Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to guide radiotherapy planning in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (SEISMIC): an international, multicentre, single-arm, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Systematic mediastinal lymph node staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) improves accuracy of staging in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients with locally advanced NSCLC commonly undergo only selective lymph node sampling. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with locally advanced NSCLC in whom systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging identified PET-occult lymph node metastases, and to describe the consequences of PET-occult disease on radiotherapy planning. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm, international study was conducted at seven tertiary lung cancer centres in four countries (Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and the USA). Patients aged 18 years or older with suspected or known locally advanced NSCLC underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node staging before combination chemoradiotherapy or high-dose palliative radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with PET-occult mediastinal lymph node metastases shown following systematic endoscopic staging. The study was prospectively registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000333314. FINDINGS: From Jan 30, 2018, to March 23, 2022, 155 patients underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node staging and were eligible for analysis. 58 (37%) of patients were female and 97 (63%) were male. Discrepancy in extent of mediastinal disease identified by PET and EBUS-TBNA was observed in 57 (37% [95% CI 29-44]) patients. PET-occult lymph node metastases were identified in 18 (12% [7-17]) participants, including 16 (13% [7-19]) of 123 participants with clinical stage IIIA or cN2 NSCLC. Contralateral PET-occult N3 disease was identified in nine (7% [2-12]) of 128 participants staged cN0, cN1, or cN2. Identification of PET-occult disease resulted in clinically significant changes to treatment in all 18 patients. In silico dosimetry studies showed the median volume of PET-occult lymph nodes receiving the prescription dose of 60 Gy was only 10·1% (IQR 0·1-52·3). No serious adverse events following endoscopic staging were reported. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggests that systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging in patients with locally advanced or unresectable NSCLC is more accurate than PET alone in defining extent of mediastinal involvement. Standard guideline-recommended PET-based radiotherapy planning results in suboptimal tumour coverage. Our findings indicate that systematic endoscopic staging should be routinely performed in patients with locally advanced NSCLC being considered for radiotherapy to accurately inform radiation planning and treatment decision making in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. FUNDING: None.

Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to determine impact on radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer (SEISMIC): protocol for a prospective single arm multicentre interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy. DISCUSSION: With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.

The impact of inter-observer variation in delineation on robustness of radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics have the potential to revolutionise cancer prognostication and personalised treatment. Manual outlining of the tumour volume for extraction of radiomics features (RF) is a subjective process. This study investigates robustness of RF to inter-observer variation (IOV) in contouring in lung cancer. We utilised two public imaging datasets: 'NSCLC-Radiomics' and 'NSCLC-Radiomics-Interobserver1' ('Interobserver'). For 'NSCLC-Radiomics', we created an additional set of manual contours for 92 patients, and for 'Interobserver', there were five manual and five semi-automated contours available for 20 patients. Dice coefficients (DC) were calculated for contours. 1113 RF were extracted including shape, first order and texture features. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess robustness of RF to IOV. Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS) was performed with a previously published radiomics signature. The median DC ranged from 0.81 ('NSCLC-Radiomics') to 0.85 ('Interobserver'-semi-automated). The median ICC for the 'NSCLC-Radiomics', 'Interobserver' (manual) and 'Interobserver' (semi-automated) were 0.90, 0.88 and 0.93 respectively. The ICC varied by feature type and was lower for first order and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features. Shape features had a lower median ICC in the 'NSCLC-Radiomics' dataset compared to the 'Interobserver' dataset. Survival analysis showed similar separation of curves for three of four RF apart from 'original_shape_Compactness2', a feature with low ICC (0.61). The majority of RF are robust to IOV, with first order, GLCM and shape features being the least robust. Semi-automated contouring improves feature stability. Decreased robustness of a feature is significant as it may impact upon the features' prognostic capability.

Impact of Medical Operability and Total Metastatic Ablation on Outcomes After SABR for Oligometastases.

PURPOSE: Medical operability is prognostic for survival after SABR in primary malignancies. This study investigated the prognostic significance of medical operability and total versus subtotal ablation of all oligometastatic disease sites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients with 1 to 5 sites of active extracranial oligometastases had medical operability status and presence of subtotal versus total metastatic ablation recorded prospectively in an institutional database. We retrospectively compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for medically operable or inoperable patients and patients undergoing total or subtotal metastatic ablation. Secondary endpoints were patterns of failure, high-grade treatment toxic effects (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), and freedom from systemic therapy. The threshold dose per fraction considered ablative was 8 Gy. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients with 530 treated oligometastases were included, with a median follow-up of 3 years. Three hundred and two and 99 patients had metachronous and synchronous presentations of oligometastatic disease, respectively. Common histologies included prostate (24%), lung (18%), gastrointestinal (19%), and breast (11%). More than 90% of doses delivered were Biologically Effective Dose [BED10]≥60 Gy. Cumulative incidence at 5 years of local-only failure was 6%, local and distant 2%, and distant-only 58%. The 3- and 5-year OS [95% confidence intervals {CIs}] were 68% [62-73] and 54% [47-61], and PFS was 20% [15-25] and 14% [10-20]. The 3- and 5-year freedom from systemic therapy [95% CIs] were 40% [34-46] and 31% [24-37], respectively. Seventy-six patients were inoperable and 325 were operable. Operability status was not prognostic for OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7; P = .9) or for PFS (adjusted HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6; P = .5). Total metastatic ablation was prognostic for OS (adjusted HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .032) and for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Medical operability was not prognostic in patients with oligometastatic disease treated with SABR. Total metastatic ablation was associated with superior OS and PFS compared with subtotal metastatic ablation. Our data support ablation of all sites of oligometastases wherever feasible.

Role of radiomics in predicting immunotherapy response.

Immunotherapies have revolutionised cancer management. Despite their success, durable responses are limited to a subset of patients. Prediction of immunotherapy response in patients has proven to be difficult due to a lack of robust biomarkers. Routinely collected imaging may offer an additional information source to personalise patient treatment, with advantages over tissue-based biomarkers. Quantitative image analysis or radiomics, which involves the high-throughput extraction of imaging features, has the potential to non-invasively predict cancer histology, outcomes and prognosis. This review evaluates the value of radiomics in patients undergoing immunotherapy, with a summary provided of the performance of radiomics models in predicting immunotherapy response and toxicity, as well as immune correlates. Much of the literature focussed on clinical endpoints and correlates to tissue biomarkers, particularly in lung cancer, while few studies investigated association with immune-related adverse events. Strengths of the studies included more frequent use of clinical trial datasets, homogenous patient cohorts and high-quality diagnostic scans. Limitations of the studies include heterogeneity in study methodology, lack of well-defined homogenous imaging datasets, limited open publishing of imaging datasets, coding and parameters used for radiomics signature development and limited use of external validation datasets. Future research should address the above limitations, as well as further explore the relationship between radiomics and immune-related adverse effects and less well-studied biological correlates such tumour mutational burden, and incorporate known clinical prognostic scores into radiomics models.

Avelumab Combined with Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The Phase 2 ICE-PAC Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has produced modest results. High-dose radiotherapy may be synergistic with checkpoint inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in mCRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From November 2017 to July 2019, this prospective phase 2 study enrolled 31 men with progressive mCRPC after at least one prior androgen receptor-directed therapy. Median follow-up was 18.0 mo. INTERVENTION: Avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk for 24 wk (12 cycles). A single fraction of SABR (20 Gy) was administered to one or two disease sites within 5 d before the first and second avelumab treatments. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), defined as a confirmed complete or partial response of any duration, or stable disease/non-complete response/non-progressive disease for ≥6 mo (Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. DCR and ORR were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact binomial method. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-one evaluable men were enrolled (median age 71 yr, 71% with ≥2 prior mCRPC therapy lines, 81% with >5 total metastases). The DCR was 48% (15/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 30-67%) and ORR was 31% (five of 16; 95% CI 11-59%). The ORR in nonirradiated lesions was 33% (four of 12; 95% CI 10-65%). Median rPFS was 8.4 mo (95% CI 4.5-not reached [NR]) and median OS was 14.1 mo (95% CI 8.9-NR). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in six patients (16%), with three (10%) requiring high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Plasma androgen receptor alterations were associated with lower DCR (22% vs 71%, p = 0.13; Fisher's exact test). Limitations include the small sample size and the absence of a control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Avelumab with SABR demonstrated encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity in treatment-refractory mCRPC. This combination warrants further investigation. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study of men with advanced and heavily pretreated prostate cancer, combining stereotactic radiotherapy with avelumab immunotherapy was safe and resulted in nearly half of patients experiencing cancer control for 6 months or longer. Stereotactic radiotherapy may potentially improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic value of radiomics based models in non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiomics allows extraction of quantifiable features from imaging. This study performs a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of radiomics based prognostic models in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for articles investigating radiomics features predictive of overall survival (OS) in NSCLC treated with curative intent radiotherapy. A random-effects meta-analysis of Harrell's Concordance Index (C-index) was performed on the performance of radiomics models. RESULTS: Of the 2746 articles retrieved, 40 studies of 55 datasets and 6223 patients were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. There was significant heterogeneity in the methodology for feature selection and model development. Twelve datasets reported the C-index of radiomics based models in predicting OS and were included in the meta-analysis. The C-index random effects estimate was 0.57 (95% CI 0.53-0.62). There was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 70.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, radiomics based models for lung cancer have to date demonstrated modest prognostic capabilities. Future research should consider using standardised radiomics features, robust feature selection and model development, and deep learning techniques, absolving the need for pre-defined features, to improve imaging-based models.

Intratumoral Hydrogen Peroxide With Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From a Phase 1 Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) plays a vital role in normal cellular processes but at supraphysiological concentrations causes oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, a property that is potentially exploitable for the treatment of cancer in combination with radiation therapy (RT). We report the first phase 1 trial testing the safety and tolerability of intratumoral H2O2 + external beam RT as a novel combination in patients with breast cancer and exploratory plasma marker analyses investigating possible mechanisms of action. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients with breast tumors ≥3 cm (surgically or medically inoperable) received intratumoral H2O2 with either 36 Gy in 6 twice-weekly fractions (n = 6) or 49.5 Gy in 18 daily fractions (n = 6) to the whole breast ± locoregional lymph nodes in a single-center, nonrandomized study. H2O2 was mixed in 1% sodium hyaluronate gel (final H2O2 concentration 0.5%) before administration to slow drug release and minimize local discomfort. The mixture was injected intratumorally under ultrasound guidance twice weekly 1 hour before RT. The primary endpoint was patient-reported maximum intratumoral pain intensity before and 24 hours postinjection. Secondary endpoints included grade ≥3 skin toxicity and tumor response by ultrasound. Blood samples were collected before, during, and at the end of treatment for cell-death and immune marker analysis. RESULTS: Compliance with H2O2 and RT was 100%. Five of 12 patients reported moderate pain after injection (grade 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02) with median duration 60 minutes (interquartile range, 20-120 minutes). Skin toxicity was comparable to RT alone, with maintained partial/complete tumor response relative to baseline in 11 of 12 patients at last follow-up (median 12 months). Blood marker analysis highlighted significant associations of TRAIL, IL-1ß, IL-4, and MIP-1α with tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral H2O2 with RT is well tolerated with no additional toxicity compared with RT alone. If efficacy is confirmed in a randomized phase 2 trial, the approach has potential as a cost-effective radiation response enhancer in multiple cancer types in which locoregional control after RT alone remains poor.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (SABR ORCA): a meta-analysis of 28 studies.

CONTEXT: The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not yet standard treatment due to uncertainties regarding its efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) protocol was utilized to select studies published during 1998-2019. The primary outcome was 1 year local control and 1 year overall survival; the secondary outcome was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-4 toxicity. Weighted random-effect meta-analyses were conducted using the DerSimonian and Laird method, heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Q test, and the Egger test assessed publication bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 265 studies were screened and 28 studies were included. There were 1602 mutually exclusive patients (679 extracranial/923 intracranial) and 3892 lesions (1159 extracranial/2733 intracranial). The median age was 62yr. The median treatment volume was 59.7cc for extracranial (interquartile range: 31.1-71.4) and 2.3cc for intracranial (interquartile range: 1.3-4.3) lesions. Under the random-effect model, the summary effect size for 1-yr local control was 89.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.6-93.7%, I2=71%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 83.5-95.3%, I2=74%) for extracranial and intracranial disease, respectively. The 1-yr survival rates were 86.8% (95% CI: 62-99.8%, I2=95%) and 49.7% (95% CI: 41.1-58.3%, I2=74%) for extracranial and intracranial disease, respectively. The incidence of any grade 3-4 toxicity was 0.7% (95% CI: 0-2.1%, I2=0%) for extracranial disease and 1.1% (95% CI: 0-7.4%, I2=53%) for intracranial disease. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiotherapy is safe and efficacious for RCC oligometastases, with local control at 90% and any significant toxicity at 1%, reported at 1yr. Further prospective studies are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: Stereotactic radiotherapy is safe and effective in treating kidney cancer that has spread to other parts of the body: 90% of cancers do not progress in the treated region and <1% of patients have side effects at 1yr.

Trends in Management of Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Systemic therapy for patients with hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer is non-curative and associated with toxicities. Meanwhile, this population presents unique clinical opportunities to improve outcomes, including the demonstrated benefits of radiotherapy to the primary tumor or oligometastatic sites. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published randomized studies have demonstrated benefits with the addition of radiotherapy to the primary disease or metastatic lesions in patients with synchronous or metachronous disease. The introduction of novel PET imaging has improved the sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic disease and provides an opportunity to better select patients who will benefit from local therapy. The data presented in this review supports revisiting practice guidelines for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, particularly in relation to the role of radiotherapy to the primary tumor and sites of oligometastatic disease. Future trials will aim to further establish the role of metastasis-directed therapies in metachronous, synchronous, and castrate-resistant disease.

Extracting tumour prognostic factors from a diverse electronic record dataset in genito-urinary oncology.

OBJECTIVES: To implement a system for unsupervised extraction of tumor stage and prognostic data in patients with genitourinary cancers using clinicopathological and radiology text. METHODS: A corpus of 1054 electronic notes (clinician notes, radiology reports and pathology reports) was annotated for tumor stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason grade. Annotations from five clinicians were reconciled to form a gold standard dataset. A training dataset of 386 documents was sequestered. The Medtex algorithm was adapted using the training dataset. RESULTS: Adapted Medtex equaled or exceeded human performance in most annotations, except for implicit M stage (F-measure of 0.69 vs 0.84) and PSA (0.92 vs 0.96). Overall Medtex performed with an F-measure of 0.86 compared to human annotations of 0.92. There was significant inter-observer variability when comparing human annotators to the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: The Medtex algorithm performed similarly to human annotators for extracting stage and prognostic data from varied clinical texts.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in males. There are a number of options for patients with localized early stage disease, including active surveillance for low-risk disease, surgery, brachytherapy, and external beam radiotherapy. Increasingly, external beam radiotherapy, in the form of dose-escalated and moderately hypofractionated regimens, is being utilized in prostate cancer, with randomized evidence to support their use. Stereotactic body radiotherapy, which is a form of extreme hypofractionation, delivered with high precision and conformality typically over 1 to 5 fractions, offers a more contemporary approach with several advantages including being non-invasive, cost-effective, convenient for patients, and potentially improving patient access. In fact, one study has estimated that if half of the patients currently eligible for conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the United States were treated instead with stereotactic body radiotherapy, this would result in a total cost savings of US$250 million per year. There is also a strong radiobiological rationale to support its use, with prostate cancer believed to have a low α/ß ratio and therefore being preferentially sensitive to larger fraction sizes. To date, there are no published randomized trials reporting on the comparative efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to alternative treatment modalities, although multiple randomized trials are currently accruing. Yet, early results from the randomized phase III study of HYPOfractionated RadioTherapy of intermediate risk localized Prostate Cancer (HYPO-RT-PC) trial, as well as multiple single-arm phase I/II trials, indicate low rates of late adverse effects with this approach. In patients with low- to intermediate-risk disease, excellent biochemical relapse-free survival outcomes have been reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up times. These promising early results, coupled with the enormous potential cost savings and implications for resource availability, suggest that stereotactic body radiotherapy will take center stage in the treatment of prostate cancer in the years to come.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma and adrenal metastases.

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and metastatic adrenal lesions continues to rise and present evolving complexities in terms of management. Technical challenges in treatment delivery are compounded by the setting of an ageing patient population with multiple medical co-morbidities. While the standard of care treatment for both primary RCC and oligometastatic adrenal lesions has typically been surgery, a number of patients may be medically or surgically inoperable, and for whom alternative options require consideration. Additionally, in metastatic disease, surgery presents an invasive option, sometimes with unacceptable risks of perioperative morbidity and therefore is considered a less desirable option to some. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established radiotherapy technique that is rapidly being incorporated into many radiotherapy departments, particu-larly with the increasing availability and capabilities of modern linear accelerators to deliver precise image guided treatment. There are considerable advantages of SBRT including its ability to provide a non-invasive ablative treatment with very few treatment sessions, with emerging evidence showing promising rates of local control (LC) and low associated mor-bidity. This review details the use of SBRT for primary RCC as well as adrenal metastases, focusing on issues including patient selection, technical considerations, and patient out-comes. Furthermore, this review explores some recent insights into the radiobiology of RCC, the immunomodulatory effects of SBRT, and the use of systemic agents with SBRT.

Radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma: renaissance of an overlooked approach.

Conventional radiotherapy previously had a limited role in the definitive treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), owing to the disappointing outcomes of several trials and the perceived radioresistance of this type of cancer. In this context, radiotherapy has been relegated largely to the palliation of symptoms in patients with metastatic disease, with variable rates of response. Following the availability of newer technologies that enable safe delivery of high-dose radiotherapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become increasingly used in patients with RCC. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that RCC cells are sensitive to ablative doses of radiotherapy (≥8-10 Gy). Trials in the setting of intracranial and extracranial oligometastases, as well as primary RCC, have demonstrated excellent tumour control using this approach. Additionally, an awareness of the capacity of high-dose radiation to stimulate antitumour immunity has resulted in novel combinations of SABR with immunotherapies. Here we describe the historical application of conventional radiotherapy, the current biological understanding of the effects of radiation, and the clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy in RCC. We also explore emerging opportunities to combine systemic targeted agents or immunotherapies with radiation. Radiotherapy, although once an overlooked approach, is moving towards the forefront of RCC treatment.

Support for the use of objective comorbidity indices in the assessment of noncancer death risk in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer management involves a balance between the risks of cancer death against those from other causes. To evaluate the performance of several comorbidity indices in predicting comorbid death in a prostate cancer radiotherapy cohort. METHODS: 2,131 men with localised prostate cancer treated with radical radiotherapy between 1999 and 2007 were studied. Tumour features, androgen deprivation usage, age, number of prescription medications (PMN) and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 Index (ACE-27) were recorded. Death from prostate cancer (DPC) and death from other causes (DOC) were analysed as competing causes of death using a competing risks model, with discrimination assessed using the concordance index. RESULTS: ACE-27 scores correlated with patient's PMN (median PMN = 2). Tumour features were independent of ACE-27 scores. Estimated cumulative incidences of DOC and DPC at 10 years were 16.4% and 7.7% respectively. In the low/intermediate risk group (n = 1026) there was a 3.4-fold predominance of DOC inside 10 years (cumulative incidence: 15.8% DOC vs 3.4% DPC). High-risk men had approximately equal rates of DPC and DOC at 10 years. Multivariable analysis showed age, ACE-27 score ≥ 1 and PMN to have significant associations with DOC (P < 0.002 for all). A multivariable model incorporating all 3 variables resulted in C-Index = 0.646. CONCLUSION: Age, ACE-27 score and PMN act as independent prognostic factors for DOC in prostate cancer patients and can improve patient's life expectancy prediction.

Outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for cranial and extracranial metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy is a non-invasive, ablative technique which may be particularly effective in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The study objective was to analyse outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic RCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of Medline was performed in March 2013. Exclusion criteria included mixed histology studies and case series. Local control, overall survival and toxicities were analysed. RESULTS: From 148 publications identified, 16 and 10 publications for cranial and extracranial metastatic RCC met inclusion criteria, respectively. There were 810 intracranial patients and 2433 targets. The weighted local control was 92%. Overall survival ranged from 6.7 to 25.6 months. Significant Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 6%. The weighted rate of treatment-related mortality was 0.6%, all secondary to intratumoral haemorrhage. There were 389 extracranial patients and 730 targets. The weighted local control was 89%. Median overall survival ranged from 11.7 to 22 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 4%. Treatment-related mortality was 0.5%. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity for intracranial and extracranial metastatic RCC. Future randomised studies are required to confirm the additional benefit of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) above standard conservative or palliative approaches.

Utilisation of plasma exchange in the treatment of digital infarcts in Wegener's granulomatosis.

Digital ischemia is a rare manifestation of Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) with previous management approaches based on the hypotheses of thromboembolic phenomenon and vasospasm. WG is an autoimmune, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-predominant small-to-medium-vessel necrotising vasculitis which mainly affects the pulmonary-renal system. We report on a patient with WG presenting with digital infarction. We successfully treated this patient who had digital infarcts refractory to cyclophosphamide, steroids and vasodilator agents, with plasma exchange.