-h steady-state plasma curves after observed ingestion of 1200 mg saquinavir-sgc were recorded, concomitantly with a normal breakfast (600 kcal, 33% fat) on the first day, and a high-fat breakfast (1040 kcal, 54% fat) on the second day. Additionally, a comparison was made between saquinavir hard-gel capsules and saquinavir-sgc with or without grapefruit juice (n = 1). Furthermore, a comparison between saquinavir-sgc and ritonavir + saquinavir-sgc 400/400 mg bid was made (n = 1). RESULTS: Although saquinavir exposure was improved by fat, grapefruit juice or ritonavir, exposure to saquinavir for all recorded curves was lower than expected. A large proportion of trough concentrations was below the efficacy threshold. CONCLUSION: Intake of squinavir-sgc with high-fat meals or grapefruit juice may improve the pharmacokinetic profile. However, plasma concentrations may then still be lower than expected and insufficient for good antiviral efficacy. Probably the only way to reach adequate saquinavir concentrations is by combining saquinavir with ritonavir.

[Oral fluoropyrimidines registered for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a possible gain]. / Orale fluoropyrimidinen geregistreerd voor de behandeling bij gemetastaseerd colorectaal carcinoom: een mogelijke aanwinst.

Up until now the standard treatment for metastasized colorectal carcinoma has been fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with folonic acid in low doses administered intravenously, even after the recent registration of a number of new intravenously administered cytostatics, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Meanwhile there are oral alternatives for 5-FU: capecitabine and the combination of tegafur and uracil with folonic acid. In four randomised studies it was shown that these drugs were globally just as effective as the combination of 5-FU with folonic acid (in accordance with the 'Mayo Clinic' scheme). There was no survival advantage for the oral drugs compared to 5-FU with folonic acid. Compared to 5-FU and folonic acid the use of capecitabine or tegafur-uracil-folonic acid was associated with less toxic effects; however, there were differences in the side effects profile between the oral drugs and 5-FU (more hand-foot syndrome for capecitabine and less (symptomatic) leucopenia for tegafur-uracil-folonic acid). An examination of the serious side effects (grade 3 and 4) revealed that the total incidence was generally comparable. These data, together with the ease of oral administration, form the basis for the registration of capecitabine and tegafur-uracil-folonic acid. The definitive place of these drugs in the treatment of metastasized colorectal carcinoma is not yet clear.