The effects of teriparatide on acceleration of bone healing following atypical femoral fracture: comparison between daily and weekly administration.

We compared the effectiveness of promoting bone healing between two teriparatide preparations for atypical femoral fracture (AFF). A total of 45 AFFs were included in this study, and we compared the duration of bone union. Teriparatide administered by daily injection enhanced bone union more than weekly administration in complete AFFs. INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of teriparatide for atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been recently reported. Although two different teriparatide preparations can be used to treat osteoporosis in Japan, daily or weekly injection, all previous reports on the effectiveness of teriparatide for AFF only examined daily injection formulations. Therefore, we compared the promotion of bone healing between the two teriparatide preparations for AFF. METHODS: A total of 45 consecutive AFFs in 43 Japanese patients were included in this study. They received either a daily 20-µg teriparatide injection (daily group; n = 32) or a once-a-week 56.5-µg teriparatide injection (weekly group; n = 13). We compared the clinical background and duration of bone union between these two groups. RESULTS: When all patents were included, the fracture healing time was not significantly different between the two groups. Only patients with complete AFFs had significantly fewer daily bisphosphonate or denosumab injections than the weekly group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time in the daily group (6.1 ± 4.1 months) was significantly shorter than that in the weekly group (10.1 ± 4.2 months) (P < 0.05). Even if the influence of bisphosphonate or denosumab usage was excluded, a similar significant difference was observed in the fracture healing time (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups among patients with incomplete AFFs. CONCLUSIONS: Daily teriparatide injections enhance bone union more than weekly injections in complete AFF patients.

Relationship between the hip joint capsule and piriformis tendon in a simulation of the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach in THA cadaver study.

Fifteen fresh frozen cadavers were used for a simulation of the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach in an anatomical study. Several parameters were measured to evaluate the relation between the piriformis tendon insertion and hip joint capsule insertion. The anteroposterior diameter of the piriformis tendon was found to be greater than the medial-lateral diameter, and that the posterior part of the incised hip joint capsule is distant from the piriformis tendon as the piriformis is inserted into the extra-articular portion. We also found that it was important not to dissect the anteroproximal portion of the greater trochanter to prevent rupture of the piriformis tendon, whereas the posterior portion was relatively safe.

Cementless total hip replacement with subtrochanteric femoral shortening for severe developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Total hip replacement for high dislocation of the hip joint remains technically difficult in terms of preparation of the true acetabulum and restoration of leg length. We describe our experience of cementless total hip replacement combined with a subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy in 20 hips with Crowe grade IV dislocation with a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (4 to 11.5). There was one man and 17 women with a mean age of 55 years (44 to 69) at the time of the operation. After placement of the acetabular component at the site of the natural acetabulum, a cementless porous-coated cylindrical femoral component was implanted following a subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy. The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association hip score improved from a mean of 38 (22 to 62) to a mean of 83 points (55 to 98) at the final follow-up. The mean lengthening of the leg was 14.8 mm (-9 to 34) in patients with iliofemoral osteoarthritis and 35.3 mm (15 to 51) in patients with no arthritic changes. No nerve palsy was observed. Total hip replacement combined with subtrochanteric shortening femoral osteotomy in this situation is beneficial in avoiding nerve injury and still permits valuable improvement in inequality of leg length.