Two assays to evaluate potential genotoxic effects of hydroxyurea in sickle cell disease patients.

Hydroxycarbamide, well known in clinical settings as hydroxyurea (HU), is an antineoplastic agent inhibiting the ribonucleotide reductase enzyme, and thus, the conversion of ribonucleotides into deoxyribonucleotides. A concern about long term side effects of HU treatment in sickle cell disease patients, particularly genotoxicity, has often been evoked. The present study assessed two suitable methods to evaluate oxidative DNA damage associated with HU: the comet assay on blood lymphocytes and the quantification of urinary excretion of 8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). Both methods were applied in a preliminary study including seven sickle cell disease patients treated with HU, seven untreated sickle cell disease patients and five healthy volunteers. Concerning DNA damage, the comet assay and the 8-oxodG assay did not reveal any significant differences among the three groups. Methodologies used in this pilot study could be suitable to carry out further research in this area including a larger size sample setting.

Transfusion safety on the African continent: an international quality control of virus testing in blood banks.

BACKGROUND: Following World Health Organization recommendations that a quality control (QC) system be implemented in African blood centers, a pilot study of the performance of human immunodeficiency virus antibody (anti-HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) testing by several Sub-Saharan African blood centers was initiated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A reference laboratory sent a panel of 25 samples to six African blood center laboratories. The panel included eight negative samples; four anti-HIV-1­, one anti-HIV-2­, four anti-HCV­, and five HBsAg-positive samples; and three samples consisting of mixtures of two sera to mimic coinfections. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall quality (correct positive or negative status) scores were calculated. RESULTS: From the 21 sets of results obtained (seven for each virus), eight were from rapid tests (two for HIV, three for HBV, and three for HCV) and 13 were from enzyme immunoassays (EIAs; all HIV EIAs were antigen/antibody combination assays). Overall assay sensitivity was 98% for HIV, 75% for HBV, and 88% for HCV; agreement between blood centers using the same assay was good. Sensitivity of rapid tests was notably poorer than EIAs, with overall sensitivity quality scores of 64.5% for rapid tests (20% for HBsAg rapid tests) compared to 100% for EIAs. The overall specificity quality scores were 98.3 and 94.5% for EIAs and rapid tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot QC study organized for blood centers of Sub-Saharan Africa showed the feasibility of the approach despite some logistic constraints. Although interlaboratory variability was small, the poor performance of rapid tests, especially for HBsAg, raises policy questions about their use as the only screening assay.