Formoterol delivered via a new multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Certihaler) is as effective and well tolerated as the formoterol dry powder inhaler (Aerolizer) in children with persistent asthma.

The Certihaler is a new multi-dose dry powder inhaler for the delivery of formoterol (Foradil), a long-acting beta(2)-agonist. This dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of formoterol 5, 10, 15 and 30 microg and placebo administered via the Certihaler or formoterol 12 microg via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (Aerolizer) in children with persistent asthma. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, incomplete block crossover, dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study. Children (5-12 years, n = 77) received four of the active treatments twice weekly (BID) for 1 week separated by 1-week single-blind washouts. The primary efficacy variable was 12-h AUC of FEV(1) after 1 week's treatment. Secondary variables included serial 12-h FEV(1). A subset of patients (n = 37) participated in a pharmacokinetic analysis. All formoterol doses resulted in significant increases in 12-h AUC of FEV(1) compared with placebo, and there was no difference between active treatments. The onset of action of formoterol was <3 min for all active treatments. Doses of formoterol > or =10 microg via the Certihaler increased FEV(1) significantly for up to 12 h compared with placebo. The 5 microcg dose via the Certihaler and 12 microg dose via the Aerolizer had a significant effect up to 8 and 7 h post-dose, respectively. Urinary excretion of formoterol via the Certihaler increased in a dose-proportional manner. All formoterol doses were well tolerated, but some patients experienced tremor at the 15 and 30 microg doses. Despite the lack of significant differences between the active doses in the overall bronchodilation, formoterol 10 microg BID via the Certihaler was the dose that provided the best balance between efficacy and tolerability: its duration of action was sustained over 12 h, contrary to that the lower dose (5 microg BID), whereas its tolerability, especially with regard to tremor, was better than the higher doses (15 and 30 microg BID). Overall, Certihaler 10 microg BID was not significantly different from formoterol 12 microg BID via Aerolizer.

Effects of formoterol and salmeterol on resting inspiratory capacity in COPD patients with poor FEV(1) reversibility.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that inspiratory capacity (IC) measured at rest can be used to predict improvements in dyspnea and exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. In this study we compared the effect of formoterol (Foradil, Aerolizer) and salmeterol (Serevent, Diskus) in terms of IC in patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose, double-dummy, crossover study conducted in five secondary care centres in four European countries. A total of 47 patients with Stage II and III COPD, as defined by ATS criteria, with an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) of

Inspiratory flow rates and volumes with the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children and adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) and forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) through the formoterol (Foradil*) Aerolizer* in patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PIFR and FIVC were assessed in 33 adults and 32 children using a spirometer alone (baseline), a spirometer with an adaptor, and a spirometer with an adaptor and the Aerolizer inhaler (placebo loaded). RESULTS: Of adult patients using the Aerolizer inhaler, 73% had PIFR values of >100 l/min and 91% had values of >60 l/min. PIFR in adults was reduced from a mean baseline of 283 l/min to 118 l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Similarly, 75% of children using the Aerolizer inhaler had PIFR values >80 l/min and 91% had values of > 60 l/min. The mean PIFR in children was reduced from a baseline of 154 l/min to 100 l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Only small mean decreases from baseline were observed in FIVC through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler: 8.4% in adults and 3.8% in children. FIVC values of > 2.0 litre were achieved in 82% of adults, and 81% of children achieved FIVC values of >1.5 litre. CONCLUSIONS: This study, albeit in a relatively small patient population, suggests that most children and adults with asthma can generate PIFRs of > 60 l/min and FIVCs of > 1.5 litre through the Aerolizer inhaler regardless of their disease severity. Such findings compare extremely favourably with other dry powder inhalers.

Formoterol therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the literature.

Numerous clinical trials have investigated the use of formoterol, a long-acting beta2-agonist, for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Formoterol provides bronchodilation as rapidly as albuterol, yet its efficacy and duration of action are similar to those of salmeterol. It demonstrates better spirometric efficacy than either ipratropium or theophylline alone, and its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol improves patients' quality of life and has a good safety profile. It is better tolerated than theophylline and has a similar tolerability to albuterol, salmeterol, and ipratropium. In short, formoterol is a bronchodilator with rapid onset of action and prolonged duration of action with a favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile when used in patients with COPD. It provides a valid therapeutic option in the pharmacologic treatment of this disease.

Faster onset of bronchodilation with formoterol than with salmeterol in patients with stable, moderate to severe COPD: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the onset and magnitude of bronchodilation after dry powder inhalations of formoterol fumarate (Foradil Aerolizer) versus salmeterol xinofoate (Serevent Diskus) with respect to normalized (*) forced expiratory volume in 1 s area under the curve 0 to 1 h after inhalation (FEV1 AUC*0-1 h). DESIGN: A double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, randomized, placebo controlled, single-dose, five-period crossover study. SETTING: Five centres in four countries - one centre each in France, Greece and Italy, and two centres in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients aged 42 to 80 years (mean age 63.5 years) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stage II and III, and mean baseline FEV1 1.17 L (range 0.56 to 1.77 L). INTERVENTIONS: Patients inhaled single doses of formoterol dry powder (12 and 24 mg), single doses of salmeterol (50 and 100 mg) and matching placebo on five separate days. MAIN RESULTS: The estimates of treatment difference in absolute terms (0.086 L) and percentage change from predose baseline (7.8%) for the primary end point, FEV1 AUC*0-1 h, showed that formoterol 12 mg was statistically significantly superior to salmeterol 50 mg (P=0.0044 and P=0.0021, respectively). In addition, both doses of formoterol were statistically superior to placebo for both absolute improvement and percentage change (P=0.0001). The analysis of secondary variables also confirmed the superiority of formoterol over salmeterol. CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol is associated with a faster onset of bronchodilation than salmeterol in patients with COPD.

Comparison of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of formoterol dry powder and oral, slow-release theophylline in the treatment of COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of therapy with formoterol and oral slow-release theophylline (THEO) in patients with COPD. DESIGN: A randomized, parallel-group study, with double-blind arms for formoterol and placebo (PL) and an open arm for oral slow-release THEO administered in individual doses on the basis of plasma concentrations. SETTING: Eighty-one centers worldwide. PATIENTS: Eight hundred fifty-four patients with symptomatic COPD. INTERVENTION: Comparison of twice-daily inhaled formoterol dry powder (12 or 24 microg), PL, and THEO (individualized doses) over 12 months. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compared to PL, doses of formoterol and THEO both significantly improved the area under the curve for FEV(1) measured over a period of 12 h following the morning dose of study medication at 3 and 12 months (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Therapy with formoterol, 12 microg, was significantly more effective than that with THEO (p < or = 0.026). Formoterol significantly reduced the percentage of "bad days" (i.e., days with at least two individual symptom scores > or = 2 and/or a reduction in peak expiratory flow from a baseline of > 20%; p < or = 0.035 vs. PL and THEO), and the use of salbutamol rescue medication (p < or = 0.003 vs PL) over the whole treatment period, while the effect of THEO was similar to that of PL. Therapy with formoterol and THEO was more effective than PL at improving quality of life for > 12 months (p < or = 0.030). Treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations were more frequent among patients receiving THEO than among those receiving formoterol. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with inhaled formoterol dry powder is more effective and better tolerated than treatment with therapeutically appropriate doses of oral slow-release THEO in symptomatic patients with COPD.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, crossover clinical trial of the onset and duration of protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol and albuterol.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are the most commonly used treatment for the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, has been demonstrated to provide protection from EIB, although the onset and duration of this protection have not been defined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the onset and duration of the protective effect of a single dose of inhaled formoterol powder against EIB, comparing them with the effect of a single dose of placebo and albuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI). METHODS: In this double-dummy, 4-way crossover study, patients received single doses of formoterol (12 and 24 microg) via a powder inhaler, albuterol by MDI (180 microg), and placebo. Exercise challenge tests (ECTs) were conducted at 15 minutes and at 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose. Pulmonary function studies (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] and peak expiratory flow rate) were performed before and after each exercise challenge. RESULTS: Twenty adolescent and adult patients (mean age, 23.8 years; range, 13-41 years; 9 male, 11 female) with asthma were enrolled in the study, and 17 completed all 4 treatment sequences. Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol produced significantly greater inhibition of FEV(1) decreases at all time points (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in efficacy measures between the 2 formoterol doses throughout the study. The exercise-induced decrease in FEV(1) after albuterol treatment was significantly reduced compared with placebo only at 15 minutes after dosing (P < 0.05). Formoterol and albuterol exhibited a similar rapid onset of action (<15 minutes), but formoterol continued to protect patients against EIB for at least 12 hours (P < 0.01), whereas albuterol was no longer clinically effective by the 4-hour ECT. CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol and albuterol, given as single-dose inhalations, both provided protection from EIB within 15 minutes in this group of patients. The bronchoprotection afforded by formoterol lasted up to 12 hours, whereas that of albuterol was no longer significant by 4 hours.

Formoterol delivered via a dry powder inhaler (Aerolizer): results from long-term clinical trials in children.

Over 500 children with asthma, aged 5-12 years, have been treated with formoterol fumarate (Foradil) delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in clinical trials, with treatment periods of up to 15 months. In pivotal double-blind trials, two dose levels, 12 and 24 microg taken twice daily, provided significant benefit in terms of lung function measurements and symptom control (a lower dose of 6 microg twice daily appeared insufficient with this formulation). The higher, 24 microg dose appeared to provide an additional margin of benefit in a subgroup of children with more unstable/severe disease when the results from long-term follow-up (12-15 months) were analysed. Formoterol was shown to have a good safety profile when taken as regular maintenance treatment and when used as rescue medication by patients already receiving formoterol as regular maintenance treatment. In this flexible regimen, with formoterol used for rescue and maintenance, the overall daily intake of formoterol was low, with 96.1% of all treatment days (n = 2452) covered by a total daily dose (regular + rescue) of 48 microg (four doses) or less. There was no increase in the average daily intake of rescue formoterol over time. The clinical efficacy associated with this regimen was maintained over time and, in the case of morning peak expiratory flow rate, steadily improved over time. The Foradil Aerolizer inhalation system is simple to use and has a low resistance to inspiratory airflow that maximises the patient's control over dosing, while minimising the risk of under- and overdosing. These features may be especially valuable in a young patient population.