Assessing the prognostic utility of hematologic response for overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: results of a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease characterized by amyloid fibril deposits made up of toxic light chains causing progressive organ dysfunction and death. Recent studies suggest that hematologic response may be an important prognostic indicator of overall survival (OS) in AL amyloidosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trial-level association between hematologic complete response (CR) or very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) and OS in newly diagnosed patients. METHODS: Studies were identified via systematic literature review. Pooled effect estimates were generated by a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine observational studies reporting hematologic CR or ≥VGPR and OS hazard ratios (HRs) were included in the meta-analysis. Achieving hematologic CR was associated with improved OS (HR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.34). Achieving ≥ VGPR was also associated with improved OS (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.17-0.26). Results of a sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study revealed no heterogeneity and a better overall HR estimate. Potential limitations of this meta-analysis include the small number of eligible studies (consistent with the rarity of the disease) and inconsistencies in reporting of results. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings support the use of deep hematologic response (CR or ≥VGPR) as a clinical trial endpoint in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This study provides evidence that early hematologic response is a strong patient-level surrogate for long-term OS in patients with AL amyloidosis receiving frontline therapy. Structured data collection of depth of response in future trials will further strengthen these observations.

A systematic review of noninferiority margins in oncology clinical trials.

Aim: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and characterize noninferiority margins for relevant end points in oncology clinical trials. Materials & methods: Randomized, controlled, noninferiority trials of patients with cancer were identified in PubMed and Embase. Results: Of 2284 publications identified, 285 oncology noninferiority clinical trials were analyzed. The median noninferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1.29 (mean: 1.32; range: 1.05-2.05) for studies that reported time-to-event end points (n = 192). The median noninferiority margin was 13.0% (mean: 12.7%; range: 5.0-20.0%) for studies that reported response end points as absolute rate differences (n = 31). Conclusion: Although there was consistency in the noninferiority margins' scale, variability was evident in noninferiority margins across trials. Increased transparency may improve consistency in noninferiority margin application in oncology clinical trials.

Estimating the Gender Distribution of Patients with Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the gender distribution in patients diagnosed with wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the male proportion in diagnosed ATTRwt patients were conducted. To avoid overlapping population, pooled estimates in the primary analysis were based on all unique studies. In secondary analyses, we considered predefined subsets of studies based on study sample size, recruitment years, geography, study design, age at diagnosis, and method of diagnosis. Additional meta-regression analyses were tested for potential determinants of gender distribution. RESULTS: Twenty-eight unique studies (2542 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Male proportion in patients with ATTRwt was 86.9% (95% confidence interval 81.5-91.6%). Studies, including patients older than 80 years at diagnosis, had a 29.1% (p value < 0.001) lower male proportion compared to studies, including younger patients. After adjusting for age, studies using autopsy as a method of diagnosis had a 21.1% (p value 0.002) lower male proportion compared to other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Studies conducted to date suggest ATTRwt disproportionally affects males. The proportion of males was significantly impacted by the age at diagnosis and method diagnosis, which may suggest important gender-based differences in the clinical manifestation and diagnostic challenges of ATTRwt in females that warrant future research.