The Impact and Influence of Hospital Clowns on Hospitalized Children Undergoing Painful Procedures: A Mixed Methods Study.

Hospital clowns are widely used in pediatric settings. However, the field of pain and pain experience in children is complex and multifaceted. Therefore, the aim of this study was to expand knowledge on the impact and influence of hospital clowns on 4 to 15-year-old children's experiences of managing painful procedures and conditions. A convergent mixed method study was conducted integrating findings from three individual studies: a prospective non-blinded study and two focused ethnographic studies. The findings illuminated a child-clown interaction characterized by a close relationship evolving during a continuous, mutually focused attention, conceptualized as WE. This WE represent a responsive interaction between child and clown, which supported the child during the procedures, and generated three integrated findings: an age-differentiated approach; understanding the child's condition; and previous experiences as a part of the child's history. The WE approach strengthened the child's competences and ability to manage during painful procedures.

"WE do it together!" An Ethnographic Study of the Alliance Between Child and Hospital Clown During Venipunctures.

PURPOSE: Hospital clowns are widely used as a means of non-pharmacological intervention in the treatment of hospitalized children. However, little research has examined the impact of clowns on common painful needle-related procedures. This study explored children's pain experience and their ability to cope during a venipuncture while interacting with a clown in the acute admission unit. DESIGN AND METHODS: An ethnographic fieldwork study was conducted. Data were collected over a 10-month period through participant observation and informal interviews, supplemented by video recordings. The participants comprised 38 acutely admitted children aged 4 to 15 years undergoing a venipuncture in the presence of a hospital clown. Analysis was structured in three stages: before venipuncture; during venipuncture; and after venipuncture. RESULTS: The development of a responsive interaction between child and clown, identified as a WE, was found to be beneficial to the child during venipuncture procedure. The WE was characterized by three themes "How do WE do this together?"; "WE are together"; and "I/WE did it!" CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasizes the importance of a WE established between child and hospital clown from the first encounter until a final evaluation. This WE was verbalized repeatedly by the clown and the child and was essential in shaping a tailored approach which met the needs of each child. This approach seemed to strengthen the child's competence in pain management and ability to cope, thus building competence for future venipunctures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Establishing a WE might advance the psychosocial care of hospitalized children undergoing acute painful procedures.

An ongoing WE: A focused ethnographic study of the relationship between child and hospital clown during recurrent pain-related procedures and conditions.

Aim: This study explored the interaction between child and hospital clown during recurrent hospitalizations for repeated pain-related procedures and conditions. Background: Despite improvements in the management of pain in hospitalized children, procedural pain in particular is a common experience for hospitalized children, and they continue to report undertreated pain. Hospital clowns are widely used as a nonpharmacological intervention in hospitalized children. Little research has examined the influence of hospital clowns during recurrent hospitalizations on repeated painful procedures. Design and methods: Ethnographic fieldwork using focused ethnography was conducted. Data were collected during October-December 2017 using participant observation and informal interviews with children at one pediatric unit at a Danish university hospital. Data include 61 interactions between children aged 4-14 years and hospital clowns. The participants comprised 13 children undergoing recurrent hospitalizations. The data were coded using thematic analysis, and the research team verified the resulting themes. Results: The overarching theme was defined as An ongoing WE, based on two identified themes, that is, Stronger in a WE and Hope in the WE. The WE was characterized by a responsive interaction between the child and clown, which evolved over the course of an ongoing relationship. Conclusion: This study demonstrates how an ongoing WE was constructed with children during repeated painful procedures and conditions. Specifically, the study emphasizes the importance of developing a trusting relationship on the child's terms. Children seemed to experience enhanced coping with painful procedures during the recurring hospital clown encounters, thus reinforcing their competence and hope for coping with future painful procedures. These findings may improve psychosocial care for hospitalized children undergoing repeated painful procedures and conditions and may facilitate multidisciplinary initiatives, such as nurses' advocacy for the inclusion of hospital clowns during recurrent hospitalizations for repeated painful procedures to ensure optimal pain management.

Acute Procedural Pain in Children: Intervention With the Hospital Clown.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalized children often describe needle-related procedures as the worst pain possible and such procedures may be emotionally traumatic. The use of hospital clowns (HCs) related to painful medical procedures in children may offer pain relief, but this has not been systematically evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a therapeutic clown in comparison with standard care on the experience of pain in children receiving venipuncture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 116 children aged 4 to 15 years consecutively admitted to the hospital was allocated to either the experimental (presence of HC) or control group (standard care) before venipuncture. Self-reported pain after the procedure was assessed using the Faces Pain Scale combined with a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale. Separate analysis was conducted in age groups from 4 to 6 (N=37) and 7 to 15 (N=74) years. RESULTS: Without the clown present, the mean pain score (2.7±2.8) was not significantly different between the 2 age groups. Children aged 7 to 15 years had lower pain scores when the clown was present compared with the control group (P=0.025). Children aged 4 to 6 years had higher pain scores with the clown present, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.054). Children with pain (N=49) or previous experiences with venipuncture (N=56) did not score pain significantly differently. DISCUSSION: Assessing the pain experience of children receiving venipuncture with the presence of an HC indicates a pain relieving effect for children older than 6 years. However, future studies should carefully study the effects on younger children where mixed effects may be present.