Trauma patients with a previous organ transplant: outcomes are better than expected-a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Few reports are available concerning outcomes following trauma in transplanted patients. Investigating outcomes for patients in this population may yield helpful information about both immunosuppression and inflammatory responses. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. The trauma registry was used to identify all patients with a history of solid-organ transplant who were admitted to the trauma center between January 2007 and June 2011. Data were stratified by age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: During the study period, 50 patients admitted for traumatic injury also had previous organ transplants. We found that white blood cell count was significantly lower for transplanted patients (p < 0.001) and remained significantly lower at each stratification criteria. In addition, LOS was either lower or no different for transplanted patients when data were stratified. Only one patient explicitly had an injured graft (a kidney) secondary to trauma at the time of admission. This resulted in acute renal failure and a doubling of the serum creatinine. Three patients had questionable graft injuries, but graft function remained normal. Seventeen percent of patients developed acute rejection following admission for trauma. CONCLUSION: Outcomes following injury in patients with previous organ transplant are not worse than outcomes for nontransplanted patients, and transplanted organs are infrequently injured. Prospective data are needed to understand better the balance of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators following acute injury in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Association of 6% hetastarch resuscitation with adverse outcomes in critically ill trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Six percent hetastarch is used as a volume expander but has been associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate trauma patients resuscitated with hetastarch. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of adult trauma patients. Demographics, injury severity, laboratory values, outcomes, and hetastarch use were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2,225 patients were identified, of whom 497 (22%) received hetastarch. There were no differences in age, gender, injury mechanism, lactate, hematocrit, or creatinine. The mean injury severity score was different: 29.7 ± 12.6 with hetastarch versus 27.5 ± 12.6 without hetastarch. Acute kidney injury developed in 65 hetastarch patients (13%) and in 131 (8%) without hetastarch (relative risk, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.28). Hetastarch mortality was 21%, compared with 11% without hetastarch (relative risk, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.48-2.29). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated hetastarch use (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.49-2.58) as independently significant for death. Hetastarch use was independently significant for renal dysfunction as well (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the detrimental association with renal function and mortality, hetastarch should be avoided in the resuscitation of trauma patients.

Reversal of coagulopathy in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: recombinant factor VIIa is more cost-effective than plasma.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability after trauma. Coagulopathy is common in this patient population and requires rapid reversal to allow for safe neurosurgical intervention and prevent worsening of the primary injury. Typically reversal of coagulopathy is accomplished with the use of plasma. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) has become increasingly used "off-label" in patients with neurosurgical emergencies to rapidly reverse coagulopathy. We hypothesized that the use of rFVIIa in this patient population would prove to be cost-effective as well as demonstrate clinical benefit. METHODS: The trauma registry at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center was used to identify all coagulopatic trauma patients admitted between January 2002 and December 2007 with relatively isolated TBI (head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >or=4). The medical records of patients were reviewed and demographics, injury-specific data, medications administered, laboratory values, blood product utilization, neurosurgical procedures, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and outcome data were abstracted. Patients who received rFVIIa for reversal of coagulopathy were compared against those who did not receive rFVIIa. t Tests were used to compare differences between continuous variables, and chi2 analysis was used to compare categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. RESULTS: During a 6-year period, there were 179 patients who met inclusion criteria. One hundred eleven patients (62.0%) were treated with conventional therapy alone whereas 68 (38.0%) received rFVIIa. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar except that Injury Severity Score and admission International normalized ratio were higher in the rFVIIa group and the rFVIIa group had a higher percentage of patients with head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 5 injuries, patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures and patients with preinjury warfarin use. There was no difference in total charges between these groups (mean US $63,403 in the conventionally treated group vs. $66,086). When patients who required admission to the intensive care unit were analyzed (n = 110, 50% received rFVIIa), total mean charges and costs were significantly lower in the group that received rFVIIa (mean US $108,900 vs. $77,907). Hospital LOS, days of mechanical ventilation, and plasma utilization were lower in the rFVIIa group. Mortality and thromboembolic complication rates were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, we were able to demonstrate a significant economic benefit of the use of rFVIIa for reversal of coagulopathy in severely injured patients with TBI. Not all patients with coagulopathy and an anatomic brain injury benefit, but in patients who are neurologically or physiologically compromised, using rFVIIa decreases total charges and costs of hospitalization. This decrease in overall cost is directly attributable to the significant decrease in LOS and decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation. This study demonstrates that in coagulopathic patients with TBI who require intensive care unit admission, rFVIIa is cost-effective and safe. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish clinical effectiveness.

Recombinant factor VIIa: decreasing time to intervention in coagulopathic patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of coagulopathy is often needed before neurosurgical intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Typically, this is accomplished with administration of plasma. We hypothesized that the off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) to normalize the coagulation profile would allow for earlier intervention than conventional therapy. METHODS: The trauma registry was used to identify patients with severe TBI who were admitted during a 4-year period and were coagulopathic at admission (international normalized ratio, INR >/=1.4) and required a neurosurgical procedure. Severe TBI was defined as head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) >3 and admission Glasgow coma score (GCS) <9. Demographics, injury, blood bank and laboratory data, time of intervention, rFVIIa use, and complications were abstracted. Characteristics of the group who received rFVIIa were compared against those treated with plasma alone with a Student's t test and chi analysis, as well as nonparametric methods for comparison of medians. RESULTS: Of 681 patients with severe TBI, 63 were coagulopathic at admission and needed an emergent neurosurgical procedure. Twenty-nine patients who received rFVIIa were compared against 34 patients who were treated with only plasma. Mean age, injury severity score (ISS), and admission GCS and INR were not different between the two groups. Time to neurosurgical intervention was less in the rFVIIa group (median = 144 vs. 446 minutes, p = 0.0003) as were the number of units of plasma administered before intervention (median = 2 vs. 6, p = 0.0006). The rate of thromboembolic complications was not different between groups. In patients with isolated TBI, mortality was 33.3% in the rFVIIa group and 52.9% in controls (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: rFVIIa rapidly and effectively reversed coagulopathy in patients with severe TBI. rFVIIa decreased the time to intervention and decreased the use of blood products without increasing the rate of thromboembolic complications.

Discharge rounds in the 80-hour workweek: importance of the trauma nurse practitioner.

BACKGROUND: Daily multidisciplinary discharge rounds have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS), increase patient volumes, and virtually eliminates "bypass" (inability to accept admissions). Originally, these were attended by senior house staff from each trauma team. Implementation of the 80-hour workweek precluded house staff participation, raising concerns that these rounds would loss their benefits. Certified nurse practitioners (CRNPs) were added to the trauma teams to assist in patient care and represent the team on discharge rounds, replacing the fellows. We hypothesized that this would offset any potential negative effects. METHODS: A senior trauma physician leads discharge rounds, focusing on each patient's plan of care. Rounds cover 90 inpatient beds and last approximately 60 minutes. CRNPs from each trauma team, orthopedics, and neurosurgery as well as the teams' discharge planner, hospital bed manager, unit nursing staff, and physical, occupational, and speech therapists participate in discharge rounds. RESULTS: The results are stratified by time period: June 1998 to May 1999 is before discharge rounds, June 1999 to May 2001 is during the house staff period, and June 2001 to May 2004 is when CRNPs replaced fellows and residents. During the 5-year period, 1999 to 2004, daily discharge rounds maintained their efficacy. We have increased admissions, whereas LOS has remained the same. Admissions of greater than 24 hours have increased, whereas average injury severity score has statistically remained the same. Bypass has virtually been eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Adding CRNPs to discharge rounds has allowed us to have the continued benefits of decreased LOS and increased patient volume. Bypass remains rare. CRNPs can effectively replace some house staff functions.

Daily multidisciplinary rounds shorten length of stay for trauma patients.

PURPOSE: Efficient patient care depends on close communication between the trauma team, other surgical providers, nursing, physical therapy, and discharge planners. Communication is hampered by the number of services involved, the workload of each service, and the institution's training mission. We hypothesized that daily multidisciplinary "discharge rounds" would improve patient flow and increase readiness. METHODS: A senior trauma center physician leads discharge rounds, focusing on each patient's plan of care, including surgeries, diagnostic tests, and anticipated date of discharge or transfer. Present at rounds are the fellows leading each trauma team; an orthopedic surgeon; the hospital bed manager; the unit's discharge planner; the unit nursing staff; and physical, occupational, and speech therapists. RESULTS: Discharge rounds cover 90 inpatient trauma service beds in approximately 60 minutes each day. Discharge rounds have had a dramatic effect on patient flow. While maintaining the daily census, we have seen a 36% increase in patient volume and a 15% decrease in length of stay. "Bypass" status-inability to accept admissions-has been virtually eliminated. This effect has been sustained. CONCLUSION: By providing a forum for clear communications among all providers, discharge rounds have streamlined the care of complex trauma patients. As health care resources become ever more constrained, this sort of multidisciplinary effort is a viable option for senior physicians to directly impact hospital performance.