Risk Stratification of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis for Treatment with Tofacitinib: A Review of Current Clinical Data.

In this commentary, we review clinical data which helps inform individualized benefit-risk assessment for tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). ORAL Surveillance, a safety trial of patients ≥ 50 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cardiovascular risk factors, found increased rates of safety outcomes (including major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, and venous thromboembolism) with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Post hoc analyses of ORAL Surveillance have identified subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNFi; higher risk with tofacitinib was confined to patients ≥ 65 years of age and/or long-time current/past smokers, and specifically for MACE, patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In patients without these risk factors, risk differences between tofacitinib and TNFi could not be detected. Given differences in demographics, pathophysiology, and comorbidities, we sought to examine whether the risk stratification observed in RA is also appropriate for PsA and AS. Data from the PsA tofacitinib development program show low absolute risk of safety outcomes in patients < 65 years of age and never smokers, and low MACE risk in patients with no history of ASCVD, consistent with results from ORAL Surveillance. No MACE, malignancies, or venous thromboembolism were reported in the tofacitinib AS development program. The mechanism of the ORAL Surveillance safety findings is unknown, and there are no similar prospective studies of sufficient size and duration. Accordingly, it is appropriate to use a precautionary approach and extrapolate differentiating risk factors identified from ORAL Surveillance (age ≥ 65 years, long-time current/past smoking, and history of ASCVD) to PsA and AS. We recommend an individualized approach to treatment decisions based on these readily identifiable risk factors, in line with updated labeling for Janus kinase inhibitors and international guidelines for the treatment of PsA and AS.Trial Registration: NCT02092467, NCT01262118, NCT01484561, NCT00147498, NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT01164579, NCT00976599, NCT01059864, NCT01359150, NCT02147587, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT01039688, NCT02281552, NCT02187055, NCT02831855, NCT00413699, NCT00661661, NCT01877668, NCT01882439, NCT01976364, NCT00678210, NCT01710046, NCT01241591, NCT01186744, NCT01276639, NCT01309737, NCT01163253, NCT01786668, NCT03502616.

Efficacy of risankizumab across subgroups in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc integrated analysis of the phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 and KEEPsAKE 2 randomized controlled trials.

In the KEEPsAKE 1 (NCT03675308) and KEEPsAKE 2 (NCT03671148) phase 3 trials, risankizumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post hoc integrated analysis evaluated achieving the following efficacy outcomes at weeks 24 and 52 by baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, minimal disease activity status, Low Disease Activity status (Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis), and minimal clinically important difference in pain. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between risankizumab (n = 707) and placebo (n = 700) groups. Numerically higher ACR20 response rates at week 24 (primary endpoint) were observed among the risankizumab (46.3%-60.1%) vs. placebo (15.5%-36.2%) cohorts, regardless of subgroups. At week 52, consistent proportions of patients randomized to risankizumab achieved ACR20 (48.6%-75.8%) while those initially randomized to placebo and switched to risankizumab experienced an improvement from week 24 (43.7%-63.9%), regardless of subgroups. Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures assessing rigorous skin response criteria, composite measures of overall disease activity, and PsA-related symptoms. Risankizumab treatment was efficacious among patients with varying demographic and psoriatic disease characteristics through 52 weeks.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the Phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) require treatment providing durable long-term efficacy in different disease domains as well as safety. We present 100-week efficacy and safety results of risankizumab in patients with active PsA and previous inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). METHODS: KEEPsAKE 1 (NCT03675308) is a global phase 3 study, including a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled and ongoing open-label extension periods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at baseline and weeks 4 and 16. After week 24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients were evaluated through 100 weeks. Endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% reduction in American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20), minimal disease activity (MDA; defined as ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and other measures. RESULTS: Overall, 828/964 (85.9%) patients completed week 100. For patients receiving continuous risankizumab, 57.3%, 70.6%, and 64.3% achieved ACR20 at weeks 24, 52, and 100, respectively. For the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 33.5% achieved ACR20 at week 24 but increased after switching to active treatment at weeks 52 (63.7%) and 100 (62.1%). In ACR20 responders at week 52, 81.2% of both treatment cohorts maintained response at week 100. MDA was achieved by 25.0%, 38.3%, and 38.2% of the continuous risankizumab cohort at weeks 24, 52, and 100. In the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 10.2% achieved MDA at week 24, increasing at weeks 52 (28.0%) and 100 (35.2%). MDA response was maintained at week 100 in week 52 responders in the continuous risankizumab (75.5%) and placebo/risankizumab cohorts (78.2%). Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Risankizumab was generally well tolerated through 100 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with active PsA who are csDMARD-IR, risankizumab demonstrated durable long-term efficacy and was generally well tolerated, with a consistent long-term safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03675308.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often affects individuals with the skin condition psoriasis. A biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug can help control inflammation and regulate the immune system to ease symptoms and slow progression of PsA. The ongoing KEEPsAKE 1 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with active PsA who previously have not had success with ≥ 1 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Patients were initially treated with risankizumab 150 mg (continuous risankizumab group) or inactive drug (inactive drug/risankizumab group). After 24 weeks, all received risankizumab for the rest of the study. At week 100, 64% (continuous risankizumab group) and 62% (inactive drug/risankizumab group) of patients had ≥ 20% improvement in PsA symptoms (measured using American College of Rheumatology [ACR20] criteria). Both groups showed similar percentages at week 52 and improvement from week 24. In patients who achieved ACR20 at week 52, 81% maintained their ACR20 response at week 100. Minimal disease activity was defined as a combination of joint and skin symptoms, affected body surface area, pain, and physical functioning. At week 100, 38% of the continuous risankizumab group and 35% of the inactive drug/risankizumab group achieved minimal disease activity. Percentages were similar at week 52 and higher than week 24 in both groups. In patients who achieved minimal disease activity at week 52, 81% maintained response at week 100. All other measures of treatment responses showed similar patterns from the start of risankizumab through week 100. Risankizumab was considered generally safe by the treating physicians.

EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update.

OBJECTIVE: New modes of action and more data on the efficacy and safety of existing drugs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) required an update of the EULAR 2019 recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of PsA. METHODS: Following EULAR standardised operating procedures, the process included a systematic literature review and a consensus meeting of 36 international experts in April 2023. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were determined. RESULTS: The updated recommendations comprise 7 overarching principles and 11 recommendations, and provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be used in monotherapy only for mild PsA and in the short term; oral glucocorticoids are not recommended. In patients with peripheral arthritis, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended and methotrexate preferred. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) should be initiated, without preference among modes of action. Relevant skin psoriasis should orient towards bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)-23p40, IL-23p19, IL-17A and IL-17A/F inhibitors. In case of predominant axial or entheseal disease, an algorithm is also proposed. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is proposed primarily after bDMARD failure, taking relevant risk factors into account, or in case bDMARDs are not an appropriate choice. Inflammatory bowel disease and uveitis, if present, should influence drug choices, with monoclonal tumour necrosis factor inhibitors proposed. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are also addressed. CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations integrate all currently available drugs in a practical and progressive approach, which will be helpful in the pharmacological management of PsA.

Changes in Inflammatory Cytokines in Responders and Non-Responders to TNFα Inhibitor and IL-17A Inhibitor: A Study Examining Psoriatic Arthritis Patients.

This study aimed to examine the changes in biomarker levels in responders and non-responders to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) and interleukin-17A inhibitor (IL-17Ai) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients over a 4-month period after treatment initiation. A total of 68 PsA patients initiating either TNFi, IL-17Ai, or methotrexate treatment were included. Blood plasma and clinical outcome measures were collected adjacent to treatment initiation and after four months. A commercially available multiplex immunoassay was included to evaluate 54 biomarkers. Mean changes were used to evaluate change over time. A statistically significant decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (log-transformed mean change -0.97, 95%CI -4.30; 2.37, [p = 0.032]) and an increase in anti-inflammatory IL-10 (0.38, 95%CI 1.74; 2.50 [p = 0.010]) were seen in TNFi responders. Meanwhile, a statistically significant increase in the target cytokine IL-17A was seen in both IL-17Ai responders (2.49, 95%CI -1.84; 6.85 [p = 0.031]) and non-responders (2.48, 95%CI -1.46; 6.41 [p = 0.001]). This study demonstrated differing changes in cytokine levels when comparing treatment responders and non-responders, highlighting the need to improve the understanding of the different immune response mechanisms explaining different responses to medical treatment in PsA patients.

Association of the clinical components in the distal interphalangeal joint synovio-entheseal complex and subsequent response to ixekizumab or adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of simultaneous distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint disease and adjacent nail psoriasis (finger unit) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and compare the efficacy of the interleukin (IL)-17A antagonist ixekizumab (IXE) and the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor adalimumab (ADA). METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated the simultaneous occurrence of DIP joint involvement (tenderness and/or swelling) and adjacent nail psoriasis among patients with PsA from the SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) trial comparing IXE to ADA. Among patients with simultaneous DIP joint involvement and adjacent nail psoriasis in ≥ 1 digit at baseline, treatment effects were assessed through week 52 for each affected finger unit; 'finger unit' defines the connected DIP joint and adjacent nail of an individual digit. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients had simultaneous DIP joint involvement and adjacent nail psoriasis in ≥ 1 finger unit at baseline. Among them, 1309 (IXE = 639, ADA = 670) finger units had baseline DIP joint tenderness and/or swelling and adjacent nail psoriasis. Proportions of affected finger units achieving complete resolution were significantly higher with IXE vs ADA as early as week 12 (38.8% vs 28.4%, p< 0.0001) and at all post-baseline assessments through week 52 (64.9% vs 57.5%, p= 0.0055). CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, patients with DIP joint involvement almost always had adjacent nail psoriasis. Greater resolution of DIP joint tenderness, swelling, and adjacent nail psoriasis was achieved at all timepoints over 52 weeks through targeting IL-17A with IXE than TNF-α with ADA, which is noteworthy given prior comparable musculoskeletal outcomes for both drug classes.

Health inequities and societal costs for patients with fibromyalgia and their spouses: a Danish cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the burden of illness of people with fibromyalgia (FM) and their spouses compared with selected match populations in Denmark. METHODS: Population-based, cohort case-control study using data from Danish registries from 1994 to 2021. Individuals with an FM diagnosis were identified from the National Patient Register (2008-2019) and randomly matched to a 1:4 general population comparator. Spouses or persons co-living with subjects with FM at the time of diagnosis were compared with matched comparator spouses. Healthcare and societal costs, socioeconomic status and occurrence of comorbidities were evaluated for subjects with FM, spouses and controls. RESULTS: 9712 subjects with FM (94.9% females, mean age 50 years) and 5946 spouses were included. At year of diagnosis, subjects with FM had significantly more comorbidities compared with controls, including significantly more comorbid rheumatic disorders. The highest risk at the time of FM diagnosis was a comorbid diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (OR 7.0, 95% CI 4.9 to 10.0). Significantly more comorbidities were also observed in spouses. Subjects with FM and spouses had higher healthcare and public transfer costs and lower income from employment at all timepoints. Loss of income from employment in subjects with FM occurred years before establishment of the FM diagnosis. The employment rate after diagnosis was 22%. 10 years after the FM diagnosis, 50% received disability pension as compared with 11% of matched controls. The observed net average increased societal cost for subjects with FM amounted to €27 193 per patient-year after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FM has major health and socioeconomic consequences for patients, their partners and society and call for improved healthcare strategies matching patients' needs.

Characteristics and drivers of fatigue in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A multitude of factors may influence fatigue in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, their individual fatigue components have not been thoroughly examined. OBJECTIVES: To explore characteristics of fatigue and its potential drivers in a cohort of patients with psoriasis with or without PsA. METHODS: Adults with psoriasis and a nonpsoriasis control group completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 questionnaire. Patients with psoriasis also reported joint pain intensity, pruritus, skin pain, and sleep problems using a numerical rating scale. Linear regression models were applied to continuous outcomes, and beta coefficients (ß) for the slopes were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 2741 adults with psoriasis (of which 593 also had PsA) and 3788 controls, the impact on total fatigue was greatest for PsA (ß = 5.22; 95% CI, 3.55-6.90), followed by psoriasis (ß = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.96-3.25), compared with the general population (Ptrend < .0001). Among patients with psoriasis with or without PsA, increasing joint pain intensity was associated with overall fatigue (ß = 2.23 [95% CI, 2.03-2.44] for each 1-point increase in joint pain numerical rating scale score). LIMITATIONS: We lacked information on the effect of pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of a symptom-based approach when treating psoriasis, rather than focusing on objective severity measures alone.

Weight Loss for Patients With Gout and Concomitant Obesity: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Despite scarce evidence, guidelines recommend weight loss as a management strategy for patients with gout. We investigated the effect of an intensive dietary intervention on body weight and clinical measures of gout severity in individuals with obesity and gout. METHODS: We conducted a 16-week randomized nonmasked parallel-group trial in Denmark, randomly assigning (one-to-one) individuals with obesity and gout to a low-energy diet or a control diet. The primary outcome was change in body weight. Key secondary outcomes were changes in serum urate (SU) level and visual analog scale-assessed pain and fatigue. RESULTS: Between December 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019, 61 participants were included in the intention-to-treat population and randomly assigned to the intensive diet group (n = 29) or control diet group (n = 32). Participants had a mean age of 60.3 (SD 9.9) years and mean body mass index of 35.6 (SD 5.0), and 59 (97%) were men. After 16 weeks, there was a significant difference in change in body weight between the diet and control groups (-15.4 vs -7.7 kg; difference -7.7 kg [95% confidence interval -10.7 to -4.7], P < 0.001). Despite results being potentially in favor of a low-energy diet, we could not confirm differences in SU level changes and fatigue between groups. No differences in pain and gout flares were observed between groups. No serious adverse events or deaths occurred during the trial. CONCLUSION: An intensive dietary intervention was safe and effectively lowered body weight in people with obesity and gout, but the weight loss did not directly translate into effects on SU level, fatigue, and pain.

Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: update for the practising clinician.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD. In the ORAL Surveillance trial, which enrolled patients >50 years of age with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, tofacitinib was statistically inferior to TNF inhibitors for the occurrence of MACEs and malignancy. Further post hoc analysis of the data revealed that an age of ≥65 years, a high baseline cardiovascular risk, a history of smoking, sustained inflammation, disease activity and suboptimal treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities all increase the risk of these outcomes. The guidance issued by regulatory agencies should be carefully considered to ensure appropriate and safe treatment of patients with RA without undertreatment of patients who might benefit from JAK inhibitor, as well as biologic, treatment. As always, the risks associated with the use of these agents, treatment goals, costs and patient preferences should be discussed with the patient.

Implementation of regulatory guidance for JAK inhibitors use in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An international appropriateness study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified. METHODS: A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice. RESULTS: Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors. CONCLUSIONS: We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice.

Exploring disease-related and treatment-related issues and concerns experienced by adults with spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis to identify unmet needs: a qualitative clinical concept mapping study.

OBJECTIVES: Exploring patients' perspectives for significant factors of relevance in living with a chronic disease is important to discover unmet needs and challenges. The primary objective of this study was to explore disease-related and treatment-related issues and concerns experienced by adults with spondyloarthropathies (SpA) and associated diseases. As a secondary objective, we wanted to explore whether these factors were generic or disease dependent. DESIGN: We used group concept mapping (GCM), a validated qualitative method, to identify disease-related and treatment-related issues and concerns. Participants generated statements in the GCM workshops and organised them into clusters to develop concepts. Furthermore, participants rated each statement for importance from 1: 'not important at all' to 5: 'of great importance'. SETTING: Participants were recruited during routine care at the outpatient clinic at the hospitals in the period from May 2018 to July 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were adults ≥18 years and diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO) or inflammatory bowel disease -split into Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). RESULTS: 52 patients participated in the 11 workshops divided into groups according to their diagnosis. They created a total of 1275 statements that generated 10 AxSpA concepts, 7 PsA concepts, 7 PsO concepts, 10 CD concepts and 11 UC concepts. The highest rated concepts within each disease group were: AxSpA, 'lack of understanding/to be heard and seen by healthcare professionals' (mean rating 4.0); PsA, 'medication (effects and side effects)' (mean rating 3.8); PsO, 'social and psychological problems, the shame' (mean rating 4.0); CD, 'positive attitudes' (mean rating 4.3) and UC; 'take responsibility and control over your life' (mean rating 4.0). CONCLUSION: People with SpA and associated diseases largely agree on which concepts describe their disease-related and treatment-related issues and concerns with a few of them being more disease-specific.

Network meta-analyses comparing the efficacy of biologic treatments for achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis at 24-28 and 48-52 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Available network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided comparisons up to 1 year. OBJECTIVE: We conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP. METHODS: Bayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24-28 and 48-52. RESULTS: For the NMA at weeks 24-28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.2-58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1-62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7-53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48-52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1-93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5-87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4-93.2). CONCLUSION: Among biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.

Tolerability and comparative effectiveness of TNF-, IL-17-, and IL-23(p19) inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: A target trial emulation study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare tolerability and effectiveness of two different classes of biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs; interleukin (IL)-17- and IL-23(p19) inhibitors) relative to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the drug survival rates and treatment outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We emulated a target trial on comparative effectiveness using observational data from a prospective cohort study based on the Parker Institute's PsA cohort - the PIPA cohort. All patients underwent interview and clinical examination programme at baseline and at follow-up visits at four and twelve months. The primary endpoint, drug survival, was assessed up to 12 months from baseline. We estimated hazard ratios from proportional hazards model and used propensity score adjustment in an attempt to deconfound and emulate a random treatment assignment. RESULTS: We included a total of 109 patients in the intention-to-monitor population at baseline initiating either TNFi (75 patients), IL17i (26 patients), or IL23(19)i (8 patients). Hazard ratios in the propensity adjusted model comparing IL-17i and IL-23(p19)i to TNFi were 1.36 (95% CI 0.59-3.14) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.10-3.24), respectively. TNFi and IL-17i had comparable effects regarding response rates and changes in clinical outcomes after 12 months, whereas IL-23(p19)i tended to perform better overall. CONCLUSION: No decisive differences between drugs were observed at group level regarding drug survival and clinical outcomes after 12 months. TNFi, IL-17i, and IL-23(p19)i may all be considered equally effective in the treatment of patients with PsA, advocating for investigating more in personalised treatment strategies.

Adherence to therapy of ixekizumab and secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis patients using first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment: A Danish population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of first- and second-line interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from 2014 to 2021, using data from the Danish Rheumatology Registry (DANBIO) by investigating adherence to therapy. METHOD: PsA patients recorded in DANBIO who received a first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment were included in this study. All patients included had previously received ≥1 TNFi treatment. Baseline characteristics were analyzed in subgroups: first-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment and second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment. adherence to therapy of first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatments were reported as Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: 534 patients were included in the study; first-line switchers: 534 (secukinumab: 510, ixekizumab: 24), second-line switchers: 102 (secukinumab: 35, ixekizumab: 67). Baseline characteristics showed a similar Health Assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain. VAS global, Disease Assessment Score-28CRP and previous number of bDMARD treatments are similar with a greater value for second-line switchers. First-line ixekizumab treated patients present a younger age, greater percentage of females, a lower disease duration and a lower CRP value. Concomitant MTX use was greater for the first-line secukinumab treated patients. First- and second-line switchers had a similar adherence to therapy. Second-line secukinumab and second-line ixekizumab switchers showed a similar adherence to treatment. CONCLUSION: PsA patients receiving first- or second-line IL-17A inhibitors showed homogeneous baseline characteristics and similar adherence to therapy. Treatment failure of the first IL-17A inhibitor treatment should not preclude a second-line IL-17A inhibitor treatment.

Pain and Inflammation as Mediators of Tofacitinib Treatment Effect on Fatigue in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Mediation Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Using mediation modelling, we describe interrelationships between fatigue, pain, morning stiffness, C-reactive protein (CRP) and tofacitinib treatment in patients with AS. METHODS: Data from phase 2 (NCT01786668)/phase 3 (NCT03502616) studies of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo were used. Initial models included treatment as the independent binary variable (tofacitinib 5 mg BID versus placebo); fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F; model A] or Bath AS Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Q1 [model B]) as the dependent variable; and pain (total back pain/nocturnal spinal pain [model A] or pain measured by BASDAI Q2/3 [model B]), morning stiffness (BASDAI Q5/6) and CRP as mediator variables. RESULTS: Pooled data from 370/371 patients were included in models A/B. Initial models demonstrated that tofacitinib treatment affects fatigue mainly indirectly via pain and morning stiffness. As a result, initial models were respecified to exclude direct treatment effect and the indirect effect via CRP. For respecified model A, 44.0% of the indirect effect of tofacitinib treatment on fatigue was mediated via back pain/morning stiffness, 40.0% via morning stiffness alone and 16.0% via back pain alone (all P < 0.05). For respecified model B, 80.8% of the indirect effect of tofacitinib treatment on fatigue was mediated via pain/morning stiffness and 19.2% via pain alone (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In tofacitinib-treated patients with AS, improvements in fatigue were collectively mediated through combined treatment effects on morning stiffness and pain.

The impact of comorbidities on interleukin-17 inhibitor therapy in psoriatic arthritis: a Danish population-based cohort study.

Objective: To investigate the influence of comorbidities on treatment response, disease activity and persistence with first-line IL-17 inhibitor (IL-17i) treatment in patients with PsA. Methods: Patients were divided into three groups depending on the presence and/or severity of comorbidities using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Groups were CCI 0: no comorbidities, CCI 1: one comorbidity and CCI ≥2: two or more comorbidities or one or more severe comorbidities. Outcomes in the groups were compared for treatment persistence, treatment response and disease activity. Results: A higher CCI score was associated to an elevation in baseline CRP, swollen joint count and frequency of depression and/or anxiety. The median drug persistence in the groups were CCI 0: 1.8 years, CCI 1: 1.9 years and CCI ≥2: 1.5 years, but was not statistically significant to the CCI score. There were no significant differences in clinical response rates between the groups. Conclusion: The presence of comorbidities was associated with increased baseline disease activity and frequency of depression and/or anxiety, but was not associated with shorter treatment persistence or lower clinical response rates in a cohort of 155 Danish patients with PsA treated with first-line IL-17i.

Cytokine Signatures in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Indicate Different Phenotypic Traits Comparing Responders and Non-Responders of IL-17A and TNFα Inhibitors.

This study aimed to explore the dynamic interactions between 32 cytokines and biomarkers in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) patients to compare cytokine signatures of treatment responders and non-responders. Biomarkers were measured before and after four months of treatment in 39 PsA patients initiating either Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) or Interleukin-17A inhibitor (IL-17Ai). Response to treatment was defined by the composite measure, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA). A two-component principal component analysis (PCA) was implemented to describe cytokine signatures comparing DAPSA50 responders and non-responders. The cytokine signature of TNFi responders was driven by the correlated cytokines interferon γ (IFNγ) and IL-6, additionally associated with IL-12/IL-23p40, TNFα, and CRP, while the cytokine signature of TNFi non-responders was driven by the correlated cytokines IL-15, IL-8, and IFNγ. IL-17Ai responders were characterized by contributions of strongly correlated Th17 inflammatory cytokines, IL-17A, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-22 to the cytokine signature, whereas IL-17A and IL-12/IL-23p40 did not demonstrate significant contribution in IL-17Ai non-responders. Based on PCA results it was possible to differentiate DAPSA50 responders and non-responders to treatment, endorsing additional examination of cytokine interaction models in PsA patients and supporting further PsA patient immune stratification to improve individualized treatment of PsA patients.

Identification of two tofacitinib subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNF inhibitors: an analysis of the open label, randomised controlled study ORAL Surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: Based on primary results from ORAL Surveillance, an event-driven clinical trial of risk-enriched patients, identify subpopulations with different relative risk (ie, 'high-risk' and 'low-risk') with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times a day or TNFi. Prior analyses had identified age and smoking as risk factors of particular interest across safety outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rates were evaluated by age and smoking individually and in combination. Results were validated across tofacitinib development programmes. RESULTS: 'Age ≥65 years or ever smoker' defined a group ('high-risk') with increased risk of malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism and all-cause death with tofacitinib (combined doses) versus TNFi (HRs 1.41-5.19). In patients 'aged <65 years and never smokers' ('low-risk'), there was no detectable risk increase with tofacitinib versus TNFi (HRs ≈1.0) up to 6 years of follow-up, and absolute risk remained low and was corroborated across tofacitinib rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis programmes with up to 10 years of observation. CONCLUSIONS: This posthoc analysis of ORAL Surveillance identified two tofacitinib subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNFi. High risk was confined to patients defined by distinct risk factors age ≥65 years or smoking, and these differentiating risk factors accounted for the excess risk observed with tofacitinib versus TNFi. These findings can guide individualised benefit/risk assessment and clinical decision-making on treatment with tofacitinib. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02092467, NCT01262118, NCT01484561, NCT00147498, NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT01164579, NCT00976599, NCT01059864, NCT01359150, NCT02147587, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT01039688, NCT02281552, NCT02187055, NCT02831855, NCT00413699, NCT00661661, NCT00787202, NCT01465763, NCT01458951, NCT01458574, NCT01470612, NCT01877668, NCT01882439, NCT01976364.