Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 52(5): 563-8, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Infantile feeding disorders (IFDs) are a common cause of food refusal, failure to thrive, and vomiting, but they may be difficult to diagnose. We have previously identified certain patterns of pathological feeding and behaviors as high-risk characteristics for IFDs and subsequently developed the diagnostic Wolfson criteria. Here, we evaluate these high-risk behaviors and prospectively compare the Wolfson criteria with 2 existing classifications of IFD, the Chatoor and that in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infants and young children referred for food refusal were invited to participate by completing a feeding pattern questionnaire. Following physicians' interview and examination, patients were scored by all 3 criteria and enrolled in a structured treatment program for IFD. Infants whose food refusal was associated with an organic cause served as a comparison group. The ability of the criteria to detect IFD and to predict response to therapy was compared with an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-five infants with new-onset IFD and 55 controls were included. The Wolfson criteria, Chatoor, and DSM-IV accurately diagnosed 100%, 77%, and 56% of the patients with IFD, respectively. Anticipatory gagging occurred in 47% of the children with IFD compared to 2% controls (P < 0.001). The response to therapy was similar among the 3 criteria (73-76%), suggesting that the Wolfson criteria did not incorrectly diagnose organic disease as IFD. The 20 infants who were diagnosed as having IFD by Wolfson but not by Chatoor responded equally well (80%) to an IFD treatment program. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic criteria of IFD that are based on food refusal, pathological feeding, and anticipatory gagging have a higher detection rate than the present criteria and are simpler to implement.


Assuntos
Comportamento Infantil , Comportamento Alimentar , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Engasgo , Comportamento do Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Erros de Diagnóstico , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Insuficiência de Crescimento/etiologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/complicações , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/etiologia
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 48(3): 355-62, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19274791

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Food refusal, poor feeding, and somatic symptoms such as vomiting, gagging, irritability and failure to thrive (FTT) are commonly found in both infantile feeding disorders (IFD) and common treatable medical conditions. Present diagnostic classifications for diagnosing IFD are complex and difficult to apply in daily practice, leading to underdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis of IFD. We attempted to identify parental and infantile behaviour patterns or symptoms that could help distinguish between organic or behavioural causes for these symptoms. METHODS: We screened 226 children with poor feeding. After exclusion criteria, we divided the remaining 151 into 2 groups. The nonorganic group (n=83) included patients with onset of symptoms before age 2, persistent food aversion longer than 1 month, and a response to behavioural intervention. The second group consisted of children (n=68) presenting with similar characteristics, who responded to medical or nutritional therapy in which a final diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, milk allergy, or idiopathic or nutritional FTT was made. RESULTS: Poor intake, poor weight gain, or vomiting did not discriminate between organic and nonorganic causes. Factors indicating the presence of a behavioural cause included food refusal, food fixation, abnormal parental feeding practices, onset after a specific trigger, and presence of anticipatory gagging (P<0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of a few structured questions regarding infant behaviour, parental feeding practices, infant symptoms, and triggers for the onset of symptoms may help clinicians distinguish between organic and nonorganic causes for food refusal or low intake FTT.


Assuntos
Sintomas Comportamentais/diagnóstico , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Comportamento Alimentar , Transtornos de Alimentação na Infância/etiologia , Comportamento do Lactente , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ingestão de Energia , Insuficiência de Crescimento/etiologia , Transtornos de Alimentação na Infância/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Alimentação na Infância/psicologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Pais , Vômito , Aumento de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA