Gender influences resident physicians' perception of an employee-to-employee recognition program: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is prevalent in medical training. While some institutions have implemented employee-to-employee recognition programs to promote wellness, it is not known how such programs are perceived by resident physicians, or if the experience differs among residents of different genders. METHODS: We used convergent mixed methods to characterize how residents in internal medicine (IM), pediatrics, and general surgery programs experience our employee-to-employee recognition ("Hi-5″) program. We collected Hi-5s received by residents in these programs from January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021 and coded them for recipient discipline, sex, and PGY level and sender discipline and professional role. We conducted virtual focus groups with residents in each training program. MAIN MEASURES AND APPROACH: We compared Hi-5 receipt between male and female residents; overall and from individual professions. We submitted focus group transcripts to content analysis with codes generated iteratively and emergent themes identified through consensus coding. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, residents received 382 Hi-5s. There was no significant difference in receipt of Hi-5s by male and female residents. Five IM, 3 surgery, and 12 pediatric residents participated in focus groups. Residents felt Hi-5s were useful for interprofessional feedback and to mitigate burnout. Residents who identified as women shared concerns about differing expectations of professional behavior and communication based on gender, a fear of backlash when behavior does not align with gender stereotypes, and professional misidentification. CONCLUSIONS: The "Hi-5" program is valuable for interprofessional feedback and promotion of well-being but is experienced differently by men and women residents. This limitation of employee-to-employee recognition should be considered when designing equitable programming to promote well-being and recognition.

Enhancing the Value of Surgical Entrustable Professional Activities through Integrative Learning Analytics.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the value of integrating surgical resident Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) data into a learning analytics platform that provides meaningful feedback for formative and summative decision-making. DESIGN: Description of the Surgical Entrustable Professional Activities (SEPA) analytics dashboard, and examples of summary analytics and intuitive display features. SETTING: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Surgery residents, faculty, and residency program administrators. RESULTS: We outline the major functionalities of the SEPA dashboard and offer concrete examples of how these features are utilized by various stakeholders to support progressive entrustment decisions for surgical residents. CONCLUSIONS: Our intuitive analytics platform allows for seamless integration of SEPA microassessment data to support Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) decisions for resident evaluation and provides point of training feedback to faculty and trainees in support of progressive autonomy.

Discussion-based interprofessional education: A positive step toward promoting shared understanding between surgical residents and nurses.

Interprofessional education during medical training may improve communication by promoting collaboration and the development of shared mental models between professions. We implemented a novel discussion-based intervention for surgical residents and nurses to promote mutual understanding of workflows and communication practices. General surgery residents and inpatient nurses from our institution were recruited to participate. Surveys and paging data were collected prior to and following the intervention. Surveys contained original questions and validated subscales. Interventions involved facilitated discussions about workflows, perceptions of urgency, and technology preferences. Discussions were recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis. Pre and post-intervention survey responses were compared with descriptive sample statistics. Group characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Eleven intervention groups were conducted (2-6 participants per group) (n = 38). Discussions achieved three aims: Information-Sharing (learning about each other's workflows and preferences), 2) Interpersonal Relationship-Building (establishing rapport and fostering empathy) and 3) Interventional Brainstorming (discussing strategies to mitigate communication challenges). Post-intervention surveys revealed improved nurse-reported grasp of resident schedules and tailoring of communication methods based on workflow understanding; however, communication best practices remain limited by organizational and technological constraints. Systems-level changes must be prioritized to allow intentions toward collegial communication to thrive.

Clinical Trials That Have Informed the Modern Management of Breast Cancer.

Randomized controlled trials have informed the historical evolution of breast cancer management, distilling operative and nonoperative treatments to achieve disease control and improve survival while maximizing quality of life and minimizing complications. The authors describe landmark trials investigating and influencing the following aspects of breast cancer care: extent of breast surgery; axillary management; neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies; and selection of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy via application of genomic assays.

Impacts of a Clinical Research Program for High School Students from Groups Historically Excluded from Science and Medicine.

Introduction: Pathway programs engage students who identify with groups historically excluded from, and therefore underrepresented in, science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine (STEMM). We explored alumni-reported impacts of eight U.S. high school-to-college pathway programs funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF). Methods: A survey was sent to 499 alumni to evaluate their perceptions of the DDCF programs, which offer mentored experiences in clinical research. A multivariate analysis was used to compare Likert-style questions related to the programs' impact on education and career plans. Open-ended responses were analyzed using inductive analysis. Results: Two hundred sixty-nine alumni responded to the survey, the majority of whom identified as Hispanic/Latinx or Black/African American. One hundred nineteen alumni (∼75%) currently in college reported majoring in STEMM fields. Of college graduates, 30 (∼65%) obtained a degree in an STEMM field. Participants identifying as Hispanic/Latinx had a significantly higher reported level of impact of the programs on their plans to attend college. Most alumni felt that the programs impacted their chosen majors and future professions and made them more confident to pursue careers in STEMM. Discussion: Surveyed alumni perceive DDCF programs to have positively impacted their interest, confidence, and skills in STEMM-related areas. Our results support the benefit of DDCF programs and substantiate their funding, integration into higher education systems, and iterative redesign to ensure positive impacts on students with diverse backgrounds. Health Equity Implications: Assessment and improvement of pathway programs may support underrepresented students in their STEMM aspirations and increase the diversity of the medical and scientific workforce.

To page or not to page? A qualitative study of communication practices of general surgery residents and nurses.

BACKGROUND: Communication errors contribute to preventable adverse hospital events; however, communication between general surgery residents and nurses remains insufficiently studied. The purpose of our study was to use qualitative methods to characterize communication practices of surgical residents and nurses on inpatient general and intermediate care units to inform best practices and future interprofessional interventions. METHODS: Our study cohort consisted of 14 general surgery residents and 13 inpatient nurses from a tertiary academic medical center. Focus groups were conducted via a secure video platform, recorded, and transcribed. Two authors performed open coding of transcripts for qualitative analysis. Codes were reviewed iteratively with themes generated via abductive analysis, contextualizing results within 3 domains of an established communication space framework: organizational, cognitive, and social complexity. RESULTS: Communication practices of general surgery residents and inpatient nurses are affected by workflow differences, disruptive communication patterns, and communication technology. Barriers to effective communication, as well as strategies used to mitigate challenges, were characterized, with select communication practices found to negatively affect the well-being of patients, nurses, and residents. CONCLUSION: Communication practices of general surgery residents and inpatient nurses are influenced by entrenched and interrelated organizational, technological, and interpersonal factors. Given that current communication practices negatively affect patient and provider well-being, collaboration between surgeons, nurses, systems engineers, health information technology experts, and other stakeholders is critical to (1) establish communication best practices, and (2) design interventions to assess and improve multiple areas (rather than isolated domains) of surgical interprofessional communication.

Which hospital-acquired conditions matter the most in trauma? An evidence-based approach for prioritizing trauma program improvement.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) is a focus of trauma center quality improvement. The relative contributions of various HACs to postinjury hospital outcomes are unclear. We sought to quantify and compare the impacts of six HACs on early clinical outcomes and resource utilization in hospitalized trauma patients. METHODS: Adult patients from the 2013 to 2016 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files who required 5 days or longer of hospitalization and had an Injury Severity Score of 9 or greater were included. Multiple imputation with chained equations was used for observations with missing data. The frequencies of six HACs and five adverse outcomes were determined. Multivariable Poisson regression with log link and robust error variance was used to produce relative risk estimates, adjusting for patient-, hospital-, and injury-related factors. Risk-adjusted population attributable fractions estimates were derived for each HAC-outcome pair, with the adjusted population attributable fraction estimate for a given HAC-outcome pair representing the estimated percentage decrease in adverse outcome that would be expected if exposure to the HAC had been prevented. RESULTS: A total of 529,856 patients requiring 5 days or longer of hospitalization were included. The incidences of HACs were as follows: pneumonia, 5.2%; urinary tract infection, 3.4%; venous thromboembolism, 3.3%; surgical site infection, 1.3%; pressure ulcer, 1.3%; and central line-associated blood stream infection, 0.2%. Pneumonia demonstrated the strongest association with in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization. Prevention of pneumonia in our cohort would have resulted in estimated reductions of the following: 22.1% for end organ dysfunction, 7.8% for mortality, 8.7% for prolonged hospitalization, 7.1% for prolonged intensive care unit stay, and 6.8% for need for mechanical ventilation. The impact of other HACs was comparatively small. CONCLUSION: We describe a method for comparing the contributions of HACs to outcomes of hospitalized trauma patients. Our findings suggest that trauma program improvement efforts should prioritize pneumonia prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

A Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Surgical Educators: Creation of the MAISE.

OBJECTIVE: Metacognition plays an important role in the professional development and growth of surgical educators. This work presents the development and pilot of the MAISE (Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Surgical Educators). The MAISE is a novel tool for surgeons who are teaching residents in workplace-based learning environments and provides a framework for surgeons to consider their roles as educators and prompt reflection on potential areas for self-improvement. DESIGN: The MAISE was developed for the surgical context by a general surgery resident by revising 2 existing validated instruments designed to measure metacognitive processes related to teaching. The first version of the MAISE consisted of 35 statements designed to measure 7 subdimensions of metacognition (factors). A principal components analysis with a varimax rotation was conducted, and factor loadings greater than 0.4 were used to assign items to factors. SETTING: The initial version of the MAISE was piloted by recruiting participants via email and social media platforms (Facebook and Twitter). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants who identified as attending surgeons with resident teaching responsibilities completed the initial version of the MAISE. RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 35 original items were included in the final version of the MAISE, which includes 5 factors. Final factors were determined based on item loadings. When items loaded on more than one factor, interpretability was used to decide which factor to which an item was assigned. Some factors were excluded due to lack of interpretability. This model explained 85% of the variance in the data. CONCLUSIONS: MAISE is a valid tool for assessing metacognition among surgical educators. Improving surgeons' metacognition of their teaching practices may advance the surgical field by promoting reflection on teaching processes and areas for growth. This will help surgical educators develop their teaching practices and to employ and model effective teaching with trainees.

Simulation-Based Medical Education: Development of an Assessment Tool for Novice Use.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based medical education, an educational model in which students engage in simulated patient scenarios, improves performance. However, assessment tools including the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) scale require expert assessors. We modified this tool for novice use. METHODS: Medical students participated in 5 nontechnical simulations. The NOTECHS scale was modified to allow for novice evaluation. Three novices and 2 experts assessed performance, with intraclass correlation used to assess validity. RESULTS: Twenty-two learners participated in the simulations. Novice reviewers had moderate to excellent correlation among evaluations (0.66 < intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] < 0.95). Novice and expert reviewers had moderate to good correlation among evaluations (0.51 < ICC < 0.88). DISCUSSION: The modified NOTECHS scales can be utilized by novices to evaluate simulation performance. Novice assessment correlates with expert review. These tools may encourage the use of simulation-based medical education.

Postoperative Outcomes after Index vs Interval Cholecystectomy for Perforated Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation is a known morbid sequela of acute cholecystitis, yet evidence for its optimal management remains conflicting. This study compares outcomes in patients with perforated cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy at the time of index hospital admission with those in patients who underwent interval cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 654 patients from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database who underwent cholecystectomy for perforated cholecystitis (2006-2018). Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative major and minor morbidity, 30-day mortality, and need for prolonged hospitalization. Patient and procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney rank sum test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables. A subset analysis was conducted of patients matched on propensity for undergoing interval cholecystectomy. RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality rate of matched cohort patients undergoing index cholecystectomy was 7% vs 0% of patients undergoing interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.01). The 30-day minor morbidity rates were 2% for index and 8% for interval patients (p = 0.06), and the major morbidity rates were 33% for index and 14% for interval patients (p = 0.003). Of the index patients, 27% required prolonged hospitalization compared with 6% of interval patients (p < 0.001). Results showed similar trends in the unmatched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent index cholecystectomy had significantly longer postoperative hospitalizations and higher 30-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality. There were no differences in 30-day minor morbidity. Selected patients with perforated cholecystitis can benefit from operative management on an interval, rather than urgent, basis.