Trends in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, reversal agents and neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a persistent and preventable problem, with serious risks. METHODS: Our objective was to describe and assess patterns in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring, and factors associated with the use of sugammadex. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study based on electronic medical records in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands that introduced an integrated NMT monitoring module with automatic recording in 2017. A total of 22,000 cases were randomly selected from all surgeries between January 2015 and December 2019 that required endotracheal intubation with the use of an NMBA. A total of 14,592 cases fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for complete analyses. RESULTS: Relative NMBA usage remained the same over time. For rocuronium, spontaneous reversal decreased from 86 to 81%, sugammadex reversal increased from 12 to 18%. There was a decline in patients extubated in the operating room (OR) with neither documented NMT monitoring nor sugammadex-mediated reversal from 46 to 31%. The percentage of patients extubated in the OR without a documented train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, decreased from 77 to 56%. Several factors were independently associated with the use of sugammadex, including BMI > 30 kg/m2 (odds ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.60), ASA class 3 or 4 (1.20; 1.07-1.34), age > 60 years (1.37; 1.23-1.53), duration of surgery < 120 min (3.01; 2.68-3.38), emergency surgery (1.83; 1.60-2.09), laparoscopic surgery (2.01; 1.71-2.36), open abdominal/thoracic surgery (1.56; 1.38-1.78), NMT monitoring used (5.31; 4.63-6.08), total dose of rocuronium (1.99; 1.76-2.25), and (inversely) use of inhalational anaesthetics (0.88; 0.79-0.99). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the implementation of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with a gradual increase in the (documented) use of NMT monitoring and an increased use of sugammadex with a more precise dose. Factors associated with sugammadex use include higher age, ASA score, BMI, abdominal and thoracic surgery, higher rocuronium doses, emergency surgery and the use of NMT monitoring. Trial registration N/A. KEY POINTS: • Introduction of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with an increase in (documented) use of NMT monitoring. • Sugammadex is more frequently used in patients with a presumed higher a priori risk of pulmonary complications. • Despite increased NMT monitoring and use of sugammadex a significant percentage of patients remain at potential risk of rNMB.

MRI measurement of the effects of moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal working space during laparoscopic surgery, a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on abdominal dimensions during laparoscopic procedures. We performed a clinical study to establish the influence of moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on the abdominal working space, measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with standard pressure (12 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum under sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: Ten patients were intraoperatively scanned three times in the lateral decubitus position, with pneumoperitoneum maintained by a mobile insufflator. The first scan without NMB (T1) was followed by scans with moderate (T2) and deep NMB (T3). The skin-sacral promontory (S-SP) distance was measured, and 3D pneumoperitoneum volumes were reconstructed. RESULTS: The mean difference in the S-SP distance was -0.32 cm between T2 and T3 (95% CI -1.06 - 0.42 cm; p = 0.344) and + 2.1 cm between T1 and T2 (95% CI 0.81 - 3.39 cm; p = 0.006). The mean differences in pneumoperitoneum volume were 166 mL between T2 and T3 (95% CI, 5 - 327 mL; p = 0.044) and 108 mL between T1 and T2 (95% CI, -273 - 488 mL; p = 0.525). The pneumoperitoneum volume showed high inter-individual variability and no increase in three patients with a high volume at T1. CONCLUSIONS: During laparoscopic surgery in the lateral decubitus position with standard pressure under sevoflurane anaesthesia, deep NMB did not increase the S-SP distance compared to moderate NMB. Moderate NMB increased the S-SP distance by a mean of 2.1 cm (15.2%) compared with no NMB. The mean pneumoperitoneum volume increased slightly from moderate to deep NMB, with high inter-individual variability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03287388.

Four different methods of measuring cardiac index during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are high-risk extensive abdominal surgery. During high-risk surgery, less invasive methods for cardiac index (CI) measurement have been widely used in operating theater. We investigated the accuracy of CI derived from different methods (FroTrac, ProAQT, ClearSight, and arterial pressure waveform analysis [APWA], from PICCO) and compared them to transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) during CRS and HIPEC in the operative room and intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Twenty-five patients scheduled for CRS-HIPEC were enrolled. During nine predefined time-points, simultaneous hemodynamic measurements were performed in the operating room and ICU. Absolute and relative changes of CI were analyzed using a Bland-Altman plot, four-quadrant plot, and interchangeability. RESULTS: The mean bias was -0.1 L/min/m2 for ClearSight, ProAQT, and APWA and was -0.2 L/min/m2 for FloTrac compared with TPTD. All devices had large limits of agreement (LoA). The percentage of errors and interchangeabilities for ClearSight, FloTrac, ProAQT, and APWA were 50%, 50%, 54%, 36% and 36%, 47%, 40%, 72%, respectively. Trending capabilities expressed as concordance using clinically significant CI changes were -7º ± 39º, -19º ± 38º, -13º ± 41º, and -15º ± 39º. Interchangeability in trending showed low percentages of interchangeable and gray zone data pairs for all devices. CONCLUSIONS: During CRS-HIPEC, ClearSight, FloTrac and ProAQT systems were not able to reliably measure CI compared to TPTD. Reproducibility of changes over time using concordance, angular bias, radial LoA, and interchangeability in trending of all devices was unsatisfactory.

Efficacy of profound versus moderate neuromuscular blockade in enhancing postoperative recovery after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Profound neuromuscular blockade (NMB) during anaesthesia has been shown to reduce postoperative pain scores, when compared with a moderate block. We hypothesised that profound NMB during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) could also improve the early quality of recovery after surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of profound versus moderate NMB during LDN in enhancing postoperative recovery. DESIGN: A phase IV, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Multicentre trial, from November 2016 to December 2017. PATIENTS: A total of 101 living kidney donors scheduled for LDN were enrolled, and 96 patients were included in the analyses. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to receive profound (posttetanic count 1 to 3) or moderate (train-of-four count 1 to 3) neuromuscular block. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the early quality of recovery at postoperative day 1, measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption and length-of-stay. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis did not show a difference with regard to the quality of recovery, pain scores, analgesic consumption and length-of-stay. Less intra-operative adverse events occurred in patients allocated to profound NMB (1/48 versus 6/48). Five patients allocated to a profound NMB received a moderate block and in two patients neuromuscular monitoring failed. The as-treated analysis revealed that pain scores were significantly lower at 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Moreover, the quality of recovery was significantly better at postoperative day 2 in patients receiving a profound versus moderate block (179.5 ±â€Š13.6 versus 172.3 ±â€Š19.2). CONCLUSION: Secondary analysis indicates that an adequately maintained profound neuromuscular block improves postoperative pain scores and quality of recovery. As the intention-to-treat analysis did not reveal a difference regarding the primary endpoint, future studies should pursue whether a thoroughly maintained profound NMB during laparoscopy improves relevant patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02838134.

Preoperative use of anxiolytic-sedative agents; are we on the right track?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although anxiolytic-sedative agents are used preoperatively since the advent of anesthesia, many aspects of this treatment, including the intended effects among which anxiolysis, effectiveness, and optimal agents, remain unclear. The objective of this study was to provide insight into the preoperative use of anxiolytic-sedative agents in the Netherlands and to relate the administration of these agents to the anxiolytic-sedative state of patients. DESIGN: Questionnaire study. SETTING: University, general, and specialized hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: One anesthesiologist in each hospital was asked for details about premedication in all elective procedures, except cardiothoracic surgery, in normal weighted adults in good to fair clinical condition. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Estimated percentage of patients receiving anxiolytic-sedative premedication, type, dose, route of administration and timing of these agents, and anxiolytic state of patients when arriving at the holding area. MAIN RESULTS: All 8 university hospitals, 69 of 82 general hospitals and 2 of 3 specialized hospitals participated in this study (response rate, 84.9%). The estimated percentage of patients that received anxiolytic-sedative agents was 46.8% for in-patients and 30.4% for day care patients (P<.0001), with large between-hospital variation. Midazolam (62.7%), oxazepam (20.2%), and temazepam (7.8%) were most frequently used and were virtually always orally administered 1 hour preoperatively. There was no relationship between use of anxiolytic-sedative agents and reduction of perceived anxiety (r=-0.09, P=.46 and r=-0.01, P=.91 for clinical and day care patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiolytic-sedative agents are used preoperatively in a substantial number of patients in the Netherlands, and the pharmacokinetic characteristics of many agents are not optimal of their intended use. In addition, we found no relationship with reduced anxiety. This study stresses the need for clear guidelines on preoperative use of anxiolytic-sedative agents.

[Capnothorax following a diagnostic laparoscopy]. / Capnothorax na diagnostische laparoscopie.

An 84-year-old woman underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy preceding a planned total gastrectomy. A bilateral pneumothorax was diagnosed postoperatively, following an uneventful procedure. The patient's clinical parameters led to the diagnosis of capnothorax, a rare complication of laparoscopic surgery. It is important to be able to differentiate between a capnothorax and a pneumothorax because the treatment is different: a capnothorax can generally be treated conservatively. The perioperative signs and symptoms, physiology and treatment of a capnothorax are discussed in this article.