Esophageal Perforation After Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation (EP) after anterior cervical surgery is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. EP caused by malpositioned implants in cervical spine injury with multiple comorbidities is challenging to treat simultaneously. STUDY: This was a case report study. PURPOSE OF STUDY: The aim of this study was to present successful treatment of EP in a subluxated C5-C6 level with implant failure, infection, septicemia, and comorbidities. The aim was to emphasize the need for a multispecialty approach while treating serious complications. CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented to the ER with a history of operated cervical spine a week ago and having breathlessness, fever, wound infection, and tracheostomy in situ. After primary investigations, the patient was initially treated in the intensive care unit, where bleeding from the tracheostomy site was noticed. Upon endoscopy, EP was diagnosed due to implant failure. She was operated for revision cervical spine surgery (drainage of pus with anterior and posterior cervical fixation) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion (esophageal diversion). On exploration of EP, a decision was made to perform conservative treatment as initial tag sutures did not hold due to infection. Postoperatively, the patient developed rectal bleed 3 times, which was ultimately treated with cecal bleed embolization. The infected cervical wound was managed with an open dressing. The patient was managed with intermittent assisted ventilation through tracheostomy postoperatively. Barium swallow at 10 weeks confirmed healing of EP and oral feed was started. Tracheostomy closure was performed once the wound had healed, and the patient was discharged with improved neurology at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative problems after cervical surgery such as breathing difficulty, wound discharge, and worsening of neurology may lead to suspicion of underlying EP due to implant failure. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy needs to be considered for a prompt diagnosis. Revision spine surgery with treatment of perforation simultaneously and maintenance of enteral nutrition through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with a multispecialty approach is recommended for this potentially life-threatening condition.

All ileo-cecal ulcers are not Crohn's: Changing perspectives of symptomatic ileocecal ulcers.

AIM: To investigated clinical, endoscopic and histopathological parameters of the patients presenting with ileocecal ulcers on colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive symptomatic patients undergoing colonoscopy, and diagnosed to have ulcerations in the ileocecal (I/C) region, were enrolled. Biopsy was obtained and their clinical presentation and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 1632 colonoscopies, 104 patients had ulcerations in the I/C region and were included in the study. Their median age was 44.5 years and 59% were males. The predominant presentation was lower GI bleed (55, 53%), pain abdomen ± diarrhea (36, 35%), fever (32, 31%), and diarrhea alone (9, 9%). On colonoscopy, terminal ileum was entered in 96 (92%) cases. The distribution of ulcers was as follows: Ileum alone 40% (38/96), cecum alone 33% (32/96), and both ileum plus cecum 27% (26/96). The ulcers were multiple in 98% and in 34% there were additional ulcers elsewhere in colon. Based on clinical presentation and investigations, the etiology of ulcers was classified into infective causes (43%) and non-infective causes (57%). Fourteen patients (13%) were diagnosed to have Crohn's disease (CD). CONCLUSION: Non-specific ileocecal ulcers are most common ulcers seen in ileo-cecal region. And if all infections are clubbed together then infection is the most common (> 40%) cause of ulcerations of the I/C region. Cecal involvement and fever are important clues to infective cause. On the contrary CD account for only 13% cases as a cause of ileo-cecalulcers. So all symptomatic patients with I/C ulcers on colonoscopy are not Crohn's.

Adrenal insufficiency predicts early mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal insufficiency (AI), also known as hepato-adrenal syndrome, is a well-known entity in cirrhotic patients. However, factors associated with AI and its effect on survival are still not clear. We determined the prevalence of AI in patients with cirrhosis who had no hemodynamic instability or any acute deterioration, and studied its influence on short-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In consecutive cirrhotic patients, presence of AI was determined either by total serum cortisol <18 µg/dl, 60 minutes after 250 µg synacthen injection, or when the delta-fraction (post-synacthen serum cortisol minus basal serum cortisol) was <9 µg/dl. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included in the study (median age 50 years (range 27-73), males 87%). The median CTP and MELD scores were 10 (range 6-13) and 20 (range 6-40). The etiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (51%), cryptogenic (28%), viral (19%) and autoimmune (2%). Sixty-nine patients (58%) had AI and the remaining 51 (42%) had normal adrenal function. Serum bilirubin was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the AI group, and total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and hemoglobin were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the AI group. CTP score, MELD score, and basal cortisol levels were not different between those with and without AI (p = NS). By 120 days of follow-up, 41 patients had died. Thus, the 120-day survival was 66%, and this was higher in patients without AI than in patients with AI (78% vs 56%; p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis absence of AI, low WBC and low CTP score independently predicted 120-day survival. CONCLUSIONS: AI is present in more than half of cirrhotic patients but does not parallel the severity scores of cirrhosis. Its presence predicts early mortality in these patients, and this prediction is independent of CTP or MELD scores.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the adrenal glands: analysis of 21 patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology of adrenal masses helps in etiological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of adrenal masses in cases where other imaging methods failed and/or were not feasible. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with adrenal masses, in whom adrenal FNA was performed because conventional imaging modalities failed and/or were not feasible, were prospectively evaluated over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients (mean age, 56±12.2 years; male:female ratio, 2:1), 12 had pyrexia of unknown origin and the other nine underwent evaluation for metastasis. The median lesion size was 2.4×1.6 cm. Ten patients were diagnosed with tuberculosis (shown by the presence of caseating granulomas [n=10] and acid-fast bacilli [n=4]). Two patients had EUS-FNA results suggestive of histoplasmosis. The other patients had metastatic lung carcinoma (n=6), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1), and adrenal lipoma (n=1) and adrenal myelolipoma (n=1). EUS results were not suggestive of any particular etiology. No procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is a safe and effective method for evaluating adrenal masses, and it yields diagnosis in cases where tissue diagnosis is impossible or has failed using conventional imaging modalities.

Pancreatic duct leak in a case of post Whipple surgery: Managed by endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatogastrostomy.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) provides an option of minimal invasive intervention over surgery. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy (EPH) is particularly useful in patients with altered anatomy where ERCP is not feasible. This paper reports a case of post Whipple surgery pancreatic ductal leak and external pancreatic fistula, which was managed by EPH. The patient had uneventful post-procedure course and were asymptomatic at 6 months.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic and prostatic abscess drainage: experience in 30 patients.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is an effective treatment for many abscesses in the abdomen. We review our experience with EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage were evaluated after excluding three patients with distance to transducer >2 cm or organized abscess. RESULTS: Thirty patients (25 male) aged 60 ± 4.5 years (mean ± SD) had 4 prostatic abscesses, 7 perisigmoid abscesses, and 19 perirectal abscesses with mean ± SD sizes of 2.5 ± 0.3, 4.7 ± 0.6, and 5.4 ± 0.4 cm, respectively. Surgery was the most common predisposing factor (n = 14, 46.6 %) followed by diverticulitis (n = 5, 16.6 %). Interventions included aspiration only (2 prostatic and 3 perisigmoid), aspiration and dilatation (2 patients in each group), and dilatation and stenting (2 perisigmoid and 17 perirectal). Five (16.6 %) patients needed re-intervention, and two (6.6 %) needed surgery. There were no recurrences. Technical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage overall was 90.9 % (30/33) and was 93.3 % (27/30) in patients in whom EUS-guided drainage was attempted, with 16.5 % (n = 5) re-intervention rate. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage has an excellent success rate in drainage of pelvic abscesses.

Terbinafine induced liver injury: a case report.

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is a cause of significant morbidity; timely diagnosis is important and requires a high index of suspicion. Terbinafine induced liver injury is rare. We report a case of Terbinafine induced hepatitis-cholestatic injury. The patient had a prolonged recovery phase lasting 3 months after discontinuation of drug.

Excellent outcome of living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome: a single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) worsens the prognosis of cirrhosis and liver transplantation is only definitive treatment. There is paucity of data about role of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in HPS. METHODS: Fourteen patients with HPS and cirrhosis who underwent LDLT were prospectively included. HPS was defined as PaO2 < 80 mmHg in presence of demonstrable macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) scan shunt fraction >6%. RESULTS: The study group composed of 11 male and three female patients, mean age 50.3 ± 8.6 yr. Most common presentations were dyspnea (92.8%), cyanosis (78.5%) and clubbing (64.2%). Mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 18.2 ± 4.7, mean MAA shunt fraction was 23.0 ± 13.2%, mean PaO2 was 58.7 ± 8.4 mmHg. Two patients had very severe HPS (PaO2 <50 mmHg), five had severe HPS (PaO2 >50 <60 mmHg) and seven had moderate HPS (PaO2 >60 <80 mmHg). All patients underwent right lobe LDLT. The overall time to extubation was 2 (1-32 days) and for hospital stay was 20 (17-46 days). The main complications in post-LT course were infection in 57% (cytomegalovirus or bacterial). All the patients are alive and off oxygen at a mean follow up of 29 ± 25 months. CONCLUSION: We report one of the largest series of LDLT in HPS which has shown excellent results.

Low eosinophil count predicts in-hospital mortality in cirrhosis with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and procalcitonin (PCT) level may have a prognostic value in critically ill patients. However, their role in cirrhotic patients has never been studied. We evaluated the role of AEC and PCT, obtained at admission, in predicting in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In consecutive cirrhotic patients with SIRS (with or without sepsis), the levels of AEC and PCT were estimated at admission. Their outcome was correlated with these baseline parameters. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled [median age 52 (range 17-78) years, 84% men]. The etiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (47%), cryptogenic (35%), viral (13%), and others (5%). Their median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores were 24 (range 6-40) and 11 (range 5-15), respectively. Infection was present in 59 patients and the rest of the 41 patients had SIRS without infection. There was a significant difference between the median levels of AEC and PCT between patients who had infection and those who did not have infection (P<0.01). Sixty-three patients recovered from SIRS and were discharged, 33 patients died, and four patients received orthotopic liver transplantation during the same admission. Baseline AEC and PCT levels were significantly different between patients who recovered and died. On multivariate analysis, baseline AEC values could independently predict in-hospital mortality, in addition to MELD and serum sodium. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of AEC for predicting mortality was 0.785, and the best cutoff of AEC, obtained by Youden's index, was 104 cells/cumm, indicating that patients with baseline AEC values less than 104 cells/cumm had higher in-hospital mortality (sensitivity 78%, specificity 70%, positive predictive value 60%, negative predictive value 85%, and accuracy 73%). CONCLUSION: In critically ill cirrhotic patients with SIRS, a baseline AEC value of less than 104 cells/cumm accurately predicts in-hospital mortality. The prediction of mortality by AEC is independent of the MELD score and serum sodium.

Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

With advancements in immunosuppressive strategies and availability of better immunosuppressive agents, survival rate following liver transplantation has improved significantly in the recent times. Besides improvements in surgical techniques, the most important factor that has contributed to this better outcome is the progress made in the field of immunosuppression. Over the last several years, the trend has changed to tailored immunosuppression with the aim of achieving optimal graft function while avoiding its undesirable side effects. Induction agents are no longer used routinely and the aim is to provide minimal immunosuppression in the maintenance phase. The present review discusses the various types of immunosuppressive agents, their mechanism of action, clinical utility, advantages and disadvantages, and their side effects in short and long-term. It also discusses about tailoring immunosuppression in presence of various situations such as renal dysfunction, metabolic syndrome, hepatitis C recurrence, cytomegalovirus infections and so on. The issue of chronic kidney disease and the available renal sparing immunosuppressive strategies has been particularly stressed upon. Finally, it discusses about the practical aspects of various immunosuppression regimens including drug monitoring.