Unlocking Diagnostic Precision: FATE Protocol Integration with BLUE and eFAST Protocols for Enhanced Pre-Hospital Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Effusion Manifested as Dyspnea in Adults-A Pilot Study.

Background: Dyspnea commonly stems from combined myocardial and pulmonary dysfunction, posing challenges for accurate pre-hospital diagnosis. Limited diagnostic capabilities hinder the differentiation of cardiac and pulmonary issues. This study assesses the efficacy of combined cardiac and pulmonary ultrasound using the BLUE, eFAST, and FATE protocols. Methods: Participants were consecutively enrolled from dyspnea-related emergency calls in Warsaw, Poland, from 4 April 2022, to 15 June 2023. Patients with pleural effusion were identified through pre-hospital and in-hospital radiological assessments. Pre-hospital thoracic ultrasonography followed the BLUE, eFAST, and FATE protocols, alongside comprehensive clinical assessments. The pre-hospital diagnoses were juxtaposed with the with hospital discharge diagnoses. Results: Sixteen patients (8 men, 8 women; median age: 76 years) were enrolled. Inter-rater agreement for the BLUE protocol was substantial (κ = 0.78), as was agreement for eFAST (κ = 0.75), with almost perfect agreement for combined protocol assessment (κ = 0.83). Left ventricle hypokinesis, identified via the FATE protocol, significantly correlated with hospital-diagnosed decompensated heart failure as the primary cause of dyspnea. Sensitivity and specificity were 1.0 (95%CI: 0.62-1.0) and 0.6 (95%CI: 0.15-0.95), respectively. Positive predictive value was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.55-0.98), and diagnostic accuracy was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.62-0.98). Conclusions: Integrating the FATE protocol into BLUE and eFAST enhances pre-hospital differential diagnosis accuracy of pleural effusion in adults. This synergistic approach streamlines diagnostic processes and facilitates informed clinical decision-making. Larger-scale validation studies are needed for broader applicability.

Ultrasound on the Frontlines: Empowering Paramedics with Lung Ultrasound for Dyspnea Diagnosis in Adults-A Pilot Study.

Lung transthoracic ultrasound (LUS) is an accessible and widely applicable method of rapidly imaging certain pathologies in the thorax. LUS proves to be an optimal tool in respiratory emergency medicine, applicable in various clinical settings. However, despite the rapid development of bedside ultrasonography, or point-of-care (POCUS) ultrasound, there remains a scarcity of knowledge about the use of LUS in pre-hospital settings. Therefore, our aim was to assess the usefulness of LUS as an additional tool in diagnosing dyspnea when performed by experienced paramedics in real-life, pre-hospital settings. Participants were recruited consecutively among patients who called for an emergency due to dyspnea in the Warsaw region of Poland. All the enrolled patients were admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). In the prehospital setting, a paramedic experienced in LUS conducted an ultrasonographic examination of the thorax, including Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency (BLUE) and extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST) protocols. The paramedic's diagnosis was compared to the ED diagnosis, and if available, to the final diagnosis established on the day of discharge from the hospital. We enrolled 44 patients in the study, comprising 22 (50%) men and (50%) women with a median age of 76 (IQR: 69.75-84.5) years. The LUS performed by paramedic was concordant with the discharge diagnosis in 90.91% of cases, where the final diagnosis was established on the day of discharge from the hospital. In cases where the patient was treated only in the ED, the pre-hospital LUS was concordant with the ED diagnosis in 88.64% of cases. The mean time of the LUS examination was 63.66 s (SD: 19.22). The inter-rater agreement between the pre-hospital diagnosis and ER diagnosis based on pre-hospital LUS and complete ER evaluation was estimated at k = 0.822 (SE: 0.07; 95%CI: 0.68, 0.96), indicating strong agreement, and between the pre-hospital diagnosis based on LUS and final discharge diagnosis, it was estimated at k = 0.934 (SE: 0.03; 95%CI: 0.88, 0.99), indicating almost perfect agreement. In conclusion, paramedic-acquired LUS seems to be a useful tool in the pre-hospital differential diagnosis of dyspnea in adults.

Concise, Practical Review on Transthoracic Lung Ultrasound in Prehospital Diagnosis of Dyspnea in Adults.

Ultrasonography is a relatively young but widely recognized method of imaging parenchymal organs, including the lungs. Our concise, practical review on transthoracic lung ultrasound (LUS) in the prehospital diagnosis of dyspnea in adults attempts to summarize current knowledge in the field. Furthermore, we discussed POCUS protocols in the analyzed context, discussing their usefulness. We concluded that bedside ultrasonography, or point of care (POCUS), is developing rapidly; however, the knowledge about the use of LUS in a pre-hospital setting is scarce, highlighting the need for further research in this field. Additionally, despite the possibility of using various ultrasound protocols in diagnosing a patient with dyspnea, there is no comprehensive and, at the same time, highly sensitive and specific protocol covering a satisfactory saccade of differential diagnosis of this symptom. It seems reasonable to conduct further targeted research to create such a dedicated solution.