Progression to Anti-TNF Treatment in Very Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data are currently available regarding anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) use and outcomes in very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEOIBD) patients. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and time to progression to anti-TNF treatment in VEOIBD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed IBD patients diagnosed under 6 years of age, between January 2005 and December 2019, from the British-Columbia (BC) Pediatric IBD database. Demographic data, disease characteristics, disease location and severity were documented. Data on anti-TNF treatment at initiation and during follow up including type of biologic, dosing, and response were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the number of years to progression to anti-TNF treatment and the parameters influencing commencement. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with VEOIBD were diagnosed during the study period. Median age at diagnosis was 3.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.6-5.1], 45.3% had Crohn disease (CD) and 62.8% were males. Median duration of follow up was 6.39 years (IQR 3.71-10.55). Anti-TNF treatment was started on 39.5% of patients and 7.0% underwent surgery. Rapid progression to biologic treatment was associated with Perianal fistulizing disease or stricturing disease in CD patients ( P = 0.026, P = 0.033, respectively), and disease severity ( P = 0.017) in ulcerative colitis(UC) patients. The median dose of infliximab at 1 year was 10 mg/kg (IQR 7.5-11) and a median dose interval of 4.5 weeks (IQR 4-6). Clinical remission was reported in 61.8% of patients on their first biologic agent. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate was higher than previously reported and might be due to higher infliximab dosing with shorter infusion intervals than standard dosing.

The impact of a global health elective on CanMEDS competencies and future practice.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that participating in global health electives generates positive educational outcomes and personal benefits for medical trainees. The objective of this study was to examine the effect and impact that a global health elective has on CanMEDS competencies and anticipated future practice. RESULTS: The medical expert, collaborator, leader, scholar, and professional CanMEDS competencies were self-perceived to be strongly impacted through this elective. A total of 94% of participants indicated it increased their strengths as a medical expert and leader, 82% indicated a major impact on the scholar competency, 88% of participants reported a strong impact as a professional, and 76% of participants indicated that it strongly impacted them as a collaborator. The majority of participants continue to have involvement in global health, and 88% of respondents found this elective to be influential on their current practice and beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that individuals who participated in this global health elective perceived value in their experience. These findings support our hypothesis that participation in this global health elective would generate self-perceived positive impacts. Global health electives may provide an opportunity for physicians to expand on their CanMEDS competencies and become more proficient in caring for diverse patient populations.