RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To present the laparoscopic management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy and discuss other treatment options. DESIGN: Surgical video article. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the video reproduction. SETTING: Tertiary referral to a university hospital PATIENT: A 29-year-old woman with spontaneous heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy presented for vaginal spotting. Ultrasound revealed two gestational sacs at 7 weeks and 6 days of gestation with fetal cardiac activity. One sac was in a normal intrauterine (IU) location, and the other was in a previous cesarean section scar. INTERVENTIONS: Scar pregnancy was excised laparoscopically, preserving IU pregnancy. No additional measures were taken to reduce bleeding. The bladder was filled with 150 cc isotonic to determine its boundaries. The peritoneum was dissected away from the cervix. After removing the ectopic pregnancy material, the myometrial defect was excised. The uterine wall was closed in three layers using 2-0 V-Loc sutures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ongoing IU pregnancy after laparoscopic removal of cesarean scar pregnancy and term delivery. RESULTS: The procedure was completed in 67 minutes. Total blood loss was <100 cc. The ongoing pregnancy follow-up was uneventful. Delivery was planned for the 37th-38th weeks. Although instructed to visit immediately after experiencing pain, the patient arrived after the 38th week and reported having pain for 2 days. During the cesarean section, a rupture was observed at the previous incision site, which was fortunately incomplete. A healthy male infant (weight, 3,210 g; Apgar score, 9/10) was delivered. CONCLUSIONS: The most common approach for heterotopic scar pregnancy is embryo reduction with potassium chloride injection. However, the mass persists in the scar area, resulting in complications associated with excessive bleeding during a cesarean section in approximately half of cases. Moreover, almost all published cases of embryo reduction resulted in premature births before week 36. Considering the present case, laparoscopic surgery may be appropriate for managing heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy by preserving IU pregnancy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare benign tumor that occurs most commonly in the kidney. Only a few cases have been described in the uterus. CASE: We describe a 32-year-old woman with tuberous sclerosis who presented with irregular bleeding. Preoperatively, the lesions were confused with leiomyoma on ultrasound. At laparotomy, multiple circumscribed subserosal and intramural purplish lesions on the corpus uteri were noted leading to a diagnosis of uterine angiomyolipoma with the histological and immunohistochemical findings. CONCLUSION: In contrast to other reported uterine angiomyolipoma cases, HMB-45 melanoma-specific antibody immunoreactivity is demonstrated in the present case. The histopathologic diagnosis as well as immunohistochemical analysis is discussed here with a review of the literature.