Four-part fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus in young adults: results of fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Four-part fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus occurring in young age are extremely difficult fractures with a high incidence of complications. The risk of avascular necrosis is high; hence, prosthetic replacement is the treatment of choice in older patients with these complex fractures; on the other hand, the longevity of the prosthesis is the main concern in young age. Thus, every effort should be made to fix these fractures in the young. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of fixation in a series of young patients with four-part fracture dislocations; to support the trend to fix these fractures; and reserve prosthetic replacement to older patients. METHODS: In a prospective study, 39 patients younger than 40 years of age with four-part fracture dislocations were treated with open reduction and fixation either with K-wires or with a proximal humerus plate. Ethibond sutures were used in all patients to supplement fixation of tuberosities. In 18 patients, the dislocation was anterior and in 21 patients it was posterior. Twelve patients had an anatomic neck fracture and 27 had a surgical neck fracture. Surgery was performed within 1 week after the injury. Physiotherapy was initiated according to the general condition of the patient and the stability of fixation; the average time was 5 days after surgery. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for an average of 26 months. Union was achieved in 36 patients and three patients had nonunion, all in anatomic neck fractures. Avascular necrosis developed in eight patients, seven of which were fractures of the anatomic neck and one was in the surgical neck. The average Constant score was 77; 26 patients were pain free, nine had mild pain and four had moderate pain. The mean active anterior elevation was 145°. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anatomic configuration of the fracture; in 12 patients (group 1), the head was fractured at the anatomical neck and in 27 patients (group 2), the head was fractured at the surgical neck. In group 2, the active anterior elevation was significantly better and the Constant score was higher. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical reduction and rigid fixation with meticulous surgical technique can lead to satisfactory results. The results in surgical neck fractures are superior to anatomic neck fractures with significantly less complications.

Proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty: does tenodesis of the long head of the biceps improve results?

INTRODUCTION: Pathology of the long head of the biceps (LHB) may be the cause of anterior shoulder pain after hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus. The currently available literature lacks adequate randomised trials examining whether tenodesis of the LHB improves results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of tenodesis of the LHB on the clinical outcome following hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. METHODS: This prospective randomised study included 37 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures, fracture dislocations and head-splitting fractures. The LHB was left intact in 18 patients (group 1) and tenodesis was performed in 19 patients (group 2). The mean age was 51.0 ± 3.7 years and 53.1 ± 4.6 years in group 1 and group 2, respectively. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon in the first 5 days after injury and one type of prosthesis was used. The shoulder was immobilised for 4 weeks before performing the same physiotherapy protocol. Pain and range of motion were assessed by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a mean of 25.1 ± 3.9 months in group 1 and 22.6 ± 3.6 months in group 2. They were evaluated using the Constant score; it had a mean of 69.8 ± 6.6 for group 1 and a mean of 74.4 ± 6.5 points for group 2 (p = 0.04). Shoulder pain affected six patients in group 1 (33.3%) and only affected three patients in group 2 (15.8%) (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in active anterior elevation of the shoulder between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained support the hypothesis to routinely perform a tenodesis of the LHB during hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus to improve pain and have better results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I therapeutic.

Comparison between pedicle subtraction osteotomy and anterior corpectomy and plating for correcting post-traumatic kyphosis: a multicenter study.

Kyphosis is a common sequel of inadequately managed thoracolumbar fractures. This study compares between pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and anterior corpectomy and plating (ACP) for correcting post-traumatic kyphosis. Forty-three patients with symptomatic post-traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine were treated with PSO and prospectively followed for a minimum of 2 years. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess clinical improvement and radiographs were obtained at 2, 6, 12 and 24 months. The recorded clinical and radiological outcomes were compared to a control group of 37 patients, who were treated earlier by the same authors with ACP. The mean correction of the kyphotic angle was 29.8° for the PSO group and 22° for the ACP group (P = 0.001). PSO group showed significantly better improvement in the VAS score and the ODI. At final follow-up, patients reported very good satisfaction (93% in PSO vs. 81% in ACP) and good function (90% in PSO vs. 73% in ACP). Complications in the PSO group included pulling out of screws and recurrence of deformity requiring revision and longer fixation (1 patient), and transient lower limb paraesthesia (2 patients). Recorded complications in the ACP group included an aortic injury (1 patient) that was successfully repaired, pseudarthrosis (1 patient), persistent graft donor site morbidity (3 patients), and incisional hernia (1 patient). PSO and ACP are demanding procedures. PSO seems to be equally safe but more effective than ACP for correcting post-traumatic kyphosis.

Direct repair of spondylolysis presenting after correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although spondylolysis is found in 6% of idiopathic scoliosis patients, very little was reported on management of pars defects in this group. These patients with painful spondylolysis are most eligible for direct repair of the defect rather than lumbosacral fusion in an attempt to save motion segments. PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to analyze the clinical and radiologic outcome of pars repair in a group of adolescents who presented after surgical correction of their idiopathic scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nonrandomized study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ten consecutive patients with spondylolysis presenting after an average of 3 months (range, 2-7 months) from correction of their idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain not responding to conservative therapy and interfering with everyday activities. The mean age at operation was 16 years (range, 14-19 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Total blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire. Fusion of the pars interarticularis was assessed using plain, lateral, and oblique radiographs and a computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: The surgical technique consisted of thorough debridement of the defect, impacting the gap created with a tricortical iliac crest graft, and rigid fixation by either pedicle screws and a V-shaped rod (five patients) or a cable-screw construct (five patients). RESULTS: Patients were followed up for an average of 4.5 years (range, 2-7 years). Nine patients had a good-to-excellent result, returned to normal everyday life, and participated in sports when desired. The mean ODI, VAS, and SRS total scores were 11 (range, 0-34), 1.1 (range, 0-2), and 92 (range, 61-108), respectively. Follow-up radiographs and CT scans revealed healing of all defects in nine cases, no signs of disc degeneration in any, and no implant-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of direct repair of spondylolysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients were very satisfactory both clinically and radiologically. Direct repair appears to be a logical alternative to spinal fusion; lumbar spine mobility was preserved, and precocious motion segments were saved with a relatively simple operation.

All pedicle screw instrumentation for Scheuermann's kyphosis correction: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Scheuermann's kyphosis has long been treated by a two-staged fusion and instrumentation with a hybrid construct using hooks, pedicle screws, and sublaminar wires. Recent interest in all pedicle screw constructs led to its use in the treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis. Evaluation of this newly described application is needed. PURPOSE: To compare the results of segmental all pedicle screw constructs versus two-staged hybrid instrumentation in patients with Scheuermann's kyphosis analyzing the amount of correction and incidence of complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series reporting on two groups of patients with Scheuermann's kyphosis treated with single-staged all pedicle screws technique versus two-staged anterior release and posterior hybrid instrumentation followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study included 33 patients divided into two groups. The average age was 15 years+9 months and 16 years+8 months, respectively. The average preoperative dorsal kyphosis was 85.5 degrees (Group 1) and 79.8 degrees (Group 2). OUTCOME MEASURES: The deformity was measured by Cobb's method preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Operative time and blood loss were also measured and recorded. The results of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 questionnaire were also reviewed. METHODS: The study included 16 patients who underwent a single-staged correction by segmental all pedicle screw constructs and multiple-level posterior osteotomies (Group 1) and 17 who underwent a two-staged fusion and instrumentation with a hybrid construct (Group 2). RESULTS: Both groups were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The deformity correction of Group 1 had an average of 52.2% postoperatively with 2.4% loss at final follow-up in comparison to Group 2 where the correction was 48.7% postoperatively with 3.1% loss at final follow-up. The operative time was considerably less in Group 1 with an average of 215 minutes than Group 2 with an average of 315 minutes. The average blood loss was 620cc in Group 1 and 910cc in Group 2. The SRS-30 questionnaire in Group 1 averaged 134 and in Group 2 averaged 120. CONCLUSIONS: The use of multiple-level all pedicle screws technique allowed a rigid anchor for posterior correction of the deformity with less operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay without the need for anterior release. A better correction was achieved and preserved with the use of all pedicle screw constructs. This technique is a useful modality in the treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis.