Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Most primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the United States utilize cementless fixation with porous or hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. A previous meta-analysis comparing HA-coated versus non-HA-coated stems in primary THA published in 2013 found no significant difference between the 2. However, an updated analysis of the current literature is needed to assess the potential benefit of HA-coated stems in primary THA. METHODS: Various libraries were searched through May 2022 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included were randomized controlled trials comparing HA-coated femoral stems to non-HA-coated stems in primary THA. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), endosteal bone formation, radiolucent lines, linear wear rate, revision for aseptic loosening, thigh pain, and heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: There were significantly fewer revisions for aseptic loosening (P = .004) and decreased postoperative thigh pain (P = .03) for patients who have with HA-coated stems. There was no significant difference in HHS (P = .20), endosteal bone formation (P = .96), radiolucent lines (P = .75), linear wear rate (P = .41), or heterotopic ossification (P = .71) between HA-coated and non-HA-coated stems. CONCLUSION: We found that HA-coated femoral stems in primary THA led to significantly fewer stem revisions for aseptic loosening and less postoperative thigh pain compared to non-HA-coated stems. These findings suggest HA-coated femoral stems should be preferred over non-HA-coated femoral stems in primary THA.

Alternative and Adjunct Treatments for Scoliosis: A Google Trends Analysis of Public Popularity Compared With Scientific Literature.

Purpose As Google searches have often been found to provide inaccurate information regarding various treatments for orthopedic conditions, it becomes important to analyze search trends to understand what treatments are most popularly considered and the quality of information available. We sought to compare the public interest in popular adjunct/alternative scoliosis treatments to the published literature on these topics and assess any temporal trends in the public interest in these treatments. Methods The study authors compiled the most common adjunct/alternative treatments for scoliosis on PubMed. Chiropractic manipulation, Schroth exercises, physical therapy, pilates, and yoga, along with "scoliosis," were each entered into Google Trends, collected from 2004 to 2021. A linear regression analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was done to determine whether there was a linear relationship between Google Trends' popularity and PubMed publication data. The seasonal popularity of the terms was assessed using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression. Results Google Trends and publication frequency linear regression curves were different for chiropractic manipulation (p < 0.001), Schroth exercises (p < 0.001), physical therapy (p < 0.001), and pilates (p = 0.003). Chiropractic manipulation (p < 0.001), Schroth exercises (p = 0.003), and physical therapy (p < 0.001) had positive trends, and yoga (p < 0.001) had a negative trend. Chiropractic manipulation and yoga were more popular in the summer and winter months. Conclusion Google Trends can provide orthopedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals with valuable information on which treatments are gaining popularity with the public, so physicians may specifically inform themselves prior to patient encounters, leading to more productive shared decision-making.

Risk of Recall for Total Joint Arthroplasty Devices Over 10 Years.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic devices comprise nearly 20% of devices on the market and 12% to 20% of these devices undergo a recall within 10 years. More than 95% of these devices are approved without supporting clinical data through the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) pathway. The risk of recall of orthopaedic arthroplasty devices approved through the 510(k) pathway has not been previously studied. METHODS: The FDA 510(k) database was queried for orthopaedic devices approved between January 01, 2008 and December 31, 2018 and subsequently codified to hip and knee arthroplasty devices using product codes. The database included 904 arthroplasty devices during the study period, with hip and knee making up 53.7% (485) and 46.3% (419) of devices, respectively. Information regarding numbers, dates, and reasons for recall were recorded. Cumulative incidence function was conducted to compare the risk of recall between hip and knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: In total, 94 (19.4%) hip and 85 (20.3%) knee devices were recalled. The hazard of recall by 10 years for hip and knee arthroplasty devices was approximately 24%, with no statistical differences between each region. The most common causes of recall were process control and device design, accounting for 29.6% and 26.3% of recalls, respectively, with no significant difference between study groups. CONCLUSION: The risk of recall for arthroplasty devices is more than that previously understood. Improved postmarket surveillance strategies along with increased physician participation in detecting and reporting device safety issues are necessary to strengthen patient safety.

Novel classification system for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a consideration for comminution.

PURPOSE: Comminution is an aspect of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) that can influence postoperative outcomes and treatment selection, but is not included in current classification systems. We propose a new classification system for PDFFs based on comminution and cortical reads. This study aims to prove its reliability and efficacy to predict fracture severity and guide treatment. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients treated with single or dual locking plates for PDFFs was performed. Two fellowship-trained orthopedic joint reconstruction specialists used available imaging to classify each PDFF as either type 1 (minimal or no comminution allowing for reconstruction of medial and lateral cortices), type 2 (comminution reasonably allowing for reconstruction of either medial or lateral cortex), and type 3 (extensive comminution not allowing reasonable reconstruction of medial or lateral cortex). Each PDFF was then analyzed for radiographic outcomes including lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA). RESULTS: Interobserver reliability assessed by Cohen's Kappa statistic was 0.707, and average intraobserver reliability was 0.843, showing substantial reliability. Type 3 PDFFs had greater varus deformity than type 1 (p = 0.0457) or 2 (0.0198). CONCLUSION: The proposed classification system accounts for comminution, demonstrates strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, and can be used to guide treatment in regard to single versus dual plating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level IV.

Cannabis Use Among Lower-Extremity Arthroplasty Patients Does Not Lead to Worse Postoperative Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking and general categorizations of substance use are linked with increased postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is a lack of similar evidence on how cannabis use may affect outcomes after arthroplasty. The present study aims to compare postoperative outcomes in cannabis users versus non-cannabis users who underwent THA/TKA. We hypothesize that cannabis users will have no difference in primarily the complication rate, revision rate, and secondarily post-operative Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) scores, hospital stay, or pain compared to matched controls. METHODS: Billing codes were used to generate lists of hip/knee arthroplasty patients from 2013 to 2019 at our institution. In the case group, cannabis use was confirmed via chart review. Cannabis-using patients were matched appropriately with non-users by (1) the same arthroplasty procedure; (2) BMI ± 3.5; (3) age ± 3 years; (4) sex. Data on postoperative outcomes were collected from charts and compared between groups using either a Chi-square test for qualitative variables or a paired t-test for quantitative variables. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with an average age of 57.1 and a BMI of 30.6 were confirmed to have isolated cannabis use. They were matched to 24 patients with an average age of 57.6 and a BMI of 31.4. There were no significant differences in the complication rate (4.2% vs 4.2%, p=1.00), the revision rate (0% vs 4.2%, p=0.31), days of hospital stay (2.7 vs 3.3, p=0.22), or postoperative pain (4.7 vs 4.9, p=0.86). Similarly, there were no significant differences in all PROMIS score measures. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Current research shows that cannabis use may lead to increased revision arthroplasty and decreased mortality, with mixed findings regarding post-surgical complications. The present study suggests that cannabis-using patients have no difference in postoperative complication rate, revision rate, PROMIS scores, hospital stay, or pain compared to matched controls.

Comminuted periprosthetic distal femoral fractures have greater postoperative extension malalignment.

INTRODUCTION: Comminution is a significant aspect of periprosthetic distal femoral fracture characterization and may influence post-surgical outcomes. Existing classification systems that guide treatment decisions do not take into account comminution and current literature is unclear on which surgical approach is optimal. We hypothesize that fractures with comminution will have poorer quality post-reduction alignment, especially with a lateral approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 study patients were identified with billing codes designating a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture. A retrospective chart review was performed to categorize fractures by absence or presence of comminution and medial parapatellar versus lateral surgical approach. These patients underwent an imaging evaluation for the primary outcome of reduction quality including the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA). Differences in radiographic outcomes were analyzed with Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis tests, and analysis by approach was through Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Patients with comminuted fractures had significantly greater extension of the fragment (PDFA = 95.4° vs 90.0°, p = 0.018) and similar coronal alignment (LDFA = 85.3° vs 86.3°, p = 0.83) of the knee compared to non-comminuted fractures after surgical reduction. This difference was more prominent amongst those treated with a lateral approach (PDFA = 96.1° vs 89.4°, p = 0.032) than with a medial approach (PDFA = 93.7° vs 91.5°, p = 0.41) (Table 1). DISCUSSION: Current classification systems and treatment guidelines for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures do not adequately address several issues that may influence treatment outcomes, especially comminution. Comminuted fractures had greater post-reduction extension malalignment, falling outside the recommended PDFA range of 87-90°, especially with a lateral approach. Consideration should be given to surgical approach and techniques to reduce excessive extension when treating comminuted periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Radiolucent Implants for Fixation of Impending and Pathologic Fractures.

Radiolucent implants offer theoretical advantages of increased ability to evaluate the fracture site for healing and recurrence and potentially less effect on radiation treatment, avoiding scatter. Their clinical utility and outcomes have yet to be proven in a well-designed randomized trial or large cohort study, although studies based on other indications have shown relative safety and they are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of pathologic fractures. Further research is necessary to better understand when and how these implants should be implemented in practice. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):e115-e121.].

Technical Considerations and Avoiding Complications in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered to be the surgical procedure of the 20th century. Current projections show that by 2030, primary THA is expected to grow by 171%, with revision THA expected to increase by 142% in the same time frame. Although complications are not common, when they occur, they can cause notable morbidity to the patient. Understanding the unique anatomy and needs of each patient will prepare the surgeon to avoid soft-tissue or bony injury, optimize prosthesis placement, and decrease the risk of infection. This article aims to highlight common causes of early revision THA and provide specific technical strategies to avoid these complications. Following a systematic approach to the primary THA and using these techniques will assist the surgeon in avoiding complications to revision hip arthroplasty.

Iatrogenic Contamination With a Surgical Helmet System in Orthopedic Surgery.

Surgical helmet systems (SHSs) have been used to decrease iatrogenic contamination to prevent periprosthetic joint infections. However, the use of SHSs has been controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate iatrogenic contamination of traditional surgical attire (TSA), SHSs, and SHSs with delayed ventilation (SHS-DV) (helmet fan not turned on until surgeon gowned and gloved). A total of 180 orthopedic surgical procedures were prospectively enrolled and randomized into one of three cohorts. The TSA cohort included any orthopedic procedures, while the SHS and SHS-DV cohorts included arthroplasty procedures. Cultures were obtained from bilateral forearms, axillae, the sternum, and face shields for SHS groups. There were 60 surgeries in each group. The rate of positive cultures was calculated for each cohort and stratified by location and type of microorganism. The positive culture rates were 15% in the TSA, 25% in the SHS, 18% in the SHS-DV cohorts. The positive swab culture rates were 6% in the TSA, 7% in the SHS, and 4% in the SHS-DV cohorts. The positive culture rate was highest from the forearms in the TSA cohort (10%), the face shield in the SHS cohort (20%), and the chest in the SHS-DV cohort (7%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common bacteria cultured. The overall bacterial contamination rates were similar between the TSA and the SHS cohorts, with a lower rate in the SHS-DV cohort. Waiting to initiate airflow in SHSs and treating the shields as contaminated may reduce iatrogenic contamination. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e753-e756.].

Metastatic prostate carcinoma: A rare presentation initially misdiagnosed as a rib fracture.

Metastatic prostate carcinoma mainly occurs in bone as an osteoblastic lesion or lesions in the pelvis, spine, or chest wall. We present a unique case of a singular metastatic osteolytic lesion in the rib initially misdiagnosed as a fracture in a 61-year-old male. A single rib fracture in a patient with no history of trauma should raise suspicion for metastatic disease. We would encourage prostate cancer to be included in the differential diagnosis for an osteolytic lesion in a male over the age of 40. We review the current literature on this rare presentation of bone metastasis as well as the pathogenesis of metastatic prostate carcinoma as it relates to a solitary metastatic osteolytic lesion.

Bone Scintigraphy: A Review of Technical Aspects and Applications in Orthopedic Surgery.

Due to its high sensitivity, low cost, accessibility, and ease of use, bone scintigraphy is used in orthopedic surgery for the diagnosis and management of varied pathology. It is commonly used for insufficiency fractures, metastatic neoplasia, staging and surveillance of sarcoma, and nonaccidental trauma. It augments diagnoses, including stress or occult fractures, musculoskeletal neoplasia or infection, and chronic regional pain syndrome, in patients presenting with normal results on radiographs. Bone scan images are resistant to metal-based implant artifact, allowing effective evaluation of failed total joint prostheses. Bone scintigraphy remains an underused tool in the evaluation and management of orthopedic patients. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e14-e24.].