Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 316(2): 84-91, 1987 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3785359

RESUMO

The value of skull radiography in identifying intracranial injury has not yet been satisfactorily defined. A multidisciplinary panel of medical experts was assembled to review the issue of skull radiography for head trauma. The panel identified two main groups of patients--those at high risk of intracranial injury and those at low risk of such injury--and developed a management strategy for imaging in the two groups. The high-risk group consists primarily of patients with severe open or closed-head injuries who have a constellation of findings that are usually clinically obvious. These patients are candidates for emergency CT scanning, neurosurgical consultation, or both. The low-risk group includes patients who are asymptomatic or who have one or more of the following: headache, dizziness, scalp hematoma, laceration, contusion, or abrasion. Radiographic imaging is not recommended for the low-risk group and should be omitted. An intermediate moderate-risk group is less well defined, and skull radiography in this group may sometimes be appropriate. A prospective study of 7035 patients with head trauma at 31 hospital emergency rooms was conducted to validate the management strategy. No intracranial injuries were discovered in any of the low-risk patients. Therefore, no intracranial injury would have been missed by excluding skull radiography for low-risk patients, according to the protocol. We conclude that use of the management strategy is safe and that it would result in a large decrease in the use of skull radiography, with concomitant reductions in unnecessary exposure to radiation and savings of millions of dollars annually.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Crânio/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Emergências , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
JACEP ; 8(10): 393-5, 1979 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-491326

RESUMO

A retrospective analysis of 75 patients admitted with the diagnosis of skull fracture to two community hospitals revealed that 48% of these patients would not have been diagnosed if the high yield criteria recently proposed by the Food and Drug Administration had been adhered to in selecting patients for skull radiography. This included four patients with depressed skull fractures and 32 with linear fractures. The remaining 39 patients had at least one high yielded criterion, the most common being loss of consciousness (21.3%).


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia/economia , Radiografia/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Virginia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA