Post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial on the impact of pre-transplant use of probiotics on outcomes after liver transplantation.

Perioperative use of probiotics serves as efficient prophylaxis against postoperative infections after liver transplantation, yet data on long-term effects of pre-transplant probiotic intake is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of pre-transplant probiotic administration on long-term results of liver transplantation. This was secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive either 4-strain probiotic or placebo before liver transplantation. Five year graft survival was set as the primary end-point. Secondary end-points comprised serum bilirubin and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, international normalized ratio (INR), serum transaminases and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity. Study group comprised 44 patients, of whom 21 received probiotics and 23 received placebo with 5-year graft survival of 81.0% and 87.0%, respectively (p = 0.591). Patients in the probiotic arm exhibited lower INR (p = 0.001) and CRP (p = 0.030) over the first 6 post-transplant months. In the absence of hepatitis B or C virus infection, pre-transplant administration of probiotics also reduced aspartate transaminase activity (p = 0.032). In the intervention arm, patients receiving probiotics for under and over 30 days had 5-year graft survival rates of 100% and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.061). Duration of probiotic intake > 30 days was additionally associated with increased INR (p = 0.031), GGT (p = 0.032) and a tendency towards increased bilirubin (p = 0.074) over first 6 post-transplant months. Pre-transplant administration of probiotics has mild positive influence on 6-month allograft function, yet should not exceed 30 days due to potential negative effects on long-term outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01735591).

Impact of Donor Risk Index on Risk of Hepatic Artery Thrombosis in Patients After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the most severe complications after liver transplantation (LT). HAT can lead to early graft loss and retransplantation or death of the recipient. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients treated between January 2008 and December 2013 in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw. A total of 750 patients underwent LT over this period. RESULTS: HAT occurred in 27 patients (2.1%). The median DRI was 1.414 (IQR 1.103-1.578) points and median donor age was 47 (IQR 33-56) years. The optimal cut-off value of DRI in predicting HAT was ≥1.328 points. The cutoff point was characterized by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.0%, 41.3%, 5.5% and 98.9%, respectively (AUC = 0.605, 95% CI 0.477-0.733). A DRI ≥1.328 was a significant risk factor for HAT (OR = 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.529-17.48, P = .008). The optimal cutoff point for donor age was 50 years and was characterized by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 66.7%, 55.8%, 5.3%, and 97.8%, respectively. Donor age ≥50 years (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.123-5.714, P = .025) was a significant risk factor for HAT. CONCLUSION: DRI is a clinically relevant factor that allows estimating the risk of HAT after liver transplantation from a deceased donor. To reduce the incidence of this complication, the allocation of organs taken from donors at DRI exceeding 1.328 for recipients without other HAT risk factors should be considered.

Profile of Gut Microbiota Associated With the Presence of Hepatocellular Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Changes within the gut microbiota contribute to the progression of chronic liver diseases. According to the results of several studies performed in animal models, gut dysbiosis plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of gut microbiota associated with the presence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis of the liver undergoing liver transplantation. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with HCC and 15 non-HCC patients matched according to etiology of cirrhosis and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores who underwent liver transplantations between 2012 and 2014 were included. Analysis of their gut microbial profile was based on prospectively collected stool samples from the pretransplant period. RESULTS: Patients with and without HCC were similar with respect to age (P = .506), sex (P = .700), hepatitis C virus (P > .999) and hepatitis B virus (P = .715) infection status, alcoholic liver disease (P > .999), and MELD score (P = .337). Notably, the presence of HCC was associated with significantly increased fecal counts of Escherichia coli (P = .025). Prediction of HCC presence based on E coli counts was associated with the area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.742 (95% confidence interval, 0.564-0.920), with the optimal cutoff on the level of 17.728 (natural logarithm of colony-forming units per 1 g of feces). Sensitivity and specificity rates for the established cutoff were 66.7% and 73.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of gut microbiota associated with the presence of HCC in cirrhotic patients is characterized by increased fecal counts of E coli. Therefore, intestinal overgrowth of E coli may contribute to the process of hepatocarcinogenesis.

Outcomes of Patients With Poorly Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) outcomes for patients with poorly differentiated (G3) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with poorly differentiated HCC undergoing LT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 192 HCC patients after LT in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, between January 2001 and April 2014. The study group comprised 24 patients with poorly differentiated tumors. RESULTS: Disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients was 49.5% at 5 years. The 5-year DFS for patients who met the Milan criteria (n = 9, 88.9%) was significantly better compared to those who did not (n = 15, 28.0%, P = .025). Multivariable analysis revealed that only the largest tumor diameter (P = .014) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration (P = .001) were independent risk factors for DFS. The optimal cut-off AFP and tumor size that could distinguish patients with the highest risk were ≥500 ng/mL and ≥3.5 cm, respectively. DFS for patients with AFP <500 ng/mL and tumor size <3.5 cm was 100% after 2.8 years, and for those with ≥500 ng/mL or tumor size ≥3.5 cm was 46.9% after 5 years. However, the DFS for patients with AFP ≥500 ng/mL and tumor size ≥3.5 cm was only 12.5% after 4.7 years (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of patients with poorly differentiated HCC treated with LT can be characterized with acceptable survival when applying criteria based on tumor size <3.5 cm and AFP <500 ng/mL.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Patients After Liver Retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite great progress and improvement in results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx), 10%-20% of patients still require retransplantation (re-OLTx). The aim of the study was to present long-term results of liver retransplantation and to determine the factors influencing outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1994 to July 2014, a total of 1461 liver transplantations were performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery of Medical University of Warsaw. There were 92 retransplantations (6.3%), including 40 early re-OLTx (up to 30 days). The most common indication for re-OLTx were vascular complications (41/92, 44.6%). Influence of clinical variables on short- and long-term outcomes was analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 30.4% (28/92). One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival for all patients was 59.8%, 56.5% and 54.1%, respectively. The best results were achieved in patients undergoing retransplantation due to chronic rejection and biliary complications, whose 5-year survival rates were 75.0% and 72.9% respectively. There was no difference in long-term survival after early and late retransplantations (60.9% and 49.3%, respectively; P = .158). Multivariable analysis revealed factors associated with longer survival of patients, namely, higher preoperative hemoglobin concentration (P = .001), increased blood transfusions (P = .048), and decreased fresh frozen plasma transfusions (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Liver retransplantation is a method providing satisfactory outcomes in selected patients. The perioperative period has a major impact on patient outcome.

The relevance of intestinal dysbiosis in liver transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND: The gut microbial ecosystem plays an important role in the pathogenesis of liver diseases. However, the association of microbial community structure with the severity of liver dysfunction is not completely understood. METHODS: Fecal microflora was assessed in 40 patients with liver cirrhosis listed for primary liver transplantation (LT). Independent associations between fecal microbial counts and serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR), and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were established in multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: Bifidobacterium (standardized regression coefficient [sß] = -0.549; P < 0.001), Enterococcus (sß = 0.369; P = 0.004), and yeast (sß = 0.315; P = 0.018) numbers were independently associated with serum bilirubin, while Escherichia coli counts (sß = 0.318; P = 0.046) correlated with INR, and Bifidobacterium counts (sß = 0.410; P = 0.009) with serum creatinine. Only Bifidobacterium (sß = -0.468; P = 0.003) and Enterococcus (sß = 0.331; P = 0.029) counts were independent predictors of the MELD score. Bifidobacterium/Enterococcus ratio, proposed as a measure of pre-LT gut dysbiosis, was significantly related to the MELD score following the adjustment for the absolute Bifidobacterium (sß = -0.333; P = 0.029) and Enterococcus (sß = -0.966; P = 0.003) numbers. This pre-transplant dysbiosis ratio (PTDR) was significantly correlated with Enterococcus (R = -0.897; P < 0.001) but not with Bifidobacterium (R = 0.098; P = 0.546) counts. Among the other components of gut microflora, only hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 )-producing Lactobacillus strains significantly influenced Enterococcus counts (sß = 0.349; P = 0.028) and PTDR (sß = -0.318; P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: While the abundance of both Bifidobacterium and Enterococcus is related to liver dysfunction, the size of the Enterococcus population seems to be the most important determinant of pre-LT gut dysbiosis in cirrhotic patients. The H2 O2 -producing Lactobacillus strains potentially ameliorate this dysbiotic state.

Poor outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with incidental cholangiocarcinoma irrespective of tumor localization.

INTRODUCTION: After liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma (CCC), patients have a poor prognosis without use of specific therapeutic strategies. Accordingly, recipients with incidental CCC might have the highest risk of recurrent disease; however, sparse data on the long-term outcome of unselected patients with incidental CCC have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-transplantation outcomes of patients with incidental CCC with special focus on tumor localization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 11 primary liver transplantations in patients with incidental CCC of 1310 liver transplantation procedures performed between December 1994 and August 2013. All patients with incidental CCC received a chemotherapy regiment including gemcitabine/5 fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. The patients were switched from calcineurin inhibitors to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppression shortly after CCC diagnosis. RESULTS: Intra- and extrahepatic tumors were found in 6 and 5 patients, respectively. At median follow-up examination of 26.3 months there were 8 CCC recurrences and 7 patient deaths. Overall survival after liver transplantation for incidental CCC was 88.9% at 1 year, 44.4% at 2 years, and 14.8% at 3 years. The corresponding rates of recurrence-free survival were 45.7%, 45.7%, and 0.0%, respectively. Post-transplantation CCC recurrences were universal with 0% 3-year recurrence-free survival both in patients with intra- and extrahepatic tumors (P = .475). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental CCC in liver transplantation is associated with poor outcomes irrespective of tumor localization. Introduction of new adjuvant multimodal treatment concepts is necessary to improve the prognosis for this subgroup of patients.