Comparison of manual and femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy in the treatment of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK) and manual astigmatic keratotomy (AK) in treatment of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. METHODS: A retrospective, comparative, pairwise-matched case series including 150 patients who underwent either FSAK (n = 75) or manual AK (n = 75) for the treatment of astigmatism (>3.00 D) following penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Pairwise matching for baseline variables (age, visual acuity and astigmatism) was performed. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.5 ± 16.0 years. The FSAK group had significantly better postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (p = 0.010), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) (p = 0.049), corneal astigmatism (p = 0.020) and manifest astigmatism (p < 0.001) compared with the manual AK group. Gain of ≥3 lines in BCVA (logMAR) was seen in five eyes (6.7%) and 21 eyes (28.0%) in manual AK and FSAK, respectively (p = 0.005). Alpins vector analysis showed lower (closer to 0) index of success (0.50 ± 0.24 and 0.79 ± 0.48, p < 0.001) and higher (closer to 1) correction index (0.94 ± 0.45 and 0.74 ± 0.55, p = 0.020) in FSAK compared with manual AK. Corneal and manifest astigmatism improved significantly in both groups, while BCVA and UCVA improved significantly in FSAK only. Repeat AK rate was 32% (24 eyes) in manual AK and 4% (three eyes) in FSAK (p < 0.001). Overcorrection-related re-suturing rate was 0% in manual AK and 8% (six eyes) in FSAK (p = 0.037). There was one microperforation (1.3%) in FSAK, and there were no occurrences of graft dehiscence, infectious keratitis or graft rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Both manual AK and FSAK were safe and effective in reducing postkeratoplasty astigmatism. FSAK had superior visual and keratometric outcomes compared with manual AK.

Factors Associated With Improvement in Vision Following Femtosecond Astigmatic Keratotomy in Post-Keratoplasty Keratoconus Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with improvement in vision following femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK) in patients with keratoconus post-keratoplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: The study took place in an institutional setting. This was a retrospective study that included patients with keratoconus who underwent FSAK for astigmatism following penetrating (PKP) or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Success was defined as improvement in 3 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study lines (doubling of the visual angle) of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes in 56 patients with keratoconus were included. Following FSAK, there was a significant improvement in UDVA (1.30 ± 0.49 to 0.87 ± 0.58 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]; P < .001), BSCVA (0.40 ± 0.26 to 0.27 ± 0.29 logMAR; P <.001), and corneal astigmatism (8.69 ± 2.72 to 3.92 ± 2.13 diopter [D]; P < .001). Success was achieved in 60.7% (34/56) of cases, and this group had a higher proportion of previous PKP (73.5% vs 45.5%; P = .03), worse preoperative UDVA (1.42 ± 0.47 vs 1.11 ± 0.47 logMAR; P = .03), and a greater preoperative manifest cylinder (7.56 ± 2.26 vs 5.72 ± 2.12 D; P = .01). In multiple regression analysis, PKP (vs DALK) (odds ratio [OR]: 8.52; P = .009), worse preoperative UDVA (OR: 9.08, P = .02), and greater preoperative cylinder (OR: 1.51; P = .04) were independently associated with success, and, when combined, led to a sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 93.8%, respectively, in predicting success. The optimal cutoff predicting success with a preoperative cylinder was a cylinder >6.75 D. CONCLUSION: Approximately 60% of patients with keratoconus post-keratoplasty experience doubling of the visual angle following FSAK. Patients with previous PKP and a greater cylinder are more likely to benefit from this procedure. Separate nomograms for DALK and PKP patients may be warranted.

Stepwise Combination of Femtosecond Astigmatic Keratotomy With Phacoemulsification and Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Treatment of Very High Postkeratoplasty Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of stepwise combined femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK) and phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the treatment of very high astigmatism after either penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective, interventional case series including 8 eyes of 6 patients with very high astigmatism [≥8.00 diopter (D)] after either penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty who underwent FSAK, followed by phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation. Outcome measures were corneal and manifest astigmatism and uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (UCVA, BSCVA). RESULTS: The average age was 58.9 ± 5.1 years. The average follow-up time was 40.9 ± 43.8 months. Outcome measure changes after both FSAK and toric IOL implantation were: corneal astigmatism improved from 13.56 ± 4.81 D to 4.48 ± 2.83 D (P < 0.001), manifest astigmatism improved from 9.15 ± 3.86 to 1.46 ± 0.88 D (P = 0.011), UCVA improved from 1.69 ± 0.45 LogMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/980) to 0.23 ± 0.11 LogMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/33, P < 0.001), and BSCVA improved from 1.01 ± 0.71 LogMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/200) to 0.19 ± 0.11 LogMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/30, P = 0.015). BSCVA and UCVA at the last follow-up were 20/40 or better in all patients. All procedures were uneventful. Two eyes underwent photorefractive keratectomy after FSAK to regularize and further reduce astigmatism before toric IOL implantation. One patient underwent temporary compression suturing because of FSAK overcorrection. CONCLUSIONS: Combined stepwise use of FSAK and phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation was an effective and apparently safe approach in patients with very high postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Additional treatment using photorefractive keratectomy may be beneficial in some cases.

Long-term outcomes of donor eyes after conjunctival limbal autograft and allograft harvesting.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ocular surface stability of donor eyes after conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU) or conjunctival limbal allograft (CLAL). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) who underwent ocular surface stem cell transplantation with postoperative follow-up of at least 3 months. METHODS: Donor eye data collected included preoperative and postoperative Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraoperative and postoperative complications, re-epithelialization times, and ocular surface stability at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Sixteen donor eyes of 16 patients were included, the mean age at the time of surgery was 59.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 53 months. The most common injury etiology was chemical injury, followed by iatrogenic causes and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, then congenital aniridia. Eleven patients underwent CLAU, 3 underwent living-related CLAL, and 2 underwent CLAL combined with keratolimbal allograft. Preoperative mean donor eye BCVA was 0.22 ± 0.32 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ≈ 20/33), and mean BCVA at the last follow-up was 0.18 ± 0.24 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ≈ 20/30) (p = 0.4). All donor eyes had a stable ocular surface at the last follow-up, with no signs of iatrogenic LSCD or delayed corneal epithelial healing. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications such as infections, persistent epithelial defects, corneal neovascularization, or chronic inflammation. CONCLUSION: This study provides additional evidence for the long-term safety of donor eyes when providing limbal stem cell tissue for CLAU or CLAL.

Evaluation of Big Bubble Technique for Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Patients With Radial Keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and success rates of the big-bubble (BB) technique or manual dissection after a failed use of the BB technique in eyes that underwent prior radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent DALK after RK at Toronto Western Hospital, Canada, between 1999 and 2017 was performed. Demographic characteristics, success rates of the BB technique and manual dissection, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before and after corneal transplant were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten eyes of 9 patients were included in the analysis. The average age was 64 ± 10 years (range 49-82). The average time between the RK surgery and the corneal transplant was 20 ± 5 years (range 8-24). Indications for corneal transplant were significant irregular astigmatism in 5 eyes (50%), central scarring or haze in 4 eyes (40%), and progressive hyperopia with visual fluctuation in one eye (10%). BB was successfully achieved in one eye (10%). In 6 eyes (60%), manual dissection was performed, and in 3 eyes (30%), DALK surgery was converted to penetrating keratoplasty. The average best spectacle-corrected visual acuity on the last follow-up visit was 0.26 ± 0.08 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/36). One eye that underwent manual DALK and one eye that underwent penetrating keratoplasty developed a rejection episode 4 and 2 months after keratoplasty, respectively. In both cases, rejection resolved with topical steroids. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes that underwent prior RK, DALK by manual dissection should be considered as a preferable surgical technique.

Wavefront-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy in the Treatment of High Astigmatism Following Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (WG-PRK) in the treatment of high astigmatism following keratoplasty. METHODS: A retrospective, interventional analysis including patients with high astigmatism following either penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, who underwent WG-PRK. RESULTS: Thirteen eyes (7 right eyes) of 12 patients (10 male) aged 35.1 ± 5.9 years were included. Preoperative astigmatism ranged between 3.00 and 5.00 D. Average follow-up time was 14.0 ± 6.2 months. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.97 ± 0.58 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (Snellen equivalent ∼20/187) preoperatively to 0.13 ± 0.15 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/27) at 6 months and 0.14 ± 0.16 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ∼20/28) at the final follow-up (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). UDVA ≥20/40 increased from 1 eye (7.7%) preoperatively to 13 eyes (100%) at 6 months and 12 eyes (92.3%) at the final follow-up (P < 0.001 for both). UDVA ≥20/25 increased from 1 eye (7.7%) preoperatively to 6 eyes (46.2%) at 6 months and at the final follow-up (P = 0.027 for both). Mean astigmatism improved from -3.98 ± 0.75 D to -1.27 ± 0.82 D and -1.40 ± 1.04 at 6 months and at the last follow-up, respectively (P = 0.001 for both). Preoperative astigmatism was ≥3.00 D in all eyes and was reduced to ≤2.50 D in all eyes at 6 months postoperatively, with 7 eyes (63.6%) having ≤1.00 D of astigmatism at both 6 months and the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: WG-PRK was safe and effective in the treatment of high and regular postkeratoplasty astigmatism.

Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Previous Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with previous Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: This retrospective interventional case series included 26 eyes (26 patients) that underwent DMEK to replace a previous DSAEK graft with at least 6 months of follow-up. The outcome measures were indications for surgery, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density, rebubbling rate, rejection, and failure. RESULTS: Patient age was 71.9 ± 12.6 years. The average follow-up time after DMEK was 15.1 ± 10.6 months. Indications for DMEK were DSAEK graft failure (69%) and a DSAEK suboptimal visual outcome (31%). BSCVA of the entire cohort (n = 26) improved from 1.33 ± 0.78 logMAR preoperatively to 1.04 ± 0.78 and 1.06 ± 0.89 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up, respectively (P = 0.019 and P = 0.033). BSCVA among eyes without visual comorbidities (n = 13) improved from 0.84 ± 0.50 logMAR preoperatively to 0.55 ± 0.47 and 0.51 ± 0.49 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively and at final follow-up, respectively (P = 0.023 for both). Of these eyes, 84.6% had improvement in BSCVA at 6 months postoperatively and at last follow-up. In the subgroup of 8 eyes with DMEK for suboptimal visual outcomes after DSAEK, BSCVA improved from 0.81 ± 0.44 to 0.52 ± 0.35 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.024). When excluding eyes with visual comorbidities, BSCVA of this subgroup (n = 5) improved from 0.54 ± 0.32 to 0.36 ± 0.25 logMAR at final follow-up (P = 0.038). BSCVA of this subgroup at 6 months postoperatively was not significantly different from preoperative BSCVA, when including visual comorbidities (n = 8, 0.75 ± 0.60 logMAR, P = 0.79) and when excluding visual comorbidities (n = 5, 0.40 ± 0.28 logMAR, P = 0.621). Endothelial cell density decreased from 2753 ± 307 cells/mm to 1659 ± 655 cells/mm 6 months after surgery (39.7% loss, P = 0.005). Three eyes (11.5%) required rebubbling, and 5 eyes (19.2%) had secondary graft failure at 2 to 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK is effective for replacing previous DSAEK not only for graft failure but also for suboptimal visual outcomes.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To suggest a new surgical approach for posterior opacities or persistent Descemet membrane (DM) detachment in failed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and to report the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a series of patients with DALK failure. METHODS: In this retrospective case series of patients who underwent DMEK for failed DALK at Toronto Western Hospital, 4 patients with failed DALK who underwent DMEK surgery were included. In all 4 cases, big bubble formation during initial DALK surgery had failed and the surgical technique was converted to manual dissection using the Melles technique. In 2 cases, the descemetorhexis in DMEK surgery was performed manually, and in 2 cases, the descemetorhexis was performed with the assistance of the femtosecond laser. RESULTS: Four eyes of 4 patients aged 70 ± 4 years were included. Average follow-up time was 9 ± 5 months. Indications for DALK surgery were corneal dystrophy in 2 patients and corneal scars in the other 2. DALK failure was due to persistent DM detachment that created a double chamber in 2 patients and due to posterior lamellar haze in the other 2. After DMEK surgery, 2 patients had graft detachment and required rebubbling. In 1 patient, the DMEK scroll was attached after 1 rebubble attempt, and in the other patient, a second rebubble attempt was needed. The final visual acuities were 20/40, 20/50, 20/70, and 20/200 (because of dense cataract). All procedures were uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK surgery may be effective in managing DALK failure.

Incidence, predictors and clinical characteristics of orolingual angio-oedema complicating thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator for ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Orolingual angio-oedema is a recognised complication of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for ischaemic stroke. We investigated its incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship with other factors in patients receiving tPA at a UK centre. METHODS: 530 consecutive patients (median age 70 years) receiving tPA treatment for confirmed ischaemic stroke were included. Cases were defined as those developing angio-oedema within 24 h of initiation of tPA. Angio-oedema was retrospectively classified as mild, moderate or severe using predefined criteria. The primary analysis was the association between prior ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) treatment and angio-oedema. RESULTS: Orolingual angio-oedema was observed in 42 patients (7.9%; 95% CI 5.5% to 10.6%), ranging from 5 to 189 min after initiation of tPA (median 65 min). 12% of the angio-oedema cases were severe (1% of all patients treated with tPA), requiring urgent advanced airway management. 172 patients (33%) were taking ACE-I. In multifactorial analyses, only prior ACE-I treatment remained a significant independent predictor of angio-oedema (odds ratio (OR) 2.3; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Angio-oedema occurs more frequently than previously reported and is associated with preceding ACE-I treatment. Angio-oedema may be delayed and progress to life-threatening airway compromise, which has implications for the assessment and delivery of thrombolysis.