Risks and benefits of renal artery stenting in fibromuscular dysplasia: Lessons from the ARCADIA-POL study.

INTRODUCTION: Although renal stenting is the standard revascularization method for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) (FMD-RAS), stenting in fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) RAS is usually limited to periprocedural complications of angioplasty and primary arterial dissection. The main aim of the study was to retrospectively analyze the immediate and long-term results of renal stenting versus angioplasty in patients with FMD. METHODS: Of 343 patients in the ARCADIA-POL registry, 58 patients underwent percutaneous treatment due to FMD-RAS (in 70 arteries). Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) was performed as an initial treatment in 61 arteries (PTRA-group), whereas primary stenting was undertaken in nine arteries (stent-group). Stent-related complications were defined as: in-stent restenosis > 50% (ISR); stent fracture; under-expansion; or migration. RESULTS: In the PTRA-group, the initial restenosis rate was 50.8%. A second procedure was then performed in 22 arteries: re-PTRA (12 arteries) or stenting (10 arteries). The incidence of recurrent restenosis after re-PTRA was 41.7%. Complications occurred in seven of 10 (70%) arteries secondarily treated by stenting: two with under-expansion and five with ISR. In the stent-group, stent under-expansion occurred in one case (11.1%) and ISR in three of nine stents (33.3%). In combined analysis of stented arteries, either primarily or secondarily, stent-related complications occurred in 11/19 stenting procedures (57.9%): three due to under-expansion and eight due to ISRs. Finally, despite several revascularization attempts, four of 19 (21%) stented arteries were totally occluded and one was significantly stenosed at follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that renal stenting in FMD-RAS may carry a high risk of late complications, including stent occlusion. Further observational data from large-scale registries are required.

Acute kidney injury as the most important predictor of poor prognosis after interventional treatment for aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common acquired valvular disease. There are two methods of interventional treatment: surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The choice between SAVR and TAVI depends on the assessment of individual perioperative risk and long-term treatment outcomes. It is essential to identify factors that may influence the outcomes of the treatment to minimize their negative effects. AIMS: The study aimed to identify the most important risk factor which affects treatment outcomes in patients with AS undergoing SAVR/TAVI. METHODS: This study reviewed retrospectively patients with AS who underwent SAVR or TAVI. The primary outcomes included incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular issues assessed over a one-year follow-up period. An occurrence of postprocedural AKI (acute kidney injury) was identified as an independent predictor of MACE. RESULTS: The study included 78 patients, with the same number of subjects in each group (SAVR/TAVI [n = 39]). Twenty-nine patients developed AKI. It was similar in both groups (SAVR [n = 15]; TAVR [n = 14]). In the SAVR group, 13 (33%) patients developed at least one MACE compared to 5 (13%) patients in the TAVI group. AKI and the type of procedure (SAVR) were shown to be significantly and independently associated with the development of MACE (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively) as shown in the Cox multivariable regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that AKI is the strongest predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events after using both methods of aortic valve replacement (SAVR/TAVI).

Optimal medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Poland: the ISCHEMIA trial experience.

Introduction: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is the cornerstone of treatment for stable coronary disease with the ISCHEMIA trial showing similar outcomes using OMT with or without an initial invasive approach. Objectives: To describe OMT goal attainment in Polish ISCHEMIA participants compared with other countries. Patients and methods: Among 5179 trial participants, 333 were randomized in Poland. The median follow-up was 3.2 years. OMT targets were: not smoking, high-intensity statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of less than 70 mg/dl, systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg, aspirin therapy, and ACEI / ARB, and ß-blocker therapy if indicated. Results: Compared with 36 other countries, at randomization, patients in Poland were older (67 [62­75] y vs 65 [58­71] y); P <⁠0.001), more often female (30% vs 22%; P = 0.002), with a longer history of angina (3 [1­9] y vs 1 [0­3] y; P <⁠0.001), and there were more cases of prior myocardial infarction (32% vs 18%; P <⁠0.01) and revascularization (PCI, 40% vs 19%; CABG, 11% vs 3%; P <⁠0.001 for both). The number of OMT goals attained increased from baseline to follow-up visits (5 [4­5] vs 6 [5­6]; P <⁠0.001) in Poland and other countries alike (P = 0.89 vs P = 0.14). In Poland, significant improvements were achieved regarding high-intensity statin therapy (27% vs 50%), LDL-C <⁠70 mg/dl (29% vs 65%), and systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg (63% vs 81%) (P <⁠0.001 for all), whereas not-smoking (89% vs 89%), aspirin (90% vs 88%), ACEI / ARB (93% vs 95%), and ß-blocker therapy (94% vs 90%) remained high. Conclusions: With regular surveillance and contemporary medical therapy, high OMT goal attainment was achievable among the participants of the ISCHEMIA trial in Poland relative to other countries. There is still room for improvement in LDL-C and blood pressure management.

Burden of multimorbidity in a Polish cohort of ambulatory and hospitalized heart failure patients from 2 large European registry programs: prognostic implications.

Introduction: Individual comorbidities have been shown to adversely affect prognosis in heart failure (HF). However, our knowledge of multimorbidity in HF and understanding of its prognostic implications still remain incomplete. Objectives: We aimed to analyze the prevalence of multimorbidity in Polish HF patients and to investigate the quantitative and qualitative impact of comorbidity burden on 12-month outcomes in that population. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 1765 Polish patients with ambulatory or acute (requiring hospitalization) HF from 2 multicenter observational European Society of Cardiology registries: the ESC-HF Pilot Survey (2009­2010) and ESC-HF-LT Registry (2011­2013). Results: Arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease were the most prevalent comorbidities, similarly to the entire European cohort. The great majority of HF patients had more than 1 predefined comorbidity and the most frequent number of comorbidities was 3. Importantly, in almost half of the patients, 4 or more comorbidities were reported. The best accuracy for predicting the adjusted 12-month rate of all-cause death was ensured by the model including only anemia and kidney dysfunction. The model including 4 comorbidities­anemia, kidney dysfunction, diabetes, and coronary artery disease­provided best accuracy for predicting 12-month rate of composite all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Conclusions: Multimorbidity is highly prevalent in a real-world cohort of Polish HF patients and the quantitative burden of comorbidities is related to increased mortality. In such patients, the clinical profile characterized by pathophysiological continuum of diabetes, kidney dysfunction, and anemia is particularly associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Is primary coronary angioplasty the treatment of choice? In-hospital follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the main causes of death in the elderly, however, the optimal therapy of AMI in this age-group has not yet been established. AIM: To compare the early outcome of patients with AMI aged > or =75 years who underwent primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or were treated conservatively. METHODS: In-hospital outcome of 180 patients aged > or =75 years, hospitalised due to AMI, was retrospectively analysed. Ninety two consecutive patients, admitted with AMI between May 2001 and October 2002, underwent primary PCI whereas 88 patients, treated for AMI between 1993 and 2002, received standard pharmacological therapy without thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI in the elderly with AMI is significantly more effective than conservative therapy, except with patients with cardiogenic shock in whom mortality is similar regardless of the therapy used.