Validated specialty-specific models for multi-disciplinary microsurgery training laboratories: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory simulation is increasingly important for teaching microsurgical skills. Training microsurgeons of different specialties within the same simulation laboratory increases efficiency of resource use. For maximal benefit, simulations should be available for trainees to practice specialty-specific, higher-order skills. Selection of appropriate simulations requires knowledge of the efficacy and validity of the numerous described laboratory models. Here we present a systematic review of validated training models that may serve as useful adjuncts to achieving competency in specialty elements of microsurgery, and appraise the evidence behind them. METHODS: In setting up a multi-disciplinary microsurgery training course, we performed a systematic review according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and PubMed databases were searched for studies describing validated, microscope-based, specialty-specific simulations, and awarded a level of evidence and level of recommendation based on a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification. RESULTS: A total of 141 papers describing specialty-specific microsimulation models were identified, 49 of which included evidence of validation. Eleven were in the field of neurosurgery, 21 in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery, two in urology/gynaecology and 15 plastic and reconstructive surgery. These papers described synthetic models in 19 cases, cadaveric animals in 10 cases, live animals in 12 cases and human cadaveric material in 10 cases. CONCLUSION: Numerous specialty-specific models for use in the microscope laboratory are available, but the quality of evidence for them is poor. Provision of models that span numerous specialties may encourage use of a microscope lab whilst still enabling more specific skills training over a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.

Analysis of Multivariables during Porcine Liver Digestion to Improve Hepatocyte Yield and Viability for Use in Bioartificial Liver Support Systems.

In order to achieve optimal BALSS function, preparation of porcine hepatocytes with high yield, viability, and P450 activity is known to be important. To date hepatocyte yields have varied from 0.58 × 1010 to 3.45 × 10 and viabilities from 75% to 95% within and between laboratories, even when using the same digestion methods and procedures, indicating that hepatocyte isolation during porcine liver digestion is not fully optimized. The aim of this work was to identify the critical parameters affecting cell recovery during porcine liver harvesting by investigating 21 variables involved in the process, including pig body and liver weight, different digestion times of perfusates, pH, a range of concentrations of sodium and chloride in EDTA, and collagenase perfusates. Univariate and multivariate analysis of a retrospective study (n = 23) revealed that low perfusate pH during the process of digestion had a positive effect on hepatocyte yield (p < 0.05), while high (relative) concentrations of sodium and chloride in the perfusates had significant negative effects on hepatocyte viability (both p < 0.05). Sodium and chloride had narrow optimal ranges for achieving a >90% viability. These findings were then tested in a prospective study (n = 10) and further verified. High hepatocyte viabilities (91.8 ± 1.6%, p = 0.036) and yields (2.56 ± 0.48 × 1010) were achieved consistently, and P450IA1 activity was increased after sodium and chloride concentrations and pH in the perfusates were controlled. The physiological mechanism by which sodium and chloride affects hepatocyte viability during porcine liver digestion is discussed.