Assessment of asthma severity according to treatment steps in Japanese pediatric patients: a descriptive cross-sectional study using an administrative claims database.

OBJECTIVES: Japan has one of the highest asthma prevalence rates in Asia; however, there is a lack of epidemiological studies on asthma among children in Japan. This study aimed to describe the severity of asthma and the prescription patterns for its treatment among pediatric patients, by using a large-scale claims database. METHODS: The analysis datasets were extracted from the JMDC database for the period of April 1, 2009 to March 30, 2015; included records were restricted to patients between 2 and 15 years of age. The Japanese Pediatric Guidelines for the treatment and management of asthma (JPGL) steps were used as a proxy for asthma treatment and severity. We also described the characteristics of asthma in children by stratifying the prevalence and incidence cohorts by index years. RESULTS: In the prevalence cohort (56% male), from 2010 to 2014, approximately 80-90% of the children received step 1 or 2 treatment, with the remainder receiving step 3 or 4 treatment, as defined by the JPGL. The majority (approximately 90%) of patients visited clinics for asthma treatment, while a minority visited hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the severity of asthma among Japanese pediatric patients, as well as their demographic characteristics, using a large-scale claims database. The majority of pediatric asthma patients received treatment for mild-to-moderate asthma, while less than 10% received treatment for severe asthma.

A retrospective cohort study evaluating healthcare resource utilization in patients with asthma in Japan.

Although the global economic burden of asthma is well described, detailed data regarding Asia, particularly for Japan, are relatively scarce. This retrospective study aims to fill this evidence gap by evaluating asthma-associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and economic burden in Japanese patients aged ≥16 years, identified using anonymized patient data from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database from April 2009 to March 2015. Asthma severity was classified according to asthma treatment guidelines from the Japanese Society of Allergology. HCRU was calculated based on hospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient visits, and prescriptions. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for HCRU and per-patient-per-year direct costs were reported. In addition, differences across HCRU and cost variables for severe versus non-severe asthma patients were also compared. Of 541,434 asthma cases identified from the JMDC database during the study period, 54,433 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. HCRU and costs were heavily concentrated within severe asthma, a subgroup comprising 12.7% of total study population. Moreover, patients with severe asthma had significantly higher all-cause hospitalizations, outpatient visits, outpatient prescriptions (IRR [95% CI], 1.60 [1.46-1.76]; 1.43 [1.41-1.45]; 1.24 [1.22-1.25], respectively), and total medical costs (mean ± SD costs, US$ 4345 ± 11,104 versus US$ 1528 ± 3989, P < 0.001 (t-test); US$ 1 = 110 JPY) compared with those with non-severe asthma. The burden of asthma is significantly and disproportionately concentrated in Japanese severe asthma patients, suggesting clinical failure to achieve adequate disease control. This study highlights the unmet needs for severe asthma in Japan and provides a catalyst for important dialogues in advancing public health.

Omalizumab and unmet needs in severe asthma and allergic comorbidities in Japanese children.

Childhood asthma is one condition within a family of allergic diseases, which includes allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy, among others. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE antibody therapy that was approved in Japan for children with asthma and added to the Japanese pediatric asthma guidelines in 2017. This review highlights the Japanese clinical perspectives in pediatric allergic asthma, and consideration for allergic comorbidities, and reflects on omalizumab clinical trials in progress to present comprehensive future opportunities.

Real-world safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma: A long-term post-marketing study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) is an approved add-on therapy for Japanese patients with severe allergic asthma. As directed by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Japan, a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study on omalizumab was conducted between 2009 and 2017. METHODS: The PMS observed safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients treated with open-label omalizumab for 52 weeks (with optional 2-year extension period). Primary safety outcomes included incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Primary efficacy outcomes included physician-assessed global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE). Asthma-exacerbation-related events including requirement for additional systemic steroid therapy, hospitalization, emergency room visits, unscheduled doctor visits, and absenteeism were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 3893 patients registered, 3620 (age [mean ±â€¯SD] 59.3 ±â€¯16.11 years) were evaluated for 52 weeks; 44.12% were aged ≥65 years and 64.45% were women. Overall, 32.24% reported AEs and 15.30% reported serious AEs. ADRs were seen in 292 (8.07%) patients. GETE results showed that the majority of patients experienced clinical improvements (58.29% at 16 weeks and 62.40% at 52 weeks). Nearly half of all patients (47.96%) were free from asthma exacerbations after therapy. Omalizumab also reduced all events related to asthma exacerbations. No specific ADRs were observed in the elderly population. CONCLUSIONS: This post-marketing study confirmed the clinically meaningful benefits of omalizumab in a majority of patients from Japan, and showed safety and efficacy in a real-life clinical setting to be consistent with previous reports.

Methods for the quantitative evaluation and prediction of CYP enzyme induction using human in vitro systems.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: For successful drug development, it is important to investigate the potency of candidate drugs causing drug-drug interactions (DDI) during the early stages of development. The most common mechanisms of DDIs are the inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes. Therefore, it is important to develop co.mpounds with lower potencies for CYP enzyme induction. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The aim of the present paper is to present an overview of the current knowledge of CYP induction mechanisms, particularly focusing on the transcriptional gene activation mediated by pregnane X receptor, aryl hydrocarbon receptor and constitutive androstane receptor. The adoptable options of in vitro assay methods for evaluating CYP induction are also summarized. Finally, we introduce a method for the quantitative prediction of CYP3A4 induction considering the turnover of CYP3A4 mRNA and protein in hepatocytes based on the data obtained from a reporter gene assay. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: In order to predict in vivo CYP enzyme induction quantitatively based on in vitro information, an understanding of the physiological induction mechanisms and the features of each in vitro assay system is essential. We also present the estimation method of in vivo CYP induction potency of each compound based on the in vitro data which are routinely obtained but not necessarily utilized maximally in pharmaceutical companies. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: It is desirable to select compounds with lower potencies for the inductive effect. For this purpose, an accurate prioritization procedure to evaluate the induction potency of each compound in a quantitative manner considering the pharmacologically effective concentration of each compound is necessary.

Quantitative prediction of in vivo profiles of CYP3A4 induction in humans from in vitro results with a reporter gene assay.

Although primary human hepatocytes are commonly used for induction studies, the evaluation method is associated with several problems. More recently, a reporter gene assay has been suggested to be an alternative, although the contribution of only transfected nuclear receptors can be evaluated. The aim of the present study was to establish a method by which the extent of in vivo CYP3A4 induction in humans can be quantitatively predicted based on in vitro results with a reporter gene assay. From previous reports, we calculated in vivo induction ratios (R(in vivo)) caused by prototypical inducers based on the alterations in the hepatic intrinsic clearance of probe drugs. Next, we derived equations by which these R(in vivo) values can be predicted from the results of a reporter gene assay. To use the data obtained from a reporter gene assay, rifampicin was used as a reference drug. The correction coefficient (CC), which is used to quantitatively correlate the activity of inducers between in vitro and in vivo situations, was calculated by comparing the predicted data with the observed R(in vivo) values for rifampicin. With the calculated CC value, good correlations were found between the predicted and observed R(in vivo) values for other inducers such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, and omeprazole. Taken together, with the equations derived in the present study, we have been able to predict the extent of in vivo induction of human CYP3A4 by inducers in a time-dependent and quantitative manner from in vitro data.