Validation of a novel direct method to determine reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy.

AIMS: Objective methods to determine statin adherence are requested to improve lipid management. We have recently established a method to detect reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy with cut-off values based on the sum of atorvastatin and its major metabolites in blood. We aimed to validate this method in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, and optimize previous cut-off values. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic study included 60 participants treated with atorvastatin 20 mg (N=20), 40 mg (N=20), and 80 mg (N=20). Atorvastatin was then stopped and blood samples collected from day zero to day four. Quantification of the parent drug and its metabolites in blood plasma was performed with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. The cut-off values for reduced adherence were validated and optimized by calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Our candidate cut-off value of dose-normalized six-component sum of atorvastatin plus metabolites <0.10 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 93% for detecting ≥2 omitted doses. An optimized cut-off <0.062 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%. An alternative simplified two-component metabolite sum with cut-off value <0.05 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 76%. An optimized cut-off <0.02 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98%. CONCLUSION: This validation study confirms that our direct method discriminates reduced adherence from adherence to atorvastatin therapy with high diagnostic accuracy. The method may improve lipid management in clinical practice and serve as a useful tool in future studies.

Frailty, health literacy and self-care in patients admitted with acute heart failure. / Skrøpelighet, helsekompetanse og egenomsorg hos pasienter som innlegges med akutt hjertesvikt.

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge from Norway on clinical characteristics, self-care and health literacy in patients admitted to hospital with acute heart failure. Our aim was to identify these factors in this group. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included patients admitted with acute heart failure over a period of six months (2022/2023) at Drammen Hospital and Vestfold Hospital Trust. Cardiac nurses collected information from the patients, including self-assessed knowledge on an ordinal scale from 0 (little knowledge) to 10 (good knowledge). Clinical frailty scores were calculated and data from the hospital records were recorded. RESULTS: Of 136 patients with acute heart failure, 81 were included. Median age was 79 (range 35-95) years, 35 (43 %) were women. A total of 35 (43 %) had been admitted with heart failure exacerbation in the past year. The patients had a median of 5 (1-10) diagnoses, and the median score on the clinical frailty scale was 4 (1-7), corresponding to 'vulnerable'. A total of 63 (78 %) had been diagnosed with heart failure before admission to hospital. Of these, 13 (21 %) were unaware of the diagnosis, and their self-assessed knowledge was median 3 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-5) for management of heart failure, 2 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-5) for lifestyle interventions and 0 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-2) for heart medications. Altogether 42 out of 63 (67 %) weighed themselves weekly, 13 (21 %) measured their blood pressure, while 3 (5 %) had a self-care plan. Of 50 patients with left ventricle ejection fraction ≤ 40 %, 32 (64 %) were discharged with betablockers and angiotensin II receptor blockers or a combination drug with a neprilysin inhibitor, whereas 11 (22 %) were also prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. INTERPRETATION: The included patients were multimorbid and had a low level of self-care and health literacy. There is potential to optimise well-documented medicinal treatment.

Atorvastatin Metabolite Pattern in Skeletal Muscle and Blood from Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms.

Self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are prevalent, but only a minority is drug-dependent. Diagnostic biomarkers are not yet identified. The local statin exposure in skeletal muscle tissue may correlate to the adverse effects. We aimed to determine whether atorvastatin metabolites in blood reflect the corresponding metabolite levels in skeletal muscle, and whether genetic variants of statin transporters modulate this relationship. We also addressed atorvastatin metabolites as potential objective biomarkers of SAMS. Muscle symptoms were examined in patients with coronary disease and self-perceived SAMS during 7 weeks of double-blinded treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day and placebo in randomized order. A subset of 12 patients individually identified with more muscle symptoms on atorvastatin than placebo (confirmed SAMS) and 15 patients with no difference in muscle symptom intensity (non-SAMS) attended the present follow-up study. All received 7 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day followed by 8 weeks without statins. Biopsies from the quadriceps muscle and blood plasma were collected after each treatment period. Strong correlations (rho > 0.7) between muscle and blood plasma concentrations were found for most atorvastatin metabolites. The impact of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C (rs4149056) gene variant on atorvastatin's systemic pharmacokinetics was translated into muscle tissue. The SLCO2B1 c.395G>A (rs12422149) variant did not modulate the accumulation of atorvastatin metabolites in muscle tissue. Atorvastatin pharmacokinetics in patients with confirmed SAMS were not different from patients with non-SAMS. In conclusion, atorvastatin metabolite levels in skeletal muscle and plasma are strongly correlated, implying that plasma measurements are suitable proxies of atorvastatin exposure in muscle tissue. The relationship between atorvastatin metabolites in plasma and SAMS deserves further investigation.

Monitoring Simvastatin Adherence in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study Based on Pharmacokinetic Measurements in Blood Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Poor statin adherence remains a public health concern associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated the use of pharmacokinetic measurements to monitor adherence to simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Eighteen patients with CHD taking an evening dose of simvastatin 20 mg (n = 7), 40 mg (n = 5), or 80 mg (n = 6) were examined at steady-state pharmacokinetics. Ten patients were instructed to interrupt simvastatin dosing and return for blood sampling for the subsequent 3 days. Dose-normalized plasma concentrations of simvastatin lactone and simvastatin acid and the sum of the 2 were evaluated to discriminate between adherent dosing and dose omission. Bioanalytical quantification was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A simvastatin acid cutoff of 1.0 × 10 -2 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 identified 100% of those omitting 2 doses and 60% of those omitting a single dose. Simvastatin acid showed superior ability to discriminate dose omission, as well as the best agreement between samples handled at ambient and cool temperatures (median deviation 3.5%; interquartile range -2.5% to 13%). The cutoff for a morning dose schedule, with a similar ability to discriminate, was estimated at 2.0 × 10 -3 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 . CONCLUSIONS: The present method discriminated between adherence and reduced adherence to simvastatin therapy in patients with CHD. Sample handling is feasible for routine practice, and the assessment of adherence can be performed by direct measurement of simvastatin acid in a blood sample, according to defined cutoff values. Further studies validating the cutoff value and utility for clinical application are encouraged.

Statins seldom cause adverse reactions. / Statiner gir sjelden bivirkninger.

Statins seldom cause muscle side effects and are tolerated by the great majority of people. It is important to spend time, build trust, manage negative expectations and identify other causes of muscle problems than the use of statins.

Clinical and psychological factors in coronary heart disease patients with statin associated muscle side-effects.

BACKGROUND: To compare clinical and psychological factors among patients with self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), confirmed SAMS, and refuted SAMS in coronary heart disease patients (CHD). METHODS: Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 1100 CHD outpatients and a study of 71 CHD outpatients attending a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study to test effects of atorvastatin 40 mg/day on muscle symptom intensity. Clinical and psychosocial factors were compared between patients with and without SAMS in the cross-sectional study, and between patients with confirmed SAMS and refuted SAMS in the randomized study. RESULTS: Bilateral, symmetric muscle symptoms in the lower extremities during statin treatment were more prevalent in patients with confirmed SAMS compared to patients with refuted SAMS (75% vs. 41%, p = 0.01) in the randomized study. No significant differences in psychological factors (anxiety, depression, worry, insomnia, type D personality characteristics) were detected between patients with and without self-perceived SAMS in the cross-sectional study, or between patients with confirmed SAMS and refuted SAMS, in the randomized study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with confirmed SAMS more often present with bilateral lower muscle symptoms compared to those with refuted SAMS. Psychological factors were not associated with self-perceived SAMS or confirmed SAMS. A careful pain history and a search for alternative causes of muscle symptoms are likely to promote communication in patients with SAMS, and may reduce the risk for statin discontinuation.

The relationship between directly measured statin adherence, self-reported adherence measures and cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to determine the relationship between statin adherence measured directly, and by self-report measures and serum cholesterol levels. METHODS: Patients prescribed atorvastatin (N = 373) participated in a cross-sectional study 2-36 months after a coronary event. Self-reported adherence included statin adherence the past week, the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8), and the Gehi et al. adherence question. Atorvastatin was measured directly in spot blood plasma by a novel liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry method discriminating adherence (0-1 doses omitted) and reduced adherence (≥2 doses omitted). Participants were unaware of the atorvastatin analyses at study participation. RESULTS: Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 8% had reduced atorvastatin adherence according to the direct method. In patients classified with reduced adherence by the direct method, 40% reported reduced statin adherence, 32% reported reduced adherence with the MMAS-8 and 22% with the Gehi question. In those adherent by the direct method, 96% also reported high statin adherence, 95% reported high adherence on the MMAS-8 whereas 94% reported high adherence on the Gehi question. Cohen's kappa agreement score with the direct method was 0.4 for self-reported statin adherence, 0.3 for the Gehi question and 0.2 for the MMAS-8. Adherence determined by the direct method, self-reported statin adherence last week, and the Gehi question was inversely related to LDL-cholesterol levels with a p-value of <0.001, 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma-statin measurements reveal reduced adherence with higher sensitivity than self-report measures, relate to cholesterol levels, and may prove to be a useful tool to improve lipid management.

Effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptoms in coronary heart disease patients with self-perceived statin muscle side effects: a randomized, double-blinded crossover trial.

AIMS: To estimate the effect of atorvastatin on muscle symptom intensity in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) and to determine the relationship to blood levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized multi-centre trial consecutively identified 982 patients with previous or ongoing atorvastatin treatment after a CHD event. Of these, 97 (9.9%) reported SAMS and 77 were randomized to 7-week double-blinded treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day and placebo in a crossover design. The primary outcome was the individual mean difference in muscle symptom intensity between the treatment periods, measured by visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores. Atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms among 71 patients who completed the trial. Mean VAS difference (statin-placebo) was 0.31 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.86). The proportion with more muscle symptoms during placebo than atorvastatin was 17% (n = 12), 55% (n = 39) had the same muscle symptom intensity during both treatment periods whereas 28% (n = 20) had more symptoms during atorvastatin than placebo (confirmed SAMS). There were no differences in clinical or pharmacogenetic characteristics between these groups. The levels of atorvastatin and/or metabolites did not correlate to muscle symptom intensity among patients with confirmed SAMS (Spearman's rho ≤0.40, for all variables). CONCLUSION: Re-challenge with high-intensity atorvastatin did not affect the intensity of muscle symptoms in CHD patients with self-perceived SAMS during previous atorvastatin therapy. There was no relationship between muscle symptoms and the systemic exposure to atorvastatin and/or its metabolites. The findings encourage an informed discussion to elucidate other causes of muscle complaints and continued statin use.

A novel direct method to determine adherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease.

AIMS: Objective methods to monitor statin adherence are needed. We have established a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of atorvastatin and its metabolites in blood. This study aimed to develop an objective drug exposure variable with cut-off values to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5), 20 mg (n = 6), 40 mg (n = 7) and 80 mg (n = 7) participated in a directly observed atorvastatin therapy study to confirm baseline adherence. After the directly observed therapy, half of the patients (test group) were instructed to stop taking atorvastatin and return for blood sample collection the subsequent 3 days. Levels of atorvastatin and metabolites were compared between the test group and the adherent control group. RESULTS: The sum of parent drug and all measured primary metabolites correlated well with the atorvastatin dose administered (Spearman's rho = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-0.87). The dose-normalized atorvastatin plus metabolites concentrations completely separated the partially adherent test group from the controls at 0.18 nM/mg after 3 days without atorvastatin. To reduce the risk of misinterpreting adherent patients as partially adherent, a corresponding cut-off at 0.10 nM/mg is proposed. A metabolite level of 2-OH atorvastatin acid <0.014 nmol/L provided the optimal cut-off for nonadherence. CONCLUSION: A direct method to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease has been developed. This tool may be important for novel studies on adherence and potentially useful in clinical practice.