Quality Review of Prone Patient Transport Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective quality review of LifeFlight Nova Scotia's prone patient transport protocol. METHODS: Electronic patient care records were queried for acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone position, proning, supine to prone, and prone to prone between February 2017 and June 2022. Eligible electronic patient care records were reviewed for demographics (sex, age, and weight); method of transports (ambulance, rotor wing, or fixed wing); duration of transports; mechanical ventilation parameters; medication infusions; arterial blood gases; occurrences of mild hypoxemia (any oxygen saturation [SpO2] < 88% or decrease in SpO2 > 5%); hypotension (any episode of MAP < 65 mm Hg); severe hypoxemia (any SpO2 < 80% or decrease in SpO2 > 10%); refractory hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg not responsive to vasopressor/inotropes); cardiac arrests; and displacement of central lines, arterial lines, and endotracheal tubes. RESULTS: Seventeen prone patients were transported by ambulance, rotor wing, and fixed wing with 4 occurrences of mild hypotension, 4 occurrences of mild hypoxemia, and 1 occurrence of refractory hypotension. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfer of prone patients by a dedicated critical care team is feasible with minimal adverse occurrences while ensuring patients have access to the specialized lifesaving care they require.

Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation in the emergency department.

Tracheal intubation is a commonly performed procedure on critically ill patients in the emergency department. It is associated with many serious complications, one of the most dangerous being unrecognized esophageal intubation, which can result in anoxic brain injury, cardiac arrest, or death. It is the responsibility of the emergency physician to do everything possible to avoid this devastating complication. Preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation requires a two-pronged approach. First, the inadvertent placement of intended tracheal tubes into the esophagus must be reduced as much as is humanly possible. This can be achieved with the routine use of video laryngoscopes for emergency department intubations. Numerous studies have demonstrated that use of video laryngoscopes can significantly reduce the occurrence of esophageal intubation, presumably by providing an improved view of the larynx. Second, if an esophageal intubation inadvertently occurs, it must be rapidly identified and appropriately addressed. The cornerstone of rapid identification is the use of continuous waveform capnography to detect exhaled carbon dioxide. Capnography has been shown to be the most accurate method to determine tube placement after intubation. Standard clinical examinations, for example, auscultation of breath sounds, visualization of chest excursion, and observation of condensation in the tube, have all been demonstrated in studies to be unreliable and thus should not be used to exclude esophageal intubation. Recently, the Project for Universal Management of Airways, an international collaborative of airway experts from anesthesiology, critical care and emergency medicine, published evidence-based guidelines to specifically address the issue of preventing unrecognized esophageal intubation. These guidelines, which have received endorsement from several prominent airway societies, including the Society for Airway Management, the Difficult Airway Society, and the European Airway Management Society, will be briefly discussed in this review.

Negotiating humanity: an ethnography of cadaver-based simulation.

Human body donation (HBD) serves an essential function in many medical schools, particularly in institutions where people engage in cadaver-based simulation (CBS) as a pedagogical approach. The people who facilitate HBD and CBS have a highly specialized skill set, yet their expertise remains largely unacknowledged, and takes place out of sight from the broader medical school community. This manuscript, based on a two-year practice-based ethnography (Structured Observations n = 68 h, Unstructured Observations n = 150 + hours; Interviews n = 24; and Document/Policy Analysis n = 14) illuminates the complex work of HBD. We identify three primary functions of HBD and CBS (1. Cadaver Intake & Administration, 2. Cadaver Preparation, and 3. Cadaver-Based Pedagogy). We describe how medical educators involved in CBS have developed a skillset specific to their role: negotiating humanity.

Potential Candidates for Emergency Department Initiated Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) in a Canadian Institution.

Introduction Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients experience poor survival. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of heart-lung bypass, in the setting of cardiac arrest, termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has promise in improving survival with good neurologic outcomes. The study objective was to determine the number of potential annual ECPR candidates among the OHCA population in a health region within the Atlantic Canadian province of Nova Scotia. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted over a five-year period: January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2016. Consecutive non-traumatic OHCA and emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests occurring in a pre-determined catchment area (20-minute transport to ECMO center) defined by a geographic bounding box were identified. Criteria for ECPR were developed to identify candidates for activation of a "Code ECPR": (1) age 16-70, (2) witnessed arrest, (3) no flow duration (time to CPR, including bystander) <10 minutes, (4) resuscitation >10 minutes without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), (5) emergency medical service (EMS) transport to hospital <20 minutes, (6) no patient factors precluding ongoing resuscitation (do not resuscitate status (DNR), palliative care involvement, or metastatic cancer), and (7) initial rhythm not asystole. Candidates were stratified by initial rhythm. Candidates were considered ultimately ED ECPR eligible if they failed conventional treatment, defined by death or resuscitation >30 minutes. Clinical data related to candidacy was extracted by an electronic query from prehospital and ED electronic records and manual chart review by three researchers. Results Our search yielded 561 cases of EMS-treated OHCA or in-ED arrests. Of those 204/561 (36%; 95% CI 33-40%) met the criteria for activation of a "Code ECPR". Ultimately 79/204 (34%; 95% CI 28-41%) of those who met activation criteria were considered ED ECPR eligible; which is 14% (95% CI 11-17%) of the total number of arrests-of the total number of arrests, the initial rhythms were pulseless electrical activity (PEA) 33/79 (42%; 95% CI 32-53%) and shockable 46/79 (58%; 95% CI 47-69%). Conclusion Of all cardiac arrests in the area surrounding our ECMO center, approximately 41 per year met the criteria for a Code ECPR activation, with 16 per year ultimately being eligible for ED ECPR. This annual estimate varies based on the inclusion of initial rhythm. This provides insight into both prehospital and hospital implications of an ED ECPR program and will help guide the establishment of a program within our Nova Scotian health region. This study also provides a framework for similar investigation at other institutions contemplating ED ECPR program implementation.

The Lifecycle of a Clinical Cadaver: A Practice-Based Ethnography.

PhenomenonCadavers have long played an important and complex role in medical education. While research on cadaver-based simulation has largely focused on exploring student attitudes and reactions or measuring improvements in procedural performance, the ethical, philosophical, and experiential aspects of teaching and learning with cadavers are rarely discussed. In this paper, we shed new light on the fascinating philosophical moves in which people engage each and every time they find themselves face to face with a cadaver. ApproachOver a two-year period (2018/19-2019/20), we applied ethnographic methods (137 hours of observation, 24 interviews, and the analysis of 22 documents) to shadow the educational cadaver through the practical stages involved in cadaver-based simulation: 1. cadaver preparation, 2. cadaver-based skill practice with physicians and residents, and 3. interment and memorial services. We used Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of becoming and acts of creation to trace the ontological "lifecycle" of an educational cadaver as embedded within everyday work practices. FindingsWe delineated six sub-phases of the lifecycle, through which the cadaver transformed ontologically from person to donor, body, cadaver, educational cadaver, teacher, and loved one/legacy. These shifts involved a network of bureaucratic, technical, educational, and humanistic practices that shaped the way the cadaver was perceived and acted upon at different moments in the lifecycle. By highlighting, at each phase, 1) the ontological transitions of the cadaver, itself, and 2) the practices, events, settings, and people involved in each of these transitions, we explored questions of "being" as it related to the ontological ambiguity of the cadaver: its conceptualization as both person and tool, simultaneously representing life and death. InsightsEngaging deeply with the philosophical questions of cadaver-based simulation (CBS) helped us conceptualize the lifecycle as a series of meaningful and purposeful acts of becoming. Following the cadaver from program entry to interment allowed us to contemplate how its ontological ambiguity shapes every aspect of cadaver-based simulation. We found that in discussions of fidelity in medical simulation, beyond both the physical and functional, it is possible to conceive of a third type: ontological. The humanness of the cadaver makes CBS a unique, irreplaceable, and inherently philosophical, practice.

An in vitro assessment of light intensity provided during direct laryngeal visualization by videolaryngoscopes with Macintosh geometry blades.

BACKGROUND: Adequate illumination of the larynx is needed during laryngoscopy to facilitate tracheal intubation. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has established a minimum light intensity for direct laryngoscopy (DL) of over 500 lux for at least ten minutes, but no such standard exists for Macintosh geometry videolaryngoscope (Mac-VL) blades, which allow for both direct or indirect (videoscopic) viewing of the larynx. Using in situ bench and in vitro testing in a human cadaver, we determined illumination and luminance values delivered by various Mac-VLs and compared these with published minimum lighting benchmarks as well as a reference direct laryngoscope. METHODS: We tested six Mac-VLs (i-view™, McGRATH™ MAC, GlideScope® Spectrum™ [single-use] DVM S4, GlideScope® Titanium [reusable] Mac T4, C-MAC® S [single-use] Macintosh #4, C-MAC® [reusable] Macintosh #4) together with one direct laryngoscope (Heine LED). Each laryngoscope was assessed with three measurements, as follows: part 1: illuminance (lux) was measured in situ using a purpose-designed benchtop light intensity measurement apparatus; part 2: luminance (light reflected back to the eye) was measured (in candela m-2 [cd·m-2]) during videolaryngoscopy (VL) and DL in a human cadaver using a spot meter pointed at the interarytenoid notch; part 3: illuminance (lux) was measured during VL and DL in a human cadaver using a light meter surgically implanted just proximal to the vocal cords. RESULTS: Illuminance and luminance varied significantly among the Mac-VLs. Mean (standard devitation) illuminance among the six tested Mac-VLs ranged from 117 (11) to 2,626 (42) lux in the measurement apparatus and from 228 (11) to 2,900 (374) lux by the surgically implanted light meter in the cadaver. All values were less than the reference Heine direct laryngoscope and some fell below the published ISO standard of 500 lux for DL. Luminance testing by spot meter had a similarly wide range, varying from 3.78 (0.60) to 49.1 (10.4) cd·m-2, with some Mac-VLs delivering less luminance than the reference Heine direct laryngoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that illuminance and luminance provided by Mac-VLs used for direct laryngeal viewing varies substantially between devices, with some falling below standards previously suggested as the minimum required for DL. While this may have no implications for the quality of image visible on a device's video monitor, the clinician should be aware that when Mac-VLs are used for direct viewing of the larynx, lighting may not be optimal. This might adversely affect ease or success of tracheal intubation.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'éclairage adéquat du larynx est nécessaire pendant la laryngoscopie pour faciliter l'intubation trachéale. Pour la laryngoscopie directe (LD), l'Organisation internationale de normalisation (ISO) a établi une intensité lumineuse minimale de plus de 500 lux pendant au moins dix minutes. Toutefois, il n'existe aucune norme de ce type pour les lames de vidéolaryngoscope à géométrie Macintosh (VL-Mac), qui permettent une visualisation directe ou indirecte (vidéoscopique) du larynx. Par des études en laboratoire et in vitro sur un cadavre humain, nous avons déterminé les valeurs d'éclairage et de luminance fournies par divers VL-Mac et les avons comparées aux valeurs repères d'éclairage minimal publiées ainsi qu'aux valeurs obtenues avec un laryngoscope direct de référence. MéTHODE: Nous avons testé six VL-Mac (i-view™, McGRATH™ MAC, GlideScope® Spectrum™ [à usage unique] DVM S4, GlideScope® Titanium [réutilisable] Mac T4, C-MAC® S [à usage unique] Macintosh #4, et C-MAC® [réutilisable] Macintosh #4) ainsi qu'un laryngoscope direct (Heine LED). Chaque laryngoscope a été évalué avec trois mesures, comme suit : partie 1: l'éclairage (lux) a été mesuré in situ à l'aide d'un appareil spécialement conçu de mesure de l'intensité lumineuse en laboratoire; partie 2 : la luminance (lumière réfléchie vers l'œil) a été mesurée (en candela m-2 [cd·m-2]) pendant la vidéolaryngoscopie (VL) et la LD sur un cadavre humain, à l'aide d'un posemètre pointé vers la commissure interaryténoïdienne; partie 3: l'éclairage (lux) a été mesuré pendant la VL et la LD sur un cadavre humain à l'aide d'un photomètre implanté chirurgicalement juste en amont des cordes vocales. RéSULTATS: L'éclairage et la luminance variaient considérablement entre les VL-Mac. L'éclairage moyen (écart type) parmi les six VL-Mac testés variait de 117 (11) à 2626 (42) lux avec l'appareil de mesure, et de 228 (11) à 2900 (374) lux lorsque mesuré par le photomètre implanté chirurgicalement dans le cadavre. Toutes les valeurs étaient inférieures au laryngoscope direct Heine de référence, et certaines étaient inférieures à la norme ISO publiée de 500 lux pour la LD. Les essais de luminance par posemètre ont rapporté une plage tout aussi large, variant de 3,78 (0,60) à 49,1 (10,4) cd·m-2, certains VL-Mac offrant moins de luminance que le laryngoscope direct Heine de référence. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats indiquent que l'éclairage et la luminance fournis par les VL-Mac utilisés pour la visualisation directe du larynx varient considérablement d'un appareil à l'autre, certains tombant en dessous des normes précédemment suggérées comme minimalement requises pour la LD. Bien que cela puisse n'avoir aucune incidence sur la qualité de l'image visible sur le moniteur vidéo d'un appareil, le clinicien doit être conscient que lorsqu'un VL-Mac est utilisé pour la visualisation directe du larynx, l'éclairage pourrait ne pas être optimal. Cela pourrait nuire à la facilité ou au succès de l'intubation trachéale.

Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

PURPOSE: Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the literature on airway management has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This first of two articles addresses difficulty encountered with airway management in an unconscious patient. SOURCE: Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians, were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence was lacking, statements are based on group consensus. FINDINGS AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Most studies comparing video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy indicate a higher first attempt and overall success rate with VL, and lower complication rates. Thus, resources allowing, the CAFG now recommends use of VL with appropriately selected blade type to facilitate all tracheal intubations. If a first attempt at tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made as long as patient ventilation and oxygenation is maintained. Nevertheless, total attempts should be limited (to three or fewer) before declaring failure and pausing to consider "exit strategy" options. For failed intubation, exit strategy options in the still-oxygenated patient include awakening (if feasible), temporizing with an SGA, a single further attempt at tracheal intubation using a different technique, or front-of-neck airway access (FONA). Failure of tracheal intubation, face-mask ventilation, and SGA ventilation together with current or imminent hypoxemia defines a "cannot ventilate, cannot oxygenate" emergency. Neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed or established, and a single final attempt at face-mask ventilation, SGA placement, or tracheal intubation with hyper-angulated blade VL can be made, if it had not already been attempted. If ventilation remains impossible, emergency FONA should occur without delay using a scalpel-bougie-tube technique (in the adult patient). The CAFG recommends all institutions designate an individual as "airway lead" to help institute difficult airway protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, and help with airway-related quality reviews.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Depuis la dernière publication des lignes directrices du Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) en 2013, la littérature sur la prise en charge des voies aériennes s'est considérablement étoffée. Le CAFG s'est donc réuni à nouveau pour examiner la littérature et mettre à jour ses recommandations de pratique. Ce premier article de deux traite de la prise en charge des voies aériennes difficiles chez un patient inconscient. SOURCES: Des sujets de recherche ont été assignés aux membres du Canadian Airway Focus Group, qui compte des médecins anesthésistes, urgentologues et intensivistes. Les recherches ont été menées dans les bases de données Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials et CINAHL. Les résultats ont été présentés au groupe et discutés lors de vidéoconférences toutes les deux semaines entre avril 2018 et juillet 2020. Les recommandations du CAFG sont fondées sur les meilleures données probantes publiées. Si les données probantes de haute qualité manquaient, les énoncés se fondent alors sur le consensus du groupe. CONSTATATIONS ET RECOMMANDATIONS CLéS: La plupart des études comparant la vidéolaryngoscopie à la laryngoscopie directe indiquent un taux de réussite plus élevé à la première tentative et globalement avec la vidéolaryngoscopie, ainsi que des taux de complication inférieurs. Ainsi, les ressources le permettant, le CAFG recommande dorénavant l'utilisation de vidéolaryngoscopes avec le type de lame convenablement sélectionné pour faciliter toutes les intubations trachéales. En cas d'échec de la première tentative d'intubation trachéale ou d'échec de positionnement du dispositif supraglottique (DSG), d'autres tentatives peuvent être entreprises tant que la ventilation et l'oxygénation du patient le permettent. Néanmoins, le nombre total de tentatives devrait être limité, à trois ou moins, avant de déclarer un échec et de considérer les options de « stratégie de retrait ¼. En cas d'échec de l'intubation, les options de stratégie de retrait chez un patient toujours oxygéné comprennent l'éveil (si possible), la temporisation avec un DSG, une dernière tentative d'intubation trachéale à l'aide d'une technique différente, ou une cricothyroïdotomie. L'échec de l'intubation trachéale, de la ventilation au masque facial et de la ventilation via un DSG accompagné d'une hypoxémie présente ou imminente, définit une urgence « impossible de ventiler, impossible d'oxygéner ¼. Le bloc neuromusculaire doit alors être confirmé ou mis en place, et une tentative finale de ventilation au masque, de positionnement du DSG ou d'intubation trachéale avec une lame de vidéolaryngoscopie hyper-angulée peut être réalisée, si cette approche n'a pas encore été essayée. Si la ventilation demeure impossible, une cricothyroïdotomie d'urgence devrait être réalisée sans délai utilisant une technique de scalpel-bougie-tube (chez le patient adulte). Le CAFG recommande à toutes les institutions de désigner une personne comme « leader des voies aériennes ¼ afin d'assister à la mise en place de protocoles pour les voies aériennes difficiles, d'assurer une formation et un équipement adéquats et d'aider aux examens de la qualité en rapport avec les voies aériennes.

Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

PURPOSE: Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the published airway management literature has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This second of two articles addresses airway evaluation, decision-making, and safe implementation of an airway management strategy when difficulty is anticipated. SOURCE: Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, statements are based on group consensus. FINDINGS AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Prior to airway management, a documented strategy should be formulated for every patient, based on airway evaluation. Bedside examination should seek predictors of difficulty with face-mask ventilation (FMV), tracheal intubation using video- or direct laryngoscopy (VL or DL), supraglottic airway use, as well as emergency front of neck airway access. Patient physiology and contextual issues should also be assessed. Predicted difficulty should prompt careful decision-making on how most safely to proceed with airway management. Awake tracheal intubation may provide an extra margin of safety when impossible VL or DL is predicted, when difficulty is predicted with more than one mode of airway management (e.g., tracheal intubation and FMV), or when predicted difficulty coincides with significant physiologic or contextual issues. If managing the patient after the induction of general anesthesia despite predicted difficulty, team briefing should include triggers for moving from one technique to the next, expert assistance should be sourced, and required equipment should be present. Unanticipated difficulty with airway management can always occur, so the airway manager should have a strategy for difficulty occurring in every patient, and the institution must make difficult airway equipment readily available. Tracheal extubation of the at-risk patient must also be carefully planned, including assessment of the patient's tolerance for withdrawal of airway support and whether re-intubation might be difficult.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Depuis la dernière publication des lignes directrices du Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) en 2013, la littérature sur la prise en charge des voies aériennes s'est considérablement étoffée. Le CAFG s'est donc réuni à nouveau pour examiner la littérature et mettre à jour ses recommandations de pratique. Ce deuxième article traite de l'évaluation des voies aériennes, de la prise de décision et de la mise en œuvre sécuritaire d'une stratégie de prise en charge des voies aériennes lorsque des difficultés sont anticipées. SOURCES: Des sujets de recherche ont été assignés aux membres du Canadian Airway Focus Group, qui compte des médecins anesthésistes, urgentologues et intensivistes. Les recherches ont été réalisées dans les bases de données Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials et CINAHL. Les résultats ont été présentés au groupe et discutés lors de vidéoconférences toutes les deux semaines entre avril 2018 et juillet 2020. Les recommandations du CAFG sont fondées sur les meilleures données probantes publiées. Si les données probantes de haute qualité manquaient, les énoncés se fondent alors sur le consensus du groupe. CONSTATATIONS ET RECOMMANDATIONS CLéS: Avant d'amorcer la prise en charge des voies aériennes, une stratégie documentée devrait être formulée pour chaque patient, en fonction de l'évaluation de ses voies aériennes. L'examen au chevet devrait rechercher les prédicteurs de difficultés pour la ventilation au masque, l'intubation trachéale utilisant la vidéolaryngoscopie ou la laryngoscopie directe, l'utilisation d'un dispositif supraglottique, ainsi que pour la cricothyroïdotomie d'urgence. La physiologie du patient et ses problématiques contextuelles devraient également être évaluées. Les difficultés anticipées devraient inciter à prendre des décisions éclairées sur la façon la plus sécuritaire de procéder à la prise en charge des voies aériennes. L'intubation trachéale éveillée peut procurer une marge de sécurité supplémentaire lorsqu'on s'attend à ce que la vidéolaryngoscopie ou la laryngoscopie directe soient impossibles, lorsqu'on prévoit des difficultés pour plus d'un mode de prise en charge des voies aériennes (p. ex., intubation trachéale et ventilation au masque), ou lorsque la difficulté prévue coïncide avec des problèmes physiologiques ou contextuels importants. En cas de choix de prise en charge des voies respiratoires du patient après induction de l'anesthésie générale malgré les difficultés prévues, les directives à l'équipe devraient inclure les déclencheurs pour passer d'une technique à l'autre, l'aide d'experts disponibles et l'équipement requis disponible. Des difficultés imprévues lors de la prise en charge des voies aériennes peuvent toujours survenir, de sorte que la personne responsable de la prise en charge des voies aériennes devrait avoir une stratégie pour chaque patient, et l'établissement doit rendre facilement disponible le matériel pour la prise en charge des voies aériennes difficiles. L'extubation trachéale du patient à risque doit également être soigneusement planifiée, y compris l'évaluation de la tolérance du patient lors du retrait du dispositif de soutien des voies aériennes et d'une ré-intubation potentiellement difficile.

Emergency medicine airway leads: a rapid response distributed educational model for emergency department COVID-19 airway management.

With the first case of COVID-19 confirmed in Canada in early 2020, our country joined in the fight against a novel pathogen in a global pandemic. The stress of uncertainty and practice change was most apparent in the emergency department when it came to managing known or suspected COVID-19 patients requiring airway management. Recognizing the need for a coordinated approach, a province wide rapid response distributed model of continuing professional development for airway management was developed utilizing Airway Leads to help prepare front-line medical personnel providing airway management for these patients. Airway Leads worked with local physicians to deliver consistent, high quality airway education across the province during the initial surge of cases. Education included both in person and virtual sessions along with real time ongoing support through provincial guidelines, videos, and other documents. Physician reported "stress level" pre- and post-Airway Lead support declined from a median score of 9 to 7 (on a 10-point Likert Scale).

RéSUMé: Le premier cas de COVID-19 ayant été confirmé au Canada au début de 2020, notre pays s'est joint à la lutte contre un nouveau pathogène dans une pandémie mondiale. Le stress de l'incertitude et du changement de pratique était plus évident au service d'urgence lorsqu'il s'agissait de gérer les patients connus ou soupçonnés de la COVID-19 qui avaient besoin d'une prise en charge des voies respiratoires. Reconnaissant la nécessité d'une approche coordonnée, un modèle de développement professionnel continu distribué à l'échelle de la province pour la gestion des voies aériennes a été élaboré en utilisant les Airway Leads pour aider à préparer le personnel médical de première ligne qui assure la gestion des voies aériennes de ces patients. Airway Leads a travaillé avec les médecins locaux pour dispenser un enseignement cohérent et de haute qualité sur les voies aériennes dans toute la province lors de l'augmentation initiale du nombre de cas. L'éducation comprenait à la fois des sessions en personne et virtuelles ainsi qu'un soutien continu en temps réel par le biais de directives provinciales, de vidéos et d'autres documents. Le "niveau de stress" déclaré par le médecin avant et après l'intervention de Airway Lead a diminué, passant d'un score médian de 9 à 7 (sur une échelle de Likert de 10 points).

The videoscopic view may not be significantly superior to the directly sighted peroral view during Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopy: a randomized equivalence cadaver trial.

PURPOSE: Videolaryngoscopy is widely believed to give a superior view to that obtained by direct laryngoscopy. Published literature suggests this benefit extends to both hyper-angulated and Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopes. Notwithstanding, our clinical experience shows that the videoscopic view with a Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope is often no different or only marginally better than the directly sighted peroral view. METHODS: A human cadaver equivalence study was performed in which four experienced laryngoscopists obtained pre-assigned laryngeal views by direct sighting using the single-use Macintosh blades of the GlideScope® Spectrum™ (GS) DirectView Macintosh (DVM) and C-MAC®S videolaryngoscopes. Blinded to the laryngoscopist's view, two independent observers rated the videoscopic view presented on the proximal video monitor at the same time. Directly sighted and videoscopic views obtained by the laryngoscopist and video scorers were recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for each device as the primary outcome measures and compared. RESULTS: On the VAS, the C-MAC®S videoscopic view revealed only approximately 0.9% more (99% confidence interval [CI], -2.5% to 4.3%) of the laryngeal inlet than the directly sighted view. Using GS DVM, the videoscopic view revealed 6.7% (99% CI, 2.3% to 11.0%) more of the laryngeal inlet than the directly sighted view. Although results for the GS DVM achieved statistical significance, neither device gave a clinically significantly improved videoscopic view compared with the directly sighted peroral view. CONCLUSION: This study failed to corroborate previously published findings of a clinically significantly improved videoscopic view compared with direct peroral sighting using Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopes. Further study of this class of device is warranted in human subjects.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La vidéolaryngoscopie est considérée par beaucoup comme une modalité offrant une visualisation supérieure à celle obtenue par laryngoscopie directe. Selon la littérature publiée, cet avantage s'étendrait tant aux vidéolaryngoscopes hyper-angulés qu'aux vidéolaryngoscopes de style Macintosh. Ceci dit, notre expérience clinique montre que la visualisation par vidéoscopie obtenue à l'aide d'un vidéolaryngoscope de style Macintosh est souvent similaire ou seulement légèrement meilleure à une visualisation per-orale directe. MéTHODE: Une étude d'équivalence sur cadavre humain a été réalisée dans laquelle quatre opérateursexpérimentés en laryngoscopies ont obtenu des vues laryngées pré-assignées par visualisation directe à l'aide de lames de Macintosh à usage unique avec unDirectView Macintosh (DVM) GlideScope® Spectrum™ (GS) et un vidéolaryngoscope C-MAC®S. Sans avoir accès à la visualisation de l'opérateur, deux observateurs indépendants ont simultanémentévalué la visualisation vidéoscopique présentée sur le moniteur vidéo proximal. Les visualisations directes et vidéoscopiques obtenues par l'opérateur et les évaluateurs des vidéos ont été enregistrées sur une échelle visuelle analogique (EVA) pour chaque dispositif en tant que critère d'évaluation principal, puis comparées. RéSULTATS: Sur l'EVA, la visualisation vidéoscopique obtenue avec le C-MAC®S n'a montré qu'approximativement 0,9 % de plus (intervalle de confiance [IC] 99 %, -2,5 % à 4,3 %) de l'orifice laryngé que la visualisation directe. Avec le GS DVM, la visualisation vidéoscopique a révélé 6,7 % (IC 99 %, 2,3 % à 11,0 %) de plus de l'orifice laryngé que la visualisation directe. Bien que les résultats obtenus avec le GS DVM aient atteint une signification statistique, aucun dispositif n'a permis d'obtenir une visualisation vidéoscopique significativement améliorée d'un point de vue clinique par rapport à la visualisation per-orale directe. CONCLUSION: Cette étude n'est pas parvenue à corroborer les résultats précédemment publiés d'une visualisation vidéoscopique améliorée et cliniquement significative avec les vidéolaryngoscopes de style Macintosh par rapport à une visualisation per-orale directe. Des recherches supplémentaires sur cette classe de dispositifs sont nécessaires chez des sujets humains.

Just the Facts: Airway management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

A previously healthy 42-year-old male developed a fever and cough shortly after returning to Canada from overseas. Initially, he had mild upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and a cough. He was aware of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and the advisory to self-isolate and did so; however, he developed increasing respiratory distress over several days and called 911. On arrival at the emergency department (ED), his heart rate was 130 beats/min, respiratory rate 32 per/min, and oxygenation saturation 82% on room air. As per emergency medical services (EMS) protocol, they placed him on nasal prongs under a surgical mask at 5 L/min and his oxygen saturation improved to 86%.

How Feasible is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Medium Urban Population Centre?

Background Patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) experience poor survival and neurological outcomes, with rates remaining relatively unchanged despite advancements. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in arrests, may offer improved outcomes. We developed local screening criteria for ECPR and then estimated the frequency of use by applying those criteria retrospectively to a cardiac arrest database. The purpose was to determine if an ECPR program is feasible in a medium urban population centre in Atlantic Canada. Methods A three-round modified Delphi survey, building upon data from a literature review, was conducted in collaboration with external experts. The resulting selection criteria for potential ECPR candidates were applied to a pre-existing local cardiac arrest database, supplemented by health records review, identifying potential candidates eligible for ECPR. Results Consensus inclusion criteria included witnessed cardiac arrest, age <70, refractory arrest, no-flow time <10min, total downtime <60min, and presumed cardiac or selected non-cardiac etiologies. Consensus exclusion criteria were an unwitnessed arrest, asystole, and select etiologies and comorbidities. Simplified criteria were developed to facilitate emergency medical services transport. Historically, 20.0% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%) of OHCA would be transported to the Emergency Department (ED), with 4.9% (95% CI 3.0% to 7.6%) qualifying for ECPR. Conclusion Despite conservative estimates based upon historically small numbers of select cardiac arrest patients meeting eligibility for transport and initiation of ECPR, a dedicated program may be feasible in our regional hospital setting. Patient care volumes suggest it would not be resource intensive yet would be sufficiently busy to maintain competency.

Clinical Cadavers as a Simulation Resource for Procedural Learning.

"See one, do one, teach one" remains an unofficial, unsanctioned framework for procedural skill learning in medicine. Appropriately, medical educators have sought alternative simulation venues for students to safely learn their craft. With the end goal of ensuring competence, educational programming will require the use of valid simulation with appropriate fidelity. While cadavers have been used for teaching anatomy for hundreds of years, more recently they are being repurposed as a "high-fidelity" procedural skill learning simulation resource. Newly deceased, previously frozen, and soft-preserved cadavers, such as those used in Baltimore and Halifax, produce clinical cadavers with high physical and functional fidelity that can serve as simulators for performing many high-acuity procedures for which there is otherwise limited clinical or simulation opportunities to practice. While access and cost may limit the use of cadavers for simulation, there are opportunities for sharing resources to provide an innovative procedural learning experience using the oldest of medical simulation assets, the human body.

Transport of a Prone Position Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patient.

We report the case of a non-physician based critical care transport team (registered nurse and paramedic) that successfully initiated prone positioning of a severe acute respiratory distress patient prior to transport to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation capable teaching hospital. With the increasing use of advanced treatments such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prone positioning, and continuous renal replacement therapy for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the necessity to transport these patients to specialized hospitals will correspondingly increase. Emergency Health Services Life Flight, the primary critical care transport program in Eastern Canada, developed a prone position protocol to meet this clinical need. Since the implementation of the protocol, we have successfully initiated prone positioning of 2 patients with ARDS before transport to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation- and continuous renal replacement therapy-capable teaching hospital. This represents the first report of a nonphysician (registered nurse and paramedic) critical care team initiating prone positioning before transport. Consent for publication was only obtained in the second case, which we present here.