An ischemic myelopathy case series: Flaccid paraplegia following a spike ball save and numbness while walking normally.

Spinal cord infarctions in children are rare and early magnetic resonance imaging studies are often negative. A high clinical suspicion must be maintained to identify stroke and initiate workup for underlying etiology to suggest appropriate treatment. We present two cases of spinal cord infarction without major preceding trauma. The first was caused by disc herniation and external impingement of a radiculomedullary artery and the second was due to fibrocartilaginous embolism with classic imaging findings of ventral and dorsal cord infarctions, respectively. These cases were treated conservatively with diagnostic workup and aspirin, though additional treatments which can be considered with prompt diagnosis are also explored in our discussion. Both cases recovered the ability to ambulate independently within months. Case 1 is attending college and ambulates campus with a single-point cane. Case 2 ambulates independently, though has some difficulty with proprioception of the feet so uses wheelchairs for long-distance ambulation.

Neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery: A comparison of stereo electroencephalography and subdural electrodes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We analyzed the association of neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery with the intracranial electrode type (stereo electroencephalography [SEEG] and subdural electrodes [SDE]), and electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) of speech/language. METHODS: Drug-resistant epilepsy patients who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation before and 1 year after epilepsy surgery were included. SEEG and SDE subgroups were matched by age, handedness, operated hemisphere, and seizure freedom. Postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes (adjusted for presurgical scores) and reliable change indices were analyzed as functions of electrode type and ESM. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients aged 6-29 years were included with similar surgical resection/ablation volumes in the SEEG and SDE subgroups. Most of the neuropsychological outcomes were comparable between SEEG and SDE subgroups; however, Working Memory and Processing Speed were significantly improved in the SEEG subgroup. Undergoing language ESM was associated with significant improvements in Spelling, Letter-Word Identification, Vocabulary, Verbal Comprehension, Verbal Learning, and Story Memory scores, but a decline in Calculation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial evaluations with SEEG and SDE are comparable in terms of long-term postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes. Our data suggest that SEEG may be associated with improvements in working memory and processing speed, representing cognitive domains served by spatially distributed networks. Our study also supports wider use of language ESM before epilepsy surgery, preferably using other language tasks in addition to visual naming. Rather than the type of electrode, postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes are driven by whether language ESM was performed or not, with beneficial effects of language mapping.

Comparing electrical stimulation functional mapping with subdural electrodes and stereoelectroencephalography.

OBJECTIVE: Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) is the clinical standard for functional localization with subdural electrodes (SDE). As stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has emerged as an alternative option, we compared functional responses, afterdischarges (ADs), and unwanted ESM-induced seizures (EISs) between the two electrode types. METHODS: Incidence and current thresholds for functional responses (sensory, motor, speech/language), ADs, and EISs were compared between SDE and SEEG using mixed models incorporating relevant covariates. RESULTS: We identified 67 SEEG ESM and 106 SDE ESM patients (7207 and 4980 stimulated contacts, respectively). We found similar incidence of language and motor responses between electrode types; however, more SEEG patients reported sensory responses. ADs and EISs occurred less commonly with SEEG than SDE. Current thresholds for language, face motor, and upper extremity (UE) motor responses and EIS significantly decreased with age. However, they were not affected by electrode type, premedication, or dominant hemispheric stimulation. AD thresholds were higher with SEEG than with SDE. For SEEG ESM, language thresholds remained below AD thresholds up to 26 years of age, whereas this relationship was inverse for SDE. Also, face and UE motor thresholds fell below AD thresholds at earlier ages for SEEG than SDE. AD and EIS thresholds were not affected by premedication. SIGNIFICANCE: SEEG and SDE have clinically relevant differences for functional brain mapping with electrical stimulation. Although evaluation of language and motor regions is comparable between SEEG and SDE, SEEG offers a higher likelihood of identifying sensory areas. A lower incidence of ADs and EISs, and a favorable relationship between functional and AD thresholds suggest superior safety and neurophysiologic validity for SEEG ESM than SDE ESM.

Clinical validation of magnetoencephalography network analysis for presurgical epilepsy evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To clinically validate the connectivity-based magnetoencephalography (MEG) analyses to identify seizure onset zone (SOZ) with comparing to equivalent current dipole (ECD). METHODS: The ECD cluster was quantitatively analyzed by calculating the centroid of the cluster and maximum distance (the largest distance between all dipoles). The "primary hub" was determined by the highest eigencentrality. The distribution of nodes in the top 5% of eigenvector centrality values was quantified by generating the convex hull between each node. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients who underwent MEG, stereotactic-EEG, and focal surgery were included. The primary hub was significantly closer to the sEEG-defined SOZ compared to ECD (p = 0.009). The seizure freedom positive and negative predictive values of complete ECD cluster and primary hub resections did not significantly differ, although complete resection of the primary hub showed slightly better negative predictive value (ECD: 50.0% NPV, hub: 64.7% NPV). Both quantitative ECD and functional connectivity analyses suggested that spatially restricted dipole distributions and higher connectivity in a smaller region correlate with better seizure outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that MEG network analysis could be a valuable complement to the ECD methods. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study are an important step towards using non-invasive neurophysiologic recordings to accurately define the epileptic network.