RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study of anesthetized brain tumor patients receiving ephedrine or phenylephrine infusions. 18 patients with magnetic imaging verified tumor contrast enhancement were included. We hypothesized that vasopressors induce microcirculatory flow changes, characterized by increased capillary transit time heterogeneity (CTH) and decreased mean transit time (MTT), in brain regions exhibiting BBB leakage. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study of anesthetized brain tumor patients receiving ephedrine or phenylephrine infusions. 18 patients with magnetic imaging verified tumor contrast enhancement were included. Postvasopressor to prevasopressor ratios of CTH, MTT, relative transit time heterogeneity (RTH), cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume, and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) were calculated in tumor, peritumoral, hippocampal, and contralateral grey matter regions. Comparisons were made between brain regions and vasopressors. RESULTS: During phenylephrine infusion, ratios of CTH, RTH, and CBF were greater, and ratios of MTT and OEF were lower, in the tumor region with contrast leakage compared with corresponding contralateral grey matter ratios. During ephedrine infusion, ratios of CTH, MTT, RTH, CBF, and cerebral blood volume were higher in the tumor region with leakage compared with contralateral grey matter ratios. In addition, the ratio of CBF was higher in all regions, the ratio of RTH was lower in the leaking tumor region, and the ratio of OEF was lower in peritumoral, hippocampal, and grey matter regions with ephedrine compared with phenylephrine. CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressors can induce distinct microcirculatory flow alterations in regions with compromised brain tumor barrier or BBB. Ephedrine, a combined α and ß-adrenergic agonist, appears to result in fewer flow alterations and less impact on tissue oxygenation compared with phenylephrine, a pure α-adrenergic agonist.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in treatment of various brain disorders is constantly growing; however, the number of studies of the reaction of the brain tissue toward implanted leads is still limited. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze the impact of DBS leads on brain tissue in a large animal model using minipigs. METHODS: Twelve female animals, one control and eleven with bilaterally implanted DBS electrodes were used in our experiment. 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation the animals were sacrificed, perfused and the brains were removed. Tissue blocks containing the lead tracks were dissected, frozen, sectioned into 40 µm sections and stained using Nissl and Eosin, anti-GFAPab or Isolectin. The tissue reaction was analyzed at five levels, following from the distal lead tip, to compare tissue response in stimulated and nonstimulated areas: four segments along each level of electrodes, and the fifth level lying outside the electrode area (control area). The sections were described both qualitatively and quantitatively. Quantitative assessment of the reaction to the implanted electrode was based on the measurement of the area covered by the staining and the thickness of the glial scar. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Tissue reaction was, on average, limited to distance of 500 µm from the lead track. The tissue response after 12 months was weaker than after 6 months confirming that it stabilizes over a time. There was no histological evidence that the stimulated part of the electrode triggered different tissue response than its nonstimulated part.
