Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery and Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain after cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery has been the subject of only a few research articles. The primary outcome of our prospective study was the incidence of persistent pain and its association to mode of delivery. We also studied the nature and intensity of pain after delivery. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed on postpartum day 2 to 1052 women who had given birth vaginally and to 502 who had undergone cesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital in Helsinki, Finland, in 2010. A second questionnaire was mailed to the women 1 year later. We recorded the women's health history, obstetric history and previous pain history, details of cesarean delivery or vaginal delivery, and description of pain, if present. RESULTS: The incidence of persistent pain at 1 year after delivery was greater after cesarean delivery (85/379 [22%]) than after vaginal delivery (58/713 [8%]: P < .001, relative risk 2.8, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.8). Because of initial differences in the groups, we performed logistic regression analysis with persistent pain as a dependent factor that confirmed the mode of delivery as a predictor of persistent pain. The incidence of persistent pain graded as moderate or more severe (25/379 [7%] vs 25/713 [4%]: P = .022, relative risk 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.2) was also greater after cesarean delivery than vaginal delivery. The incidence of persistent pain was significantly more common in women with a history of previous pain and among primiparous women in logistic regression analysis. The women with persistent pain had experienced more pain the day after cesarean delivery (P = .023) and during vaginal delivery (P = .030) than those who did not report persistent pain. Complications such as perineal trauma, episiotomy, vacuum extraction, endometritis, wound infection, or ante- or postpartum depression did not predispose women to persistent pain. Dyspareunia was reported by 41% of women after vaginal delivery and by 2% after cesarean delivery among women with persistent pain at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of persistent pain at 1 year is greater after cesarean delivery than after vaginal delivery. Pain shortly after cesarean delivery and during vaginal delivery correlated with persistent pain.

Verbal information about anesthesia before scheduled surgery - contents and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: The contents of information for patients before medical procedures are outlined by legislation and guidelines. The amount and form are less regulated. Our aim was to evaluate the contents of verbal information provided by anesthesiologists in a long-established preoperative clinic, and how satisfied patients are with it. METHODS: A questionnaire based on legislation and the DISCERN quality criteria for information on treatment choices was sent to patients who recently had anesthesia for elective hysterectomy in our hospital (n=372), and to the anesthesiologists involved (n=24). RESULTS: Preoperative information was regarded as sufficient by 82% of the patients and rated good by 65%. Information on the benefits of anesthesia, its risks, and effects on the quality of life was considered satisfactory by 74%, 49%, and 49%, respectively. Only 54% received enough information on lifestyle interventions to reduce their individual risks. Of the anesthesiologists, 33% had a policy to tell about risks on request only. CONCLUSION: Verbal information was highly appreciated by the patients, but only two-thirds rated its quality as good, and half were satisfied with the information concerning risks. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: More attention has to be focused on how to offer information on risks and self-help interventions to reduce them.

The effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Apart from being antiemetic, glucocorticoids have an analgesic property. The optimal dose of dexamethasone in the management of pain after surgery has not been established. In this placebo-controlled, dose-finding study, we evaluated the analgesic effect of three doses of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We randomized 129 women scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy to receive placebo, dexamethasone 5 mg (D5), 10 mg (D10), or 15 mg (D15) IV before the induction of anesthesia. The patients were anesthetized with propofol and remifentanil in a standardized manner. Until the first postoperative morning, postoperative pain was managed with IV oxycodone using patient-controlled analgesia. The visual analog scale scores for pain and side effects, and the amounts of the analgesics were recorded for 3 days after surgery. RESULTS: The total dose of oxycodone (0-24 h after surgery) was smaller in the D15 (0.34 mg/kg [0.11-0.87]) group than in the placebo group (0.55 mg/kg [0.19-1.13]) (P = 0.003). The doses of oxycodone during Hours 0-2 after surgery were smaller in the D10 (0.17 mg/kg [0.03-0.36]) and D15 (0.17 mg/kg [0.03-0.35]) groups than in the placebo (0.26 mg/kg [0.10-0.48]) (P = 0.001, D10 versus placebo; P < 0.001, D15 versus placebo) group. During Hours 2-24 after surgery, however, the doses of oxycodone were equal in the placebo, D5, D10, and D15 groups (0.31 mg/kg [0.03-0.78], 0.22 mg/kg [0.03-0.92], 0.24 mg/kg [0.05-0.87], and 0.20 mg/kg [0-0.65], respectively). The visual analog scale scores for pain at rest, in motion, or at cough did not differ in the study groups. The incidence of dizziness was lower in the D15 group than in the placebo group (P = 0.001), the D5 group (P = 0.006), and the D10 group (P = 0.030) during the first 24 h after surgery. During the later course of recovery, the incidence of dizziness did not differ among the four study groups. CONCLUSIONS: IV dexamethasone 15 mg before induction of anesthesia decreases the oxycodone consumption during the first 24 h after laparoscopic hysterectomy. During first 2 h after surgery, dexamethasone 10 mg reduces the oxycodone consumption as effectively as the 15 mg dose.

A randomized controlled trial of perioperative administration of pregabalin for pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Pregabalin has anticonvulsant, antihyperalgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In this study we evaluated the control of pain after perioperative administration of pregabalin 300 or 600 mg, compared with diazepam 10mg. Altogether 91 women scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomized to receive diazepam 10mg (D10), pregabalin 150 mg (P300) or 300 mg (P600) for premedication, and the dose was repeated after 12h, except for the D10 group, in which the patients received placebo. Up until the 1st postoperative morning, analgesia was provided by oxycodone using patient controlled analgesia. The visual analogue scale scores for pain and side effects, and the amounts of the analgesics were recorded for three days after surgery. The doses of oxycodone during hours 0-12 after surgery were similar in the three groups, whereas the dose of oxycodone during hours 12-24 after surgery was smaller in the P600 group than in the P300 group (0.09 vs. 0.16 mg kg(-1); P=0.025). The total dose of oxycodone (0-24h after surgery) was smaller in the P600 group than in the D10 group (0.34 vs. 0.45 mg kg(-1); P=0.046). The incidence of dizziness (70% vs. 35%; P=0.012), blurred vision (63% vs. 14%; P=0.002) and headache (31% vs. 7%; P=0.041) were higher in the P600 group than in the D10 group. In conclusion, perioperative administration of pregabalin 600 mg decreases oxycodone consumption compared with diazepam 10mg, but is associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects.

Similar recovery from bispectral index-titrated isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia after outpatient gynecological surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the recovery of gynecological day-case patients is equally fast after isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia, when administration of the inhaled agent is adjusted by monitoring the bispectral index (BIS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated women's hospital. PATIENTS: 120 adult female patients, ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either isoflurane or sevoflurane as the maintenance anesthetic. BIS values were titrated to remain between 50 and 60 during the maintenance of anesthesia by adjusting the inspired concentration of the inhaled agent. Administration of the inhaled agent was discontinued abruptly at the end of the procedure. MEASUREMENTS: The times to achieving several recovery end points were recorded. The main outcome parameter was the time to home-readiness. In the postoperative care unit, sedation was evaluated with the digit-symbol substitution test. The degree of pain and nausea was evaluated on the visual analog scale. MAIN RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the times to home-readiness, or in any other parameters of early or intermediate recovery between the 2 groups. The degrees of sedation, pain, and nausea in the postoperative care unit were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane and sevoflurane are equally acceptable maintenance anesthetics in terms of the speed and quality of recovery in gynecological ambulatory surgery patients when the dose of the inhaled agent is adjusted to achieve a BIS between 50 and 60.

A rapid increase in the inspired concentration of desflurane is not associated with epileptiform encephalogram.

UNLABELLED: The large inspired concentration of sevoflurane (S) during mask induction of anesthesia can induce epileptiform electroencephalogram (EEG) associated with tachycardia. Tachycardia is also seen when the concentration of desflurane (D) is abruptly increased. It is not known whether this is associated with epileptiform EEG similar to S. We studied EEG and heart rate (HR) during rapidly increased concentrations of S or D in 31 females during the postintubation period of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil, and the tracheas were intubated. Patients were randomized to receive either S or D in nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture after intubation, at a small dose first. After 10 min, S or D vaporizer was advanced to the highest reading of the vaporizer (7% for S, 18% for D) for 5 min. HR and EEG were recorded. Epileptiform EEG activity was recorded in eight of 15 patients in group S and in none in group D (P < 0.05). HR increased in both groups. In group S, HR increased gradually and the highest HR value was 84 bpm at 5 min after the increase in sevoflurane concentration. In group D, HR increased to 93 bpm 2 min after the increase in desflurane concentration (no significant difference, S versus D). A rapid increase in the concentration of S frequently induces epileptiform EEG during normoventilation. Tachycardia during increasing concentrations of D is not associated with epileptiform EEG. IMPLICATIONS: A rapid increase in the concentration of sevoflurane induces epileptiform encephalogram (EEG) with tachycardia. A rapid increase in the concentration of desflurane also induces tachycardia but is not associated with epileptiform EEG.

A comparison of selective spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and general anesthesia with desflurane for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

In this randomized and controlled trial, 64 adult ambulatory knee arthroscopy patients received either selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) with 4 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or general anesthesia (GA) with desflurane. We conducted the study to determine whether SSA with small-dose bupivacaine provides equal fast-tracking possibilities, a shorter stay in the postanesthesia care unit, and earlier discharge home compared with GA with desflurane. Patients with a high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting received prophylaxis in the GA group. No difference was seen in the fast-tracking possibilities or time in the postanesthesia care unit between the groups. Home readiness was achieved after 114 (31-174) and 129 (28-245) min (NS) in the SSA and GA groups, respectively. In the hospital, the pain scores were significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the SSA group compared with the GA group and the need for postoperative opioids was significantly (P = 0.008) larger after GA. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 0% versus 19% in the SSA and GA groups (P = 0.024), respectively. We conclude that for outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy, SSA with hyperbaric bupivacaine provides equal recovery times with less frequent side effects compared with GA with desflurane.

Timing of administration of dolasetron affects dose necessary to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if the timing of administration affects the dose of dolasetron necessary to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DESIGN: Pooled data from 8 randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with common endpoints. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 4,587 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, including 4,124 females undergoing primarily gynecologic procedures and 463 males undergoing various procedures (i.e., thyroidectomy or orthopedic, ophthalmologic, urologic, ENT, or laparoscopic surgery). INTERVENTIONS: Balanced general anesthesia was used during all procedures. Patients received a dose of dolasetron either for prevention of PONV (25 or 50 mg IV at induction; 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg orally 1 to 2 hours pre-induction; or 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg IV at end of anesthesia) or for treatment of PONV (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg IV). One PONV prevention study had an ondansetron (comparator) group. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measures over a 24-hour study period included complete response (defined as no vomiting/retching and no need for rescue medication), percentage of patients without nausea [defined as nausea visual analog scale (VAS) score < 5 mm], and maximum nausea according to VAS score. MAIN RESULTS: A 12.5-mg IV dose of dolasetron resulted in a complete response rate that was statistically significantly higher than placebo and comparable to higher dolasetron doses (25 mg to 100 mg IV) when administered either near the end of anesthesia for prevention of PONV or at the onset of symptoms for treatment of PONV. In contrast, when administered at induction of anesthesia, a statistically significant treatment response was observed with dolasetron 50 mg IV, but not at a lower dose. CONCLUSIONS: When dosed near the end of anesthesia, a 12.5 mg IV dose of dolasetron was comparable to higher doses administered at or before induction of anesthesia.

A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: Untreated, one third of patients who undergo surgery will have postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although many trials have been conducted, the relative benefits of prophylactic antiemetic interventions given alone or in combination remain unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 5199 patients at high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting in a randomized, controlled trial of factorial design that was powered to evaluate interactions among as many as three antiemetic interventions. Of these patients, 4123 were randomly assigned to 1 of 64 possible combinations of six prophylactic interventions: 4 mg of ondansetron or no ondansetron; 4 mg of dexamethasone or no dexamethasone; 1.25 mg of droperidol or no droperidol; propofol or a volatile anesthetic; nitrogen or nitrous oxide; and remifentanil or fentanyl. The remaining patients were randomly assigned with respect to the first four interventions. The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting within 24 hours after surgery, which was evaluated blindly. RESULTS: Ondansetron, dexamethasone, and droperidol each reduced the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 26 percent. Propofol reduced the risk by 19 percent, and nitrogen by 12 percent; the risk reduction with both of these agents (i.e., total intravenous anesthesia) was thus similar to that observed with each of the antiemetics. All the interventions acted independently of one another and independently of the patients' baseline risk. Consequently, the relative risks associated with the combined interventions could be estimated by multiplying the relative risks associated with each intervention. Absolute risk reduction, though, was a critical function of patients' baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: Because antiemetic interventions are similarly effective and act independently, the safest or least expensive should be used first. Prophylaxis is rarely warranted in low-risk patients, moderate-risk patients may benefit from a single intervention, and multiple interventions should be reserved for high-risk patients.

An international multicenter protocol to assess the single and combined benefits of antiemetic interventions in a controlled clinical trial of a 2x2x2x2x2x2 factorial design (IMPACT).

For various diseases clinicians have to combine different drugs or interventions when a single drug or intervention does not lead to satisfactory results. However, quantifying the relative benefit of certain drugs or interventions when given alone and in combination under controlled conditions requires a complex factorial design. This paper describes such a method applied to a large multicenter trial for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), which may be of great interest for other specialties. Approximately 28 million operations are performed annually in the United States, mainly under general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics. Unfortunately, one-third of these patients suffer from PONV. This prompted extensive research of antiemetic and anesthetic drugs, but none of the interventions appeared to satisfactorily prevent PONV. Scuderi et al. were the first to almost eliminate PONV by combining various antiemetic interventions; however, the relative benefit of each intervention remained unclear. Accordingly, we have designed a large randomized controlled trial studying six different antiemetic interventions-three involving use of various antiemetic drugs and three involving choice of anesthetic drugs-to answer the following main questions: (1) What is the relative benefit of each of the antiemetic intervention? (2) Are certain combinations of antiemetic interventions more effective than others? Using a complete factorial design this leads to 2(3)=8 antiemetic combinations, which multiply with the 2(3)=8 combinations of anesthetic drugs, leading to a total of 2(6)=64 possible combinations. The six factors are the antiemetics ondansetron (versus control), dexamethasone (versus control), droperidol (versus control), and the intravenous anesthetic propofol (versus volatile anesthetics), air (versus nitrous oxide), and remifentanil (versus fentanyl). The primary outcome is freedom from PONV within the first 24 hours after anesthesia. Eligible patients are adults scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with an increased risk for PONV so that the expected incidence in the control group (with none of the six antiemetic interventions) is approximately 60%. In order to allow analyses for up to three factor interactions, a sample size was estimated to be in the range of approximately 5000 patients. To the best of our knowledge this is the first randomized controlled trial of a six-way factorial design that may serve as an example for numerous other medical specialties.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after noncardiac surgery is strongly associated with increasing age in elderly patients; middle-aged patients (aged 40-60 yr) may be expected to have a lower incidence, although subjective complaints are frequent. METHODS: The authors compared the changes in neuropsychological test results at 1 week and 3 months in patients aged 40-60 yr, using a battery of neuropsychological tests, with those of age-matched control subjects using Z-score analysis. They assessed risk factors and associations of POCD with measures of subjective cognitive function, depression, and activities of daily living. RESULTS: At 7 days, cognitive dysfunction as defined was present in 19.2% (confidence interval [CI], 15.7-23.1) of the patients and in 4.0% (CI, 1.6-8.0) of control subjects (P < 0.001). After 3 months, the incidence was 6.2% (CI, 4.1-8.9) in patients and 4.1% (CI, 1.7-8.4) in control subjects (not significant). POCD at 7 days was associated with supplementary epidural analgesia and reported avoidance of alcohol consumption. At 3 months, 29% of patients had subjective symptoms of POCD, and this finding was associated with depression. Early POCD was associated with reports of lower activity scores at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction occurs frequently but resolves by 3 months after surgery. It may be associated with decreased activity during this period. Subjective report overestimates the incidence of POCD. Patients may be helped by recognition that the problem is genuine and reassured that it is likely to be transient.

Eliminating intensive postoperative care in same-day surgery patients using short-acting anesthetics.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary effort was undertaken to determine whether patients could safely bypass the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after same-day surgery by moving to an earlier time point evaluation of recovery criteria. METHODS: A prospective, outcomes research study with a baseline month, an intervention month, and a follow-up month was designed. Five surgical centers (three community-based hospitals and two freestanding ambulatory surgical centers) were utilized. Two thousand five hundred eight patients were involved in the baseline period, and 2,354 were involved in the follow-up period. Outcome measures included PACU bypass rates and adverse events. Intervention consisted of a multidisciplinary educational program and routine feedback reports. RESULTS: The overall PACU bypass rate (58%) was significantly different from baseline (15.9%, P < 0.001), for patients to whom a general anesthetic was administered (0.4-31.8%, P < 0.001), and for those given other anesthetic techniques (monitored anesthesia care, regional or local anesthetics; 29.1-84.2%, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, the average (SD) recovery duration for patients who bypassed the PACU was significantly shorter compared to that for patients who did not bypass, 84.6 (61.5) versus 175.1 (98.8) min, P < 0.001, with no change in patient outcome. Patients receiving only short-acting anesthetics were 78% more likely (P < 0.002) to bypass the PACU after adjusting for various surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents a substantial change in clinical practice in the perioperative setting. Same-day surgical patients given short-acting anesthetic agents and who are awake, alert, and mobile requiring no parenteral pain medications and with no bleeding or nausea at the end of an operative procedure can safely bypass the PACU.