Effect of suramin on urinary excretion of diabetes-induced glomerular and tubular injury parameters in rats.

Diabetes mellitus causes changes in metabolism of extracellular nucleotides acting through P2 receptors (P2Rs). This affects renal function and may lead to glomerular and tubular disturbances. We measured urinary excretion of nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP, UTP, UDP, UMP) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (65 mg/kg, i.p., day 0) and the effects of P2Rs' blockade by suramin (10 mg/kg, i.p., days +7, +14) on glomerular P2×7R expression and urinary excretion of glomerular (albumin, nephrin) and tubular (KIM-1, NGAL) injury markers, electrolytes, and oxidative stress markers (TBARS, 8-OHdG). Concentrations of nucleotides, specific proteins, electrolytes, and oxidative stress markers in 24-h urine samples collected in metabolic cages at days -1, +6 and +20 were measured using ion-paired reversed-phase HPLC, immunoenzymatic and fluorometric methods, and flame photometry, respectively. Expression of KIM-1 and P2×7R was examined by immunohistochemistry or immunoblotting. Diabetes was associated with increased urinary excretion of ATP, ADP, UTP, UDP and glomerular P2×7R expression. Suramin attenuated P2×7R expression but did not affect urinary excretion of nucleotides. Urinary excretion of albumin, nephrin, NGAL, and 8-OHdG were increased in diabetic rats and were not affected by suramin. TBARS was higher in diabetic rats and suramin attenuated the excretion dynamics in this group. KIM-1 excretion was higher in diabetic rats and suramin further increased excretion of KIM-1 in both diabetic and non-diabetic rats. Furthermore, suramin attenuated the diabetes-induced natriuresis and kaliuresis. It is possible that suramin affects both glomerular and tubular functions in diabetic rats.

A large-scale automated method for hepatocyte isolation: effects on proliferation in culture.

Large-scale sterile methods for isolating hepatocytes are desirable for the development of bioartificial liver support systems. In this study the traditional centrifuge method was compared with the use of a Baylor Rapid Autologous Transfusion (BRAT) machine for isolating large quantities of porcine hepatocytes. After isolating hepatocytes, the methods were evaluated in terms of cell viability and yield per liver, proliferation over 7 days, and the effects on the cell cycle using the trypan blue exclusion test, conventional phase-contrast light microscopy, the lactate to pyruvate ratio, the leakage of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lidocaine clearance, albumin production, and flow cytometry. With the centrifuge method the mean cell viability was 92.5%, while with the BRAT method the viability was 95.9%. The minimal cell yields with the BRAT procedure were 7.3 x 10(9) for 250-ml centrifuge bowls and 2.8 x 10(9) for 165-ml bowls, which compares well with that found by other authors. Because the same initial procedures were employed in both methods the total hepatocyte yield per liver was comparable. Flow cytometry confirmed that the proliferation of hepatocytes was facilitated by oxygenation during the isolation procedure. The recovery of hepatocytes in culture following isolation was similar after either method. Daily microscopic investigation indicated that cytoplasmic vacuolization and granularities were present after either procedure and these disappeared following 3-4 days of culturing. Flow cytometry indicated that the hepatocyte cell cycle was similar after either method; at 7 days the profile indicated that the cells were still proliferating. Trends in the lactate to pyruvate ratio and the leakage of LD and AST indicated that the functional polarity of hepatocytes was regained after approximately 3 days. Lidocaine clearance at 4 days indicated that the cytochrome P450 system was active, while significant albumin production was apparent at day 5. The benefit of using BRAT technology in hepatocyte isolation lies in guaranteed sterility, convenience, speed, and the ability to oxygenate media and cell suspensions during the procedure.